Myths and assumptions in training young athletes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Myths and assumptions in training young athletes

Description:

ACSM reported that strength training programs can prevent up 50% of all ... Current ACSM Recommendations for Physical activity & bone health: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:193
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jki8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Myths and assumptions in training young athletes


1
Myths and assumptions in training young athletes
  • Objectives
  • Identify some common constraining beliefs
  • Explore the basis of these beliefs
  • Refined, more informed perspective

2
Prevailing beliefs?
  • Young people should be protected from stress T/F
  • Certain forms of stress are unsuitable T/F
  • Low impact/endurance-type training is safe T/F
  • High impact/explosive-type exercise is unsafe T/F

3
Common beliefs relating to strength training
  • Strength training slows you down
  • Strength training makes you bulky
  • Strength training reduces flexibility
  • Strength and endurance training dont mix
  • Strength training is dangerous

4
Definitions
  • Strength
  • The maximal amount of force a muscle or muscle
    group can generate in a specific movement pattern
    at a specific velocity of movement
  • (Knuttgen Kraemer 1987)
  • The ability of a given muscle or muscle group to
    generate a muscular force under specific
    conditions
  • (Siff 2000)
  • But in reality strength is a general term used
    to describe a number of aspects of physical
    performance

5
Definitions (contd)
  • Stress
  • The response of the body to any demand made upon
    it (Seyle 1946)
  • Beneficial stress gt Positive response
  • Detrimental stress gt Decay, damage
  • Training Process
  • An exercise in stress management planning,
    application, control

6
Historically 2 points of debate relating to
Strength training for young people
  • Potential benefits, or lack of, to general health
    /or athletic performance
  • Potential negative effects on bone growth
    long-term bone health

7
Historical Basis
  • Observation of stunted growth/deformity amongst
    Japanese child labourers who habitually carried
    heavy loads (as noted by Faigenbaum 2000)
  • A 1978 study in which prepubescent children
    failed to gain strength from resistive training.
    (Vrijens1978)
  • National Electronic Injury Surveillance System
    (NEISS) in the United States
  • A limited number of case study reports of growth
    plate fractures

8
Accordingly in the 70s 80s
  • General consensus that weight training would
    compromise the bone health of growing young
    people
  • AAP (1983) an insufficiency of androgens implies
    neither girls nor prepubertal boys will increase
    muscle mass with resistive training and will have
    little or no gain in strength

9
Bone Health Facts The Bad News
  • Limited number of cases have raised concern about
    epiphyseal injuries in the wrist apophyseal
    injuries in the spine from weight lifting in
    skeletally immature individuals
  • (AAP 2001)
  • The lumbar back region has been reported as the
    most common injury site in child adolescent
    weight training populations
  • (Brady et al 1982, Brown Kimball 1983)

10
Bone Health Facts The Bad News (contd)
  • Damage cartilaginous cells of epiphysis may
    result in premature closure of the epiphyseal
    plate resulting in bone growth disturbance
    subsequent deformity (Peterson Renstrom 1994,
    Sports injuries in children, Conference report
    2000)
  • Adolescent athletes may be at risk of restricted
    growth delayed maturation when intense training
    (of any form!) is combined with insufficient
    energy intake (Lanyon et al 1992)

11
Bone Health Facts The Good News
  • Bone Mineral Density was higher in the spine
    proximal femur in elite junior weightlifters than
    age-matched controls. There were strong
    relationships between BMD maximal strength,
    suggesting differences were due in part to
    training, not "self-selection due to genetic
    factors
  • (Conroy et al 1993)
  • Observed that intensive training will increase
    the BMC to an extent that the spine can tolerate
    extraordinary loads
  • (Granhed et al 1987)
  • It has been demonstrated that high impact
    activity is effective in facilitating an increase
    in bone mineral acquisition thereby promoting
    bone density possibly in decreasing the risks
    of joint deterioration (Heinonen et al 2000,
    Jakes et al 2001)

