TASK: To conductfamiliarize with CivilMilitary Operations.

1
1 OF 2
CIVIL MILITARY OPERATIONS
1 DECEMBER 2001
TASK To conduct/familiarize with
Civil-Military Operations. CONDITIONS
Conducting operations in peace, conflict, and
war. STANDARD CMO coordinator must posses
fundamental knowledge in populace resources
control, foreign nation support, humanitarian
assistance, military civic action, and civil
defense. 1. REFERENCES a. FM 41-10,
11 Jan 93, Civil Affairs. b. FM 27-10,
1956, Law of Land Warfare. 2.
DISCUSSION The Civil Military Operation (CMO)
functional area encompasses all those activities
that facilitate the integration of CMO into unit
operations and plans. This includes developing a
CMO element within the unit and planning for the
attachment of active component or US Army Reserve
Civil Affairs (CA) personnel to this element,
when available. CMO activities also include
planning and coordination for the use of Foreign
Nation Support. Requirements are determined by
logistics personnel and are coordinated for by US
units through Host Nation resources possibly
required by the 3d COSCOM in contingency
operations. 3. SPECIFIC QUESTIONS a.
Does the brigade/separate battalion have a Civil
Military Operations (CMO) Coordinator (S5)
appointed by memorandum (down to battalion
level)? b. Does the brigade/separate
battalion CMO Coordinator have the references
listed above? c. Does the
brigade/separate battalion CMO Coordinator
possess appropriate knowledge of the following
procedures? (1) Major tasks
performed by Civil Affairs units and teams. (CH
4, FM 41-10) (2) How Foreign
Nation Support should be coordinated, including
appointment of class A Agents and Field Ordering
Officers (FOO). (3) Planning
consideration for Dislocated Civilians Control.
(Ch 10, FM 41-10) (4) Planning for
interface and coordination with NGO/PVO (FM
41-10)
G-5
2
2 OF 2
1 DECEMBER 2001
CIVIL MILITARY OPERATIONS
(5) Commanders
Legal and Moral obligations (FM 27-10 Law of Land
Warfare) 4. Does the unit integrate CMO into
unit exercises, plans and training? Rating
Standard (Functional Area Civil Military
Operations) Commendable - 90 of all inspected
items are rated GO. Satisfactory - 60 of
overall items in 1, 2, and 3 must receive a GO
rating. Unsatisfactory - Overall items in 1, 2,
and 3 receive more than 40 of NO GO rating.
________________________________________________
___________________ Inspectors comments
mandatory for all NO GO items. (Attach
additional sheets if necessary.) NOTES ________
__________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________ ________________________________________
__________________ _______________________________
___________________________ ______________________
____________________________________ _____________
_____________________________________________ ____
__________________________________________________
____ _____________________________________________
_____________ ____________________________________
______________________
VERIFICATION

x_______________
Unit POC Signature, Name,
Rank, Date
x_______________

Inspectors Signature, Name, Rank, Date

G-5
3
1 OF 3
PROJECT PARTNERSHIP
1 DECEMBER 2001
G-5
TASK To increase the main goal of
interoperability between US/Allied
units. CONDITIONS Providing further
development of most effective US/Allied fighting
force possible. STANDARD Partnership POC must
be able to entail the assigned responsibility,
outline funding, and set up a reporting
system. 1. REFERENCES a. USAREUR Reg
350-2, 19 October 2000, Project Partnership.
b. 1AD Suppl 1 to USAREUR Reg 350-2,
(Reference Only). 2. DISCUSSION Project
Partnership is a USAREUR program designed to
improve interoperability and to foster trust and
confidence between allied units. An effective
Partnership Program emphasizes joint training at
the soldier, battalion and higher level
organizations. Sport and social activities
support interoperability by developing
understanding, confidence and trust. The
emphasizes, however, must be placed on joint
training that will improve the ability of units
to fight together as allies. An effective
Partnership program insures soldiers are aware of
the goals of Project Partnership and the benefits
of interoperability training. This training
should be planned well ahead and be incorporated
into the units training plan.. 3. SPECIFIC
QUESTIONS a. Does the unit have allied
partnership unit(s) (formal or informal)? (Para
5, USAREUR Reg 350-2) If not, do not continue.
If so, what is name of the unit? b. Are
the partnership activities planned and integrated
in the training program? (Para 5, USAREUR Reg
350-2) (1) Do partnership units
conduct partnership planning meetings?
(2) Is the emphasis on training and
interoperability? (3) Are the
partnership activities soldier oriented?
(4) What is the frequency of activities?

