Financing Municipalities and relevance of Credit Rating the Indian experience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Financing Municipalities and relevance of Credit Rating the Indian experience

Description:

International Conference on Financing Muncipalities and Sub-National Governments, ... No lien period commence from 360 and 180 days prior to the principal and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: developm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Financing Municipalities and relevance of Credit Rating the Indian experience


1
Financing Municipalities and relevance of Credit
Rating - the Indian experience
  • International Conference on Financing
    Muncipalities and Sub-National Governments,
    Washington
  • October 1, 2004

Roopa Kudva
Executive Director Chief Rating Officer,
CRISIL Limited, India
2
Presentation flow
  • Introduction to CRISIL
  • Credit Rating Definition
  • Urban Infrastructure in India A snapshot
  • Benefits of Credit Rating of Urban Local bodies
  • CRISIL Ratings for borrowing programmes of Urban
    Local bodies
  • Credit enhancement mechanisms and illustration
  • Conclusion

3
About CRISIL
  • First and the largest credit rating agency in
    India
  • 4th Largest Rating Agency in the World
  • Affiliation with Standard Poors (USA)
  • The first to rate a state government in India
    Gujarat
  • The first municipal bond rating in Asia
    Ahmedabad
  • Credit assessment of all the major state
    governments and more than 100 urban local bodies
    in the country. This also includes
  • 5 municipal corporations
  • 2 Water and Sewerage Service providers

4
What is Credit Rating?
  • Credit Rating is an opinion on the relative
    degree of safety regarding debt obligations being
    met on time.
  • It is an opinion, not a recommendation
  • Relative degree of safety vis-a-vis other debt
    instruments
  • Timeliness is key
  • Instrument-specific could be different for a
    structured instrument and stand-alone
  • Assigned by a committee of experts in finance,
    management economics, after a detailed and
    in-depth discussion

5
CRISILs Rating Scale
6
Current status of urban infrastructure
  • Current availability of urban infrastructure is
    inadequate
  • Most of the ULBs do not meet the WHO water supply
    (140 LPCD) and sewerage services norms (80 of
    the water supplied)
  • Solid waste management services need
    modernization
  • Though roads are mostly available their quality
    is poor

7
Current status of urban infrastructure
Sharply growing urban population is putting
pressure on already stretched urban
infrastructure
8
Capital Expenditure Requirement
  • Estimates of capex on urban civic services show
    significant expenditure requirements

9
Sources to fund urban infrastructure
  • Fund and non-fund based support from the state
    government
  • Capital grants
  • Direct project specific loans
  • Support to borrowing programmes through
    guarantee
  • Project specific/reform oriented assistance from
    the central government
  • Mega city scheme
  • City Challenge fund
  • National slum development programmes
  • Projects to be under taken in accordance with the
    planning commission recommendation
  • Internal sources

10
Growing importance of market borrowing
  • Pressure on funding sources
  • Traditionally, most projects have been funded
    through state government support. However, this
    source is declining
  • Strained fiscal position, results in lowering of
    fund based support
  • Mounting guarantee levels limit the non fund
    based support
  • Abolition of octroi has impacted buoyancy in the
    revenues
  • This necessitates the use of market borrowing for
    funding the urban infrastructure projects.
  • Credit rating is vital for market borrowing

11
Credit Rating of Urban Local Bodies Benefits
  • Use of market borrowings to bridge gap in
    critical infrastructure can accelerate economic
    growth in the service area
  • Increased accessibility to funds from the capital
    markets
  • Improved visibility - facilitates flow of
    international capital
  • Potential for creation of a municipal bonds market

12
Credit Rating of Urban Local Bodies Benefits
  • Helps benchmarking with other urban local bodies
  • Municipal corporations like Ahmedabad, Nashik
    Thane have used market borrowings to part fund
    their projects
  • Helps in monitoring overall debt level finances
  • Provides investors an independent and unbiased
    evaluation of credit quality
  • Helps investors in pricing the debt offer

13
CRISIL ratings for Urban Local Bodies
14
CRISIL rating methodology for Urban Local Bodies
  • CRISILs Rating Methodology involves an in-depth
    assessment of the following factors
  • Legal and Administrative framework
  • Economic base of the service area.
  • Municipal finances
  • Existing operations of the municipal body
  • Managerial Assessment
  • Project specific issues
  • Credit Enhancement Structure

15
Need for credit enhancement
  • Relatively low standalone credit quality of most
    local bodies/water boards necessitates
    credit enhancement.
  • Rating can be enhanced to a target rating through
    credit enhancement mechanisms.

