Ausgangslage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Ausgangslage

Description:

... Member States take no immediate action, because the products has not reached the market ... Brasil. Germany. Thailand. Italy. Spain. Singapur. France ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: drannettm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ausgangslage


1
Responsibility for Food Operators within the EUs
legal Framework for Food and the proposed
Mechnisms for Food and Feed Controls, including
the Rapid Alert System
Frerk Feldhusen Veterinary Institute for Fish and
Fishery Products Lower Saxony Federal State
Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety
2
LAVES locations
LAVES locations
Schleswig-Holstein
Cuxhaven
Mecklenburg-West Pomerania
Hamburg
Stade
Oldenburg
Bremen
Lüneburg
Hannover
Saxony-Anhalt
Braunschweig
North Rhine-Westphalia
Thuringia
Hesse
3
LAVES institutes
Cuxhavenveterinary testing center for fish and
fishery products
Tasks
  • Analysis and valuation of fishery products
  • Supervision of EU - registrated
  • fish factories
  • EU border control station
  • Measuring of radioactivity
  • Diagnostics of diseases marine fish and mammals

4
Basic Regulations Food Hygiene
White Book of European Union
New EU-Regulations of Food Law
  • Reg. 178/2002/EC about general principles and
    requirements of food law
  • Common Positions EC - Hygiene
  • Reg. EC on the hygiene of foodstuffs
  • Reg. with specific hygiene rules for food of
    animal origin
  • Common Positions EC - Hygiene
  • - Reg. EC on feed and food controls
  • - Reg. with specific rules for the organisation
    of official controls of
  • products of animal origin intended for human
    consumption

5
Reg. (EC) 178/2002 Procedures in Matters of Food
Safety
Important Contents
  • Definitions (Risk analysis etc.)
  • Primary production included
  • Risk analysis and precautionary principle
  • Co-developement of internationl standards
  • Food safety requirements
  • Traceability
  • Responsibility for food food business
    operators
  • Responsibility for feed feed business
    operators
  • Scientific organisations
  • Rapid alert system

6
Food Safety
Different Responsibilities
Governments
Consumer
Industry / Market
Food chain! / Traceability
Research / Risk assessment
Information
constructive/criticalposition
HACCP-concept / self responsibility
Law making / Risk management
Advice/ Risk communication
Acceptance of hygienic guidelines
Training of personal
Manifestation of precautionary principle
Asking for advice
Labelling
mod. WHO 1991
7
Government, Consumer, Industry, MarketFood chain
from farm to fork
Supplier
Primary producer
Food producer
Consumer
  • storage in the household
  • preparation of products
  • specifications
  • semi-finished
  • product
  • partnership
  • recipe
  • production process
  • hygienic conditions
  • controll of residues
  • feed
  • plant protection
  • animal welfare
  • residues

8
GovernmentConsequences of WTO/SPS-contract
  • Definition of requirements on food
  • by requirements to ensure human health
  • by application of scientific principles of risk
    analysis
  • Member states (WTO) take international standards
    in all food safety actions into account
  • standards of Codex Alimentarius are relevant for
    food safety actions!

9
GovernmentRisk analysis Definitions (Codex
Alim. 1999)
1. Risk assessmenta scientific process of
systematic and objective evaluation of all
available information concerning to food
hazards hazard identification hazard
characterisation incl. evaluation of doses and
effects exposure assessment and risk
characterisation 2. Risk management 3. Risk
communication
10
GovernmentRisk analysis (Codex Alim. 1997)
  • General Principles
  • actions to produce safe food must result from
    risk assessment
  • risk assessment on scientific basis
  • Risk assessment shall mostly be based on
    quantitative informations
  • Functional separation of risk assessment and risk
    management
  • No zero risk possible!

