Title: Econometric Modelling of Technical Progress, Consumer Tastes: An Application to Petrol Demand in Jap
1Econometric Modelling of Technical Progress,
Consumer TastesAn Application to Petrol Demand
in Japan
- Yasushi Ninomiya
- Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
- 22 June 2004
- IEW 2004, IEA, Paris
2Contents of this presentation
- Research questions
- Background of this research
- Model description
- Application to petrol demand in Japan
- Estimated results and findings
- Conclusions
3Research questions
- How far does technological progress (improvement
of fuel efficiency) contribute to reduce petrol
demand? - Does consumer taste to use petrol reflect recent
growing concern about global warming and
establishment of climate change mitigation
framework? - What are the implications of these results?
- This research attempts to answer these questions
numerically
4Background
- Energy demand is derived demand
- Efficiency improvement of energy appliance
substantially affect demand for energy - In addition, change in consumer tastes also
affect demand for energy - These create difficulty of energy demand model
- Energy demand model needs to incorporate these
factors Rather unexplored area
5Background
- ln E a ln Y b ln P (1)
-
-
- E Energy demand Y GDP P Energy price
-
?
- ? Tmp
Income elasticity around 0.51.0
Temperature
Technical progress
Price elasticity-0.1-0.5
Changes in consumer taste
? Changes in consumer taste ? Unobservable and
data is hardly available often ignored in
energy demand modelling
6Structural Time Series Model
- Energy demand
- Trend component Seasonal component Exogenous
variable Residuals - STSM can easily separate out trend component and
seasonal component from exogenous variables
effectively
7Structural Time Series Model
- Modelling of trend component
- In STSM, a trend component ? is flexibly modelled
by the stochastic properties ? can shift in
level and change its direction by a stochastic
slope component ? - ?t ?t-1 ?t-1 ?t ?t NID (0, ??)
(2) -
2
2
?t ?t-1 ?t ?t NID (0, ??) (3)
8Structural Time Series Model
- If the variances of ?t and ?t (hyperparameters)
are estimated as zero, trend component is not
stochastic and reverts into the following
conventional linear time trend - ?t ? ?t (4)
- This implies that a linear time trend is a
restricted version of a stochastic trend - ? This restriction is statistically testable
9Structural Time Series Model
Linear time trend
Stochastic trend
10Structural Time Series Model
- Equation (2)(3) and log-linear energy demand
equation (1) are set in Space State form and the
Kalman filter can estimates the optimal
estimators for the unknown parameters - A(L)lnEt ?t B(L) lnYt C(L)lnPt ?t ?t
(6) - ? Observation equation
- ?t ?t-1 ?t-1 ?t
- ?t ?t-1 ?t ?State equation (7)
- S(L)?t ?t
11Structural Time Series Model
Observation equation
(8)
State equation
(9)
12Application to petrol demand in Japan
- Why petrol demand is chosen?
- Most rapidly growing energy demand (1990-2003
35 increased) - Homogeneous usage (e.g. car) ? technological
progress can be well approximated by average
fuel-efficiency data of car stock - Change in consumer taste to use petrol is of
particular interest since there is no major
substitution for passenger car use
13Data used for estimation (1976q1-2004q1)
Real GDP
Petrol consumption
All in log
Real petrol price
Average fuel efficiency of car stock (Litre per
100Km)
14Summary of estimated parameters
- LR GDP elasticity 0.3
- LR price elasticity -0.1
- LR fuel efficiency elasticity 0.9
- Large impact of average fuel efficiency of car
stock on petrol demand - Relatively small impact of GDP growth on the
demand new tendency with recent sample data
period
15Changes in consumer tastes (after GDP, petrol
price, fuel-efficiency effects are controlled)
Growth rate 1.9 p.a. at 2003
16Changes in fuel efficiency of car stock
Litre/100Km in log
Growth rate -1.15 p.a. at 2003
17Findings from the estimated result
- The result shows that changes in consumer tastes
continuously boosted up the petrol demand by 1.9
p.a. over the whole sample period - Despite growing concern about global warming
recent years and ratification of Kyoto Protocol,
there has been little impact on consumer taste - There is no indication that actual consumers
behaviour becomes to be more environmental
friendly over the past decade
18Findings from the estimated result
- It implies that consumers cannot change their
behaviour within a short period of time - Therefore, given unchanged consumer behaviour and
expected GDP growth in the future, petrol demand
would inevitably increase - In order to reduce, at least to stabilise, the
petrol demand, it is absolutely necessary to
accelerate the improvement rate of fuel
efficiency of car stock which is currently 1.15
p.a..
19Basic assumptions for forecast
Petrol price Remains at the 2004q1 level
GDP2 p.a. growth
Seasonal variations set at the latest pattern
Fuel efficiency improvement 1.15 p.a. (same as
the current rate)
20Forecast of petrol demand with current rate of
fuel efficiency improvement
18 above the 2003 level at 2012
2003 level
Forecast
Actual
21Average fuel efficiency of car stock
Actual
Assumptions
Fuel efficiency Improvement by 1.15 p.a
(2004-12)
Litre/100Km
Fuel efficiency Improvement by 1.2 p.a
(2004) 2 p.a.(2005-06) 3 p.a.(2007-12)
22Forecast of petrol demand with higher rate of
fuel efficiency improvement
9 reduction at 2012
With higher efficiency improvement rate
Actual
Forecast
23Conclusions (1)
- Technical progress (improvement of fuel
efficiency of car stock) does significantly
contribute reduction of petrol demand in Japan - However, change in consumer taste boosted up the
petrol demand by 1.9 p.a. which is large enough
to cancel out the contribution of technical
progress - The consumer taste has been little affected by
recent growing concern about global warming and
other environmental issues
24Conclusions (2)
- In order to reduce, or at least stabilise, the
petrol demand, it is necessary to increase the
improvement rate of average fuel efficiency of
car stock which is currently 1.15 p.a.. - Forecasting analysis implies that, even with 2
real GDP growth and unchanged consumer taste, it
is possible to stabilise the petrol demand at
2007 level if fuel efficiency improvement rate is
set at 2 to 3 p.a. between 2005 and 2012. -