Title: Havana Workshop on Trade, Environment and Development
1Havana Workshop on Trade, Environment and
Development
- Conclusions
- Recommendations
- Preparing for future events
2Conclusions on Biodiversity-related issues
- Sui generis systems and protection of traditional
knowledge - Patents may not be an appropriate instrument
- Effective protection requires prior informed
consent, at national and multilateral levels - Art 27.3(b) of the TRIPs Agreement allows sui
generis systems for plant varieties and could be
extended to traditional knowledge
3Conclusions on Biodiversity-related issues
- Sui generis systems and protection of traditional
knowledge - National experiences with sui generis systems
show that a national biodiversity policy and a
legal framework are required - Legal system at the national level is not enough
multilateral legal framework is needed
4Conclusions on Biodiversity-related issues
- Sui generis systems and protection of traditional
knowledge - Ongoing debate in WTO and WIPO Developing
countries have proposed that prior informed
consent and material transfer agreements include
certificates of origin, opposition from several
developed countries
5Conclusions on Biodiversity-related issues
- Experiences with benefit sharing
- Process of learning by doing
- Contracts on Access are already being made, but
legal framework is required to ensure fair and
equitable benefit-sharing - Ownership has to be established clearly
6Conclusions on MEAs
- Recent developments (Biosafety Protocol, PIC
Convention, PoPs) address and minimize the risks
of potential conflict between MEA trade measures
and WTO rules - However the issue of eco-labelling and technology
transfer still need to be resolved
7Conclusions on EPPs
- Organic food has a niche market, but that market
is growing rapidly - Food security may be taken into account by
countries - Products that could be mainstreamed have to be
identified - Mainstream marketing channels have to be explored
8Conclusions on Market Access
- There are significant effects of health and
environmental requirements on market access - Fisheries (India, Cuba, Rep. Tanzania,
Bangladesh) - Coffee and honey (Cuba)
- Tea, mango pulp, peanuts (India)
- Textiles (Bangladesh, India, Tunisia)
9Conclusions on Market Access
- Effects are not uniform across sectors
- Fisheries high costs of compliance
- Coffee, honey and peanuts testing is difficult
and even technically impossible - Scientific justification for standards is not
always clear to developing countries
10Conclusions on Market Access
- What to do about it?
- WTO challenge (dispute settlement) is costly
- Standards could be challenged where they are
deemed to be protectionist or restrict trade
unnecessarily - Use review processes of WTO (SPS and TBT
Committees) - Prepare strong case studies (London)
11Conclusions on Trade Liberalization and the
Environment Agriculture
- Brazil removal of subsidies resulted in
environmental benefits, good environmental
policies were put in place simultaneously - No consensus on multifunctionality
- Need to define support measures and other
measures that promote food security and
development
12Conclusions on Textiles
- Bangladesh
- child labour issues used to be more important,
but MoU with ILO has resolved issue of pressure
for trade restrictions - With increased production of textiles,
environmental impacts become more important
13Conclusions on Textiles
- Tunisia
- Environmental factors are becoming important in
trade relations with European Union - Eco-labels
- Environmental management systems
- Informal requirements by buyers
- Industry is responding effectively
14Conclusions on Technology issues
- Evolution away from technology transfer to
technology management and technology development
concepts - What to do for SMEs?
- How to comercialise existing RD in developing
countries? - How to promote technology development agreements
between private investors and companies in
developing countries (example Inbio-Merck)
15Conclusions on Technology issues
- Incentive packages are needed nationally
- How can commitments by Governments (MEAs, TRIPS
and other WTO Agreements) be implemented? - Publicly funded research and development
- Capacity building needs for technology transfer
should be clearly identified - Capacity building is needed to develop projects
to benefit from ToT provisions in MEAs and to
adapt technologies to local conditions
16Conclusions on DPGs
- General problem of export of DPGs continues
- Some MEAs cover some DPGs, but not consumer
products - Institutional and regulatory structures at the
domestic level are helpful
17DPGs
- Technical assistance needed for identifying DPGs
and their effect on human health, trade and
development - South south information sharing
- Export notification of DPGs should be revived
18Recommendations
- Outcome of the project?
- Follow-up?
19Terms of reference for further studies
- Ongoing studies by researchers
- South Africa EPPs, Biodiversity/benefit sharing
- Philippines DPGs, EPPs (organic foods), ToT
- Tunisia transfer of technology
- Studies to be commissioned in other participating
countries
20Publication of papers
- Los Banos workshop
- Cuba workshop
21London roundtable, hosted by FIELD
- Agenda
- Dates
- Other Participants
22UNCTAD Expert Meeting on Traditional Knowledge
30 October to 1 November 2000
- In cooperation with WIPO and CBD
- Experts nominated by Governments, but once
nominated participate in their personal capacity
23UNCTAD Expert Meeting on Traditional Knowledge
30 October to 1 November 2000
- Systems
- National experiences
24Challenges
- How to add value to the work being undertaken in
CBD and WIPO? - Developmental aspects
- Trade aspects
25Systems
- Legal forms of protection
- (a) conventional IPR regimes
- (b) sui generis systems
- (c) national access and benefit-sharing
legislation, embodying the prior informed consent
principle - (d) contractual agreements and
- (e) customary and common-law regimes
26Systems
- Non-legally binding forms of protection
- (a) voluntary guidelines
- (b) codes of conduct and
- (c) traditional resource rights.
27National experienes
- Need to prepare papers and presentations
- Countries participating in this project
- Brazil
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
- India
- Philippines
- South Africa
- Tanzania, Rep. of
28UNEP/UNCTAD Task Force on Capacity Building in
Trade, Environment and Development
- Building on existing UNCTAD-UNEP co-operation
(MoU, 1997) - Response to growing demand from developing
countries - Open to other institutions
- Idea launched in briefing at UNCTAD X
29ObjectivesAssist developing countries in
- Enhancing understanding of trade and
environmental interface - Assessing environmental effects of trade
liberalization at the national level and trade
effects of environmental policies - Developing policy packages
- Participating effectively in international
deliberations
30Proposed activities during first year
- Thematic research
- Country-level studies
- Training
- Policy dialogues
- Public outreach
31 Thematic research
- Environmentally preferable products
- Subsidies in agricultural sector
32Country-level studies
- Integrated assessments in specific sectors,
building on UNEP experience - Policy coordination at national level, building
on UNCTAD/UNDP experience - Common characteristics
- Sector-specific
- National workshops
- Institutional partnerships(multi-stakeholder
approaches)
33Country-level studies
- 6 June Call for proposals
- Depending on financial resources four countries
will be selected by UNCTAD/UNEP for first year
34Training
- 4-day training courses, based on UNCTADs
TrainforTrade 2000 package - Four countries, in particular LDCs
35Policy dialogues
- Least Developed Countries
- Integrated assessment techniques to analyse the
impacts of trade policies - International seminar on trading opportunites for
environmentally preferable products - International seminar on environmental impacts of
subsidies in agriculture
36Network and information exchange
- Website
- Newsletter
- Database for networking
37South Africa workshop
- Preliminary ideas about dates