11
GovernmentRisk Analysis and Food Safety
Objectives (FSOs)
  • Risk Assessment
  • risk assessment describes food safety elements
  • quantitative risk assessment no zero risk
  • food safety aims comparable to Acceptable Level
    of Protection (ALOP)
  • examples
  • aflatoxin M1 in milk lt 10ppt
  • L. monocytogenes max. 100 cfu/g
  • MRL-values for veterinary drugs(4 ppb penicillin)

12
GovernmentPrinciples of analysis
  • Developement of modern principles of
    investigation
  • Identification und quantification of substances
    and microorganisms
  • (Enlargement of investigation possibilities and
    reduction of quantification limit zero
    tolerance)
  • Analysis of structures und sequences(e.g.
    PCR-analysis, antisera)
  • Analysis of effects(e.g. cell culture tests)

13
Government/Market/IndustryResidues
  • Problems with zero tolerance residues
  • Importing countries have to show residue control
    plans to ensure residue control garantees
  • Border inspection Cecks and investigations of a
    percentage of the consignments of the food (e.g.
    on hormones, contaminants, residues etc.)
  • Substances with zero- tolerance, independent to
    the ability of being a human risk at very low
    concentrations (e.g. CAP, Nitrofuranes)
  • Rejected consignments
  • Prawns and honey from China (CAP)
  • Turkey breasts fom Chile (CAP)
  • Milk powder from Russia (CAP)
  • Eels from China (Nitrofuranes)
  • Fish from Vietnam (Nitrofuranes)

14
GovernmentInvestigation of samples
  • Potential Analysis Problems
  • Zero Tolerance Compounds
  • (Annex IV of EWG No. 2377/90)
  • Aristolochia
  • Ronidazol
  • Chloroforme
  • Chlorpromazine
  • Colchicine
  • Dapson
  • Dimetridazole
  • Metronidazole
  • Nitrofuran
  • Chloramphenicol

15
Goverment/IndustryFeed
Unwanted Ingredients in Feed
  •  ? mushroom toxins, e.g. aflatoxine B1, ergot
  •  ? heavy metals, e.g. lead, mercury, arsenic,
    cadmium
  •  ? chlorinated hydrocarbons, e.g. chlordane,
    DDT, dieldrine, endosulfane, endrine, heptachlor,
    hexachlorbenzene (HCB), ?- und ? - HCH, ? - HCH
    (lindane), dioxins
  •  ? special ingredients of plants, e.g.
    hydrocyanic acid, mustard oil, gossypol,
    theobromine
  •  ? weed seeds and fruits, which contain
    alcaloides, glucosides or other toxic substances
  • (Annex 5 of Feed Regulation)

16
GovernmentInvestigation of samples
  • Potential Analysis Problems
  • Zero Tolerance Compounds
  • (Annex IV of EWG No. 2377/90)
  • Chloramphenicol (CAP)
  • Minimum Required Performance Level (MRPL) is
    0.3 µg/kg
  • requires LC-MS/MS or GC-MS
  • limit of detection 0.05 µg/kg
  • toxicological relevance?
  • reclamation ?

17
Market/IndustryEC-Regulations
  • New concepts
  • including the whole food chain
  • increase of autonomy
  • direction to self control with HACCP-concept
    control of self control
  • priority to process control (compared to
    control of final product)
  • increase of competence by self responsibility
    (possibility for deregulation)

18
Industry/MarketReg. (EC) 178/2002 Art. 18
  • Traceability
  • Implementation for food, feed, food-producing
    animals or any substance incorporated into the
    stages of production, processing and distribution
  • Identification of every supplier
  • Implementation of systems and procedures
  • Labelling has to ensure traceability in
    combination with documentation etc.
  • More specific provisions possible

19
IndustryRequirements for official controls (H 3
Art. 4)
  • Food business operators apply procedures
    continuously and properly at least
  • checks on food chain information
  • the design and maintenance of premises and
  • equipment
  • pre-operational, operational and post
    operational hygiene
  • personal hygiene
  • training in hygiene and in working procedures
  • pest control
  • water quality
  • temperature control
  • controls on food entering and leaving the
    establishment and
  • any accompanying documentation

20
IndustryHACCP based Procedures (H 3, Art. 4)
  • Procedures should guarantee, as far as possible,
    that products of animal origin
  • comply with microbiological criteria of EC
  • comply with community legislation on residues,
  • contaminants and prohibited substances
  • do not contain physical hazards, such as
    foreign bodies

21
Government/IndustryReg. (EC) about
Microbiological Criteria
  • General Concept
  • Microbiological criteria defining acceptance of
    products
  • Sampling and investigation International
    standards
  • L. monocytogenes (max. 100 cfu/g) in RTE
  • Meat/ meat products (Salmonella, E. coli, total
    viable count etc.)
  • Milk/ milk products (Salmonella, Staph. aureus,
    E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae)
  • Criteria for egg products, fishery products etc.
  • Hints for sampling

