Title: Financing Municipalities and relevance of Credit Rating the Indian experience
1Financing Municipalities and relevance of Credit
Rating - the Indian experience
- International Conference on Financing
Muncipalities and Sub-National Governments,
Washington - October 1, 2004
Roopa Kudva
Executive Director Chief Rating Officer,
CRISIL Limited, India
2Presentation flow
- Introduction to CRISIL
- Credit Rating Definition
- Urban Infrastructure in India A snapshot
- Benefits of Credit Rating of Urban Local bodies
- CRISIL Ratings for borrowing programmes of Urban
Local bodies - Credit enhancement mechanisms and illustration
- Conclusion
3About CRISIL
- First and the largest credit rating agency in
India - 4th Largest Rating Agency in the World
- Affiliation with Standard Poors (USA)
- The first to rate a state government in India
Gujarat - The first municipal bond rating in Asia
Ahmedabad - Credit assessment of all the major state
governments and more than 100 urban local bodies
in the country. This also includes - 5 municipal corporations
- 2 Water and Sewerage Service providers
4What is Credit Rating?
- Credit Rating is an opinion on the relative
degree of safety regarding debt obligations being
met on time. - It is an opinion, not a recommendation
- Relative degree of safety vis-a-vis other debt
instruments - Timeliness is key
- Instrument-specific could be different for a
structured instrument and stand-alone - Assigned by a committee of experts in finance,
management economics, after a detailed and
in-depth discussion
5CRISILs Rating Scale
6Current status of urban infrastructure
- Current availability of urban infrastructure is
inadequate - Most of the ULBs do not meet the WHO water supply
(140 LPCD) and sewerage services norms (80 of
the water supplied) - Solid waste management services need
modernization - Though roads are mostly available their quality
is poor
7Current status of urban infrastructure
Sharply growing urban population is putting
pressure on already stretched urban
infrastructure
8Capital Expenditure Requirement
- Estimates of capex on urban civic services show
significant expenditure requirements
9Sources to fund urban infrastructure
- Fund and non-fund based support from the state
government - Capital grants
- Direct project specific loans
- Support to borrowing programmes through
guarantee - Project specific/reform oriented assistance from
the central government - Mega city scheme
- City Challenge fund
- National slum development programmes
- Projects to be under taken in accordance with the
planning commission recommendation - Internal sources
10Growing importance of market borrowing
- Pressure on funding sources
- Traditionally, most projects have been funded
through state government support. However, this
source is declining - Strained fiscal position, results in lowering of
fund based support - Mounting guarantee levels limit the non fund
based support - Abolition of octroi has impacted buoyancy in the
revenues - This necessitates the use of market borrowing for
funding the urban infrastructure projects. - Credit rating is vital for market borrowing
11Credit Rating of Urban Local Bodies Benefits
- Use of market borrowings to bridge gap in
critical infrastructure can accelerate economic
growth in the service area - Increased accessibility to funds from the capital
markets - Improved visibility - facilitates flow of
international capital - Potential for creation of a municipal bonds market
12Credit Rating of Urban Local Bodies Benefits
- Helps benchmarking with other urban local bodies
- Municipal corporations like Ahmedabad, Nashik
Thane have used market borrowings to part fund
their projects - Helps in monitoring overall debt level finances
- Provides investors an independent and unbiased
evaluation of credit quality - Helps investors in pricing the debt offer
13CRISIL ratings for Urban Local Bodies
14CRISIL rating methodology for Urban Local Bodies
- CRISILs Rating Methodology involves an in-depth
assessment of the following factors - Legal and Administrative framework
- Economic base of the service area.
- Municipal finances
- Existing operations of the municipal body
- Managerial Assessment
- Project specific issues
- Credit Enhancement Structure
15 Need for credit enhancement
- Relatively low standalone credit quality of most
local bodies/water boards necessitates
credit enhancement. - Rating can be enhanced to a target rating through
credit enhancement mechanisms.