16
Credit enhancement alternatives
  • Escrowing of dedicated revenue streams
  • Full guarantee from an entity with superior
    credit profile
  • Partial guarantee mechanism
  • Pledging of cash collateral
  • Partial amount guarantee
  • Partial tenor guarantee
  • Partial interest guarantee
  • Pool financing

17
Rating approach to structured Bonds
  • Full guarantee Rating of the guarantor
  • Cash Collateral Coverage of debt and stand
    alone rating
  • Partial guarantee Credit view on issuing entity
    and guarantor
  • Escrow structures / Interception grants
  • Separately identifiable cash flow stream
  • Quality and sustainability of the cash flow
    stream
  • Pool Financing
  • Smaller Urban local bodies aggregating to raise
    funds
  • Useful for Urban local bodies with weaker credit
    profile as pooling leads to diversification of
    Risk

18
Pool Financing
ULB 1
SPV
  INVESTORS
Legend Structured Bonds Issue Proceeds Bonds Subs
criptions Subsequent Repayments
ULB 10
19
Pool Financing (cont.)
  • Advantages
  • Diversification of risk
  • Structuring possible to enhance credit quality
  • Optimum use of credit enhancement
  • Credit enhancement by multilaterals or Government

20
Rating approach for pool financing
  • Credit analysis of the pool of assets (Urban
    local bodies)
  • Cash flow analysis
  • Sizing credit enhancement
  • Payment structure analysis
  • Legal analysis

21
Illustrations of credit enhanced ratings
  • Nashik Municipal Corporation
  • Size of the bond programme USD 22 mn
  • Salient features of the credit enhancement
  • Escrow of Octroi receivable
  • No lien period commence from 360 and 180 days
    prior to the principal and interest payment
    respectively
  • Monthly annuity payment
  • Rating Assigned AA(So)

22
Illustrations of credit enhanced ratings
  • Chennai Metropolitan Water and
    Sewerage Board
  • Size of the bond programme USD 22 mn
  • Salient features of the credit enhancement
  • Escrow of water charges receivable
  • No lien period commence from 360 and 180 days
    prior to the principal and interest payment
    respectively
  • Monthly annuity payment
  • Rating Assigned AA(So)

23
Illustrations of credit enhanced ratings
  • A group of 116 ULBs (a pool financing case)
  • Size of the bond programme USD 22 mn
  • Salient features of the credit enhancement
  • State government guarantee 35
  • Cash collateral 35.9
  • Bond would be floated by a SPV
  • Target Rating A (so)

24
Conclusion
  • Significant need for capital expenditure
  • Growing population has intensified the need to
    improve the existing services
  • Limited funding support from traditional sources
  • Already high level of state government guarantees
  • The relatively low credit quality of many state
    governments restricts any meaningful credit
    enhancement
  • Increasing use of market borrowing as a funding
    option

25
Conclusion
  • Most of the ULBs borrowing programme would
    necessarily require a credit enhancement due to
    their weak credit profiles
  • Market discipline will have a beneficial impact
    on the reforming ULBs systems and process
  • User charges would be rationalized to attain
    project viability

26
Thank You
Contact Details Phone 91 (22) 5691 3001- 09
Fax 91 (22) 5691 3000 www.crisil.com
27
Annexure CRISILs criteria for rating urban
local bodies1. Legal Administrative Framework
  • Municipal functional domain as defined by the
    relevant act
  • Decision making process
  • State government transfers
  • Tax rates basis of assessment
  • Borrowing powers ability to pledge revenues
  • State government municipal linkages

28
2. Economic Base of the Service Area
  • Population base and growth rate
  • Level of industrial and commercial activity
  • Diversity and elasticity of tax base
  • Per capita income levels
  • Prospects for widening of tax base

29
3. Municipal Finances
  • Accounting quality
  • Overall surplus/deficit on revenue account
  • Profile and trends in tax and non tax revenues
  • Property tax effort Demand raised, rates,
    systems, coll. eff.
  • Dependence on SG transfers Stability
    transparency
  • Expenditure profile Head wise activity wise
  • Capital receipts and expenditures - Trends
  • Debt profile Cost, tenure, coverage
  • Future sources of revenue growth
  • Measures to curtail revenue expenditure

30
4. Existing Operations
  • Range of services obligatory/discretionary
    functions.
  • Core services Water, sewerage facilities,
    primary education health, etc.
  • Systems in place for delivery of these services
  • Level and trend of past expenditure on these
    services.
  • Proposed level of service enhancement
  • Major projects undertaken

31
5. Managerial Assessment
  • Linkage between financial health initiatives
    taken by a proactive management.
  • Organizational structure
  • Administrative systems and procedures
  • Project management skills
  • Level of control on expenditure
  • Initiatives taken to enhance resources and
    improve collection mechanisms

32
6. Project Details
  • Proposed projects
  • Project tenure and funding patterns
  • Debt servicing requirements due to new projects
  • Existing level of service improvements
    envisaged
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com