Title: Promoting Science among ELLs in a HighStakes Testing Policy Context
1- Promoting Science among ELLs in a High-Stakes
Testing Policy Context - Okhee Lee, PI
- University of Miami
- National Science Foundation ESI 035331
- http//www.education.miami.edu/psell
2(No Transcript)
3Goals
- A 5-year research project (2004-2009)
- Explores effective ways for elementary school
teachers to teach science to all students,
especially ELLs - Supports English literacy and math
- Helps ELLs to perform well on high-stakes science
assessment (Florida Comprehensive Achievement
Test, FCAT)
4Research Setting
- 6 elementary schools in treatment group
- 3 elementary schools in replication group
- 6 elementary schools in comparison group
- Schools were selected based on three criteria
- 1. Percentage of ELLs (Spanish or Haitian Creole)
above the district average of 24 - 2. Percentage of students on free and reduced
lunch programs above the district average of 72 - 3. School grades of C or D according to the
states accountability plan
5OutcomesStudent AchievementTeacher Change
6Student AchievementGains and Gaps
- 1. Can ELLs learn academic subjects, such as
science, while also developing English
proficiency? - YES
- 2. Can ELLs, who learn to think and reason
scientifically, also perform well on high-stakes
science tests? - YES
7Student Data
- Project-developed assessments
- - Science tests at grades 3, 4, and 5
- - Reasoning interviews at grades 3, 4, and 5
- - Writing test at grade 3
- High-stakes assessments
- - Math (measurement strand) at grade 3
- - Writing at grade 4
- - Science at grade 5
8Project-Developed Tests(Treatment Schools)
- Students displayed statistically significant
increases (i.e., large effect sizes). - Students currently enrolled in ESOL programs
(ESOL levels 1 to 4) showed achievement gains
comparable to ESOL level 5 and non-ESOL students
combined. - ESOL level 5 students (during the two-year
monitoring period after exiting ESOL programs)
performed highest and made most gains. - - Converging evidence on multiple measures
- - Analysis by (a) ESOL levels 1-4, (b) ESOL level
5, and (c) Non-ESOL
9High-Stakes Tests(Treatment and Comparison
Schools)
- Students at treatment schools showed higher
scores than students at comparison schools on - the measurement strand of the math test at grade
3 - the writing test at grade 4, and
- the science test at grade 5 (see graphs)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12State Science Achievement by Exposure Level
within Treatment
- Years in Mean Scale Percent
- P-SELL Score Passing
- 1 272 21
- 2 279 ½ SD 21
- 3 303 37
- The unconditional SD was about 60.
13Teacher Change
- Science as primary focus
- Integration with English language and literacy
- Integration with mathematics
14Science
- Science content knowledge
- Science inquiry to promote understanding
- hands-on and minds-on (reasoning and
application) - gradual shift from teacher-directed to
student-initiated inquiry - State science content standards
15English Language and Literacy
- Literacy strategies for all students
- ESOL strategies
- Discourse strategies
- Home language
- Home culture
16Mathematics
- Measurement and instruments
- Recording and display of data using
- graphs, charts, tables, and drawings
- Analysis and interpretation of data
17Published Online September 29, 2008 Published in
Print October 1, 2008 Education Week Finding
the Language to Teach Science
Nathessa Petit-Frere, left, whose
first language is Creole, gets help from Creole-
and English-speaker Princiana Pierre, center, as
English-speaker Kenyata Seide watches during
Martina Perezs 4th grade science class at
Gratigny Elementary School in Miami last week.
Andrew Innerarity for Education Week
18(No Transcript)
19InterventionCurriculum DevelopmentTeacher
Professional Development
20Curriculum Development
- P-SELL science curriculum for grades 3 through 5
covers all state science content standards in
preparation for high-stakes science test at grade
5 - P-SELL provides the teachers with
- (1) teachers guides,
- (2) student books, and
- (3) science supplies including trade books.
21Curriculum Development
- Grade 3 Measurement States of Matter
- Water Cycle and Weather
- Grade 4 Energy Force and Motion
- Processes of Life
- Grade 5 Nature of Matter, Earth Systems,
Synthesis - Nature of Science Embedded Throughout
- - Issue in urban settings Student mobility
22Teacher Professional Development
- Workshops
- - Year 1 five or six full-day workshops
- - Years 2/3 three or four full-day workshops
- - Year 4 no workshop and sustainability
- Research Activities
- Foster reflections on their own knowledge and
practices. - - Issue in urban settings Teacher mobility
23Challenges
- Limited science curriculum available for ELLs
- Slow and demanding process of teacher change in
reform-oriented science teaching with ELLs - School-wide intervention involving all teachers
- Costs for curriculum, science supplies, and
teacher professional development - Implications for scale-up
24ContextUrban SchoolsAccountability Policy
25Urban Schools Mobility
- Student mobility
- Impact on student achievement over time
- (grades 3 through 5)
- Teacher mobility
- Impact on teacher change over time
- (three-year participation in intervention)
- Principal mobility
- Fidelity of implementation
- Implications for efficacy and effectiveness
26Why Worry About Mobility?
- Mobility tends to underestimate the impact of
intervention on teacher and student outcomes - Complicates intervention
- Compromises fidelity of implementation
- Disrupts teachers professional growth
- Disrupts students learning progression
27Science Accountability
- NCLB has required that by the 2007-2008 school
year each state must have in place science
assessments to be administered and reported for
formative purposes at least once during grades
3-5, grades 6-9, and grades 10-12. - - Nearly all states administer science
assessments. - - It is unclear how many states report science
- assessment results.
- It is unclear how many states include science
assessment results in state accountability.
28Science Accountability
- As of 2009, NCLB had not required science to be
included in AYP calculation, although a state
could choose to include science as an additional
academic indicator. - A web-based search (as of fall of 2008) did not
- uncover any state that included science
- assessments in AYP calculation.
-
- The ultimate role that science will play hinges
on decisions in the reauthorization of NCLB.
29Why Worry about Accountability?
- Impact on subjects that are taught When science
is part of accountability - Impact on subjects that are not taught When
science is not part of accountability - Impact on science in urban schools Resources
- Impact on science with ELLs Perceived urgency of
literacy and numeracy
30Take-Home Message
31ELLs Funds of Knowledge
- Value and respect ELLs experiences from home and
community - Articulate ELLs linguistic and cultural
knowledge with science disciplines - Adjust to ELLs differing needs when deciding how
much explicit instruction to provide and how to
guide students for their own learning.
32Curriculum and Instruction
- Engage ELLs in an academically rigorous science
curriculum aligned with reform-oriented practices
according to national and state science content
standards. - Engage ELLs in hands-on, inquiry-based science to
promote scientific understanding, inquiry, and
discourse. - Ensure instructional time for science in
low-performing urban schools where science tends
to be ignored due to the urgency of developing
basic literacy and numeracy of ELLs.
33Professional Developmentand Resources
- Offer school-wide professional development (PD)
opportunities, especially for teachers who
normally do not volunteer for such opportunities. - Coordinate curriculum and instruction across
grade levels, as ELLs acquire English language
and literacy at advancing levels of proficiency
while demonstrating the learning progression in
academic content. - Provide adequate resources and funding for
science instruction in urban schools where ELLs
tend to be concentrated.