Computer Science, Logic, and Religion Islam - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Computer Science, Logic, and Religion Islam

Description:

Muslim Theologians. Both reason and revelation necessary. ... Muslim theologians a thousand years ago wrote the 'Book of Five Fundamentals' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: amras9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computer Science, Logic, and Religion Islam


1
Computer Science, Logic, and Religion (Islam)
  • Amr Sabry

2
Amr the computer scientist
  • Associate professor at Indiana University
  • Assistant professor at the University of Oregon
  • Postdoctoral researcher at Chalmers University,
    Göteborg
  • Ph.D. from Rice University
  • M.Sc., B.Sc. from Cairo University

3
Amr the Muslim
4
Outline
  • Computer Science
  • Computability Theory Logic
  • Logic and Revelation
  • Islam

5
What are computers good for?
6
Computers
  • automate tasks and processes that humans can
    do (generally a lot faster)

7
Easy tasks
  • Sorting. For example, 3,6,1,10,22,0,2,15,18,9
    becomes 0,1,2,3,6,9,10,15,18,22
  • The record for sorting is 1 terabyte in 50
    minutes
  • 1 terabyte 1,000,000,000,000 bytes (characters)
  • 1 terabyte about the information contained in a
    million unabridged dictionaries

8
Harder tasks
  • Find p and q such that pq n
  • It took the international community 17 years to
    solve a challenge problem where n
  • 1438162575788886766923577997614661201021829672124
    23625625618429357069352457338978305971235639587050
    58989075147599290026879543541
  • The RSA public key encryption relies on even
    larger numbers the whole thing is based on the
    assumption that factoring large numbers is a hard
    task for the computer!

9
More hard problems
10
Largest solved TSP instance
  • 15,112 cities
  • 110 processors
  • 22 years of computation time

11
Status
  • There are lots of very important and very
    interesting computational problems that are hard
    to do with current technology

12
Is there a limit
  • or is it just a matter of buying and building
    more powerful computers with faster and faster
    processors, and larger and larger memories?

13
Undecidable problems
  • Theory of computation asserts that some problems
    are undecidable (unsolvable in principle, no
    matter how much computing power you have!!!)
  • Example There is a program that you want to
    download and execute. Before downloading it, you
    want to check if it is a virus. Is it possible to
    be absolutely certain that the program is not a
    virus?

14
Perfect virus detection. Not.
  • Assume that we have an incredibly clever way to
    check that programs are safe
  • // Let P be a program
  • // Assume that check(P,I) can
  • // tell us whether it is safe to
  • // execute program P with input I
  • weird (p)
  • if check(p,p)
  • then delete_all_files
  • else return_normally
  • What happens if we execute weird(weird)?
  • If our clever program says that the execution is
    safe, the execution is actually not safe.
  • If our clever program says the execution is not
    safe, the execution is actually safe.
  • So our clever technique cant possibly exist!

15
Computers
  • automate tasks and processes that humans can do
    (generally a lot faster).
  • There exist tasks that cannot be done using
    computers.

16
Fine. So what?
  • The fact that computers cannot be used to
    automate certain tasks implies that rational
    thought (logic) is inherently an unsound or
    incomplete way of understanding the universe.

17
Logic
  • Aristotle, the first teacher
  • Al-Farabi (????????), the second teacher
  • Gödel

18
Aristotle
  • Start with axioms which denote true facts
  • Use rules of inference to deduce more true
    facts
  • If everything the logic proves is true then the
    logic is called sound
  • If everything that is true can be proved then
    the logic is called complete

19
Al-Farabi
  • Applied logic to the study of language (Arabic)
  • Developed a philosophical method to reconcile
    Islam and Aristotles logic
  • Still believed that human reason was superior to
    revelation.

20
Muslim Theologians
  • Both reason and revelation necessary.
  • Debated for 300 years, which is superior?
  • The 3 brothers the good brother is in Paradise,
    the wicked brother is in Hell, and the one who
    died as a child is in a place less than
    Paradise. The third brother complains that by
    dying as a child he was not given the opportunity
    to worship God and enter Paradise. To this, God
    responds that dying early was better for him
    because God foresaw that he would have grown up
    to be wicked. To this the second brother asks
    why he was not made to die at a young age?
  • Consensus emerged that revelation is superior.

21
Gödel
  • By the beginning of the 1900s, the consensus of
    the mathematical community was that all of
    mathematical facts could be derived using logic.
  • Gödel in an astonishing 1931 article showed that
    this was impossible.
  • His argument is very similar to our argument that
    the perfect virus detector cannot exist a simple
    yet devious mathematical fact which refers to
    itself in a way that asserts that it cant be
    proved.

