How To Study The Bible - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

How To Study The Bible

Description:

And the tribe of Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared. ... Earliest Jewish polemic suggests that they themselves accepted the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: jeff274
Category:
Tags: bible | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How To Study The Bible


1
(No Transcript)
2
The Resurrection of Jesus
3
Import of the Resurrection
  • D-B-R of Jesus differentiates Christianity from
    all other World Religions
  • Our willingness to live crucified lives lives
    of hope in the midst of suffering is wholly
    dependent upon the veracity of the bodily
    resurrection of Jesus

4
The Christian Life Depends on the Resurrection of
Jesus
  • Jesus Resurrection
  • Our Resurrection

5
The Christian Life Depends on the Resurrection of
Jesus
  • Jesus Resurrection
  • Our Resurrection

6
Rational Foundations of Faith
  • There is much misunderstanding about faith.  It
    is commonly supposed to be a leap in the dark,
    totally incompatible with reason.  This is not
    so.  True faith is never unreasonable, because
    its object is always trustworthy.  When we human
    beings trust one another, the reasonableness of
    our trust depends on the relative trustworthiness
    of the people concerned.  But the Bible bears
    witness of Jesus Christ as absolutely
    trustworthy.  It tells us who he is and what he
    has done, and the evidence it supplies for his
    unique person and work is extremely compelling. 
    As we expose ourselves to the biblical witness to
    this Christ, and as we feel its impact --
    profound yet simple, varied yet unanimous -- God
    creates faith within us.  We receive the
    testimony.  We believe. Faith is not belief in
    spite of evidence but belief based on testimony.
  • (John Stott)

7
What We Can Do With Jesus
8
C.S. Lewis
  • I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the
    really foolish thing that people often say about
    Him Im ready to accept Jesus as a great moral
    teacher, but I dont accept His claim to be God.
    That is the one thing we must not say. A man who
    was merely a man and said the sort of things
    Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher! He
    would either be a lunatic on a level with the
    man who says he is a poached egg or else he
    would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your
    choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of
    God or else a madman or something worse. You can
    shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and
    kill Him as a demon or you can fall at His feet
    and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come
    with any patronising nonsense about His being a
    great human teacher. He has not left that open to
    us. He did not intend to.

9
What We Can Do With Jesus
  • Lord Liar Lunatic
  • A Fourth Option Lewis did not address Declare
    that the Documents are Historically Unreliable

We know very little about Jesus. The first full
length account of his life was St. Marks gospel,
which was not written until about the year 70,
some forty years after his death. By that time,
historical facts had been overlaid with mythical
elements which expressed the meaning Jesus had
acquired for his followers. It is this meaning
that St. Mark primarily conveys rather than a
reliable straight forward portrayal. - Karen
Armstrong, A History of God
10
The Approach to the Gospels
  • Circular Reasoning of some Disciples

CLAIM Jesus is Son of God
Why Believe Them?
Why?
1. This reasoning a logical fallacy.
Jesus Apostles Say so!
Bible Tells Me
2. This is not the Holy Spirits approach.
Why Believe Bible?
How do you Know that?
Bible is Gods Word
11
The Approach to the Gospels
  • Are the accounts of Jesus, sufficiently reliable
    history?
  • J.W. Montgomery We do not naively assume the
    inspiration or infallibility of the New
    Testament records, and then by circular reasoning
    attempt to prove what we have previously assumed.
    We regard the documents only as documents, and we
    treat them as we would any other historical
    materials.

12
Our Approach to the Subject
  • A two-stage argument
  • Evaluate the gospels as we would any historical
    document
  • We do not assume inspiration - thats what were
    trying to prove - begs the question
  • Examine arguments for historical reliability
  • Evaluate the testimony within those documents
    concerning Jesus

13
  • The Issue of Miracles - are they possible?
  • Is it conceivable that there is a Creator God who
    exists above and beyond the natural, physical
    universe?
  • Is it conceivable that such a God could, if
    desired, interfere with or suspend the ordinary
    course of nature (e.g., suspend gravity stop
    disease without medicine raise someone from the
    dead)? And, do this through a man?

