Title: Moral and Social Philosophy 3
1Moral and Social Philosophy 3
Section taught by Howard Taylor
Texts for reading Blind Alley Beliefs David
Cook, chapters 3,4,5 Questions that Matter, Ed
Miller. Philosophy, Popkin and Stroll.
2Topics for Third Term
- Humanism
- Post-Modernism.
- Existentialism
- Marxism
3Ideology.
- Ideas.
- How to improve the world or how to behave in the
world. - What is wrong with the world.
- How it should be put right.
- Systematic written explanations
- Actions justified by the ideology
- Own morality.
4- The tutor does his best to be fair to all views -
religious and non-religious. - However in the interests of honesty he will
explain what he thinks and believes and why. - Although the tutor has his own convictions, the
assessment of essays and tutorials will not be
affected by a student's own different
convictions. - Knowledge of the subject and good argument are
all important for assessment. - Holding the same convictions as, or different
convictions from, the tutor will not be relevant
for module assessment.
5Humanism
- HUMANISM
- "Man is the measure of all things"
- Said Protagoras the ancient Greek Philosopher.
- (What he actually meant was that each person
knows for him/herself alone what it true and what
is good.)
6These days humanist usually means
atheist. However that was not always so. Even
in its modern atheist form it is only a special
(optimistic) form of atheism. In its modern form
it believes that we know nothing greater than
humans and therefore we should place our faith
in humanity above all else. As we shall see later
in the module, other forms of atheism say that
there are no grounds for putting our faith in
anything at all - not even ourselves.
7- We now turn briefly to the ancient world.
- Ancient Greek philosophers believed the ability
for reason - abstract thought
- universal thought
- made human beings unique and superior to all
other earthly living or non-living things.
8- Everywhere they looked in nature they saw order
and therefore mindedness. - Somehow, then, they believed that
- mind pervades nature.
- human beings share in that universal mind.
- They had no belief in a Creator or Creation -
(although Aristotle believed in a Prime Mover),
so nature has to be as it is by logical
necessity. - The mysteries of the universe can be understood
by reason, logic and mathematics alone - without
the need for experimentation.
9Renaissance Humanism (15th 16th Centuries)
- Celebration of freedom of thought.
- Dependence on the doctrines of the Church became
less necessary - Right and wrong could be discerned from the way
the world is. - Natural law.
- Although knowledge became less dependent upon the
Church, underpinning this humanism was faith in
the goodness of the natural world and its Creator.
10Post Enlightenment and Modern Humanism.
- After Newtons discoveries of the laws of
motion governing the movement of bodies (large
and small), many gradually came to believe that
eventually all things would be explicable by
physical laws alone. - Growth of a humanism without belief in God.
- The Laws of Nature, eternal?
- Why do the planets orbit the sun?
- Not God but the law of gravity.
- God of the gaps.
- A mechanistic universe.
- Reductionism
- Nevertheless humanism maintains its optimistic
belief in the goodness of humanity.
11- EXCERPTS FROM THE BRITISH HUMANIST ASSOCIATIONS
DECLARATION OF ITS MAIN CONVICTIONS (whole
slide) - Humanists reject the idea of any supernatural
agency intervening to help or hinder us. - Evidence shows that we have only one life, and
humanists grasp the opportunity to live it to the
full. - Humanists retain faith that people can and will
continue to solve problems, and that quality of
life can be improved and made more equitable.
Humanists are positive, gaining inspiration from
a rich natural world, our lives and culture. - Humanists think that
- this world and this life are all we have
- we should try to live full and happy lives
ourselves and, as part of this, make it easier
for other people to do the same - all situations and people deserve to be judged on
their merits by standards of reason and humanity
- individuality and social co-operation are equally
important.
12Questions and Problems for Modern Humanism 1
13Questions and Problems for Modern Humanism 2
- We must promote human happiness.
