The AGN Torus: A Paradigm Change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

The AGN Torus: A Paradigm Change

Description:

Lag Times ? BLR and near-IR. Suganuma et al 06. BLR is dust bound (Netzer & Laor 93) ... B ~ 1.5 1km/s n71/2 mG. Elitzur & Shlosman 06. Resistance to tidal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: moshee
Category:
Tags: agn | change | paradigm | torus

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The AGN Torus: A Paradigm Change


1
The AGN TorusA Paradigm Change
Moshe Elitzur University of Kentucky
2
What is the Torus?
Smooth continuation of the BLR
3
X-ray Obscuration
  • Dusty clouds absorb both UV/optical and X-rays
  • Dust-free clouds absorb only X-rays

Risaliti, Elvis Nicastro 02 Smooth
distribution of dusty and dust-free clouds
4
Lag Times ? BLR and near-IR
Suganuma et al 06
No correlation with M?!!!
NIR(K-band)
Broad Emission Line
  • Broad-emission line lags for objects that also
    have infrared lags
  • Including Hi Lo ionization lines)

(? luminosity)
(nucleus)
BLR is dust bound (Netzer Laor 93)
5
The Dust-Sublimation Transition
Rd
r lt Rd dust free clouds Broad Lines
Region/ X-ray Obscuration Region
r gt Rd dusty clouds Toroidal
Obscuration Region
TOR Torus
6
0
The Disk Wind Paradigm
Everett Konigl 00
Bottorff 97
7
Grand Unification Theory
0
Emmering, Blandford Shlosman 92
8
Clumpy Torus Modeling
  • N0 5 10 clouds
  • ? 30 60
  • ?V 30 120
  • q 1 2
  • Rd 0.4L½45 pc Ro 5 Rd

s
N ? N0 exp(-?2/?2)/rq
Standard ISM dust works fine
Nenkova et al 02, 07
9
Cloud Properties in TOR Outflow
IR modeling ?v 30 120 ? NH 1022
1023 cm-2
Resistance to tidal shearing
n gt 107 M?7 / rpc3 cm-3 Rc lt 1016 NH,23 rpc3 /
M?7 cm Mc lt 7?10-3 NH,23 Rc,162 M? B 1.5
?1km/s n71/2 mG
Elitzur Shlosman 06
10
TOR Scale Height
  • Clouds rise and expand
  • M nR3 nRR2 ? NH ? M/R2
  • Crossing the TOR factor 10 expansion
  • ? 1 km s-1 vK 208 (M7/rpc)½ km s-1 ?
    H r

11
TOR Mass Outflow Rate
Rd ? L½
v(Rd) ? vK(Rd) ? (M/Rd)½ ? (LEdd/L½)½
Torus should disappear at small L/LEdd!
12
Torus Disappearance at Low Luminosities
  • Nucleus visible in FR I radio galaxies
    (Chiaberge 99)
  • and LINERs too (Maoz 05)
  • LINER 1 2 UV colors similar (AV lt 1)
  • No torus dust emission in M87 (Whysong
    Antonucci 04 Perlman 07)
  • No torus dust emission in FR I and half of FR
    II (van der Wolk 07)

13
If only TOR is removed, all low-luminosity AGN
become type 1
  • HOWEVER
  • Both type 1 and type 2 LINERs do exist (Maoz et
    al 05)
  • true type 2 AGN exist at L lt 1042 erg s-1
    (Panessa Bassani 02 Laor 03)
  • THEREFORE

BLR must disappear at some lower L
14
(No Transcript)
15
  • Wind diminishes mass outflow directed to jets
    (?)
  • Ho 02, Sikora et al 07 Radio loudness
    (Lrad/Lopt) varies inversely with Macc!

.
16
Radio-loudness Sikora 07
R Lrad/Lopt ? L/LEdd
17
  • Wind diminishes mass outflow directed to jets
    (?)
  • Ho 02, Sikora et al 07 Radio loudness
    (Lrad/Lopt) varies inversely with Macc!

.
  • Similar effect in X-ray binaries

18
High
Low
Full Unification Scheme both type 1 2
Accretion Rate (L/LEdd)
Radio Loudness
molecular outflow extinguished Torus disappears
type 1 only
atomic outflow extinguished BLR disappears
true type 2
High
Low
19
TOR Energy Outflow Rate
Estimate at the wind base disk surface Outflow
v vturb 10 km s-1
Negligible in the energy budget
20
Final Speculation
  • With ? 0.1, the required accretion rate is
    Macc 0.1 L45 M? yr-1
  • The AGN phase lasts 107 ? 108 yrs
  • Overall accreted mass 106 ? 107 L45 M?

.
Is the whole Seyfert phenomenon the accretion of
just a single GMC?
Is the QSO feeding source different (mergers)?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com