Developing and Managing Digital Projects October 1718, 2002 WiLS and the Department of Public Instru - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Developing and Managing Digital Projects October 1718, 2002 WiLS and the Department of Public Instru

Description:

Model #1: Working in a Vacuum the Path of Least Resistance. Background reading ... The Structure of Strongly Monotonic Probabilistic Voting Procedures. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: wils5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Developing and Managing Digital Projects October 1718, 2002 WiLS and the Department of Public Instru


1
Developing and Managing Digital ProjectsOctober
17-18, 2002 WiLS and the Department of Public
Instruction
2
Collaboration and Digital Initiatives Promise,
Processes and Probabilities for Success

A Review of the Literature
Lee Konrad Digital Content Group University of
Wisconsin-Madison Libraries Lkonrad_at_library.wisc.e
du http//uwdcc.library.wisc.edu
3
Case Studies Deviating from the Script
Script Lee Konrad from UW Madison Libraries
will highlight specific case studies of projects
the UW-Madison has been involved in, including
their role in hosting project materials on their
server. As part of the presentation, Lee will
talk about collaboration and how to work with a
group of stakeholders to create a successful
project. Why Deviate? - striking similarities
across projects regardless of scale - early
projects not fair assessments of collaborative
process - success is ultimately user-defined,
lofty though that may sound - collaboration as a
topic can convey the lessons learned
4
(No Transcript)
5
Collaboration Theory and Practice for Digital
Librarians
  • The Digital Librarian as Social Scientist
  • Observation
  • Vocabulary
  • Models
  • Programming in C (collaboration)
  • Logic (recognizing the need to use it)
  • Dream states (visions, realizations and other
    scary stuff)

http//dummies.com/collabtheorprac.html
6
Vocab The Cool Digital Project - Envisioned
  • This is your project before it begins, the stage
    during which you evaluate its promise with little
    regard for probability for success and even less
    regard for processes.
  • Note this is as it should be

7
Vocab The Cool Digital Project Collaborative
Process
  • This is your project as it moves from inception
    to completion. During this stage you continually
    evaluate its promise and resist the notion that
    probability for success is correlated with the
    collaborative process.
  • Note this is not as it should be
  • Collaboration is a process and while it implies
    team decision-making, it is to be considered a
    process and needs to be managed as such.
  • Note this is as it should be

8
Vocab The Cool Digital Project Realized
  • This is your project after it moves into
    production and is actively being used by the
    public. During this stage you evaluate its
    promise and consider the notion that process may
    well be equated with probability for success.
  • Note this is as it should be

9
Collaborative Models A Primer
  • As social scientists, librarians would be remiss
    if they failed to develop collaborative models
    with which to test their assumptions about the
    promise, processes and probabilities for building
    successful digital projects.
  • Note if poor research design makes you queasy,
    you are advised to skip this section of the
    chapter.

10
Model 1 Working in a Vacuum the Path of Least
Resistance
  • Background reading
  • Can the Vacuum be Engineered for Digital Library
    Applications?
  • Abstract Quantum theory predicts, and
    experiments verify, that empty space (the
    vacuum/vision) contains an enormous residual
    background energy known as zero-point energy
    (anti-collaboration). Originally thought to be of
    significance only for such esoteric concerns as
    small perturbations to atomic emission processes
    (digitization), it is now known to play a role in
    large-scale phenomena of interest to librarians
    as well, such as the inhibition of discourse, the
    generation of short-range attractive forces
    (e.g., revenue streams), and the possibility of
    accounting for success.

11
Model 2 Working with a Library Committee
  • Background readings
  • The Structure of Strongly Monotonic Probabilistic
    Voting Procedures. by Nandeibam, S.
    (RePEcfthbirmec98-07)
  • Excerpt Pattanaik and Peleg showed that the
    power structure under a probabilistic voting
    procedure which satisfies project goals,
    optimally and independent of irrelevant
    alternatives, is almost completely characterized
    by random dictatorship. The authors propose a
    new probabilistic monotonicity axiom called
    strong monotonicity and show that, if the
    probabilistic voting procedure is required to
    satisfy this new axiom along with the project
    goals, then the distribution of coalitional power
    under it is completely characterized by random
    dictatorship.

12
Model 3 Collaborating with Multiple Library
Committees
  • Recommended Readings
  • Political Support for Targeted versus
    Institutional Priorities
  • Social Choice with Infinite Populations
    Construction of a Rule and Impossibility Results.
  • Distributive and Additive Costsharing of an
    Homogeneous Good
  • The Geometry of Implementation A Necessary and
    Sufficient Condition for Straightforward Games
  • Social Decision Rules Are Not Immune to Conflict
  • A Multiplication of Solution Concepts
  • An Exploration into the Social Evolution of
    Adaptive and Rigid Behavior
  • Preferences Over Education Expenditure
  • Consequences, Opportunities, and Procedures
  • Self-Control in peer Groups
  • Competing for Endorsements
  • Computing Power Indices for Large Voting Games A
    New Algorithm
  • Show Them Your Teeth First
  • Required Reading
  • Beyond Altruism, Duty or Collusion. Introducting
    Solidarity into Digital Project Management
  • Coalitional Provision of Pure Collective Goods

13
All Kidding Aside
  • Collaboration is a process and needs to be
    managed as such
  • At the outset of the project, little information
    is known or understood by team members
  • Successful collaborative projects require
    continual assessment and documentation of what
    is known and/or changing

14
Selected Digital Collaborations
15
Envisioned v. Realized Programming Logic for
Digital Collaborations
  • Sum(known variables) Sum(unknown variables)
    final_product
  • If sum(known variables) gt sum(unknown variables)
    then final_product gt envisioned
  • If sum(unknown variables) gt sum(known variables)
    then final_product lt envisioned
  • final_product user_experience lt gt envisioned

16
Flowcharting the Digital Collaborative Process

Project Envisioned
Project Realized
17
Variables in Collaboration

Project Envisioned

Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Content Rights Funding Required
expertise Delivery models Stakeholder
expectations (everybodys!)
Project Realized
18
Clarification Through Project Phases

Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Known
Unknown
Pre-proposalProposal development and
assessmentReformattingInfrastructure
DevelopmentEncodingMetadata Quality
ControlTesting
Project Realized
19
The final_product of our collaboration

Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
final_product
Sum(known unknown)
Project Realized
20
The End User The Ultimate Unknown Variable
Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
final_product
User
Unknown
Known
Project Realized
21
The Project Realized
Sum(Final_product user)
Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
final_product
User
Unknown
Known
Project Realized
22
Tips for Successful Collaborations
  • Document everything that is known early on and
    share broadly
  • During all phases, continue to refine and revise
    documentation in attempts to make more about the
    project known to all
  • Promote notion that collaboration is a
    time-intensive process
  • Promote notion that garbage in equals garbage out
    collaboration can save time!
  • Seriously consider the possibility that
    perfection and excellence are very different
    notions
  • Consider the notion that even though a given
    project may never become what you as a
    collaborator hoped it to be, the user ultimately
    defines the success of the project in terms of
    how s/he applies it in the teaching, research or
    discovery process
  • Sum(final_product user) lt gt project as
    envisioned

23
Project Realized
24
Initialize Project Collaboration
Set Variables 5WH Unknown
25
Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
26
Final_Product
27
USER
28
Project Realized
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com