ISG Agenda

1
ISG Agenda

• Welcome/Introductions
• Organization Briefings (5-15 minutes/briefing)
• Interagency Transformation, Education, After
  Action Review Erik Kjonnerod
• State/Coordinator for Reconstruction and
  Stabilization-Don Krumm
• Institute for Defense Analyses Mart Lidy
• State/Humanitarian Information Unit Doug Nash
• Joint Staff, J-7 Roger Corneretto
• Training Transformation TIM2 Hank Richmond
• Discussion

2
JIACG Educational Program

• 14-17 Feb at NSGC/NDU
• Developed for CENTCOM JIACG Expanded to include
  participants from all CoComs and additional
  command components
• Topics to be presented include
• Department and agency briefings
• NGO/IO/Multinational Organizations
• Joint Planning Process
• Link between Strategic and Theater-Strategic
  Levels
• Negotiations
• JIACG History/Models/Future
• Narco Terrorism Exercise
• Next JIACG Program for EUCOM in theater,
  April-May timeframe

3
JIACG Distance Learning

• Developing DL course in conjunction with the
  Joint Knowledge Development and Distribution
  Capability (JKDDC)
• Introductory level information --including
  background on the interagency process, an
  overview of interagency coordination mechanisms,
  and a description of interagency players
• Prerequisite to prepare for more detailed courses
  and exercises offered at NDU or the commands
• 6 month development phase
• Available online, password protected site
• Estimated at 16-20 seat hours

4
Other Initiatives

• POLAD Conference Erik Kjonnerod facilitated
  
  discussion on Joint Interagency Coordination
  Groups (JIACG).
• CRS ITEA is assisting with interagency
  roundtables and strategic policy games focusing
  on USG policy in several potential crisis
  regions.
• First exercise scheduled for 10-11 February
• Civil-Military Relations Video Series
• Working with NGOs and A Discussion on
  Civil-Military Planning are available.
• Working with the Military is in the final stages
  of production.

5
Other Initiatives

• ITEA Web Site Member site, which will consist of
  access to Blackboard, will be available within a
  month
• Member site can be accessed from current ITEA
  site
• Provides detailed course information (lesson
  plans)
• Users will have to register to receive password
• InfoWorkSpace Expanding capability in Gaming
  Center to support interagency and multi-national
  audiences for exercise participation and
  collaboration

Return to Agenda
6
Templates for Integrating the Multinational,
Multilateral, and Interagency Partners

• MNE Workshop
• 26-28 January 2005
• Scott R. FeilA. Martin LidyOperational
  Evaluation Division

7
Agenda
(1) Describes theUSG interagency capacity for
DefensePlanning Scenarios

• Evolving USG Civilian Concepts
• Transformation to an Integrated Civil-Military
  Architecture
• Complex Contingencies
• Support to Alliance Intergovernmental Organization

(3) Basis fordeveloping options to improve
alliance andcoalition management
(2) Basis for determiningS/CRS deployable
civiliancapabilities
8
S/CRS Mission

• The Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction
  and Stabilization (S/CRS) was established to
• Lead, coordinate, and institutionalize U.S.
  Government civilian capacity to prevent or
  prepare for post-conflict situations, and to help
  stabilize and reconstruct societies in transition
  from conflict or civil strife so they can reach a
  sustainable path toward peace, democracy and a
  market economy.

Mission covers USG civilian resource employment
(1) to prevent collapse and (2) to help
stabilize and reconstruct nations
Source S/CRS Briefing USA PKSOI, 13 Dec 04.
9
Mobilize and Deploy Additional USG Requirements
to Lead, Coordinate, Design and Manage