Yes!
14
The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
Documents
  • The Gospel
  • Accounts of Jesus

15
Documentary Evidence
ANSWERING THE QUESTION How do we know what we
have today is what the disciples wrote
originally?
  • Time Interval Between the Original Autographs and
    the Earliest Manuscripts
  • The Number of manuscripts
  • The agreement of existing manuscripts

16
Time Interval Number
17
Manuscript Agreement
There exists less than 1/1000 of variance among
the manuscripts. - Westcott and Hort, Greek
Text of the New Testament
18
Manuscript Agreement
  • There are more variations among our manuscripts
    than there are words in the New Testament.
    (p.90)
  • Bart Ehrman
  • Elsewhere he states that the number of variants
    is as high as 400,000. (p. 89)

19
Daniel Wallace, http//www.bible.org/page.php?page
_id4000
20
Manuscript Agreement
We can have great confidence in the fidelity
with which this material has come down to us,
especially compared with any other ancient
literary work. - Bruce Metzger, Former
Professor emeritus of Princeton Theological
Seminary at Princeton University, quoted in The
Case for Christ, Lee Strobel
21
Manuscript Agreement
To be skeptical of the New Testament books is
to allow all of classical antiquity to slip into
obscurity. - John Warwick Montgomery, Where is
History Going?
22
Three Tests of Reliability
1) Ability Test Were authors able to preserve
a reliable history? 2) Character Test Is
there reason to doubt the authors integrity?
3) Corroboration Test Do external sources
confirm or validate the historical information?
23
Reliability Tests
  • 1) Ability Test Were authors able to preserve
    a reliable history?
  • Oral Culture strong memorization skills
  • Rabbis had memorized entire Old Testament
  • Oral folklore studies in 20th century showed
    great memorization skills e.g., Yugoslavian
    folk-singers had memorized epic stories of up to
    100,000 words in length (Albert Lord, The Singer
    of Tales)
  • 90 of Jesus sayings were in figures or styles
    common to Hebrew poetry more easily memorized.
  • Elementary education for boys until age 12 was
    widely practiced in Israel in 1st century.
  • Oral traditions were flexible freedom to vary
    paraphrase (obvious from the 3 Synoptics).

24
Reliability Tests
  • 1) Ability Test Were authors able to preserve
    a reliable history?
  • Oral Culture strong memorization skills
  • Correctives intervention of living witnesses
    and community of believers.
  • Dating Often hear - these records (gospel
    accounts) were 40-50 years after the events

25
What about Dates?
  • Dating of gospels in dispute. Good reason for
    earlier dates than liberal critics.
  • Resurrection testimony in 1 Cor. 153-5 - an
    early Christian creed (memorized).
  • Paul shared this with Corinthians on his first
    visit (probably w/in 10-15 years of Christs
    death).
  • This creed existed earlier (within 5-7 years
    after the death of Christ, this was being
    communicated by Christians)
  • The early existence of the Christian movement,
    its rapid growth, is inexplicable without the
    resurrection testimonies -

26
Reliability Tests
  • 1) Ability Test Were authors able to preserve
    a reliable history?
  • Oral Culture strong memorization skills
  • Correctives intervention of living witnesses
    and community of believers.
  • Dating Often hear - these records (gospel
    accounts) were 40-50 years after the events
  • Authors Matthew (tax-collector) Luke
    (physician) Mark (with Peter) John (eyewitness)

27
Authors Ability
  • Matthew
  • Matthew must have been familiar with a great
    variety of forms of fraud, imposture, cunning,
    and deception, and must have become habitually
    distrustful, scrutinizing, and cautious and, of
    course, much less likely to have been deceived in
    regard to many of the facts in our Lords
    ministry, extraordinary as they were, which fell
    under his observation. (Simon Greenleaf,
    Testimony of the Evangelists)

28
Authors Ability
  • Luke
  • If Lukes Gospel were to be regarded only as the
    work of a contemporary historian, it would be
    entitled to our confidence. But it is more than
    this. It is the result of careful inquiry and
    examination, made by a person of science,
    intelligence and education, concerning subjects
    which he was perfectly competent to investigate,
    and as to many of which he was peculiarly
    skilled. (Greenleaf)

29
Reliability Tests
  • 2) Character Test
  • Reported teachings that called for as exacting a
    level of integrity as any.
  • Blatantly honest about their own failings.