12
Bone Health Facts The Good News (contd)
  • Case study of World record holder in the squat
    revealed
  • the highest bone mineral density yet measured,
    redefining previously conceived upper limits of
    BMD
  • A compressive force that doubled the previously
    perceived critical compression force
  • Normal alignment, no evidence of disc herniation
    or compressive disc disease, no frank or neural
    foraminal canal stenosis
  • (Dickerman et al 2000)
  • Observation that incidence of low back pain in
    retired weightlifters was not different from that
    of the population in general
  • Lifters that competed prior to the exclusion of
    the Clean press lift, today incidence of back
    pain in ex-lifters likely to be significantly
    lower
  • (Granhed and Morelli 1988)

13
General HealthMore good news
  • 1RM tests can be performed safely effectively
    with adolescents younger if proper technique is
    used lifting is supervised by a trained SC
    coach. No injuries were reported during or after
    the lifts (Faigenbaum 2003).
  • Light to moderate weight training has been shown
    to increase bone density, reduce the level of
    meniscal problems, and increase red blood cell
    production in children aged 8 to 14 years (Lanyon
    et al 1992)
  • The majority of studies have concluded that
    weight training programmes do not seem to
    adversely effect linear growth and do not seem to
    have any detrimental effects on cardiovascular
    health (Ramsay et al 1990 )
  • Study results indicate that strength trained
    growing subjects experience significant increases
    in isokinetic strength, flexibility, vertical
    jump, maximum rate of oxygen consumption.
    Muscoskeltal scintgraphy revealed no evidence of
    damage to epiphyses, bone or muscle (Tippett
    1986)

14
General HealthMore good news
  • ACSM reported that strength training programs can
    prevent up 50 of all preadolescent sports
    injuries
  • Skeleton is most responsive to strength training
    benefits during growth. This means strength
    training is most beneficial for young women
    before the age of 16 and young men before the age
    of 18 (Welton et al 1994)

15
Current Opinion on Weight TrainingMajor
Organisations
  • NSCA supports the sports of weight lifting and
    power lifting as well as strength training in
    both children adolescents

16
Current Opinion on Weight TrainingMajor
Organisations (contd)
  • "Studies have shown that strength training, when
    properly structured with regard to frequency,
    mode (type of lifting), intensity, and duration
    of program, can increase strength in
    preadolescents adolescents (AAP 2001)
  • Both AAP ACSM now recommend strength training
    for children as young as six years old

17
Current Opinion on Weight TrainingMajor
Organisations (contd)
  • Current ACSM Recommendations for Physical
    activity bone health
  • Impact activities such as gymnastics,
    plyometrics, moderate resistance training
  • Frequency of at least 3 d.wk-1
  • AAP the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports
    Medicine recommend that until good data becomes
    available children adolescents should avoid
    extreme weight lifting, power lifting,
    bodybuilding until Tanner stage 5 (near physical
    maturity)

18
So whats safe whats not safe
  • All training modes are unsafe, IF..
  • All training modes are safe, IF..
  • Dependent on number of factors NOT JUST volume
    intensity of training loadings. For example,
    Nutritional status, sleep status, hormonal
    cycles, circadian rhythms, mood etc etc

19
Implications of Mythology..
  • Avoidance of high force/high power output
    training with young athletes
  • A bias towards excessive volumes of low load,
    repetitive, cyclical activities /OR therapy
    type training

20
Shield or Inoculate?
  • The goal is certainly not to avoid stress
    stress is a part of life. But in order to
    express yourself fully you must find your optimum
    stress level and then use your adaptation energy
    at a rate and in a direction adjusted to the
    innate structure of your mind and body.
  • (Seyle 1946)

21
Shield or Inoculate? (contd)
  • Goal of the training process is to provide
    systematic exposure to controlled progressive
    stressors to enable more efficient management of
    future stress
  • Stress can start at a low level be progressed
    in gradual increments, but ultimately young
    athletes are preparing for future maximal
    performance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com