• S/CRS leadership and coordination TBD
• Additional positions needed for DoS to lead and
  coordinate USG civilian responses, mobilize
  international responses, and coordinate with
  military or multilateral operations
• Additional resources for planning, exercises,
  training for USG civilian agencies and to
  integrate civilian and military planning
• Diplomatic Operations Active Response Corps
  (ARC) TBD
• Additional DoS positions to create corps of
  specialists to deploy rapidly, participate in
  peace negotiations, develop relations with
  transitional governments, liaise with
  international organizations,and establish
  diplomatic operations
• Standby Corps of Active Response Corps graduates,
  5 year target TBD
• Technical Corps for design and management Skills
  TBD
• Additional positions needed in USG agencies
• Addressing transitional security and governance
• To design and manage programs and deliver a
  quality product
• Rapid design and delivery of civilian security
  programs will enhance their success and can
  help accelerate military drawdown
• State/INL Civilian Police TBD
• Justice Rule of Law TBD
• USAID Humanitarian, Governance, Economic TBD
• Advance Civilian Teams (ACTs)
• Drawn from Active Response and Technical Corps
• Deploy with military at brigade or division level
  and provide
• foundation for PRTs

Coordination is made or broken by whether we
have a diplomatic presence on the ground the
Active Response and Technical Corps give usthe
ability to deploy quickly when the momentum of
stabilization and reconstruction hangs in the
balance
Source S/CRS Briefing USA PKSOI, 13 Dec 04.
10
Two Strategic Level Cross-Sector Working Groups
(CSWGs)

• CSWG-Resources for Stability Operations
• Funding mechanisms and authorities
• Operational readiness corps and reserves
• Training
• Logistics
• Technology (e.g., databases, websites,
  collaborative workspace, field equipment,
  communications)
• Staff security
• CSWG-Monitoring, Analysis, and Intelligence
• Develop and put into practice a methodology for
  continuous monitoring and analysis
• Intelligence support to planning and operations

• Interagency Sectoral and Cross-Sectoral
  Working Group Tasks
• Agree on essential tasks Participate in
  planning and gaming exercises
• Prepare operational databases Participate in
  response management
• Identify gaps and deficiencies Establish and
  maintain international contact
• Generate lessons learned

Source Draft S/CRS Working Group Outline,
undated.
11
Humanitarian, Stabilization, and Reconstruction
Team (HSRT)

• Team of 4 to 6 trained civilian experts led by
  CRS and knowledgeable in
• Military and civilian agency planning and
  capabilities
• UN, other IGOs, and multinational partners
  capabilities and procedures
• Guided by CRSG on specific objectives for the
  relevant crisis
• Evolving policy decisions
• National Political Military Plan (NPMP)
• Deploys to Regional COCOM and is integrated into
  the staff
• Hosted by the JIACG-Full Spectrum
• Remains until end of major combat operations, or
  as mutually agreed
• Post-combat civilian command and control is
  through US Chief of Mission or designated
  civilian authority in affected nation
• Purpose is to
• Work with COCOM planning staff
• Develop stabilization and reconstruction plans
  for the combat and transition phase of the
  operation in coordination with CRSG
• Propose longer-term strategies to COCOM and CRSG
  when security permits, in coordination with
  S/CRS-led PCC which develops long-term RS plan
• Coordinate deployment of 10 to 20 person ACTs
  with the COCOM

Strategic-Theater and Operational Level
Source S/CRS Draft Concept of Operation, 16 Nov
04
12
Strategic Level Development of aNational
Political-Military Plan
(1)One NationalPM Plan, two supportingAnnexes
(2) Planningprocess shouldbe used for Phase
0and Phases 1-7
Strategic-National Level
NPMP Annex B CivilianOperations
Strategic-Theater Level
Coordinating USG response across sector and phase
involves collaboration among NSC, Joint Staff,
S/CRS staff. RCC, other intervention partners and
affected nation authorities
13
Civilian and Military InterventionResource
Requirements
Affected Nation Capacity
Generic NationalPolitical-MilitaryPlan Template
7 Self-sustaining Peace
Interagency planning is required for all
interventions Both civilian and military
resources are employed from Phase 0
through Phase 7 Transitions between phases
change lead and support roles
14
Coordinate with the International Community

• International Partners U.S. working with
  international partners to increase global
  capacity for peacekeeping and peace support
  activities
• Managing Relations on the Ground
• Rapid deployment of civilian presence allows
  field-based coordination of civilian-military
  operations
• Active Response and Technical Corps create a U.S.
  civilian base to coordinate with international
  partners, UN missions, and NGOs
• Work with affected nation authorities