22
Consumer in Germany
Niedersächsisches Landesamtfür Verbraucherschutz
und Lebensmittelsicherheit
International Food Issues Monitor August 2002,
Germany
Average values on a scale from 1 absolutely
not to 4 very much concerned
23
Government/Consumer/Industry/MarketRapid Alert
System (RASFF)
  • Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF)
  • Legal Basis
  • Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 laying down the
    general principles and requirements of food law,
    establishing the European Food Safety Authority
    and laying down procedures in matters of food
    safety (Article 50)
  • Operated by the European Commission (Health and
    Consumer Protection DG)
  • established as a network consisting of national
    competent authorities, the EFSA and the European
    Commission
  • Aims
  • To protect the consumer against any danger or
    potential danger arising from the consumption of
    foodstuffs
  • To exchange rapidly information between Member
    States and the Commission
  • Objective
  • The pricipal objective is to prevent the
    placement on or the recall from the community
    market of foodstuffs (or feed), which pose a
    serious risk to the health of the consumer
  • Scope
  • The system is limited to those food products,
    which pose a risk to health that goes beyond the
    territory of a single Member State

24
GovernmentRapid Alert System for Food and Feed
(RASFF) - Criteria for Notifications -
  • Rapid Alert System Criteria for Notifications
  • Basic criteria
  • A foodstuff poses a serious risk to the health
    and safety of consumers, and
  • The probability that the foodstuff is on the
    market in another Member State
  • Risk is assessed on case by case basis by the
    national authorities (BVL / Federal States)
  • Evaluation of information (Germany Federal
    Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety)
  • Seriousness / plausibility
  • Sufficiency of the documents / completeness

25
GovernmentRapid Alert System for Food and Feed
(RASFF) - Criteria for Notifications -
  • Rapid Alert System Criteria for Notifications
  • Alert notifications
  • Alert notifications (food and feed) are sent when
    the food or feed presenting the rsik is on the
    market and when immediate action is required
  • Member States should take the necessary measures
  • Information notifications
  • Risk has been identified, Member States take no
    immediate action, because the products has not
    reached the market
  • Mostly concerned consignments that have been
    tested and rejected at the external borders of
    the EU

26
Government/Consumer/Industry/Market RASFF
  • Informations of notification
  • Definition of danger
  • Results of the tests
  • Methods
  • Persons affected
  • Types of illness
  • Origin of product (e.g. address manufacturer,
    veterinary approval number etc.)
  • Data for traceability (e.g. health certificate,
    identification of the lot etc.)
  • Measures adopted (voluntary and compulsory
    measures, justification)
  • Other informations (e.g. persons to contact)
  • More RASFF-Vademecum

27

Government/Consumer/Industry/MarketRapid Alert
System for Food and Feed (RASFF) - Upstream -
European Commission
Federal Ministry for Consumer Protection, Food
and Agriculture
Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food
Safety
Federal States
l
28
Government/Consumer/Industy/MarketRapid Alert
System for Food and Feed (RASFF) - Downstream -
European Commission
FederalMinistries
statistics (daily)
Verification implementation of measures
29
GovernmentRapid Alert System for Food and Feed
(RASFF) Statistical Evaluation -
30
RASFF 2003
Bulgaria
Philippines
Origin of product
USA
Marokko
Chile
Malaysia
Indonesia
Netherlands
Vietnam
Countries of origin with more than 20
notifications
Egypt
Taiwan
Alert
Great Britain
Information
Argentina
France
Message
Singapur
Spain
Italy
Thailand
Germany
Brasil
India
China
Turkey
Iran
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
31
RASFF 2003
Europe
Notifying Member States
Sweden
Luxembourg
Portugal
Finland
Message
Austria
Information
Belgique
Danmark
Alert
Norway
France
Greece
Netherlands
Great Britain
Spain
Italy
Germany
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
32
RASFF 2003
Alerts groups of products
Fish
Meat
25
Milk
Fruit and vegetable
Grain
32
Nuts
Spices
Others
33
RASFF 2003
Reasons of Alerts 2003
Bacteria
17
Mildew
Mycotoxins
10
Heavy metals
Org. environ. contaminants
14
33
Pestizides
Veterinary drugs
8
Additives
Others
34
Thank you very much for your attention !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com