TENSILE STRENGTH AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC REINFORCING BARS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

TENSILE STRENGTH AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC REINFORCING BARS

Description:

TENSILE STRENGTH AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC REINFORCING BARS ... to investigate the tensile strength of Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1157
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: john450
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TENSILE STRENGTH AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC REINFORCING BARS


1
TENSILE STRENGTH AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF
FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC REINFORCING BARS
  • David Imam and Allison Johnson-Moore
  • Undergraduate Civil Engineering Research
  • University of Southern California 

2
Fiberglass rebar positive attributes
  • Impervious to chloride ion and chemical attack
  • Tensile strength greater than steel
  • 1/4th weight of steel reinforcement
  • Transparent to magnetic fields and radio
    frequencies
  • Electrically non-conductive
  • Thermally non-conductive

3
Fiberglass rebar negative attributes
  • Low Modulus of Elasticity
  • Brittle nature

4
Objective
  • This exploratory study was carried out to for
    two purposes
  • to develop a suitable method for producing
    uniform stress throughout the member during
    testing
  • to investigate the tensile strength of Fiber
    Reinforced Plastic (FRP) reinforcing bars

5
Experimental Options
  • Analyze a plain FRP specimen
  • Wrap the ends of the sample in epoxy-coated
    carbon fiber cloth
  • Encase the ends of the sample with metal sleeves

6
Experimental Program
  • Setup
  • Cut specimen to appropriate length
  • Affix strain gauges to bars
  • Encase select samples in steel tubing

7
Experimental Program
  • Testing Method
  • Secure specimen in SATEC machine
  • Connect wires to strain gauge boxes
  • Apply load
  • Collect data

8
Observations
  • Slippage
  • Epoxy failure
  • Tensile performance
  • Specimen failure

9
Experimental Results
10
Experimental Results
  • Failure of naked bar

11
Graphical Results
BAR A large diameter steel ends BAR B large
diameter naked ends BAR C small diameter steel
ends BAR D small diameter naked ends (results
unattainable)
12
Conclusion
  • Developed method relatively successful
  • Modulus of Elasticity much less than steel
  • Failure stress much greater than steel

13
Sources of Error
  • Failure of epoxy to perform to full potential
  • Specimen not completely vertical
  • Slippage

14
Conclusion
  • Improvements for Testing/Producing FRP
  • Use a more ductile polymer
  • Allow Epoxy to fully set
  • Custom design metal sleeves
  • Experiment with a variety of wrapping procedures

15
Thank For Coming to Our Show
  • ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com