Vaccine Safety Evaluation: Postmarketing Surveillance Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Vaccine Safety Evaluation: Postmarketing Surveillance Conference

Description:

Meningococcal disease isolate serogroup and dominant subtype 1990 -2005 ... e.g. all intensive care admissions within 7 days/ unusual events thought to be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:213
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: stewar45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vaccine Safety Evaluation: Postmarketing Surveillance Conference


1
Vaccine Safety Evaluation Post-marketing
Surveillance Conference
  • New Zealand Experience with Meningococcal Vaccine
    Post-marketing Surveillance
  • Stewart Reid
  • 11th April 2007

2
Population 4M Maori 14 Pacific
7 Asian 9 European 70 Location
South Pacific Australia 3 hours West LA 12
hours North East
3
Meningococcal disease isolate serogroup and
dominant subtype 1990 -2005not including PCR
positive cases
Epidemiology of meningococcal disease in New
Zealand 2005 ESR May 2006
4
The problem
  • Major epidemic
  • Strain specific outer membrane vesicle (OMV)
    vaccine - MeNZB
  • Clinical trials in Auckland

5
The Problem (cont)
  • Licensure application - 1100 recipients 3300
    doses
  • Substantial experience with other OMV vaccines
    Norway, Cuba and Walter Reed outer membrane
    protein vaccine

Vaccine 23 (2005) 2191 -2196.
6
The Problem (cont)
  • Intention to vaccinate 1,000,000 New Zealanders
    aged 6m -19y
  • No National Immunisation Register (NIR)
  • Only monitoring - Centre for Adverse Reaction
    Monitoring (CARM) - passive reporting

7
The Solution Safety Monitoring System
  • National Immunisation Register (NIR)
  • - with same patient identifier used in hospitals
  • Several data sources

8
Several data sources
  • CARM
  • Passive reporting system Intensive Vaccine
    Monitoring Programme (IVMP)
  • Hospital based monitoring
  • All event
  • Rare event

9
(No Transcript)
10
Several data sources
  • CARM
  • Passive reporting system Intensive Vaccine
    Monitoring Programme (IVMP)
  • Hospital based monitoring
  • All event
  • Rare event

11
Rare events to be monitored
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Encephalopathy/encephalitis
  • Flaccid paralysis
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Hypotonic hypo-reponsive episodes
  • Seizures
  • Petechial rashes
  • catch all categories e.g. all intensive care
    admissions within 7 days/ unusual events thought
    to be related to immunisation/deaths

12
Hospital Based MonitoringRare Event
  • Events of interest
  • A priori determined case definitions
  • Independent case ascertainment Clinical Review
    Committee (CRC)

13
Hospital Based MonitoringRare Event (cont)
  • Background disease rates
  • Thresholds stop/go points
  • Minimum data sets

14
(No Transcript)
15
Under 5 ThresholdMinimum dataset
  • All 4 Northern District Health Boards to rest of
    country
  • 16 months 4 years 30,000 1st doses
  • 6-16 months 7,500 1st doses
  • 6 weeks 5 months 4,000 1st doses
  • At each of these points substantial data was
    available on those vaccinated in Counties Manukau
    DHB.

16
Independent Safety Monitoring Board
  • Separation of data collection and analysis from
    assessment
  • Independent assessment - Independent safety
    Monitoring Board (ISMB)

17
Safety Monitoring Plan
  • Discussed with Chair ISMB during development
  • Reviewed and approved by ISMB
  • Included
  • monitoring methods,
  • case definitions,
  • background disease rates,
  • cluster investigation protocol and
  • causality assessment discussion

http//www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagesmh/5220/File/
safety-monitoring-plan.pdf
18
Conclusion
  • AS of June 2006 gt 3,000,000 doses given
  • ISMB review concluded
  • outstanding programme of sensitive and
    objective safety monitoring
  • no evidence of any significant adverse health
    event associated with the vaccine

http//www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagesmh/5220?Open
19
Acknowledgements
  • Meningococcal Management Team (MMT) and Advisors
  • Professor Diana Lennon, Dr Jane OHallahan, Dr
    Philipp Oster, Professor Kim Mulholland.
  • Sue Crengle, Diana Martin, Liane Penney, Teuila
    Percival, Stewart Reid, Joanna Stewart
  • MVS Trial Team, Auckland University
  • Laboratory staff, Institute of Environmental
    Science and Research
  • Independent Safety Monitoring Board and Clinical
    Review Committee
  • MVS Safety Team, Ministry of Health
  • Anne McNicholas, Yvonne Galloway, Paul
    Stehr-Green et al,
  • Centre for Adverse Reaction Monitoring (CARM) Dr
    Michael Tatley et al
  • Safety monitoring teams at participating
    hospitals
  • Rest of MVS team, Ministry of Health

20
References
  • Strategy -
  • Sexton K, Lennon D, et al. 2 articles
  • NZMJ 20 August 2004, Vol 117 No 1200
  • http//www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1200/1026/
  • http//www.immunise.moh.govt.nz/documents/nzmj-vac
    cinestrategy.pdf
  • Safety Monitoring Plan NZ Ministry of Health
  • http//www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagesmh/5220/File/
    safety-monitoring-plan.pdf

21
Back up slides
22
Observed vs expected cases
  • Total population e.g. Acute flaccid paralysis

23
Observed vs expected cases
  • Vaccinees only e.g. seizures

24
Immunisation Safety Surveillance
  • A system that comprehensively monitors vaccine
    safety
  • Should identify events caused by vaccination
  • Enable causality assessment for events which may
    be caused by vaccination,
  • Increase public confidence in vaccine programs
    helping to avoid reductions in coverage caused by
    unsubstantiated fears of vaccine reactions.