- Yes but, how do we know what is good for the
promotion of human happiness in the long term? - Does not human happiness come from a sense of
purpose, which is being fulfilled? - What is this purpose?
- Is humanity's purpose in life to be happy?
- If that is the case, all that is being said is
that in order for humanity to be happy it must be
happy! - The first question above has not been answered.
14Questions and Problems for Modern Humanism 3
- God is now unnecessary because education has
meant that humans have 'come of age'. - Are not some educated people criminals?
- Is there evidence from our behaviour that we have
grown up and can now safely guide ourselves? - Mankind is potentially capable of achieving great
progress in terms, of technology and social
justice. - Can we be sure that the way we have used the
progress in technology has brought more good than
evil?
15Questions and Problems for Modern Humanism 4
- Mankind is also free to act and achieve his aims
if he so chooses - there are no supernatural
bonds to tie him down. - If we are nothing but bundles of matter and
physical laws can there be real freedom?
16Lord Hailsham If Common Law did take the view
that a child in the womb has the same rights as a
separate human being, it would follow that the
termination of a pregnancy, even to save a
woman's life, is legally the same thing as the
murder of a child. But at the other end of the
scale, I find it impossible to deny that the
embryo in the mother's womb is a form of human
life and, as such, to be reverenced both by the
mother herself and by her doctor. I have to take
into account the holiness and worshipfulness of
human life, whether in the mother or the unborn
child, and, in so far as humanism leads one to
treat human beings as if they were just animals
or, for that matter, to treat animals as if they
were chattels and nothing more, it seems to me to
fall down precisely because it has degraded
humanity and even animal life in the proper scale
of values. . . Humanism by itself has never
redeemed mankind from sin or despair, offers no
explanation why, in acting morally, men are also
acting rationally. In so far as humanism exalts
the nature and destiny of man I am with it all
the way. But in so far as it debases man to a
mere bundle of wants and satisfactions, I find it
unworthy of the name of humanism, because it
fails to understand the nature of humanity it
professes to serve.
17Post Modernism.
- First what is meant by Modernism?
- It had/has many differing forms mainly expressing
beliefs about science and/or politics and the
meaning of human history. - It was/is the quest for certainty without
reference to religion. (Many modern people
remained religious but used religion for their
private lives and kept it out of the public
domain.)
18What is Modernism - continued.
- From science
- Truth is built on logic applied to self-evident
truths (rationalism) and/or experimental data. - Objective scientific method applied across the
board in the soft sciences (eg sociology,
psychology) - Naturalism - and scientism The physical
universe is all there is. - From history and politics
- Hegels Universal Spirit and the Dialectic.
- Marxism was one political example of modernism.
19The Meta-narratives of Modernism broke down
- Problems with Modernism.
- Political Theories broke down.
- Sciences advance reveals more and more mystery.
- It cant answer the ultimate questions after all.
- Doubts about sciences ability to be really
objective. - Depersonalising influence of modernism
- wars, pollution,
- it cannot explain our personal self-awareness and
spiritual longings. - Its optimistic belief in progress has been
undermined by recent human history.
20Post Modernism reacts against Modernism.
- If the Meta narratives of Modernism fail should
we return to the big stories or Meta narratives
of religion? - Jean-Francois Lyotard (French Canadian), in 1979,
defined Post Modernism as incredulity towards
(all) Meta-narratives. - Neither science nor politics nor religion give us
universal truth. - There is no big story - no universal truth.
- Dont worry - just pick and mix what makes you
feel good. - Dont consider the big questions. Just enjoy your
own little world.
21Mix together ancient and modern images, sayings
and teachings. Dont ask yourself what they mean
- meaning does not matter - there is no universal
meaning. If possible enjoy both religious
services and speeches by atheists. If they
appear to contradict one another - dont worry -
its how they make you feel that matters. Just
dont get bored.
22.
- Post Modernism is a care-free attitude to life
coming from the conviction that there are no
universal truths. - But can that conviction remain care-free?
