A System for Creating Specialized DDS Architectures


1
A System for Creating Specialized DDS
Architectures
Research and Work By Tom Puzak Nathan
Viniconis Solomon Berhe Jeffrey Peck
Project web site http//www.revrick.net/CSE333/P
rojectTimeline.htm
2
Objectives

• Break down multiple (Data Distribution System)
  DDS architectures into their main components.
• Create a unified view of the differing
  architectures in UML.
• Tag elements in each component with the
  attributes of each DDS analyzed.
• Propose a method to generate DDS architectures by
  utilizing the component breakdown and attribute
  selection.

3
Process

• Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs
• Step 2 Determine main common components
• Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
  into disjoint entities.
• Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
  DDSs together within each component
• Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
  inheritance lines with them
• Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
  given attributes in which to customize
• Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
  and more

4
Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs

• DDSs are used to transfer data across a network
  however the methods involved vary.
• To generate a more complete picture of the
  generic DDS architecture analysis of existing
  DDSs needs to take place over a broad scope.
• We chose four DDSs
• Unix FTP FTP Protocol
• Limewire Gnutella Protocol
• BitTorrent BitTorrent Protocol
• DC Direct Connect Protocol (not standard)
• They are all File Sharing Applications but their
  underlying functionality is different.

5
Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs

• The DDSs were chosen to show a wide range of
  functionality
• FTP was chosen because of its simplicity
• Sever and client have separate well-defined
  roles
• Maintains separate connections for data and
  messages (i.e. commands)
• Lots of documentation available
• Limewire represents an interesting and very
  popular peer-to-peer system
• No central server every client is also a server
• Every client maintains network
• Searches traverse the network to a defined depth

6
Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs

• BitTorrent was chosen because it is exotic.
• It does not behave like any other peer-to-peer
  file sharing system.
• Very large files are broken into small pieces
  which are held together by .torrent files
  which contain information about the files.
• A new solution to the problem of transferring
  large files over the Internet
• Direct Connect was chosen because it represents a
  simple peer-to-peer system that utilizes its
  own non-standard protocol.
• Clients connect to a hub where they search for
  other clients files and then directly connect.
• Maintains security restricting certain functions
  on the hub from non-Op users.

7
Process

• Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs
• Step 2 Determine main common components
• Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
  into disjoint entities.
• Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
  DDSs together within each component
• Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
  inheritance lines with them
• Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
  given attributes in which to customize
• Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
  and more

8
Step 2 Determine main common components
FTP
Limewire

• Network Connection
• Search
• Different Security Mechanism
• GUI

DirectConnect
BitTorrent
9
Step 2 Determine main common components

• Initial focus of research is the Network
  Communication
• Communication between peers
• Commucication between host and server
• Responsible for sending/receiving msg/files
• Responsible for searching mechanism

10
Process

• Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs
• Step 2 Determine main common components
• Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
  into disjoint entities.
• Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
  DDSs together within each component
• Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
  inheritance lines with them
• Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
  given attributes in which to customize
• Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
  and more

11
Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
into disjoint entities.

• Sources
• Use Papers
• Open APIs
• Problems
• Within one DDSs components overlap significantly
• Searching relies on the network communication
• Security is wrapped into everything
• Solutions
• Strip away functionality which is overlapping
• This creates a generic and an application
  specific layer

12
Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
into disjoint entities.
Network Communication
Network Communication
Search
Search
13
Process

• Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs
• Step 2 Determine main common components
• Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
  into disjoint entities.
• Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
  DDSs together within each component
• Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
  inheritance lines with them
• Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
  given attributes in which to customize
• Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
  and more

14
Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
DDSs together within each component

• A global component is created that is a superset
  of all generic architectures from every DDS.
• After all generic layer for all DDSs have been
  found the architectures are added together to
  create a larger one.
• Find generic layer for each DDS.
• Add the resulting architectures together to
  create a larger one.