UN Engaging DPKO, DPA, OCHA, UNDP, UNICEF to
coordinate security, emergency, and developmental
aid
EU Coordinating on constabulary, policy, judges,
civil administration, early warning For 2007,
550m stability instrument New European
constabulary initiative
Bilateral Partners UK new post conflict unit and
fund Germany establishing skills reserve France
named SR coordinator Nordics building niche
expertise
IFIs World Bank, IMF, Regional Banks creating
vehicles to assess and respond to conflict
G-8 Enhancing international peacekeeping and
constabulary capacity through trainequip Deepeni
ng support for regional organizations
Regional Organizations Neighbors bear 50 of
costs of conflict, but regional organizations
weak Priority Strengthen AU
How will the community be organized, what
information must beexchanged, and how will it be
accomplished for both classified and
unclassified domains?
15
Agenda

• Evolving USG Civilian Concepts
• Transformation to an Integrated Civil-Military
  Architecture
• Complex Contingencies
• Support to Alliance Intergovernmental Organization

16
Proposed Interagency Direct Support to Military
Forces
XXX
(2) Military force controls all territory
during combat operations, but becomesa tenant
in Phase 4
(1) ISTs coordinatecivilian and military
resources operatingin same AOR, andare
embedded in, train, and deploy with same
military HQ
X
Legend
CAT Civil Affairs TeamPOLAD Political
AdvisorRST Reconstruction and
Stabilization Team (or a Disaster
Assistance Response Team
(DART) starting with pre-conflict)
Tactical Level
17
Proposed GS to Civil Authorities Regional
Reconstruction Team (RRT)
(3) Could be filled byCivil Affairs
whensecurity puts civiliansat unacceptable
riskincludes affectednation government
(1) Aligned with national boundaries and could be
headed by military or civiliandepending on
security situation
(4) Includesaffected nationauthorities
Regional Reconstruction Team
Civil-MilitaryManagement Center
?
Civilian Section
Military Section
SecuritySupport
Economics
Governance
TransportationSupport
?
Transitional Security
Infrastructure
Communicationsand ComputerSupport
LifeSupport
HumanitarianAssistance
Rule of Law
Direction, coordination, and supervision
InformationOperations
Legend
Civil AffairsTeams (CATs)
Information reporting
OPCON
(5) ? Size of Securityelement and C2based on
situation
(2) Civil Affairs in general support to civil
authorities
ResourceManagement
Monitor, Analysis, and Intelligence
Tactical Level
18
Proposed US NIRS Headquarters
Chief of Mission
Regional COCOMCommander
National Interagency Reconstructionand
Stabilization Headquarters (NIRS)
USG Country Team
Joint InteragencyManagement Center
TacticalForces
Civilian Section
Military Section
Economics
Governance
SecurityOperations
TransportationSupport
Infrastructure
Transitional Security
Communicationsand ComputerSupport
HumanitarianAssistance
SecuritySupport
Rule of Law
Train and EquipAffected NationMilitary Forces
Strategic Communications
Life Support
Legend
RRTs
Direction, coordination, and supervision
Civilian-led
Information reporting
Military-led
COCOM (less OPCON)
ResourceManagement
Monitor, Analysis, and Intelligence
OPCON
Interagency Activities
OperationalLevel
Provides S/CRS and DoD plug to US Embassy in
affected nation
19
Proposed Multinational and Multilateral
Reconstruction and Stabilization Organization
(1) Includes alldonors and affected
nationauthorities
Multinational and MultilateralInteragency
Coordination Group
Affected NationAuthorities
National Interagency Reconstructionand
Stabilization Headquarters (NIRS)
UN CountryTeam
Legend
(2) RRTs and CATs could be provided by allies
Multinational and MultilateralInteragency
OperationalLevel
20
Multinational and Multilateral Interagency
Coordination Group
Steering Group
UNSG Special Representative
Multinational andMultilateral Interagency Group
(M2IG)
Chiefs of Mission
Affected Nation Reps
Economics
Transitional Security
SecurityOperations
HumanitarianAssistance
Governance
Train and EquipAffected NationMilitary Forces
Steering Group establishes priorities and
providescoordinated guidance and direction
Strategic Communications
Rule of Law
Infrastructure
Monitor, Analysis, and Intelligence
Legend
Civilian-led
ResourceCoordination
Military-led
Joint Activities
OperationalLevel
Affected Nation
Multinational and Multilateral Interagency
21
Agenda