30
Reliability Tests
  • 3) Corroboration Test Outside sources?
  • Within 100 to 150 years after the birth of
    Christ, approximately eighteen non-Christian,
    extra-biblical sources from secular history
    mention more than one hundred facts, beliefs, and
    teachings from the life of Christ including
    miracles, the Resurrection, and his claims to be
    deity. (Dr. Gary Habermas)

31
Reliability Tests
  • 3) Corroboration Test Outside sources?
  • Josephus About this time there lived Jesus, a
    wise man For he was one who wrought surprising
    feats and was a teacher He won over many Jews
    and many of the Greeks When Pilate, upon
    hearing him accused by men of the highest
    standing among us, had condemned him to be
    crucified, those who had in the first place come
    to love him did not give up their affection for
    him And the tribe of Christians, so called
    after him, has still to this day not
    disappeared.
  • (quoted in F.F. Bruce The New Testament
    Documents)

32
Reliability Tests
  • 3) Corroboration Test Outside sources?
  • Tacitus Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted
    the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for
    their abominations, called Christians by the
    populace. Christus, from whom the name had its
    origin, suffered extreme penalty during the reign
    of Tiberius at the hands of one of our
    procurators, Pontius Pilate, and a most
    mischievous superstition broke out not only in
    Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in
    Rome.
  • (quoted in F.F. Bruce The New Testament
    Documents)

33
Reliability Tests
  • 3) Corroboration Test Outside sources?
  • Compare Tacitus to Luke Now in the fifteenth
    year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when
    Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod
    was tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip
    was tetrarch of the region of Iturea and
    Trachonitis, and Lysanias was tetrarch of
    Abilene, in the high priesthood of Annas and
    Caiaphas, the word of God came to John, the son
    of Zacharias, in the wilderness (Luke 31-2).

34
Three Tests of Reliability
1) Ability Test Were authors able to preserve
a reliable history? 2) Character Test Is
there reason to doubt the authors integrity?
3) Corroboration Test Do external sources
confirm or validate the historical information?
35
Our Approach to the Subject
  • A two-stage argument
  • Evaluate the gospels as we would any historical
    document
  • We do not assume inspiration - thats what were
    trying to prove - begs the question
  • Examine arguments for historical reliability
  • Evaluate the testimony within those documents
    concerning Jesus

36
Resurrection three critical aspects
  • Death Evidence
  • Burial Empty Tomb Evidence
  • Resurrection Evidence

37
Evidence for Jesus Death
  • All four gospels testify to His crucifixion,
    burial resurrection (Mt. 2735 Mk. 1524-25
    Luke 2333 Jn. 1917ff).
  • John 1931-37 Johns unique testimony
  • Romans were experts at crucifixions (performed
    tens of thousands).

38
Evidence for Jesus Death
  • External Corroboration
  • Tacitus Christus, from whom the name had its
    origin, suffered extreme penalty during the reign
    of Tiberius at the hands of one of our
    procurators, Pontius Pilate
  • Lucian of Samosata (2nd Century) The
    Christians, you know, worship a man to this day
    the distinguished personage who introduced their
    novel rites, and was crucified on that account.

39
Evidence for Jesus Death
  • External Corroboration
  • Josephus When Pilate, upon hearing him accused
    by men of the highest standing among us, had
    condemned him to be crucified.
  • Mara Bar-Serapion Or, what advantage came to
    the Jews by the murder of their Wise King, seeing
    from that very time their kingdom was driven away
    from them.
  • The Talmud On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was
    hanged.

40
Credibility of the Burial Story and the Empty
Tomb
  • If the tomb were not empty
  • Christianity could not have flourished when it
    did
  • The disciples would not have courageously taught
    about Jesus as the Messiah
  • The Jews could easily have snuffed out the
    movement by showing the body was still in the
    tomb.
  • Earliest Jewish polemic suggests that they
    themselves accepted the empty tomb (Mt.
    2811-15). They argued that the disciples stole
    the body.

41
Credibility of the Burial Story and the Empty
Tomb
  • Women as witnesses in antiquity
  • Josephus But let not the testimony of women be
    admitted, on account of the levity and boldness
    of their sex since it is probable that they may
    not speak truth, either out of hope of gain, or
    fear of punishment.
  • Talmud Any evidence which a woman gives is not
    valid to offer. This is equivalent to saying that
    one who is Rabbinically accounted a robber is
    qualified to give the same evidence as a woman.

