Keys to Native Nation Building - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Keys to Native Nation Building

Description:

Indian Self-Determination and Education Act, 1975 (Tribal Take-Over of Federal Programs) ... 'American Indians were conquered and lost their sovereignty. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: joanti
Category:
Tags: building | keys | nation | native

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Keys to Native Nation Building


1
  • Keys to Native Nation Building

2
IS THERE A NATIVE AMERICA?
DIMENSIONS OF DIVERSITY
  • Size Geography and Population
  • Location Urban v. Rural
  • History
  • Social Economic Conditions
  • Gaming v. Non-Gaming
  • Agriculture, Tourism, Manufacturing, Subsistence
  • Culture Historic and Contemporary
  • Language
  • Religion and Ceremony
  • Arts
  • Social Relations
  • Governmental Form

3
BUT WITH COMMON CHALLENGES
  • Political Self-Determination
  • Defending and Expanding Sovereignty
  • Exercising Powers of Self-Rule
  • Social and Cultural Self-Determination
  • Continuity of Shared Identity
  • Collective Commitment to the Nation
  • Economic, Social, and Cultural Well-Being
  • Reversing the Centuries of Deficits
  • A Place Where People Can and Want to Live

The Challenge is Nation Building
4
NATION BUILDING
  • Definition
  • The enhanced capacity of indigenous nations to
    realize their own cultural, educational,
    economic, environmental, and political objectives
    through foundational actions of their own design
    and initiation.

5
SUCCESSFUL NATIVE NATION BUILDING THE COMMON
PATTERN
  • The Sovereignty Attitude
  • Capable Institutions
  • Cultural Match
  • ..and
  • Leadership

6
KEYS TO NATION BUILDINGIN INDIAN COUNTRY
  • Indian Nations That Are Successful on Their Own
    Terms
  • Use Strong Leadership to
  • Assert the Right to Govern Themselves and
  • Exercise That Right Effectively
  • By Building Capable Governing Institutions
  • That Match Their Cultures.

7
  • What Constitutes Citizenship?
  • The Case of Upper Sioux

8
CASE SIMULATIONUPPER SIOUX CITIZENSHIP
  • Small Tribe, SW Minnesota
  • lt1000 Acres, lt1000 Members
  • Successful Casino
  • Every Upper Sioux Also a Member of Another Tribe
  • Chair Helen Blue-Redner Seeks Constitutional
    Reform
  • Sees Lack of Loyalty Dedication to Upper Sioux
  • Per Capita Payments Other Benefits Rising
    Membership
  • Constitutional Reform Options
  • Require Relinquishment of Citizenship in Any
    Other Tribe
  • Tight, Enforced Residency Requirement w/in 5
    Miles of Res
  • No Per Capita to Dual Enrollees and/or
    Non-Resident Members

9
Elements/Sources of Individual and Social Identity
  • Language
  • Property Owner
  • Commitment /-
  • Shared history
  • Political Views
  • Political Connections
  • Race/Blood Quantum
  • Descendency
  • Cultural Values
  • Residency
  • Family ties
  • /- Economic Contribution
  • Achievement
  • Status of Kin
  • Education
  • Friendships

10
  • Strategies of Nation Building
  • Darrin Old Coyote
  • Vice-Secretary of the Crow Nation

11
Sand and Gravel Resource Areas
Bentonite Resource Areas
Coal Resource Areas
CBM Areas
Oil and Gas
Limestone Resource Areas
12
Coal Resource Areas
13
Oil and Gas, CBM
14
  • Legal and Policy Foundations
  • of Tribal Sovereignty

15
FORMS OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY
  • Sovereignty as Self-Rule
  • De Jureby Law
  • De Factoin Practice
  • De Rectoby Moral Right

16
ORIGINS OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY
  • Pre-Contact Proto-Nationhood in North America
  • The Colonial Period
  • British v. Spanish and French Experience
  • Conflicts and Alliances
  • Early U.S. State-Tribal and Federal Tribal
    Relations
  • Alliances and Power Balances
  • The Founders and the Iroquois Confederacy
  • The U.S. Constitution