• Evolving USG Civilian Concepts
• Transformation to an Integrated Civil-Military
  Architecture
• Complex Contingencies
• Support to Alliance Intergovernmental Organization

22
Current USG Alliance Management

• Efforts to influence varies widely within USG
• US missions assigned to the intergovernmental
  organization (IGO) (e.g., OSCE, OECD)
• A US mission to the IGO and an integrated command
  structure and staffs (e.g., NATO )
• An integrated command structure and staff (e.g.,
  NORAD)
• A additional duty assigned to a country team
  where the IGO is headquartered (e.g., Ethiopia
  for the AU, Nigeria for ECOWAS)
• Participation in periodic meetings orchestrated
  by one or more departments with allied
  counterparts (e.g., ARF)
• Benign neglect until a crisis (e.g., GCC and
  SADC)
• Military security assistance is typically
  arranged on a national basis
• Transformation has started through
  experimentation with multinational, multilateral,
  and interagency groups are underway at JFCOM
• Joint Interagency Coordination Groups (JIACGs)
  for Counter Terrorism exist at 7 COCOMs
• JIACGs for full spectrum operations are being
  developed by some COCOMs
• Multinational experiments with selected allies
  are also under development

The Global Peace Operations Initiative (GPOI) is
a multinationaldonor effort focused on Africa,
but with a worldwide reach
23
Management of the G-8 Global Peace Operations
Initiative

• Announced at the G-8 Summit, Jun 04, and focuses
  on enhancing African peacekeeping forces as well
  as others
• Goal train 75,000 peacekeepers worldwide by
  2010
• GPOI Program
• Establishes G-8 expert-level meetings for
  exchanging information on efforts to enhance
  peace support capabilities
• Conducts periodic exercises and provide training
  to maintain skills
• Enhances the institutional capacity of African
  regional and sub-regional organizations to plan
  for and conduct peace operations
• Develops transportation and logistics support
  arrangements to facilitate deployment and
  sustainment in the field
• Increases training of stability police units by
  supporting existing centers and promoting the
  Italian initiative for a international center of
  excellence
• Reaffirmed by the POTUS at the UN General
  Assembly meeting, Sep 04

But, AU region is already in crisis and unable
to manage its current situation
24
African Regional Realities

• AU includes 53 African member nations in 5
  sub-regional groups
• West (15) 197,000 troops managed through
  Economic Community of Western African States
  (ECOWAS)
• South (12) 281,000 troops managed by South
  Africa Development Community (SADC)
• East (9) 590,000 troops with no sub-regional
  oversight
• Central (11) 334,000 troops with no sub-regional
  oversight
• North (6) 706,000 troops with no sub-regional
  oversight
• Regional contingency planning and force
  employment
• Location of 10 of 17 ongoing UN DPKO peacekeeping
  missions
• AU forces already deployed to major humanitarian
  crisis in Darfur and requested for security when
  Somali exile government returns
• Zimbabwe is a rapidly failing state
• AIDS has had a severe impact on most nations
• AU Horizon 2004-2007 is the Alliances agreed
  strategic plan for improving peace, security, and
  governance in region
• US management of AU support
• Is an additional duty for Ambassador and
  country team in Ethiopia same arrangement for
  ECOWAS
• Three US COCOMs have oversight of AU nations
  Security Cooperation Programs (EUCOM42
  CENTCOM8 PACOM-3)

If GPOI is to succeed, its management must
beimproved
25
Allies Are Willing to Collaborate and Coordinate