- The conviction also has its inevitable darker
despairing side - e.g. Nietzsche (19th C German
philosopher) and his alternatives to Nihilism. - Nietzsche and his fear of Nihilism are considered
later under the heading of Existentialism.
23The Intellectual Problem for Post
Modernism There is no absolute truth is itself
a statement that claims to be absolutely
true! Post Modernism therefore refutes
itself! ------------------------------------------
------ See handout Post Modernism
24Structuralism, Post Structuralism and
Decontructionism. In contrast to the old view
that all my disparate parts are held together by
my unchanging 'self' and 'consciousness', Structur
alism held that the real 'I' is the construction
of the 'language' of my culture. The old view had
been that my conscious self apprehends the real
world around me, and then from my ideas about
it, formulates language to communicate to other
selves my ideas of reality. So language is a
product of the 'self' apprehending the real world
out there.
25Structuralism reverses this by making the whole
'language' the source of the structure of the
real 'me'. Words are defined by other words not
by the reality they pretend to reflect. So words
do not refer to the real world. They are
understood by their difference in relation to
other words. (Words 'differ' and do not
'refer') It is claimed evidence for this comes
from attempts to translate one language to
another. All translations are approximations.
This means that there is no direct reference
from reality to word. Words only find meaning in
relation to other words. Structuralists tried to
strip the human of his various cultures that
structure the 'person' to find the real 'person'
behind all the differing manifestations of
humanity.
26- Post Structuralists thought that
- there were no definite underlying structures that
could explain the human condition - it was impossible to step outside of discourse
and survey the situation objectively. - Jacques Derrida (1930- ) developed Deconstruction
as a technique for uncovering the cultural
assumptions hidden in the texts. - Influenced by Nietzsche and others, Derrida
suggests that all text has ambiguity, - therefore the possibility of a final and complete
interpretation is impossible. - There is no point in trying to get back to the
author (including Derrida himself?).
27- According to Post Structuralists and
Deconstructionists - Language contains hidden hierarchies' and
'privilege' which construct the culture. - Language gives Reason/Science special places of
privilege. - (Yet science does not really know what reality
is. It should be more humble.) - To identify these hierarchies one is involved in
'deconstruction'. - Attempts to interpret texts have given the Author
a privilege. - Deconstruction rejects this and therefore seeking
'what the author really meant' is wrong.
(Therefore to find what Derrida really meant is
also wrong!) - Anti-Elitism.
- Post-modern art attacks traditional views of
'quality. Exhibits - a bicycle wheel, vacuum cleaners, a dirty nappy,
a urinal. - those portraying contradiction and absurdity,
such as - a picture of a horse labelled as a door and a
glass of water labelled as an oak tree.
28Existentialism.Some important existentialists
- Soren Kierkegaard (1813-55)
- father of existentialism
- Christian
- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900)
- Atheist.
- Jean Paul Satre (1905-1980)
- Atheist
- Albert Camus (1913 - 60)
- Atheist.
- John McQuarrie
- Christian.
29Essence and Existence.
- Essence
- Does God exist?
- Who are we?
- Is there life after death?
- What is the good life?
- What is right?
- How can we improve the world?
- What is the purpose of life?
- Existence
- Decisions
- Commitments
- Passions
30Existentialism
It has many forms but there is a common thread
- Existence precedes essence.
- You are not born with a fixed nature.
- You cannot, by thinking, find the meaning of
life. - So dont ponder the essence of your life and then
act. - Rather choose and commit yourself to something.
- From your choice you will make and find your own
essence. - You cannot avoid choices. (Choosing not to choose
is a choice) - This involves a frightening responsibility.
- Death mocks everything in the end. (Atheistic
form of existentialism only)
31To Be or Not to Be? - that is the Question.
- Albert Camus (Atheist existentialist who
eventually died in a car crash) said - death is philosophy's only problem.
