Title: Developing and Managing Digital Projects October 1718, 2002 WiLS and the Department of Public Instru
1Developing and Managing Digital ProjectsOctober
17-18, 2002 WiLS and the Department of Public
Instruction
2Collaboration and Digital Initiatives Promise,
Processes and Probabilities for Success
A Review of the Literature
Lee Konrad Digital Content Group University of
Wisconsin-Madison Libraries Lkonrad_at_library.wisc.e
du http//uwdcc.library.wisc.edu
3Case Studies Deviating from the Script
Script Lee Konrad from UW Madison Libraries
will highlight specific case studies of projects
the UW-Madison has been involved in, including
their role in hosting project materials on their
server. As part of the presentation, Lee will
talk about collaboration and how to work with a
group of stakeholders to create a successful
project. Why Deviate? - striking similarities
across projects regardless of scale - early
projects not fair assessments of collaborative
process - success is ultimately user-defined,
lofty though that may sound - collaboration as a
topic can convey the lessons learned
4(No Transcript)
5Collaboration Theory and Practice for Digital
Librarians
- The Digital Librarian as Social Scientist
- Observation
- Vocabulary
- Models
- Programming in C (collaboration)
- Logic (recognizing the need to use it)
- Dream states (visions, realizations and other
scary stuff)
http//dummies.com/collabtheorprac.html
6Vocab The Cool Digital Project - Envisioned
- This is your project before it begins, the stage
during which you evaluate its promise with little
regard for probability for success and even less
regard for processes. - Note this is as it should be
7Vocab The Cool Digital Project Collaborative
Process
- This is your project as it moves from inception
to completion. During this stage you continually
evaluate its promise and resist the notion that
probability for success is correlated with the
collaborative process. - Note this is not as it should be
- Collaboration is a process and while it implies
team decision-making, it is to be considered a
process and needs to be managed as such. - Note this is as it should be
8Vocab The Cool Digital Project Realized
- This is your project after it moves into
production and is actively being used by the
public. During this stage you evaluate its
promise and consider the notion that process may
well be equated with probability for success. - Note this is as it should be
9Collaborative Models A Primer
- As social scientists, librarians would be remiss
if they failed to develop collaborative models
with which to test their assumptions about the
promise, processes and probabilities for building
successful digital projects. - Note if poor research design makes you queasy,
you are advised to skip this section of the
chapter.
10Model 1 Working in a Vacuum the Path of Least
Resistance
- Background reading
- Can the Vacuum be Engineered for Digital Library
Applications? - Abstract Quantum theory predicts, and
experiments verify, that empty space (the
vacuum/vision) contains an enormous residual
background energy known as zero-point energy
(anti-collaboration). Originally thought to be of
significance only for such esoteric concerns as
small perturbations to atomic emission processes
(digitization), it is now known to play a role in
large-scale phenomena of interest to librarians
as well, such as the inhibition of discourse, the
generation of short-range attractive forces
(e.g., revenue streams), and the possibility of
accounting for success.
11Model 2 Working with a Library Committee
- Background readings
- The Structure of Strongly Monotonic Probabilistic
Voting Procedures. by Nandeibam, S.
(RePEcfthbirmec98-07) - Excerpt Pattanaik and Peleg showed that the
power structure under a probabilistic voting
procedure which satisfies project goals,
optimally and independent of irrelevant
alternatives, is almost completely characterized
by random dictatorship. The authors propose a
new probabilistic monotonicity axiom called
strong monotonicity and show that, if the
probabilistic voting procedure is required to
satisfy this new axiom along with the project
goals, then the distribution of coalitional power
under it is completely characterized by random
dictatorship.
12Model 3 Collaborating with Multiple Library
Committees
- Recommended Readings
- Political Support for Targeted versus
Institutional Priorities - Social Choice with Infinite Populations
Construction of a Rule and Impossibility Results. - Distributive and Additive Costsharing of an
Homogeneous Good - The Geometry of Implementation A Necessary and
Sufficient Condition for Straightforward Games - Social Decision Rules Are Not Immune to Conflict
- A Multiplication of Solution Concepts
- An Exploration into the Social Evolution of
Adaptive and Rigid Behavior - Preferences Over Education Expenditure
- Consequences, Opportunities, and Procedures
- Self-Control in peer Groups
- Competing for Endorsements
- Computing Power Indices for Large Voting Games A
New Algorithm - Show Them Your Teeth First
- Required Reading
- Beyond Altruism, Duty or Collusion. Introducting
Solidarity into Digital Project Management - Coalitional Provision of Pure Collective Goods
13All Kidding Aside
- Collaboration is a process and needs to be
managed as such - At the outset of the project, little information
is known or understood by team members - Successful collaborative projects require
continual assessment and documentation of what
is known and/or changing
14Selected Digital Collaborations
15Envisioned v. Realized Programming Logic for
Digital Collaborations
- Sum(known variables) Sum(unknown variables)
final_product - If sum(known variables) gt sum(unknown variables)
then final_product gt envisioned - If sum(unknown variables) gt sum(known variables)
then final_product lt envisioned - final_product user_experience lt gt envisioned
16Flowcharting the Digital Collaborative Process
Project Envisioned
Project Realized
17Variables in Collaboration
Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Content Rights Funding Required
expertise Delivery models Stakeholder
expectations (everybodys!)
Project Realized
18Clarification Through Project Phases
Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Known
Unknown
Pre-proposalProposal development and
assessmentReformattingInfrastructure
DevelopmentEncodingMetadata Quality
ControlTesting
Project Realized
19The final_product of our collaboration
Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
final_product
Sum(known unknown)
Project Realized
20The End User The Ultimate Unknown Variable
Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
final_product
User
Unknown
Known
Project Realized
21The Project Realized
Sum(Final_product user)
Project Envisioned
Initialize Project Collaboration Set Variables
5WH unknown
Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
final_product
User
Unknown
Known
Project Realized
22Tips for Successful Collaborations
- Document everything that is known early on and
share broadly - During all phases, continue to refine and revise
documentation in attempts to make more about the
project known to all - Promote notion that collaboration is a
time-intensive process - Promote notion that garbage in equals garbage out
collaboration can save time! - Seriously consider the possibility that
perfection and excellence are very different
notions - Consider the notion that even though a given
project may never become what you as a
collaborator hoped it to be, the user ultimately
defines the success of the project in terms of
how s/he applies it in the teaching, research or
discovery process - Sum(final_product user) lt gt project as
envisioned
23Project Realized
24Initialize Project Collaboration
Set Variables 5WH Unknown
25Clarification All Phases
Unknown
Known
26Final_Product
27 USER
28Project Realized