15
Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
DDSs together within each component
16
Process

• Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs
• Step 2 Determine main common components
• Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
  into disjoint entities.
• Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
  DDSs together within each component
• Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
  inheritance lines with them
• Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
  given attributes in which to customize
• Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
  and more

17
Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
inheritance lines with them

• Each component has been broken up into a generic
  and application layer.

• The generic layers components are inherited by
  each DDS.
• Attribute sets for each inheritance through the
  generic layer will be found.

18
Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
inheritance lines with them

• The attribute sets pertaining to each inheritance
  line have to be carefully chosen.
• These will be the base of a new DDS architecture.
• Some examples of the possible attributes that may
  be used can be seen through the search example.
• Generic Layer FTP Layer
• Search over Telnet
• FTP language
• Use file/directory structure search
• Generic Layer BitTorrent
• Search over HTTP
• Query DB of file locations
• Return connection information for file host
• Generic Layer Limewire
• Deep search through network traversal
• Utilize caching
• Limit depth searched

19
Process

• Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs
• Step 2 Determine main common components
• Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
  into disjoint entities.
• Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
  DDSs together within each component
• Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
  inheritance lines with them
• Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
  given attributes in which to customize
• Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
  and more

20
Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
given attributes in which to customize

• Sets of attributes have now been given to the
  inheritances through the generic layer within
  each component.
• The user will be able to view the different sets
  of attributes available for each component.
• Next the user selects the best-fit attribute set
  for each component.
• The application layer component of each chosen
  attribute set is returned and is displayed to the
  user.
• As a result
• As more DDSs are analyzed and added to this
  system the number of possible outcomes rapidly
  grows.

21
Process

• Step 1 Pick a subset of existing DDSs
• Step 2 Determine main common components
• Step 3 Break up the components within each DDS
  into disjoint entities.
• Step 4 Combine the breakdowns of the different
  DDSs together within each component
• Step 5 Determine a set of attributes and tag
  inheritance lines with them
• Step 6 Create an architecture based on a set of
  given attributes in which to customize
• Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
  and more

22
Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
and more

• For this final step we plan on analyzing our
  work
• Any difficulties encountered will be discussed.
• Could we have taken measures to avoid problems
• We will make conclusions
• Did we successfully create an architecture by
  which a new DDS could be spawned
• Is our architecture thorough
• Is our theoretical model able to work in reality
• Could the use of our architecture benefit a DDS
  creator by saving time money or both

23
Step 7 Analysis Conclusions Problem summary
and more

• We will analyze our UML structure
• Did we use the proper diagrams to express the
  ideas behind our research
• Was UML able to accurately simulate our
  theoretical model
• Would our final UML model able to clearly
  demonstrate our generic DDS architecture to
  somebody who is outside the project
• A novel idea is tagging the inheritance found in
  UML with attributes that describe the specific
  gains of the class.

24
Individual Focus

• Each group member took a different DDS to break
  down and analyze.
• Solomon Berhe Limewire
• Jeff Peck DC
• Tom Puzak FTP
• Nate Viniconis BitTorrent
• The responsibilities include
• Creating an overview UML class diagram describing
  the workings of the application
• Breaking the UML diagram into the main components
• Proposing a generic layer for each main component
  contained within.

25
Original Project Focus

• Analyze existing DDSs and break them down into
  their functional components
• Combine the UML diagrams of the each component
  together into a global component
• Tag different areas of each global components
  with attributes
• Develop a set of hueristics for generating a
  customized DDS using
• user selected attributes
• global version of each component

26
Current Progress

• Identified some major DDS components
• Defined generic root of the Network
  Communication tree
• Began creation of UML class diagrams. FTP Ex

27
Planned Future Activities

• Finalize list of common components
• Diagram components with UML
• Discretize overlapping components in UML diagrams
• Break down components into their most generic
  pieces
• Develop unified view of broken down components
• Inheritence hierarchy

28
Future Activities (Continued)

• Describe inheritence in terms of attributes
• Propose method for creating customized DDS
  architectures based on attributes
• Analyze the performance the architecture engine

29
References (1)
30
References (2)