EPR Assessemnt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

EPR Assessemnt

Description:

POC for Wing POW/MIA day; largest crowd ever... emotional day of remembrance carried out to perfection. Rater's Comments. 16. Rater's Comments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: nau84
Category:
Tags: epr | assessemnt

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EPR Assessemnt


1
EPR Assessment
2
Overview
  • Review Of EPR For SMSgt Climber
  • Section I Ratee Identification Data (Not
    Assessed)
  • Section II Job Description (Not Assessed)
  • Section III Evaluation Of Performance
  • Section IV Promotion Recommendation
  • Section V Raters Comments
  • Appropriate Bullets
  • Inappropriate Bullets
  • Overall Instructor Assessment

3
(No Transcript)
4
FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY
I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62
carefully before completing any item)
1. NAME
2. SSN
3. GRADE
4. DAFSC
Climber, Cliff R.
123-45-6789
SMSgt
2A690
5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION
6a. PAS CODE
6b. SRID
20th Bomb Squadron, ACC, Fogler AFB OR 12345
MXOBR549
OJ2MG
7. PERIOD OF REPORT
8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION
9. REASON FOR REPORT
From 1 Jan 00 Thru 31 Dec 00
ANNUAL
365
5
SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru
CMSGT)
I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62
carefully before completing any item)
1. NAME
2. SSN
3. GRADE
4. DAFSC
6a. PAS CODE
5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION
6b. SRID
7. PERIOD OF REPORT
8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION
9. REASON FOR REPORT
From
Thru
II. JOB DESCRIPTION
1. DUTY TITLE
2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity,
and timeliness of duties performed)
Inefficient. An unprofessional performer.
Good performer. Performs routine duties
satisfactorily.
Excellent performer. Consistently produces high
quality work.
The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas.
2. JOB KNOWLEDGE
(Consider whether ratee has technical expertise
and is able to apply the knowledge)
Extensive knowledge of all primary duties
and related positions.
Excels in knowledge of all related
positions. Mastered all duties.
Lacking. Needs considerable improvement.
Sufficient. Gets job accomplished
3. LEADERSHIP
(Consider whether ratee motivates peers
or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and
enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly
and consistently, plans and organizes work, and
fosters teamwork)
Gets satisfactory results.
Highly effective leader.
Exceptionally effective leader.
Ineffective.
4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS
(Consider how well member uses time and resources)
Manages resources in a satisfactory manner.
Skillful and competent.
Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities.
Ineffective.
5. JUDGMENT
(Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and
reaches logical decisions)
Emphasizes logic and decision making.
Highly respected and skilled.
Poor.
Sound.
6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES
(Consider ratees dedication and preservation of
traditional military values - integrity and
loyalty)
Unprofessional, unreliable.
Sets an example for others to follow.
Epitomizes the Air Force professional.
Meets expectations.
7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
(Consider ratees ability to organize and express
ideas)
Organizes and expresses ideas clearly
and concisely.
Unable to communicate effectively.
Organizes and expresses thoughts
satisfactorily.
Highly skilled writer and communicator.
AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO)
6
II. JOB DESCRIPTION
1. DUTY TITLE
NCOIC, Sortie Support Flight Supervises 24
People. Responsible for effective management of
2 facilities, 4 vehicles, and equipment account
valued more than 5 million. Ensures capability
to receive, inspect, store, and maintain over 350
line items. Provides guidance and establishes
training standards necessary for effective
planning and scheduling of all Sortie Support
Flight functions in support of operational and
contingency requirements. Ensures expedient
completion of all Time Compliance Technical
Orders. Establishes accountability for all
aircraft training devises. Enforces safety and
supply discipline. ADDITIONAL DUTY Squadron
Performance Measures Coordinator.
2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION
(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade
and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation
for increased responsibilities )
NOT RECOMMENDED
NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME
IMMEDIATE PROMOTION
RECOMMENDATION
READY
CONSIDER
1
3
2
4
5
RATERS RECOMMENDATION
RATERS RATERS RECOMMENDATION
3
4
1
2
5
V. RATERS COMMENTS
I certify that in accordance with AFI 36-2403 an
initial feedback session was conducted on
______________, and a midterm feedback session
was conducted on _______________. (If not
accomplished, state the reason).
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, LOCATION
DUTY TITLE
DATE
SSN
SIGNATURE
VI. RATERS RATERS COMMENTS
CONCUR
NONCONCUR
DUTY TITLE
DATE
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, LOCATION
SSN
SIGNATURE
CONCUR
NONCONCUR
DUTY TITLE
DATE
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, LOCATION
SSN
SIGNATURE
VIII. FINAL EVALUATORS POSITION
IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE (N/A for CMSgt or
CMSgt selectee)
X. COMMANDERS REVIEW
A
SENIOR RATER
SENIOR RATERS DEPUTY
NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)
CONCUR
B
YES
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
C
SIGNATURE
NO
D
LOWER LEVEL
10
Raters Comments
  • Start with a strong impact statement!
  • - Single-handedly spearheaded squadron ORI
    preparations, ensured "Outstanding" rating in
    June 2000 ORI

