ICEHS Data Wonks Roundtable - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ICEHS Data Wonks Roundtable

Description:

What's New from NCHS ... New Death Certificates. Injury ICE- 10 year review. Injury Prevention, 10/04 ... date and there is no new ICDMAP based on ICD-10 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: loisfin
Category:
Tags: icehs | data | roundtable | wonks

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ICEHS Data Wonks Roundtable


1
ICEHS Data Wonks Roundtable
Lois A. Fingerhut November 2004
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention National Center for Health Statistics
2
Whats New from NCHS
  • International Collaborative Effort (ICE) on
    Injury Statistics 10 year review
  • Injury Severity
  • Multiple cause of death analyses
  • Barell Matrix for main injury death
  • Poisoning examples
  • New Death Certificates

3
Injury ICE- 10 year review
4
Article Published
  • Injury Prevention, 10/04
  • Injury Control and Safety Promotion 12/04 (to be
    published)
  • History
  • Mission
  • Participants
  • Current projects
  • Other ICE related projects

5
Current Projects
  • Injury indicators injury severity
  • Selecting a main injury from among multiple
    diagnoses on death certificates
  • Poisoning- how to define it?
  • Household survey comparisons of injury questions
    (to be published by Injury Prevention)
  • Occupational injuries
  • Multiple injury profiles

6
Other projects
  • Frameworks for presenting injury mortality data
  • Barell Injury Diagnosis Matrix
  • ICECI technical assistance
  • Definition of injury (ongoing??)

7
Injury Severity
8
Injury Severity
  • Outgrowth of
  • Injury Indicators work in the ICE activities
  • Desire for public domain severity measure
  • Meeting held early September at NCHS to discuss
    with the experts how we can incorporate
    measure(s) of injury severity into administrative
    datasets
  • Focus was on AIS related measures and ICISS
    (based on ICD codes) measures

9
What we know
  • National trends in injury-related hospital
    discharges and emergency dept. visits reflects
    utilization, but not differences in injury
    severity
  • ICD codes alone cannot distinguish severity among
    injuries
  • ICD-10 has provided no real guidance on how to
    select a main injury among multiple cause of
    injury mortality data

10
The practical problems
  • ICD-9 CM is still being used for coding morbidity
    data annual updates to CM continue
  • Most recent version of ICDMAP translates ICD-9
    CM codes to AIS scores doesnt recognize new
    codes
  • ICD-10 CM doesnt yet have an implementation date
    and there is no new ICDMAP based on ICD-10
  • ICD codes used for mortality data often lack
    specificity

11
What we discussed
  • Strengths and weaknesses of different severity
    scales
  • Solutions for administrative data acknowledging
    the limitations of the source data (e.g.,
    non-specific coding, changes in admission
    practices)
  • Can we measure threat to function as well as
    threat to life?

12
Severity scales
  • AIS
  • Based on anatomical descriptors
  • Used in trauma data
  • Post-dot score ranges from 0-6
  • Subjective
  • Time consuming
  • Proprietary
  • ICISS
  • Based strictly on ICD codes
  • ICISS score for a given patient
  • Product of survival risk ratios (survivors
    with a given code/ all patients with that code)
    associated with each ICD dx
  • Easy to apply to admin. data sets- free

13
What was accomplished
  • Consensus paper is being drafted
  • Recommend a standard measure to users of
    administrative databases (e.g., Statewide
    hospital discharge data sets)
  • Incorporate a method to identify the main
    injury in mortality and add it to the mortality
    file
  • Multiple cause analyses

14
Optimism.
  • Incorporate ICISS into administrative data
  • Retain AIS for trauma and for measuring threat
    to function
  • Add ?? to mortality file

15
Multiple cause mortality data from NCHSNational
Vital Statistics System
16
  • ICD-10 uses all digits up to 20 listed
    diagnoses
  • For 2001, range (0-15 injuries listed)
  • 1 injury listed 65 of deaths
  • 2 injuries 22
  • 3 injuries 8
  • 4 -15 injuries 4
  • Can we select the most severe injury?
  • Do we need to include underlying cause of death?

17
Specificity in ICD-10 mortality coding
(1)Frequently occurring pairs
  • Most frequent pair occurs 3,327 times
  • S06.9 (Intracranial injury, unspecified) and
    S09.9 (Unspecified injury of the head)
  • Second most frequent occurs 2,671 times
  • S09.9 (Open wound of head, part unspecified) and
  • S29.9 (Unspecified injury of the thorax)

18
Specificity in mortality coding (2) accounts
for significant numbers of deaths
  • S09.9 Unspecified injury of head
  • Any mention 21,343
  • S01.9 Open wound of head, part unspecified
  • Any mention 17,677

19
Analyzing multiple cause of death data
  • Detailed explanations and SAS codes are provided
    in
  • Anderson RN, MiniƱo AM, Fingerhut LA, Warner M,
    Heinen MA. Deaths Injuries, 2001. National vital
    statistics reports vol 52 no 21. Hyattsville,
    Maryland National Center for Health Statistics.
    2004

20
Near final version of ICD -10 Barell Matrix (APHA
Poster)
  • I hope you got to see it!
  • Lead authors are Paul Jones and Bruce Lawrence
    who work for Ted Miller
  • Lois Fingerhut contributed draft ICD codes for
    matrix based on work done earlier in Australia by
    Richard Hockey
  • Hope to finalize this in the next two months.
    NCHS 2002 Injury Mortality report will
    incorporate it!

21
Poisoning deaths
  • Must analyze multiple cause data to get any
    substance-specific counts
  • From the mc data, for example, in 2002 cocaine
    was the single leading substance mentioned
    followed by other opioids (includes, for example
    hydrocodone, oxycodone, morphine)
  • Poster handouts available

22
New Death CertificatesTransportation questions
23
Injury Checkbox items on Revised Death
Certificates
  • 2 Standard certificate questions to be
    implemented by 1/1/05- not mandatory
  • 43. DESCRIBE HOW INJURY OCCURRED more space on
    certificate than before
  • 44. IF TRANSPORTATION INJURY, SPECIFY
  • ? Driver/Operator ? Passenger
  • ? Pedestrian ? Other (Specify)

24
Idaho 2003
37. DESCRIBE HOW INJURY OCCURRED. IF
TRANSPORTATION INJURY, STATE THE TYPE(S) OF
VEHICLE(S) INVOLVED (Automobile, pickup,
motorcycle, ATV, bicycle, etc), SPECIFY WHICH
VEHICLE DECEDENT OCCUPIED, if applicable TRANSPOR
TATION INJURY ONLY 38a. WAS DECEDENT ?
Driver/Operator ? Passenger ? Pedestrian ?
Other (Specify) 38b. WHAT SAFETY DEVICE(S) DID
THE DECEDENT USE/EMPLOY? ? Seat Belt ? Child
Safety Seat ? Helmet ? Air bag ? None ?
Unknown
25
South Dakota Florida
  • IF TRANSPORTATION INJURY, (Check all that apply)
  • ? Driver/Operator ? Car/Minivan
  • ? Passenger ? Pickup/Van
  • ? Pedestrian ? Heavy transport
  • ? Other (Specify) ? Bus
  • ? Other (Specify)

26
Coming soon
National Trendsin Injury Hospitalizations,1979-2
001
27

www.cdc.gov/nchs/injury.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com