- How does one make sense of life when haunted by
this spectre? - Existentialists say
- We must answer To Be and put everything into
our lives.
32Background to Existentialism.
- German Philosopher - Hegel. (1770 - 1831)
- Not an existentialist!
- Dialectic
- Socrates
- Ideas in conflict with other ideas lead to
advance in knowledge. - Hegels Dialectic
- Nation in conflict with nation leads to advance
in the progress of history. - This progress is guided by Great Spirit -
immanent in World
33Kierkegaards themes
- Rejected Hegels philosophy as unrelated to life.
- Tumultuous life marked by indecision re marriage
and ordination. - We cannot find truth by reflection and reason.
- I must do what God wants me to do and then I will
find truth. - Dont go in for proofs.
- The less the evidence the better.
- Decision - leap in dark - pain.
34Kierkegaards book titles give a clue to his
thinking
- Fear and Trembling
- Philosophical Fragments
- Concluding Unscientific Postscript.
- The Concept of Dread
35Kierkegaards main themes (Cont)
- Stake your life on something even if, at first,
there is no reason to do so. - Dont live a second or third hand life, choose
for yourself. - Subjectivity not objectivity is key to truth.
- Enlightenment must come from beyond ones reason.
- One must desire enlightenment for its own sake.
36Kierkegaards parable.
- King (representing God and/or enlightenment)
wants to marry peasant girl. - She must love him not for his wealth or power
- He cant dazzle her with wealth and entice her.
- He cant force her to marry her.
- He conceals himself.
- So
- God concealed Himself from us in Christ.
- We must desire enlightenment for its own sake and
not be enticed by its benefits. - Then God is able to miraculously reveal true
purpose of life to us. - Kierkegaard was converted during Holy Week
37Subject - Object relationship
- HGTs comments
- Objective truth does exist.
- Thinking is necessary.
- Thinking alone is not enough.
- Revelation is necessary especially in knowledge
of persons. - We cannot be detached observers
- Understand a little, commit a little, understand
more, commit more. - Truth does change us.
- Personal commitment and passion is part of the
quest for objective truth.
38- Soren Kierkegaard - quotations (1)
- Faith
- Faith is the highest passion in a human being.
Many in every generation may not come that far,
but none comes further. - Life and Living
- Life has its own hidden forces which you can only
discover by living. - Mystics and Mysticism
- Just as in earthly life lovers long for the
moment when they are able to breathe forth their
love for each other, to let their souls blend in
a soft whisper, so the mystic longs for the
moment when in prayer he can, as it were, creep
into God.
39Soren Kierkegaard - quotations (2)
- Personality
- Personality is only ripe when a man has made the
truth his own. - Saints
- God creates out of nothing. Wonderful you say.
Yes, to be sure, but he does what is still more
wonderful he makes saints out of sinners. - Tyranny
- The tyrant dies and his rule is over, the martyr
dies and his rule begins.
40Meaning and meaninglessness from two philosopher
mathematicians. (I owe the thoughts to the
Christian philosopher Thomas V.
Morris.) Bertrand Russell (20th C) in Why I am
not a Christian. That man his growth, his
hopes and fears, his love and beliefs, are but
the outcomes of accidental collocations of atoms
that no fire, nor heroism, no intensity of
thought and feeling can preserve individual life
beyond the grave that all the labours of the
ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all
the noonday brightness of human genius, are
destined to extinction in the vast death of the
solar system .. and be buried beneath the debris
of a universe in ruins - all these things, are
yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which
rejects them can hope to stand. Pascal (17th C),
Pensees 139 How hollow and full of trash is
mans heart.