16 Credit enhancement alternatives
- Escrowing of dedicated revenue streams
- Full guarantee from an entity with superior
credit profile - Partial guarantee mechanism
- Pledging of cash collateral
- Partial amount guarantee
- Partial tenor guarantee
- Partial interest guarantee
- Pool financing
17Rating approach to structured Bonds
- Full guarantee Rating of the guarantor
- Cash Collateral Coverage of debt and stand
alone rating - Partial guarantee Credit view on issuing entity
and guarantor - Escrow structures / Interception grants
- Separately identifiable cash flow stream
- Quality and sustainability of the cash flow
stream - Pool Financing
- Smaller Urban local bodies aggregating to raise
funds - Useful for Urban local bodies with weaker credit
profile as pooling leads to diversification of
Risk
18Pool Financing
ULB 1
SPV
INVESTORS
Legend Structured Bonds Issue Proceeds Bonds Subs
criptions Subsequent Repayments
ULB 10
19 Pool Financing (cont.)
- Advantages
- Diversification of risk
- Structuring possible to enhance credit quality
- Optimum use of credit enhancement
- Credit enhancement by multilaterals or Government
20Rating approach for pool financing
- Credit analysis of the pool of assets (Urban
local bodies) - Cash flow analysis
- Sizing credit enhancement
- Payment structure analysis
- Legal analysis
21Illustrations of credit enhanced ratings
- Nashik Municipal Corporation
- Size of the bond programme USD 22 mn
- Salient features of the credit enhancement
- Escrow of Octroi receivable
- No lien period commence from 360 and 180 days
prior to the principal and interest payment
respectively - Monthly annuity payment
- Rating Assigned AA(So)
22Illustrations of credit enhanced ratings
- Chennai Metropolitan Water and
Sewerage Board - Size of the bond programme USD 22 mn
- Salient features of the credit enhancement
- Escrow of water charges receivable
- No lien period commence from 360 and 180 days
prior to the principal and interest payment
respectively - Monthly annuity payment
- Rating Assigned AA(So)
23Illustrations of credit enhanced ratings
- A group of 116 ULBs (a pool financing case)
- Size of the bond programme USD 22 mn
- Salient features of the credit enhancement
- State government guarantee 35
- Cash collateral 35.9
- Bond would be floated by a SPV
- Target Rating A (so)
24Conclusion
- Significant need for capital expenditure
- Growing population has intensified the need to
improve the existing services - Limited funding support from traditional sources
- Already high level of state government guarantees
- The relatively low credit quality of many state
governments restricts any meaningful credit
enhancement - Increasing use of market borrowing as a funding
option
25Conclusion
- Most of the ULBs borrowing programme would
necessarily require a credit enhancement due to
their weak credit profiles - Market discipline will have a beneficial impact
on the reforming ULBs systems and process - User charges would be rationalized to attain
project viability
26Thank You
Contact Details Phone 91 (22) 5691 3001- 09
Fax 91 (22) 5691 3000 www.crisil.com
27Annexure CRISILs criteria for rating urban
local bodies1. Legal Administrative Framework
- Municipal functional domain as defined by the
relevant act - Decision making process
- State government transfers
- Tax rates basis of assessment
- Borrowing powers ability to pledge revenues
- State government municipal linkages
282. Economic Base of the Service Area
- Population base and growth rate
- Level of industrial and commercial activity
- Diversity and elasticity of tax base
- Per capita income levels
- Prospects for widening of tax base
293. Municipal Finances
- Accounting quality
- Overall surplus/deficit on revenue account
- Profile and trends in tax and non tax revenues
- Property tax effort Demand raised, rates,
systems, coll. eff. - Dependence on SG transfers Stability
transparency - Expenditure profile Head wise activity wise
- Capital receipts and expenditures - Trends
- Debt profile Cost, tenure, coverage
- Future sources of revenue growth
- Measures to curtail revenue expenditure
304. Existing Operations
- Range of services obligatory/discretionary
functions. - Core services Water, sewerage facilities,
primary education health, etc. - Systems in place for delivery of these services
- Level and trend of past expenditure on these
services. - Proposed level of service enhancement
- Major projects undertaken
315. Managerial Assessment
- Linkage between financial health initiatives
taken by a proactive management. - Organizational structure
- Administrative systems and procedures
- Project management skills
- Level of control on expenditure
- Initiatives taken to enhance resources and
improve collection mechanisms
326. Project Details
- Proposed projects
- Project tenure and funding patterns
- Debt servicing requirements due to new projects
- Existing level of service improvements
envisaged