The Risks of EVoting Machines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

The Risks of EVoting Machines

Description:

Non-traditional election styles. Condorcet voting, approval voting, etc. 9/7/09. 7 ... Cost / complexity to defraud election increases. In the 'real' world ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: johnwh73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Risks of EVoting Machines


1
The Risks of E-Voting Machines
  • Dan S. Wallach
  • Department of Computer Science
  • Rice University

2
Clearly, voting machines matter
  • Failure of machines ? failure of democracy
  • Potentially dire consequences

3
Many potential failure modes
  • Human-factors issues

4
Many potential failure modes
  • Mechanical flaws

Bush
Bush
Gore
Gore
5
What about e-voting?
  • Several different forms
  • Internet voting (used on many college campuses)
  • Computerized voting machines

6
Obvious benefits
  • Better human factors
  • Can check for overvoting
  • Can review for mistakes
  • Interfaces for blind users
  • Its new
  • No antiquated machinery
  • Non-traditional election styles
  • Condorcet voting, approval voting, etc.

7
Obvious flaws
  • Indication to voter that vote is recorded?
  • No paper to drop in ballot box
  • No satisfying thunk from mechanical gears
  • Last-minute voters remorse?
  • Paper ballot can tear up, get another one
  • Mechanical / electronic machines done is done

8
How e-voting works
  • Inside the polling place (Hart architecture)

network
Base station
Voting machine

Memory
Memory
Code
Code
Card
9
Buggy code?
  • Write bad data to all three memories?

network
Base station
Voting machine

Memory
Memory
Code
Code
Memory
Memory
Card
Card
10
But in Brazil
  • Electronic voting since 1996
  • Paper built-in for newest systems
  • Type number for your candidate
  • Screen shows picture
  • Paper held behind glass verifiable, but not
    touchable

11
Threat models vs. real world
  • To a computer scientist
  • Add paper remove code from the TCB
  • Paper seen by voter ? voter-verifiable audit
    trail
  • Cost / complexity to defraud election increases
  • In the real world
  • Accessibility community hates paper
  • Vendors need standards
  • And still advocate security through obscurity
  • Municipalities required to upgrade machines by
    04
  • Security people seen as paranoid

12
Ongoing advocacy
  • David Dills petition
  • Lots of action happening in California
  • Vendors slowly changing their tune
  • You require it, well build it.
  • Some congressional attention in Washington
  • Strongest detractors are accessibility advocates
  • Blind voters cannot read paper cards
  • You never know who will turn out to be clueless
  • League of Women Voters (national office)

13
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com