17
THE EBB AND FLOW OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY IN THE
UNITED STATES
18
TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ANDTHE U.S. CONSTITUTION
  • Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 The Congress
    shall have Power To regulate Commerce with
    foreign Nations, and among the several States,
    and with the Indian Tribes
  • Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 Representatives
    and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the
    several States which may be included within this
    Union, according to their respective Numbers,
    which shall be determined by adding to the whole
    Number of free Persons, including those bound to
    Service for a Term of Years, and excluding
    Indians not taxed
  • Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 To make all Laws
    which shall be necessary and proper for carrying
    into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all
    other Powers vested by this Constitution in the
    Government of the United States, or in any
    Department or Officer thereof.

19
THE FORMATION OFFEDERAL INDIAN POLICY
  • Trade and Intercourse Act, 1790 (Permit Required
    for Trade with Tribes)
  • Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1831 (Tribes Not
    Foreign Nations, but Domestic Dependent
    Nations)
  • Worcester v. Georgia, 1832 (Federal law supreme
    tribes are distinct, independent political
    communities retainingoriginal natural rights)
  • Jackson Removal Act, 1830 (Attempt to remove
    tribes to the western territories)
  • U.S. v. Kagama, 1886 (Federal Government is as a
    guardian to a ward)
  • Allotment Act, 1887 (Allotment of reservation
    lands to individual Indians sale of surplus
    lands)

20
VASCILATING FEDERAL POLICYSELF-DETERMINATION OR
TERMINATION?
  • Indian Reorganization Act, 1934 (Repeal of
    Allotment Constitutional Tribal Governments)
  • Termination Policy, 1953 (Official Policy to
    Terminate Disband Tribes 100 Terminated)
  • Indian Civil Rights Act, 1968 (Apply U.S. Bill of
    Rights to Tribes, Except Religious
    Non-Establishment, Voting Based on Race Review
    by Tribal Courts)
  • Nixon Self-Determination Policy, 1970 (Reverses
    Policy of Termination)
  • Indian Self-Determination and Education Act, 1975
    (Tribal Take-Over of Federal Programs)
  • Clinton Government-to-Government Executive Order,
    1998 (Tribal Consultation, Easier Waivers of
    Federal Statutes and Regulations).

21
RECENT EVOLUTION OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY
  • Oliphant v. Suquamish Tribe, 1978 (Tribes Lack
    Jurisdiction over Non-Indians)
  • California v. Cabazon, 1987 (States Lack
    Jurisdiction over Tribal Government Gaming)
  • Brendale v. Yakima Nation, 1989 (Tribes Lack
    Jurisdiction over Non-Indian Lands on Res)
  • Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley, 2001 (Tribes
    Cant Tax Non-Indian On-Res Land Owners)
  • Nevada v. Hicks, 2001 (Tribes Lack Jurisdiction
    over Non-Indian Law Enforcement on Res)

22
TAX STATUS OF INDIANS
23
SOURCES OF TRIBES SOVEREIGNTY
  • American Indians were conquered and lost their
    sovereignty.
  • There cant be multiple sovereigns in the same
    geographic area.
  • Tribal sovereignty means special rights for
    Indians.
  • Indian rights of sovereignty are race-based.

24
THE STATE OF TRIBES SOVEREIGNTY
  • Tribes arent really nations theyre more like
    clubs.
  • The treaties are out-of-date anachronisms.
  • Even if Indians originally had rights of
    self-rule, there are no authentic Indians left.
  • The U.S. is anti-sovereignty.

25
CONSEQUENCES OF TRIBES SOVEREIGNTY
  • Tribes may be sovereign, but their sovereignty
    produces lawlessness.
  • Sovereignty is a shibboleth. Reservations are
    just welfare states funded by the federal
    government.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com