41Something has meaning if and only if it is
endowed with meaning of significance by a
purposive personal agent or group of such
agents. To have meaning of any kind, a thing
must be brought under the governance of some kind
of purposive intention, whether an intention to
refer, to express, to convey, or to operate in
the production of some acknowledged value. This
is true of all meaning. Meaning is never
intrinsic it is always derivative. Objective or
Subjective Meaning? Some philosophers advocate a
Do-It-Yourself approach to questions of
meaning. According to this view there is no
objective meaning of life waiting to be
discovered. If we order our lives around things
we desire, value and enjoy, within the structure
of goals we take for ourselves, we render them
meaningful and thereby give meaning to the life
they compose. A persons life can therefore have
subjective meaning - or so they say.
42Problems for Subjective Meaning. How do you
distinguish between one kind of meaningful goal
and another? Someone may focus his whole life on
collecting matchbox covers and another on finding
cures for terrible diseases. How does one
distinguish the trivial from meaningful goals?
There is nothing to appeal to. Someone may be
very good at torturing people and enjoy it very
much so that he focuses his life on that
pursuit. How does one distinguish between worthy
goals and unworthy goals? There is nothing to
appeal to. How can a purely subjective approach
to lifes meaning account for these objective
differences?
43Nietzsche.
- God is Dead
- Thus Spake Zarathustra begins with pronouncement
by Zarathustra that God is dead - Nietzsche meant that belief in God is dying and
that is the significant fact for belief in lifes
alleged value. (Rather than the actual
existence/non-existence of God.)
44According to Nietzsche Christian belief in God is
essential for meaning and morality. To try to
preserve it without God is an English
fantasy. Values cannot survive without belief in
God. There is no value to be discovered in the
world. He attacks the view that the preservation
and advancement of humankind can be a motive for
morality. He is thus afraid of the nihilism
that will follow the death of God. However he is
also afraid we may cling to Christian morality
(without reason - because God is dead) and
deteriorate into the slave morality described
in the Sermon on the Mount.
45No truth can serve as the basis of morality or
immorality. (Although there are cases where
moral action should be pursued and immoral be
action avoided but not for any ultimate
reason.) Why should we be interested in truth?
Maybe the pursuit of falsehood might serve us
better. Dissatisfaction is the germ of
ethics. Survival of the fittest belongs to what
we actually are. Therefore our humanity must be
affirmed by the pursuit of Greatness rather
than Goodness. Greatness absorbs and uses
pain. Goodness tries to relieve pain - and is
therefore to be despised. We must assert the
will to power or the master morality rather
than the pathetic appeals to goodness by the
slaves who invoke Christian morality or human
rights to protect them from the masters.
46Because God is Dead (said Nietzsche)
- It follows that
- the physical world with its laws is all that
there is - there is no real I' independent of my
body/brain. (See quote in next slide) - no such thing as free thought
- no such thing as reasoning and knowledge
- science as knowledge of the real universe is an
illusion
47Quotation from Beyond Good and Evil
As for the superstitions of the logicians, I
shall never tire of underlining a concise little
fact which these superstitious people are loath
to admit - namely that a thought comes when it
wants, not when I' want so that it is a
falsification of the facts to say the subject
I' is the condition of the predicate think'
Here Nietzsche is saying two related things 1.
There is no real self (I) that can initiate
anything. All actions and thoughts are the
result of impersonal physical laws. 2.
Thinking, as we normally consider it, is
impossible.
48The Irony
- In an age of dramatic scientific discoveries we
decide that we know nothing - To the obvious question How can it be true that
there is no truth?' he provides no answer. He
cannot. - Nietzche enjoys the irony that the rationality
that made science possible has been destroyed by
science.
49Nietzsches existentialism in blue
- Science alone provides the given
- This has made our normal understanding of truth
unintelligible - There is no objective purpose to life - no good
and evil. - We must now seize the moment, say yes to life,
and impose our will on the world around us. We
must be strong willed. - Truth is not discovered it is created.
- Truth is the will to power.