• AU is supported by multinational and multilateral
  interagency partners from
• European Union (Commission and various member
  nations)
• US, Australia, Canada, Japan, and Norway
• United Nations
• To avoid duplication of effort and coordinate
  their activities, multinational and multilateral
  partners have formed ad hoc organizations
• Technical Support Group of Deputy Chiefs of
  Missions meets weekly (civilian-led)
• Interim Darfur Integrated Task Force (DITF)
  (military-led)

Employing a concept of a Multinational,
Multilateral, and InteragencyGroup (M2IG)
assigned to the AU could facilitate
implementation of the GPOI program and other USG
NSS goals in the region
26
Traditional African Union Planning Coordination
(1)
Author or directinput to Plan
(1) AU membernations often duplicate requests
to multiple donors
OASD(ISA) NEA Affairs
DoS Bureau for NEA
Africa Affairs
Bureau for Africa
Guidance orcoordination
Informs
RCCEUCOM
USRegionalSC Plan
OtherDonorNationsand IGOs
CENTCOM
PACOM
JIACGs
(2) AU plan and partner support have not been
coordinated
CountrySC andMPP Plan
US CountryTeam
Nationaland IGOPlans forRegion
AUPlan
AU MemberNation
AUSecretariat
Strategic-TheaterLevel
AU includes countries in EUCOM, CENTCOM, and
PACOM AORs
27
Ad Hoc African Union Planning Coordination (2)
Author or directinput to Plan
OASD(ISA) NEA Affairs
DoS Bureau for NEA
Africa Affairs
Bureau for Africa
USCongress
Guidance orcoordination
Informs
Temporary orad hoc arrangement
RCCEUCOM
USRegionalSC Plan
OtherDonorNationsand IGOs
CENTCOM
JIACGs
RCCPACOM
(2) AU plan and partner support still have not
been coordinated
CountrySC andMPP Plan
US CountryTeam
Nationaland IGOPlans forRegion
AUPlan
(1) Donors havecreated ad hocorganizational arra
ngements and processesto achieve unity of effort
AU MemberNation
AUSecretariat
Partners TechnicalSupport Group
Darfur IntegratedTF (DITF)
AU includes countries in EUCOM, CENTCOM, and
PACOM AORs
28
Proposed M2IG to Improve AU and GPOI Planning
Coordination
Return to Agenda
Author or directinput to Plan
OASD(ISA) NEA Affairs
DoS Bureau for NEA
Africa Affairs
Bureau for Africa
USCongress
Guidance orcoordination
Informs
M2IG is a standingbody of reps from all donor
nationsand IGOs, perhaps led by UN
RCCEUCOM
USRegionalSC Plan
OtherDonorNationsand IGOs
CENTCOM
PACOM
JIACGs
M2IG
CountrySC andMPP Plan
US CountryTeam
Nationaland IGOPlans forRegion
AUPlan
AU MemberNation
AUSecretariat
M2IG would coordinate and harmonize all
AU-related plans and implementing programsand
the JIACGs would coordinate the regional plan,
not the host country Country Team
29
The Humanitarian Information Unit
30
Mission Statement

• The Humanitarian Information Unit (HIU) serves as
  a USG interagency center to identify, collect,
  analyze and disseminate unclassified information
  critical to USG decision makers and partners in
  preparation for and response to humanitarian
  emergencies worldwide, and to promote best
  practices for humanitarian information management.

31
HIU Steering Committee Members

• State INR, State PRM
• USAID/DCHA
• Department of Defense
• National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
• US Geological Survey
• NASA

