Social Validation Ethical Practices When Conducting Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Validation Ethical Practices When Conducting Research

Description:

Informed consent is provided. Welfare and dignity of person is protected. ... How informed consent will be obtained. How will confidentiality be guaranteed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: martin93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Validation Ethical Practices When Conducting Research


1
Social ValidationEthical Practices When
Conducting Research
  • EDEX 5150
  • Spring, 2007

2
Agenda
  • Discuss value of social validity.
  • Discuss types of socially valid data.
  • Discuss limitations of social validity.
  • Discuss ethics involved in single subject
    research.

3
Need for Social Validation
  • By definition, single subject research involves
    applied research--it is about understanding
    behavioral relationships in targeted
    environments.
  • As such, it involves people who impact other
    people in those or other settings or environments.

4
  • As a democracy that values individual freedom and
    choice, we, as a society, believe that
    people--especially those who are most devalued or
    marginalized (persons with disabilities)--have
    the right to inform researchers about
    interventions/treatments and their effects, and,
    ultimately, whether they wish to receive the
    intervention/treatment.

5
Historical Antecedents
  • Nuremberg Trials
  • The Perils of Behavior Modification--fear of
    behavioral language manipulation, control,
    consequent responding, behavior is determined, no
    real free will, distrust of self-reports (verbal
    behavior).
  • How people felt got little attention--later
    realization that the social importance of
    research is necessary (Kazdin, Wolf).

6
Social Validity
  • Social validity aims to assess the acceptability
    of behavioral interventions with key
    stakeholders person receiving the intervention,
    parents, cooperating teachers, therapists,
    siblings, peers, and other persons in
    individuals universe.
  • Social validity seeks to obtain data on
    acceptability and desirability of the goals,
    procedures, and/or magnitude of effects
    (outcomes).

7
  • Social validity involves
  • Subjective Evaluations
  • or
  • Normative Comparisons

8
Subjective Evaluations
  • Questionnaires (e.g., survey).
  • Forced choice procedures (e.g., Which of the
    following skills would you like to improve?, or
    Which of the following self-determination
    strategies do you wish to learn?).

9
  • Likert-scale Do you think this goal is an
    appropriate learning skill for Ellen?
  • 1________3_______5
  • I strongly I agree I strongly
  • disagree agree
  • Interview (structured or open-ended questions).

10
Normative Comparisons
  • Comparison is made between target group and
    normative population (Would typical third
    graders have this goal? Would we use this
    behavior management procedure with third
    graders? What is the frequency of occurrence
    of on task behaviors for third graders?)
  • Such social validity gives the intervention
    validity and acceptability.

11
Limitations
  • Is the normative group representative?
  • Is the normative level acceptable?

12
General Limitations of Social Validity
  • Subjective--opinions/perceptions may differ from
    observational data.
  • Verbal data vs. behavioral performance (say vs.
    do)
  • Acquiescence
  • Primary or secondary measure?

13
Ethics
  • Goal of science is to advance knowledge, with the
    understanding that scientists will conduct
    research in an ethical manner.
  • This is especially true for professionals who
    work with people (e.g., physicians,
    psychologists, educators).

14
Ethical Assumptions When Conducting Research
  • Research is designed to benefit the participant.
  • Informed consent is provided.
  • Welfare and dignity of person is protected.
  • Participant may decline to participant at any
    time.
  • Research should not involve discomfort, harm, or
    danger, but if these may be present, the
    participant must be fully informed, and efforts
    to minimize them must be taken.

15
  • Full confidentiality needs to be guaranteed.
  • In particular, these safeguards must be
    guaranteed for special populations.

16
Ethical Practices
  • Behavioral research requires in most cases a
    human subjects review in which the researcher
    describes how s/he will respect the rights of
    participants--in particular, why the target
    behavior is interfering with normal functioning
    and why the intervention, if successful, will
    make life better for the participant.

17
Informed Consent
  • Need to describe
  • Purpose of study
  • Procedures to follow
  • Discomforts and risks
  • Potential benefits
  • Period of time
  • How informed consent will be
    obtained
  • How will confidentiality be guaranteed

18
  • Is the information sensitive?
  • (Most educational data arent.)
  • Can the human subjects be identified?
  • (Dont use names, but what about someone with
    a unique condition?)
  • Is there a plan to control access to the data?

19
Researcher Behavior
  • Must be expert.
  • Must be courteous.
  • Should involve teachers as partners and not make
    top-down decisions encourage input, share data.

20
Ethical Problems with Single Subject Research
  • Extended baselines.
  • Reversals.
  • Stability.
  • Experimental conventions.
  • Need to convince stakeholders that intervention
    is warranted, that design allows one to have
    confidence in studys findings, and that all
    students will receive appropriate intervention.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com