4
2 OF 3
PROJECT PARTNERSHIP
1 DECEMBER 2001
G-5
c. Is there a Partnership POC appointed by
memorandum? (1) Has a Scroll been
exchanged? (Para 9, USAREUR Reg 350-2).
(2) Is the unit Partnership Scroll displayed?
(Display of Partnership Scroll is encouraged
but not required). d. Does the
Battalion/Brigade Partnership POC possess
appropriate knowledge on the following
procedures? (Appropriate knowledge will be a
subjective determination based on conversation
with the Partnership Officer/NCO). (1)
The general concept of Project Partnership?
(Para 3, USAREUR Reg 350-2). (2)
Procedures for requesting Partnership Funds to
support partnership activities? (3)
USAREUR Project Partnership Awards Program?
(Para 8, USAREUR Reg 350-2) e. Has unit
submitted the quarterly Project Partnership Event
Register on the 5th working day following the end
of the quarter? Has the POC retained copies of
past calendar year events in the proper file?
f. Does U.S. unit ensure NATO unit
reciprocates training per NATO Mutual Support
Act? (USAREUR Regulation 12-16, Page 7, Para
10) g. Does the unit use STANAG Form 3381
(AE Form12-16A-R) for each project Partnership
training event to document logistics support,
supplies and services provided for their
partnership unit? Rating standard (Functional
Area (Project Partnership) Commendable -
90 of all inspected items are rated GO.
Satisfactory - 60 of overall items in 1, 2, and
3 must receive a GO rating.
Unsatisfactory - Overall items in 1, 2, and 3
receive more than 40 of NO GO
rating. _________________________________________
___________________________ Inspectors comments
mandatory for all NO GO items. (Attach
additional sheets if necessary.)
5
3 OF 3
PROJECT PARTNERSHIP
1 DECEMBER 2001
G-5
NOTES __________________________________________
________________ _________________________________
_________________________ ________________________
__________________________________ _______________
___________________________________________ ______
__________________________________________________
__ _______________________________________________
___________ ______________________________________
____________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________
______________________________________ VERIFICA
TION x_______________ Unit POC Signature,
Name, Rank, Date x_______________ Inspector
s Signature, Name, Rank, Date
6
1 OF 3
MANEUVER MANAGEMENT
1 DECEMBER 2001
1. References a. USAREUR Reg 350-22,
23 Jun 98 Maneuver Field Training Exercise Rights
in Germany. b. USAREUR Pam 385-15, 6 Sep 94,
Leaders Guide for Tactical Exercise Safety. 2.
Task a. Request Permission to conduct off
post maneuvers. b. Maneuver Damage Prevention
and Control 3. Condition a. The U.S. Forces
right to maneuver in the Federal Republic of
Germany is based on the Supplementary Agreement
to the NATO Status of Forces Agreement.
This right, however, entails the following basic
obligations (1) To notify the German
authorities of exercise plans and provide them
with necessary details. (2) To comply
with German laws and ordinances and USAREUR
regulations maneuvers and exercises. (3)
To take all necessary measures before and during
the conduct of maneuvers and training exercises
to insure that maneuver damage is kept to
a minimum. b. V Corps Federal and State
governments and private citizens concerns, that
the environment may be deteriorated during
exercises. Maneuver requests outside of MTAs are
being challenged by public concerns about
environmental issues. To meet this challenge,
commanders and soldiers must be familiar with the
USAREUR and Division Maneuver Damage Prevention
and Control Program. Unit commanders must ensure
compliance with existing regulations and
individual soldiers must be knowledgeable of his
or her responsibilities and trained in maneuver
damage prevention, damage recording and
reporting.
G-5
7
2 OF 3
MANEUVER MANAGEMENT
1 DECEMBER 2001
4. Standards. a. Maneuver planning and
execution (1) Does initial maneuver
planning include the S/G-3, or Operations
Section? (2) Does initial maneuver
planning include the appropriate Maneuver
Area Coordination Center (MACC)? (3)
Does final maneuver plan account for host nation,
and terrain limitations? (4) Will final
Maneuver Area Request support the scheme of
maneuver? (5) Is an Environmental Damage
Control Officer (EDCO) appointed on orders
as required by USAREUR Reg 350, Para, Page 9?
b. Do unit personnel possess appropriate
knowledge of the following procedures?
(1) Maneuver and Field Training Exercise Rights
in Germany as required by USAREUR Reg 350-22).
(2) Pre-maneuver coordination procedures as
required by USAREUR Reg 350-22, Sec III, para 10
and 11. (3) Pre-maneuver training
requirements for maneuver damage prevention
as required by USAREUR Reg 350-22, Sec IX, para
33.) (4) Use of Maneuver Rights Areas
(MRA) as required by USAREUR Reg 350-22, Sec V,
para 15,16, and 17. (5) Master Maneuver
Damage Report as required USAREUR Reg 350-22, C5,
para 7. c. Does the unit conduct
pre-maneuver damage prevention training as
prescribed by USAREUR Reg 350-22, Sec IX, Para
32, 33. d. Does the unit submit the Maneuver
Damage Report (MDR) as required by USAREUR Reg
350-22, Section X, Para 35. (1) Are the
reports complete? Do they include sufficient
information for USAREUR Claims service to
determine legitimate claims? (USREUR Pam 27-2,
App B) (2) Is the MDR forwarded to
MAO?
G-5
8
3 OF 3
MANEUVER MANAGEMENT
1 DECEMBER 2001
e. Does the unit maintain the
following files for two years? (AR 25-400-2, 15
Oct 86) (1) Maneuver Rights Approval?
(File No. 350-1d) (AE Form 350-22ER Jun 98)
(2) Master Maneuver Damage Reports? (File No.
350-1d) (AE Form 350-22A) (3) Records of
Local Pre-coordination? (File No. 350-1d)
(4) Claims Investigation Data? (File No.
27) Rating Standard (Functional Area Maneuver
Damage Prevention and Control)
Commendable - 90 of all inspected items are
rated GO. Satisfactory - Items 4.a.(4)
(5) 4.b.(1), (2), (4) 4.d.(1) must receive
a GO rating. Unsatisfactory - a NO GO
rating in any of the critical inspection 4.a.(4)
(5) 4.b.(1), (2), (4) 4.d.(1). Inspector
s Comments mandatory for all NO GO items (attach
additional sheets if necessary.) Inspectors
comments mandatory for all NO GO items.
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.) NOTES
__________________________________________________
________ _________________________________________
_________________ ________________________________
__________________________ _______________________
___________________________________ ______________
____________________________________________ _____
__________________________________________________
___ ______________________________________________
____________ _____________________________________
_____________________ ____________________________
______________________________

VERIFICATION

x_______________
Unit POC Signature, Name,
Rank, Date

x_______________
Inspectors Signature,
Name, Rank, Date
G-5