32
HIU Staff
Alan Davis Director (USAID)
Cynthia Dial Office Manager (State/INR
halftime)
Fred Smith State/INR - FSO Deputy Director
Kathleen Miner Geo-spatial Data
Coordinator (USAID/DCHA PSC)
Dennis King Humanitarian Affairs
Analyst (State/INR)
COL Doug Nash Civil Affairs LNO/Deputy DoD
Detailee
Noam Unger Humanitarian Affairs
Analyst (State/INR)
Tiffany Hill GIS Analyst and Internet
Manager (STG contractor)
David Springer Geo-spatial Intelligence
Analyst (NGA)
Lewis McCulloch Humanitarian Affairs
Analyst (State/INR)
Walter Adcock Foreign Affairs Officer (State/INR-
Short-term Detailee)
David Dodson Economist (State/INR- Short-term
Detailee)
Victoria Jabara Information Specialist (STG
contractor)
Dr. Deborah Belsky State/AAAS Fellow
Dr. Melba Crawford State/Jefferson Fellow
Heather Phelps GIS/IT Web Technician Manager (STG
Contractor)
33
Select HIU Initiatives An Update

• Darfur (Sudan) Crisis
• Populations at Risk Information Working Group
• HIV/AIDS Collaboration Efforts
• Countries of Humanitarian Interest and Concern
  (CHIC) Study
• HIU web initiatives
• Civil Affairs Information Management Workshop
• Tsunami Humanitarian Information Sharing (THIS)
  Working Group

34
Darfur Crisis

• Product Requests
• Variety of Data and Data Sources
• Key Users and Audiences

35
Populations at Risk Information Working Group

• Workshop on
• Systematic Population Estimation
• Building a Prototype Country Package
• Working Group Members

State/INR USAID/DCHA NGA CIA State/PRM USAID/GH
DIA NASA State/OES Census Bureau USGS NOAA CDC
NAS
36
Collaboration with the Office of the Global
AIDS Coordinator

• Development of GIS maps for focus countries
• Technical assistance for
• Presidents Emergency Plan
• Database
• Evaluation of UN databases
• (WHO UNAIDS) for
• collaborative efforts

37
Countries of Humanitarian Interest and Concern
(CHIC)

• Establish a mechanism to quickly provide
• critical data
• information
• knowledge

38
HIU Website Initiatives

• Designed an interactive GIS site to support data
  collection and mapping in Iraq
• Developing informational public web page to post
  HIU product and resource information
• Sites capabilities allow users to find geospatial
  and other data quickly and easily

39
DoD Civil Affairs Civil Information Management

• CA units developing GIS tools and data bases
  using off-the-shelf technology
• CA drafting operational needs documents to drive
  development and procurement of IM systems
• ASD/SOLIC drafting new DoD policy for Civil
  Information Management

40
Best Practices in Information Management

• Adoption, implementation, and guidance on basic
  data standards for information collection and
  dissemination
• Information management best practices written
  into interagency policies/doctrine
• Education and training (simulation exercises)

41
Tsunami Humanitarian Information Sharing (THIS)
Working Group

• Goal To facilitate interagency coordination of
  information management activities related to the
  Tsunami relief and reconstruction efforts and
  minimize duplication.
• Efforts Related to Ongoing Relief Missions
• - Consolidated access point for unclassified USG
  acquired satellite remote sensing imagery of
  devastated areas
• - Creation of eRoom collaboration tool site to
  facilitate interagency information management
  coordination.

42

• Upcoming HIU Executive Steering
  Committee (ESC) Meeting
• The next ESC meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
  February 17th, 2005 at the HIU. HIU welcomes Jed
  Meline (NSC), John Kelmelis (USGS), Jeb Nadaner
  (ASD/SOLIC), and Brian Fila (ASD/NII) as new
  members of the HIU Executive Steering Committee.

43
Thank you!

• Log on to http//hiu.state.gov
• Username User12
• Password password
• HIU_info_at_state.gov

Return to Agenda
44
Transforming DoD TrainingJoint Forces Prepared
to Engage

• Training Transformation Interagency,
  Intergovernmental, and Multinational Mission
  Essential Tasks (TIM2) Task Force Conference
  Update ITEA Interagency SG MeetingFebruary 1,
  2005