25
Independent Safety Monitoring Board
  • Reviewed all safety data during the period of
    hospital based monitoring
  • Independent with Australian chair and four other
    members, one from USA
  • Advise on cessation of vaccination because of
    safety risk
  • Advise on further investigation of possible
    safety risks

26
Target population
  • Reside in Counties Manukau, Auckland, Waitemata
    and Northland DHBs.
  • Target Cohorts
  • 100,000 aged 5 19 years in CMDHB and Auckland
    DHBs
  • 100,000 aged 0 - 4 years in all 4 DHBs

27
Consent for MeNZB
  • 08 July 2004 consent for individuals aged 6
    months or older valid for 2 years
  • 03 February 2005
  • consent for individuals aged 6 weeks or older.
  • 12 January 2006
  • consent for 4th dose of the vaccine to infants
    who received the first dose when aged less than
    6 months of age.
  • 21 July 2006
  • renewal of Provisional Consent under Section 23
    of the
  • Medicines Act 1981, valid for 2 years from 8 July
    2006.

28
Medicines Act 1981 section 23
  • The Minister may, by notice in the Gazette, in
    accordance with this section, give his
    provisional consent to the sale or supply or use
    of a new medicine where s/he is of the opinion
    that it is desirable that the medicine be sold,
    supplied, or used on a restricted basis for the
    treatment of a limited number of patients.

29
Intensive Vaccine Monitoring Programme
  • Prospective observational cohort study of MeNZB
    vaccine

6/52
Immunisation (s)
All health care visit details
Sentinel Practices across NZ (primary health
care providers)
events
incidents
reactions
30
IVMP sentinel practice monitoring
  • Monitoring cohort
  • Infants lt 19 months who have an immunisation in
    the practice
  • All Immunisations

31
IVMP sentinel practice monitoring
  • Monitoring cohort
  • Selection of practices
  • 35 large medical centres (known as sentinel group
    practices)
  • MedTech32 Practice Management Software
  • Population geographically socio-demographically
    diverse

32
IVMP sentinel practice monitoring
  • Monitoring cohort
  • Selection of practices
  • Data collection
  • Software extraction from existing PMS data fields
  • All immunisations (MeNZB other)
  • All health consultation details for the six weeks
    following an immunisation
  • Secure electronic transfer from PMS
  • Background mode
  • no additional work required at practice !!

33
IVMP sentinel practice monitoring
  • Monitoring cohort
  • Selection of practices
  • Data collection
  • Events assessment
  • Events assessed as unrelated (incidents) or
    related (reactions)
  • Standardised coding and entry into IVMP database
  • WHO National Centres causal relationship (after
    Karch Lasagna)
  • WHOART (event terminology)
  • Grouped by related event terms (modified for
    clinical AEFIs)

34
52,754 Vac-visits (17,921 vaccinees)
10 vaccinees opted out
19 July 2004 30 Sept 2005
22,385 Vac-visits not yet assessed
IVMP Cohort groups
30,369 Vac-visits assessed
11,112 Vac-visits excluded1
19,257 Vac-visits (10,308 vaccinees) analysed
lt 6 month olds 6, 749 vac-visits (3,156 vaccinees)
6-lt19 month olds 4,474 vac-visits (2,368
vaccinees)
19 month 5 year olds 8,034 vac-visits (4,784
vaccinees)
MeNZB Vac-visit 1,166
Hybrid Vac-visit 2,452
Routine Vac-visit 3,131
MeNZB Vac-visit 3,540
Hybrid Vac-visit 441
Routine Vac-visit 493
Routine Vac-visit 209
Hybrid Vac-visit 304
MeNZB Vac-visit 7521
  • 1 Outside of defined time periods
  • lt 6 month olds, 03 Feb. 2005 - 30 Sep. 2005
  • 6 month olds, 19 Jul. 2004 - 15 Nov. 2004

35
Key Findings
  • Low opt-out rate (10/17921)
  • No unexpected AEFIs identified
  • Low rate of reactogenicity
  • Reaction profile similar to Routine immunisations

36
ConclusionIVMP is a novel valuable
Pharmacovigilance tool
  • Source of representative unbiased data
  • Minimal participant compliance burden
  • EDT technologies result in resource savings and
    efficiencies
  • Real life real time vaccine campaign monitoring
  • Feedback in real time to Programme leaders
  • Reassurance to public
  • Database available for long term follow-up
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com