11
Raters Comments
  • - Personally created inspection checklists for
    all sections to ensure compliance with
    established directives
  • - Allowed sections to teach other sections
    their processes--improved working relations
    between sections
  • -- Increased efficiency, eliminated duplication
    of effort, saved over 26,000decreased equipment
    support by 25, pre-flight inspection times by
    50, post-flight inspections by 33 and no-shows
    by 73

12
Raters Comments
  • Constantly striving to improve quality of life
    for all members of the unit--personally
    undertook challenge of reducing dormitory
    problems...rid the dormitory of all incidents of
    underage drinking/ property damage
  • -- Incorporated inputs from dormitory members to
    ensure all issues were addressed morale
    skyrocketed
  • - Dorm of the Month program created, 20 BS first
    selected showcase for other units on base to
    emulate

13
Raters Comments
  • - Instilled pride of ownership across all
    sections ensured all personnel in customer
    service positions received customer service
    training decreased customer wait time and
    increased customer satisfaction
  • - Greatly enhanced civil-military relations,
    briefing lauded by civic leaders...look forward
    to more interaction
  • - Selected SNCO of the year--exemplifies core
    values and instills unit pride--promote to CMSgt
    immediately!

14
Raters Comments
  • Weak comments would include
  • - Elected President of Wing Top 3 organization,
    making the organization more responsive to
    enlisted personnel and community partnerships
  • -- Organized the Top 3 children's Haunted House,
    manned the refreshment booth at the base picnic
  • -- Organized renovation efforts for Bear Creek
    Elementary School, hard work praised by school
    leadership

15
Raters Comments
  • - Spearheaded squadron pre-inspection barbecue
    to reward efforts of all members for preparation
    efforts
  • - POC for Wing POW/MIA day largest crowd
    ever... emotional day of remembrance carried out
    to perfection

16
Raters Comments
  • Inappropriate comments include
  • - Continual self-improvement...completed a
    Masters Degree in Airfield Management during his
    off-duty time
  • - Submitted for Meritorious Service Medal for
    his consistently superior efforts and outstanding
    results

17
Feedback Dates
  • Initial Feedback 15 Jan 00
  • Midpoint Feedback 17 Jul 00

18
(No Transcript)
19
Overall Instructor Assessment
RA
134
20
Summary
  • Review Of EPR For SMSgt Climber
  • Section I Ratee Identification Data (Not
    Assessed)
  • Section II Job Description (Not Assessed)
  • Section III Evaluation Of Performance
  • Section IV Promotion Recommendation
  • Section V Raters Comments
  • Appropriate Bullets
  • Inappropriate Bullets
  • Overall Instructor Assessment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com