50An extreme example of Nietzsches rejection of
objective morality
- "Who can attain to anything great if he does not
feel in himself the force and will to inflict
great pain ? The ability to suffer is a small
matter in that line, weak women and even slaves
often maintain masterliness. - But not to perish from internal distress and
doubt when one inflicts great suffering and hears
the cry to it - that is great, that belongs to
greatness. - Friedrich Nietzche, 'The Joyful Wisdom', trans.
by Thomas Common (New York Russell and Russell,
Inc., 1964), p.25.
51Nietzsches Contradictory Tragic Life(1)
- Son of a Protestant minister
- Father died young.
- He always loved and honoured his fathers memory.
- On his fathers grave stone he put the words from
the New Testament - Love abides forever.
- He had little money, poor health and was lonely.
52Nietzsches Contradictory Tragic Life(2)
- Yet he hated teaching of Jesus (which taught
slave morality such as - Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the
kingdom of heaven. - Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the
earth. - Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for
righteousness, for they will be filled. - Blessed are those who are persecuted because of
righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of
heaven. - But I tell you Love your enemies and pray for
those who persecute you.
53Nietzsches Contradictory Tragic Life(3)
- He believed such teaching went against his
conviction that we must assert ourselves in the
face of adversity. - He believed Jesus encouraged weakness.
- A Question
- Could the contradictions in his intellectual and
spiritual life have contributed to his eventual
insanity? (He died at 56 after spending years in
a psychiatric hospital)
54Richard Rorty is Professor of Comparative
Literature in USA and a well known supporter of
Post-Modernism.
- Richard Rorty, Human Rights, Rationality and
Sentimentality - When contemporary admirers of Plato claim that
all featherless bipeds - even the stupid and
childlike, even the women, even the sodomized -
have the same inalienable rights, admirers of
Nietzsche reply that the very idea of
'inalienable human rights is, like the idea of a
special added ingredient, a laughably feeble
attempt by the weaker members of the species to
fend off the stronger. - As I see it, one important intellectual advance
made in our century is the steady decline of
interest in the quarrel between Plato and
Nietzsche. There is a growing willingness to
neglect the question 'What is our nature?' and to
substitute the question 'What can we make of
ourselves?' We are coming to think of ourselves
as the flexible, protean, self-shaping animal
rather than as the rational animal or the cruel
animal. - One of the shapes we have recently assumed is
that of a human rights culture We should stop
trying to get behind or beneath this fact, stop
trying to detect and defend its so-called
'philosophical presuppositions' Philosophers
like myself see our task as a matter of making
our own culture - the human rights culture - more
self-conscious and more powerful, rather than of
demonstrating its superiority to other cultures
by an appeal to something trans-cultural.
55- If we think of our essence as mere accidental
descent from bacteria, we can - find it depressing, as did George Bernard Shaw.
(Next slide) - See also handout Bad and Bored.
- Or we can rejoice in the meaninglessness of life
- and allow the strong to eliminate the weak as
in the quote of H. G. Wells. (2 slides ahead.) - (The following GBS and HGW quotes are taken from
Richard Dawkins The Devils Chaplain.) - Or we can attempt to rise above the
meaninglessness of life in personal
existentialism. (Satre, Camus (?)
56George Bernard Shaw wrote of Darwinian
evolution When its whole significance dawns on
you, your heart sinks into a heap of sand within
you. There is a hideous fatalism about it, a
ghastly and damnable reduction of beauty and
intelligence, of strength and purpose, of honour
and aspiration.
57H.G.Wells, however, revelled in the ruthlessness
of nature And how will the New Republic treat
the inferior races? How will it deal with the
black? . . . the yellow man? . . . the Jew? . . .
those swarms of black, and brown, and
dirty-white, and yellow people, who do not come
into the new needs of efficiency? Well, the world
is a world, and not a charitable institution, and
I take it they will have to go. . . . And the
ethical system of these men of the New Republic,
the ethical system which will dominate the world
state, will be shaped primarily to favour the
procreation of what is fine and efficient and
beautiful in humanitybeautiful and strong
bodies, clear and powerful minds. . . . And the
method that nature has followed hitherto in the
shaping of the world, whereby weakness was
prevented from propagating weakness . . . is
death. . . . The men of the New Republic . . .
will have an ideal that will make the killing
worth the while. Someone asked Why shouldn't
morality be accepted as the truth and Darwinism a
mere political construct?
