bsr update <draft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-11.txt> - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

bsr update <draft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-11.txt>

Description:

In addition we have made changes based on secdir review. I posted a few mails on this to the ... Some editorial changes trying to avoid synonyms and other nits ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 5
Provided by: ietf
Learn more at: http://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: bsr | synonyms | update

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: bsr update <draft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-11.txt>


1
bsr updateltdraft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-11.txtgt
  • Stig Venaas
  • venaas_at_uninett.no

2
bsr update
  • Some editorial changes that were presented by
    Alex last wg meeting
  • In addition we have made changes based on secdir
    review
  • I posted a few mails on this to the mailing list
    the last few weeks
  • Some editorial changes trying to avoid synonyms
    and other nits
  • E.g. group range, address range, group prefix
  • IPsec related changes, see next slide
  • Access lists vs BSR border, see later slide

3
IPsec related changes
  • Got comments regarding IPsec replay and
    multi-sender SAs
  • Added informational reference to
    draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal and text regarding
    per source SA

4
Access lists vs BSR border
  • Got comments regarding our recommendation for ACL
    to block BSMs from invalid BSR addresses and
    whether they were of any use
  • Realised two things
  • They are of very limited use, and its better and
    more effective to do BSR border
  • I believe many implementations allow you to
    configure an interface as border interface and
    block all BSMs
  • Also, text in 11 has text from PIM draft
    regarding dropping messages from invalid
    neighbours
  • This text should be changed to talking about
    dropping BSMs from neighbours outside the domain
  • Plan to make a new revision 12 that recommends
    BSR border instead of ACLs
  • Anyone disagreeing with this?
  • Can update this now and get IESG to review
    revision 12
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com