45
TIM2 Task Force Conference

• At State Departments National Foreign Affairs
  Training Center (Foreign Service Institute),
  Arlington, VA
• On February 24-25, 2005, starting daily at 0830
• For operators, planners, strategists, transition
  leads, and policy developers primarily at the
  GS-15 and O-6 level
• Construct Plenary and Working Group sessions
  with breakout capability 150 participant limit
  3 max per agency or organization with one per WG
  or 2 per when participating in only one WG
• By-invitation event with advanced registration
  (RSVP) required for placement of name on access
  roster necessary to clear security
  inspection/acquire pass
• Invitations out by COB February 2, 2005
• Visit TIM2 Collaborative Forum website to review
  pre- conference materials for password access,
  contact Lori Frumkim, lfrumkim_at_alionscience.com,
  703-998-1651

46
Task Force Conference Agenda
Day one Arrive, clear security, move to
conference site, take seats NLT 0830
Conference Welcome and introduction of Director
FSI by Colonel Pat Kelly Remarks by Ambassador
Petersen, Director of Foreign Service
Institute Introduction and remarks by
Interagency Panelists followed by short
QA Break 30 minutes (side-bar discussions and
networking) TF conference overview, goals and
deliverables, administrative comments, and
Working Group guidance by Colonel Kelly Working
Group introductions, organization, and
discussions AM Lunch in FSI cafeteria at
1245 Working Groups continue until
1630 Optional evening dinner no-host social
event at location TBD
47
Task Force Conference Agenda
Day two Working Groups continue beginning at
0830 Lunch in FSI cafeteria at 1230 Working
Groups wrap-up and prepare for plenary
presentation Break 15 minutes load Working
Group briefings for presentation Working Groups
present plenary reports (20 minutes per group) at
1400 Plenary discussions moderated by Colonel
Kelly and introduction of speaker   Closing
remarks at 1530 by Mr. Doug Feith, USD-Policy
(T) TIM2 Way Ahead and farewell by Colonel
Kelly Conference concludes NLT 1600
48
Federal Government Interagency Operations(Cabinet
-level Interagency View)
Interagency Strategic Policy Advice to POTUS
Homeland Security Council
National Security Council
Incidents of National Significance (DHS Lead,
Other Agencies Support)
Foreign Affairs (DoS Lead, Other Agencies Support)
Federal Government Interagency Operations
Multinational Operations
Intergovernmental Operations
Federal, State, and Local Agencies, and
Nongovernmental Organizations
US Government Agencies, Allies, Coalition
Partners, and International, Regional, and
Nongovernmental Organizations
Homeland Defense (DoD Lead, Other Agencies
Support)
Warfighting (DoD Lead, Other Agencies Support)
OCONUS
CONUS
49
TIM2 Task Force Working Groups

• Three Working Group (focus) areas for TIM2 Task
  Force Conference discussions
• Interagency/National Security Policy (Federal
  agencies at national, strategic level)
• Intergovernmental/Domestic Security (Federal,
  state, and local agencies operating in the
  continental United States on Homeland Security
  and Defense)
• Multinational/International Security (Federal
  and foreign agencies allies and coalition
  partners multinational, international, regional,
  and non-governmental organizations operating
  together outside of the continental United States)

50
TIM2 Way Ahead
Feb 1 ITEA Interagency Steering Group TIM2 Update
Feb XX Establish TIM2 DoD Executive Steering
Group Feb XX Establish TIM2 USG Agencies
Executive Steering Group Feb 9 TIM2 Integration
Working Group Meeting (existing group of
advisors) at Pentagon Room 2C554, suite 1,
1500-1630 TBD Meetings with Dir FSI, JFCOM,
NORTHCOM, DHS, DOS Feb 24-25 TIM2 Task Force
Conference with DOS at FSI Mar 10 TIM2 DoD
Steering Group meeting by VTC from Pentagon Mar
15 TIM2 USG Agencies Steering Group meeting by
VTC Mar 16 Meetings by individual Working Groups
Interagency Mar 23 Meetings by individual
Working Groups - Multinational Mar 30 Meetings by
individual Working Groups - Intergovernmental June
29 Technical Working Group Workshop (T)
51
TIM2 Task Force End State
End State DoD individuals, organizations, and
staffs are educated and trained for broader, more
inclusive joint operations with all of the
interagency community and are prepared to execute
capabilities and tasks before being required to
do so in an actual situation.
52
TIM2 Points of Contact