IF the Gospel writers were making up this story,
they never would have included women as the
earliest witnesses to the empty tomb
resurrection.
42
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Eyewitness Testimony
  • A physical, bodily resurrection (not a ghost or
    spirit - which many Jews would have believed)
  • Luke 2436-43
  • 1 Cor. 153-8 earliest written account of the
    resurrection witnesses (cf. 1 Cor. 91)
  • Cephas (Peter) Twelve 500 James Apostles
    Paul

43
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Gospel Witnesses
  • Mary Magdalene (John 2010ff)
  • Other women (Mt. 288ff)
  • Cleopas and another (Lk. 2413-32)
  • Eleven disciples others (Lk. 2433ff)
  • 10 apostles (John 2019ff)
  • Thomas other apostles (Jn. 2026-30)
  • Seven apostles (John 211ff)
  • Disciples (Mt. 2816-20)
  • Apostles others before his ascension. (Lk.
    2450-52 Acts 14-9)

44
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Acts Eyewitnesses
  • Twelve references to Jesus resurrection in Acts
    1-5
  • Demonstrating the resurrection as the foundation
    of testimony conversion.
  • (cf. Acts 224, 31-32 315 1041 1331)

45
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Willingness to Suffer for Testimony
  • They had nothing to gain except criticism,
    ostracism, and martyrdom. They certainly had
    nothing to win financially. If anything this
    would have provided pressure to keep quiet, to
    deny Jesus, to downplay him, even to forget they
    ever met him yet because of their integrity,
    they proclaimed what they saw, even when it meant
    suffering and death (Craig Blomberg)
  • People dont suffer die for what they know to
    be a lie (e.g., Acts 540-42 1 Cor. 49-13).

46
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Eyewitness Testimony
  • Physical Resurrection
  • 153-8 earliest written account of the
    resurrection witnesses (cf. 1 Cor. 91)
  • Gospels Acts Witnesses (willingness to suffer
    for what they knew to be true or false).
  • Circumstantial Evidence

47
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Change in disciples fear depression to courage
    joy
  • Mark 1450 - and they all left him and fled
  • John 2019 - the doors were shut where the
    disciples were for fear of the Jews
  • ..
  • Acts 236 - to Jews on day of Pentecost This
    Jesus, whom you crucified, God has made both Lord
    and Christ.

48
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Conversion of skeptics
  • Paul (Enemy Acts 81-3 91 Phil. 33-8)
  • suffered (1 Cor. 4 2 Cor. 11).
  • Performed miracles as testimony (2 Cor. 12).
  • Change? Resurrection (Acts 9, 22, 26 1 Cor.
    158)
  • James, brother of Jesus (skeptic Mk. 321
    63-4 Jn. 75)
  • Turned teacher leader (Acts 1518-19).
  • Martyred (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, 209)

49
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Josephus account of James death
  • Ananus high priest brought before them a
    man named James, the brother of Jesus, who was
    called the Christ, and certain others. He accused
    them of having transgressed the law and delivered
    them up to be stoned
  • (Antiquities of the Jews, book 20, chapter 9)

50
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Conversion of skeptics
  • Paul (Enemy Acts 81-3 91 Phil. 33-8)
  • suffered (1 Cor. 4 2 Cor. 11).
  • Performed miracles as testimony (2 Cor. 12).
  • Change? Resurrection (Acts 9, 22, 26 1 Cor.
    158)
  • James, brother of Jesus
  • Skeptic (Mark 321 63-4 Jn. 75) turned
    teacher leader (Acts 1518-19).
  • Martyred (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews,
    209)
  • What changed him? Resurrection (1 Cor. 157)

51
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Conversion of thousands of Jews
  • Social structures (essential to their family,
    identity and nationality) relinquished
  • Animal Sacrifices (day of atonement)
  • Law of Moses (as authoritative rule)
  • Sabbath (founded in Creation)
  • Synagogue (center of Jewish culture esp.
    Diaspora)
  • Accepting Jesus as God in flesh (against
    perceptions)
  • Nature of Messiah (Crucified versus political
    rebel against Rome)

52
The Resurrection Evidence
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Change in Disciples
  • Conversion of Skeptics
  • Conversion of thousands of Jews

53
THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS
  • Rests on sound historical evidence
  • HISTORICAL RELIABILITY OF DOCUMENTS
  • DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
  • TESTS OF RELIABILITY
  • TESTIMONY WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS
  • DEATH / EMPTY TOMB / RESURRECTION
  • CREDIBLE EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY
  • CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com