22
Some quotes
  • In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,
    one of the big mathematical goals was to reduce
    all of number theory to a formal axiomatic
    system. Like Euclid's Geometry, such a system
    would start off with a few simple axioms that are
    almost indisputable, and would provide a
    mechanical way of deriving theorems from those
    axioms. It was a very lofty goal. The idea was
    that this system would represent every statement
    you could possibly make about natural numbers. So
    if you made the statement "every even number
    greater than two is the sum of two primes," you
    would be able to prove strictly and mechanically,
    from the axioms, that it is either true or false.
    For real, die-hard mathematicians, the words
    "true" and "false" would become shorthand for
    "provable" or "disprovable" within the system.
    Russell and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica was
    the most famous attempt to find such a system,
    and seemed for a while to be the pinnacle of
    mathematical rigor.

23
Continued
  • Gödel's theorem dashed this hope completely. It
    didn't just find a hole in Russell and Whitehead,
    which would presumably have been patched it
    showed that the entire goal is unachievable. More
    specifically, Gödel showed that for any formal
    axiomatic system, there is always a statement
    about natural numbers which is true, but which
    cannot be proven in the system. In other words,
    mathematics will always have a little fuzziness
    around the edges it will never be the rigorous
    unshakable system that mathematicians dreamed of
    for millennia.


  • Kenny Felder

24
More quotes
  • Although this theorem can be stated and
    proved in a rigorously mathematical way, what it
    seems to say is that rational thought can never
    penetrate to the final ultimate truth ... But,
    paradoxically, to understand Gödel's proof is to
    find a sort of liberation. For many logic
    students, the final breakthrough to full
    understanding of the Incompleteness Theorem is
    practically a conversion experience. This is
    partly a by-product of the potent mystique
    Gödel's name carries. But, more profoundly, to
    understand the essentially labyrinthine nature of
    the castle is, somehow, to be free of it.
  • Rucker,
    Infinity and the Mind

25
More quotes
  • Gödel showed that provability is a weaker
    notion than truth, no matter what axiom system is
    involved ...
  • The other metaphorical analogue to Gödel's
    Theorem which I find provocative suggests that
    ultimately, we cannot understand our own
    mind/brains ... Just as we cannot see our faces
    with our own eyes, is it not inconceivable to
    expect that we cannot mirror our complete mental
    structures in the symbols which carry them out?
    All the limitative theorems of mathematics and
    the theory of computation suggest that once the
    ability to represent your own structure has
    reached a certain critical point, that is the
    kiss of death it guarantees that you can never
    represent yourself totally.

  • Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach

26
More quotes
  • The symbolic systems we use to describe the
    universe are not separate from the universe they
    are a part of the universe just as we are a part
    of the universe. Since we are within the system,
    our small understandings are 'the system modeling
    itself' (system meaning reality in this case).
    Completion of the model can never happen because
    of the basic self-referential paradox the model
    is within the universe, so in effect the universe
    would have to be larger than itself. Or you can
    view it iteratively the model models the
    universe. The universe includes the model. The
    model must model itself. The model must model the
    model of itself.. ad absurdum.
  • So Gödel's incompleteness is something to
    expect. It is even something that can be
    intuitively understood without a mathematical
    approach and proof the incompleteness concept
    appears in clearly recognizable form in Zen
    Buddhism.

  • http//www.myrkul.org/recent/godel.htm

27
Our Universe
Fact
Fact
Falsehood
Fact
Falsehood
Fact
Fact
Fact
Falsehood
Falsehood
Fact
  • But if you do believe in logic, then logic shows
    that logic
  • either proves everything including the
    falsehoods, or
  • - does not prove certain true facts.

Fact
Fact
Falsehood
Fact
Falsehood
Fact
Fact
Fact
Fact
Fact
Falsehood
If you dont believe in logic you cant even
distinguish facts from falsehoods in this region.
Falsehood
Fact
28
The Ultimate Truth
  • Logic (rational thought) gets into contradictions
    and is not appropriate beyond a certain point.
  • One can
  • Never venture beyond the limits of logic
  • Venture beyond the limits of rational reason in
    search of the truth

29
Searching for the truth
  • Muslim theologians a thousand years ago wrote the
    Book of Five Fundamentals which starts as
    follows
  • If it is asked What is the first duty that God
    imposes upon you? Say to him Speculative
    reasoning which leads to knowledge of God

30
Revelation mercy and guidance
  • Speculative reasoning may go astray.
  • Revelation is a mercy and guidance.
  • 3918 Those who listen to the word, then follow
    the best of it those are they whom Allah has
    guided, and those it is who are the men of
    understanding.