• Colonel Patrick (Pat) Kelly, ODASD/Resources
  Plans
• 2900 Defense Pentagon (Room 4B940)
• Washington, DC 20301-2900
• 703-614-4535 patrick.kelly_at_osd.mil
• Mr. Henry (Hank) Richmond, OUSD-Policy TIM2
  Project Manager
• 1701 N. Beauregard Street, Suite 600
• Alexandria, VA 22311
• 703-575-2817 hrichmond_at_alionscience.com
• Mr. Richard Keller, OUSD-Policy (Spt Tm)
• 1701 N. Beauregard Street, Suite 600
• Alexandria, VA 22311
• 703-575-2885 rkeller_at_alionscience.com
• Mr. Jack Coyne, OUSD-Policy (Spt Tm)
• 1701 N. Beauregard Street, Suite 600
• Alexandria, VA 22311
• 703-575-3284 jjcoyne_at_alionscience.com

Return to Agenda
53
Back-up Slides
54
TIM2 USG Agencies Executive Steering Group

• The TIM2 USG Agencies Executive Steering Group is
  a senior advisory organization for the
  interagency community aspects of TIM2
• Hosted by Mr. Ryan Henry, PDUSD-Policy
• Initial meeting is scheduled for Feb XX 05
  Time TBD
• Representation is from the broader Interagency
  Community at the SES/Flag Officer level (DV Code
  5/2-star equivalent) your agency or organization
  is welcomed please identify representative to
  Hank Richmond, hrichmond_at_alionscience.com,
  703-575-2817
• Location SecDef Executive Support Center (VTC)
  Suite in Pentagon National Defense University
  or your agency/organization site with prior
  arrangements (POC Richard Keller,
  rkeller_at_alionscience.com, 703-575-2885)
• This TIM2 USG Agencies ESG meeting will provide
  senior leaders with an information update on
  TIM2, a pre-brief on the TIM2 Task Force
  Conference in February 2005, and an opportunity
  to contribute to the collaborative TIM2 dialogue

55
Conference Attendee Preparations

• Come knowledgeable about your agency/organization
  
• Bring references you may need
• Bring existing capabilities, tasks, and national
  or homeland security strategy missions
• Be prepared to discuss what support or
  information your agency/organization needs from
  other agencies
• Be prepared to discuss intersections
  between/among agencies/organizations and to
  identify gaps and seams
• Visit TIM2 Collaborative Forum website to review
  pre- conference materials for password access,
  contact Lori Frumkim, lfrumkim_at_alionscience.com,
  703-998-1651

56
Task Force Conference Goals

• Current, mandated role from DoD Training
  Transformation plans
• Develop capabilities and tasks for conducting
  broader, more inclusive Joint operations with
  interagency community partners
• Broader, longer-term implied role
• Contribute to overall synchronization of
  homeland and national security preparation and
  operations in conjunction with U.S. Government
  Agencies and other participants in the
  interagency community

57
TF Conference WG Deliverables

• Produce an initial list of agency and
  organization capabilities provided and tasks to
  be accomplished to plan, coordinate, and conduct
  operations with other agencies and organizations
  identify intersections between agencies where
  coordination is required
• Develop for each Working Group a plan of action
  (schedule) for follow-on meetings or events to
  expand the list of capabilities and further
  develop the tasks to be performed to achieve
  these capabilities under varying conditions
• Prepare a list of specific agencies and
  organizations (not present) that need to be
  included within future Working Group efforts

58
WG Process/Methodology

• Working Groups use matrix approach to conduct
  analysis under various case study/scenario driven
  conditions to determine deliverables. Sub-groups
  formed, as needed, to discuss details.
• Exchange information on capabilities agencies
  offer
• Determine the intersections between/among
  agencies
• Identify gaps and seams
• Determine for what, when, and how to communicate
  and coordinate
• Identify tasks required to provide capabilities

Return to Agenda