58EXISTENTIALISM AFTER KIERKEGAARD
- Some books by Jean Paul Sartre
- Nausea
- Mockery of humanism.
- Distinction between a person and a thing is
blurred or denied. - Being and Nothingness
- The Wall
- No Exit
- The Room
59Jean Paul Satre - Quotations 1
- "Atheistic existentialism...states that if God
does not exist, there is at least one being in
whom existence precedes essence, a being who
exists before he can be defined by any concept
and that this being is man, or, as Heidegger
says, human reality. What is meant here by saying
that existence precedes essence? It means that,
first of all, man exists, turns up, appears on
the scene, and, only afterwards, defines himself."
60Jean Paul Satre - Quotations 2
- "The existentialist is strongly opposed to a
certain kind of secular ethics which would like
to abolish God with the least possible expense.
(This is Satres attack on Humanism.) - All human actions are equivalent... and all are
on principle doomed to failure. - The poor don't know that their function in life
is to exercise our generosity. - Every existing thing is born without reason,
prolongs itself out of weakness, and dies by
chance.
61Jean Paul Satre - Quotations 3
- Things are entirely what they appear to be and
behind them . . . there is nothing. - Hell is other people.,
- My thought is me that's why I can't stop. I
exist because I think. . . and I can't stop
myself from thinking.
62Jean Paul Satre - Quotations 4
- "There are two kinds of existentialists first,
those who are Christian...and on the other hand
the atheistic existentialists, among whom...I
class myself. What they have in common is that
they think that existence precedes essence, or,
if you prefer, that subjectivity must be the
turning point." - We must act out passion before we can feel them.
- Man is condemned to be free because once thrown
into the world, he is responsible for everything
he does.
63Albert Camus - Most famous book - The Outsider.
Summary in next slide.
- Quotations from Albert Camus 1
- Ideology
- Whoever today speaks of human existence in terms
of power, efficiency, and "historical tasks" is
an actual or potential assassin. - Injustice
- Children will still die unjustly even in a
perfect society. Even by his greatest effort, man
can only propose to diminish, arithmetically, the
sufferings of the world. - Life and Living
- If, after all, men cannot always make history
have meaning, they can always act so that their
own lives have one.
64Albert Camuss The Outsider. The Outsider is not
a bad man, but he is indifferent to the
difference between good and evil and to societys
norms. This means No pretence of sadness at
mother's funeral. Helps his bad friends,
e.g pimp who was brutal to Arab girl who tried
to escape, neighbour who was cruel to his dog
but wept when it died, Pimp quarrels with girl's
brothers and this leads to a fight in which the
Outsider kills, in self defence??, an Arab. He is
arrested and put on trial for murder. Evidence
against him includes attitude to his mother's
death helping the pimp escape. No pretence. He
is then sentenced to death. Priest comes to him
before execution and appeals to him to accept the
gospel of forgiveness and peace with God.
Angrily refuses saying he doesn't believe in
God. Just before his death he rejoices at
meaningless of everything.
65Quotations from Albert Camus 2
- Optimism
- If Christianity is pessimistic as to man, it is
optimistic as to human destiny. Well, I can say
that, pessimistic as to human destiny, I am
optimistic as to man. - Self-knowledge
- To know oneself, one should assert oneself.
Psychology is action, not thinking about oneself.
We continue to shape our personality all our
life. If we knew ourselves perfectly, we should
die. (This quote shows Camus as a true
existentialist) - Suffering
- In default of inexhaustible happiness, eternal
suffering would at least give us a destiny. But
we do not even have that consolation, and our
worst agonies come to an end one day.