31
Main message of revelation
  • Revelation repeats the same message over and over
    and over
  • Think, reflect, speculate, reason, until you
    believe
  • Once you believe, you must believe in the whole
    thing
  • And then you must act to ascertain that the
    belief is real.

32
First chapter of the Quran after the opening
prayer starts with
  • 2.1 A.L.M.
  • 2.2 This is the Book in it is guidance sure,
    without doubt, to those who fear Allah
  • 2.3 Who believe in the Unseen, are steadfast in
    prayer, and spend out of what We have provided
    for them
  • 2.4 And who believe in the Revelation sent to
    thee, and sent before thy time, and (in their
    hearts) have the assurance of the Hereafter.

33
Historically the first verses were
  • 96.1 Read in the name of your Lord Who created.
  • 96.2 He created man from a clot.
  • 96.3 Read and your Lord is Most Honorable,
  • 96.4 Who taught (to write) with the pen
  • 96.5 Taught man what he knew not.

34
Reflection
  • 3.191 Those who remember Allah standing and
    sitting and lying on their sides and reflect on
    the creation of the heavens and the earth Our
    Lord! Thou hast not created this in vain! Glory
    be to Thee save us then from the chastisement of
    the fire

35
Belief speculative reason
  • 75.36 Does man think that he will be left
    uncontrolled, (without purpose)?
  • 75.37 Was he not a drop of sperm emitted (in
    lowly form)?
  • 75.38 Then did he become a leech-like clot then
    did (Allah) make and fashion (him) in due
    proportion.
  • 75.39 And of him He made two sexes, male and
    female.
  • 75.40 Has not He, (the same), the power to give
    life to the dead?

36
Belief is not just lip service!
  • 2.214 Or do ye think that ye shall enter the
    Garden (of bliss) without such (trials) as came
    to those who passed away before you? they
    encountered suffering and adversity, and were so
    shaken in spirit that even the Messenger and
    those of faith who were with him cried "When
    (will come) the help of Allah?" Ah! Verily, the
    help of Allah is (always) near!

37
Part of belief system Money
  • The Earth and all its resources belong to God.
  • Humans are trustees on Earth.
  • The goal of a trustee is not to accumulate
    resources at the expense of others, but rather to
    work to multiply the resources and then to make
    sure they reach those who need them the most.

38
Proving your Belief Money matters
  • The bank promises you 7 interest (that is seen)
  • God promises 700 for charity and even more (that
    is unseen)
  • 2261 The likeness of those who spend their
    wealth in Allah's way is as the likeness of a
    grain which groweth seven ears, in every ear a
    hundred grains. Allah giveth increase manifold to
    whom He will. Allah is All-Embracing,
    All-Knowing.
  • Are you going to put your money in a savings
    account or give it to the poor?

39
Money a test not a sign of honor
  • 89.15 Now, as for man, when his Lord trieth him,
    giving him honour and gifts, then saith he,
    (puffed up), "My Lord hath honoured me."
  • 89.16 But when He trieth him, restricting his
    subsistence for him, then saith he (in despair),
    "My Lord hath humiliated me!"
  • 89.17 Nay, nay! but ye honour not the orphans!
  • 89.18 Nor do ye encourage one another to feed
    the poor!-
  • 89.19 And ye devour inheritance - all with
    greed,
  • 89.20 And ye love wealth with inordinate love!

40
How about charity without Belief?
  • Not clear but
  • 18.103 Say "Shall we tell you of those who lose
    most in respect of their deeds?-
  • 18.104 "Those whose efforts have been wasted in
    this life, while they thought that they were
    acquiring good by their works?"
  • 18.105 They are those who deny the Signs of
    their Lord and the fact of their having to meet
    Him (in the Hereafter) vain will be their works,
    nor shall We, on the Day of Judgment, give them
    any weight.
  • 18.106 That is their reward, Hell, because they
    rejected Faith, and took My Signs and My
    Messengers by way of jest.

41
No guarantees anyway!
  • 70.27 And those who are fearful of the
    chastisement of their Lord--
  • 70.28 Surely the chastisement of their Lord is (a
    thing) not to be felt secure of--

42
So
  • Believe in the Unseen
  • Reason speculatively
  • Seek guidance
  • Do your best
  • Hope for the best
  • Repeat
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com