Lead NAAQS Review: 2nd Draft Risk Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Lead NAAQS Review: 2nd Draft Risk Assessment

Description:

1991- Agency-wide Integrated Lead Strategy ... Lead introduced to food chain via atmospheric deposition, however, is policy-relevant exposure ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: bhas1
Learn more at: https://www.epa.gov
Category:
Tags: 2nd | naaqs | assessment | draft | lead | review | risk

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lead NAAQS Review: 2nd Draft Risk Assessment


1
Lead NAAQS Review2nd Draft Risk Assessment
  • NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call
  • August 8, 2007
  • Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar
  • OAQPS

2
Overview
  • Background
  • History of Lead NAAQS
  • Key Policy Aspects
  • Basis for Current Standard
  • Current NAAQS Review
  • Whats changed since 1978?
  • Human Exposure Risk Assessment
  • Next Steps

3
Background Lead NAAQS History
  • 1976 Lead added to list of criteria pollutants
  • Court Order
  • 1978 Primary and Secondary NAAQS set
  • 1.5 µg/m3, quarterly average
  • 1980s-90 First lead NAAQS review
  • Criteria Document 1986, with 1990 supplement
  • Staff Paper Dec 1990
  • 1991- Agency-wide Integrated Lead Strategy
  • Increased NAAQS enforcement, soil abatement,
    waste policy, drinking water, products,
    recycling, research
  • 2005 (Sept 14) -Court order
  • New lead NAAQS review

4
BackgroundKey Policy Aspects
  • Lead is a multimedia pollutant
  • Lead emitted into the air is distributed to other
    media
  • Human exposures are dominated by ingestion route
    (e.g., indoor dust)
  • Lead emitted yesterday (or years ago) can remain
    available for human exposure
  • Resuspension of deposited lead contributes to
    this
  • In addition to emissions to the air, there are
    various policy-relevant background exposures
  • Lead-based paint
  • Drinking water
  • Diet
  • Lead introduced during food processing is
    background
  • Lead introduced to food chain via atmospheric
    deposition, however, is policy-relevant exposure

5
BackgroundBasis for Current Standard
  • Level
  • Sensitive population
  • Young children, aged 1 to 5
  • maximum safe blood lead level for individual
    children
  • 30 µg/dL blood (anemia symptoms at 40 ug/dL,1977
    CD)
  • Policy goal keep 99.5 young children lt maximum
    safe level
  • Translates to population mean of 15 ug/dL blood
  • Non-air source contributions
  • 12 µg/dL blood
  • Limit on air contribution
  • 3 µg/dL blood
  • Estimated relationship of air lead to blood lead
  • 1 ug/m3 to 2 ug/dL blood
  • Primary NAAQS - 1.5 µg/m3 air
  • Averaging Time - calendar quarter
  • Form - not to be exceeded (maximum) value
  • Indicator - total suspended particulate (TSP)
    lead
  • Secondary Standard set equal to primary

6
Current NAAQS ReviewWhats Changed Since 1978?
(1)
  • Emissions reduced dramatically, but still arise
    from many sources
  • Ambient air concentrations
  • National mean reduced, but top 10 of sites still
    average almost 1 ug/m3
  • Monitoring network provides incomplete coverage
    of todays large emitters
  • Ambient non-air concentrations
  • Surface concentrations reduced in quiet forest
    soils lake sediments
  • Trends less clear in systems near sources and
    with more activity
  • E.g., resuspension near roadways, primary smelter
  • Human Exposure Childrens Blood Lead
  • U.S. population levels substantially reduced
    (median 15 ug/dL to lt5 ug/dL)
  • Health Effects - Adverse effects observed at
    dramatically lower exposures
  • More robust evidence for broad array of effects
  • Focus on childrens IQ (vs. blood effects)
  • No evidence of threshold
  • Ecological Effects
  • Better understanding of Pb ecosystem mobility and
    transport
  • Screening levels developed to associate Pb levels
    with potential for effect

7
Current NAAQS ReviewWhats Changed Since 1978?
(2)
  • CDC advisory blood lead level for children
  • Initially set in 1960 (60 µg/dL)
  • Revised in 1970 (30 µg/dL), and 1985 (25 µg/dL)
  • Current level set 1991 (10 µg/dL)
  • Children with blood lead gtadvisory level should
    receive follow-up attention
  • Reviewed by CDC in 2005
  • Recognized no safe threshold for blood lead
    levels in young children
  • Did not change level as
  • Critical to focus resources on children where
    potential for effects remain greatest
  • Setting a new level below 10 µg/dL would be an
    arbitrary decision
  • Feasibility effectiveness of intervention
    activities below 10 µg/dL not yet demonstrated
  • Emphasized importance of preventing childhood
    exposures

8
Human Exposure and RiskAssessment
  • Case study approach
  • General urban case study
  • Hypothetical (non-location specific) with
    simplifying assumptions, e.g.,
  • Uniform media concentrations and demographics
    across study area
  • Point source-oriented case studies (large
    medium)
  • Primary lead smelter
  • Secondary lead smelter
  • Estimated blood lead levels for children
  • 7 years exposure (from birth)
  • Predicted associated IQ points lost
  • Population distribution
  • Assessed multiple air quality scenarios
  • current conditions, current NAAQS, alternate
    NAAQS
  • Multiple sets of risk results for each
    combination of case study and air quality
    scenarios
  • Recognizes uncertainty in key modeling elements

9
Human Exposure and RiskResults
  • Blood lead estimates all case studies
  • Lower for all alternate standards compared to
    current NAAQS
  • Risk - General urban case study
  • Average current conditions, lt1 to 5 IQ point
    loss for average child
  • lt 1 IQ point from lead most recently in the air
  • lt1 to 4 IQ point from recent plus past air Pb
  • Current NAAQS
  • Average child, 1 to 4-5 IQ point loss from
    air-related lead exposures
  • alternative NAAQS (0.5 0.05 ug/m3)
  • Average child, lt1 to 2 IQ point loss from
    air-related lead exposures
  • Most highly exposed sub-populations
  • Higher risks and greater risk reductions
  • Greater uncertainty associated with these
    estimates
  • Risk - Primary lead smelter case study
  • Risk somewhat similar to general urban case study
  • Risk - Secondary lead smelter case study
  • Lowest risk estimates

10
Next Steps
  • October, 2007 - Final Risk Assessment Report
  • November, 2007 - Policy Assessment
  • Staff Paper/ANPR
  • March, 2008 - Proposed Rule
  • Sept 1, 2008 - Final Rule
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com