66Marxism
- Karl Marx (1818 - 1883)
- The Two Main Writings
- Das Capital
- The Communist Party Manifesto.
- But first the background to Marxist theory
67The Dialectic.
- Process.
- Thesis against Antithesis leads to Synthesis.
- This new thesis has its own antithesis.
- So a new synthesis emerges
- And so on
- Dialectic in Socrates and Plato.
- Method of argumentation using contrary case to
elicit more truth. - One opinion has a counter opinion.
- The clash of the two leads to advance in
understanding in a synthesis - and so on
68Hegel(1770-1831) the Dialectic
- Absolute Spirit (Mind) guides dialectic process.
- A) Process in history of universe
- Material universe - Low level consciousness -
higher consciousness - self-awareness - human
reason. - The Mind of the Universe now expresses itself in
human reasoning. - B) Process in history of nations.
- Nation against nation leads to new nation
incorporating best of both in a new synthesis. - This new nation conflicts with another nation and
another nation appears. - So on until the perfect society is reached.
69Feuerbach (1804 - 1872)
- He denied the existence of the Absolute Mind or
Spirit. - Reality can be understood by material processes
alone.
70Marxs Dialectical Materialism
- The Dialectic is not the conflict of nations but
classes. - The Class Struggle.
- The Dialectic is an inevitable process but is not
moved forward by Absolute Spirit or Mind - there
is no God or Eternal Mind. - It can be understood by material and economic
processes alone. - A Question for Marxists
- How do we know that blind material processes
alone will follow the path Marx believed in?
71Some of the main phases of Marxs dialectic
- 1. Feudalism, 2. Capitalism, 3. Socialism, 4.
Communism. - Each change is revolutionary not gradual or
evolutionary. - The process needs each of these in order.
- A people cannot jump from Feudalism to Socialism
(say). - For example Marx believed capitalism was needed
to give socialism a prosperous foundation. - However, after Marxs time, one of the main
communist nation (Russia) did try to jump from
rural semi-feudal economies to socialism, missing
out industrial capitalism!
72Feudalism
- Landowner and Tenants.
- Tenants have no right to buy land or significant
property. - Permanent serfdom.
- Clash between serfs and landowners leads to
Capitalism.
73Capitalism leads to Socialist revolution.
- Every person can own land and/or capital.
- Some are successful and start businesses.
- They employ workers.
- Competition between businesses lowers prices.
- Low prices means low wages paid to workers.
- Worker is paid less than the value he puts into
the product. - The difference is the surplus value
- Worker becomes alienated from the product.
- Workers rise against owners of capital.
- Workers take over government and seize all
property for the people. - Dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism)
begins.
74Socialism to Communist Utopia.
- The power of the state withers away
- Nations and governments disappear.
- A community of common ownership emerges.
- This communist community would then fulfil Marxs
famous words - From each according to his ability to each
according to his need. - It was this statement that inspired many Western
Christian people to sympathise with Communist
ideology - at least until the realities of life
under Stalin (USSR) and Mao (China) became
apparent. - This final communist phase was never reached.
75The reality was the opposite of Utopia.
- Even excluding those killed in war or civil war,
in the 20th Century more than 100 million people
perished under so-called Marxist governments -
many more than all those who perished under all
other systems of government put together. - Why did this happen?
- Three things, at least, contributed
- Absence of the rule of law.
- The concentration of all political and economic
power in the hands of a political elite. - The explicit materialist conviction that human
beings are not finally accountable to God.
76Marxist Morality and a Paradox
- An act which encourages the forward movement of
the revolutionary process is good. - An act (say generosity to the poor) that delays
the revolution is bad. - The revolutionary process is inevitable and
cannot be stopped by anyone. - Nevertheless we must struggle and fight to
promote the revolution.