Fitness to Stand Trial - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Fitness to Stand Trial

Description:

... responsible on account of mental disorder ... stand trial and criminal responsibility are concerned with mental status ... nature or object of the proceedings, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:158
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: deborahc4
Category:
Tags: fitness | stand | trial

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fitness to Stand Trial


1
  • Fitness to Stand Trial
  • NCRMD
  • not criminally responsible on account of mental
    disorder

1
2
Fitness To Stand Trial and Criminal Responsibility
  • Both fitness to stand trial and criminal
    responsibility are concerned with mental status
  • criminal responsibility (CR) is concerned with
    mental status at the time of the crime
  • fitness to stand trial is concerned with mental
    status at the time of the trial.
  • Fitness assessment must precede judgment of
    criminal responsibility
  • Fitness may often be remediated, CR (re the
    crime) is not

3
Fitness to Stand Trial
  • Unable on account of mental disorder to conduct
    a defense at any stage of the proceeding before a
    verdict is rendered or to instruct counsel to do
    so, and, in particular, unable on account of
    mental disorder to
  • understand the nature or object of the
    proceedings,
  • understand the possible consequences of the
    proceedings, or
  • communicate with counsel
    C.C. s. 2

2
4
Fitness Interview Test
  • Individuals understanding of the nature and
    object of the proceedings
  • Individuals understanding of the consequences of
    the proceedings
  • Individuals ability to communicate with counsel

5
5
Success of FIT-R
  • Correctly identified 100 of mentally incompetent
    (unfit)
  • but correctly rejected only 80 of those
    competent.
  • Risk of false alarm (20)
  • considered less important than risk of erroneous
    competent (fit) judgment.

6
Disposition Order May Be
  • Fit to Stand Trial
  • proceed to trial
  • Unfit to Stand Trial
  • set aside trial procedure
  • dismiss jury (if applicable)

6
7
If Found Unfit
  • reassess every 2 years
  • May treat against will
  • Why deficit
  • Drugs
  • Training to address the particular deficit(s)

7
8
What is Insanity?
  • Wild Beast (1724)
  • Total defect of understanding (1847)
  • M.Naghten Test (1843)
  • Volition Test (1886)
  • Mental Illness test (1870/1954)
  • American Law Institute (1964)
  • Insanity Defence Reform Act (1984)

9
9
Wild Beast (1724)
  • totally deprived of his understanding and
    memory and doth not know what he is doing, no
    more than an infant, than a brute, or a wild
    beast

10
10
Total Defect of Understanding (1847)
  • referred to a person having the level of
    understanding which is less than a normal
    14-year-old child

11
11
MNaghten Test (1843)
  • Presumed sane unless at the time of committing
    the offence the accused had
  • a disease of the mind that caused the person to
  • not understand the nature and quality of the act
    or
  • not understand that the act was wrong

12
12
Volition Test (1886)
  • In Parsons v. State the Irresistible Impulse Test
    was added to the MNaghten test
  • to include the availability of the insanity
    defence if the accused could not control his
    actions

13
13
Mental Illness (1870/1954)
  • the court expanded the definition of insanity to
    include any behaviour that was a product of
    mental illness
  • adopted in 1954 by the United States Court of
    Appeals

14
14
American Law Institute (1962)
  • A person is not responsible for criminal conduct
    if at the time of such conduct as a result of
    mental disease or defect he lacks substantial
    capacity either to appreciate the criminality
    (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform his
    conduct to the requirements of law.
  • The terms mental disease or defect do not
    include an abnormality manifested only by
    repeated criminal or otherwise anti-social
    conduct.

15
15
Canada (1894)Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
(NGRI)
  • a person is insane when . . .
  • Is in a state of natural imbecility
  • or has disease of the mind to an extent that
    renders him
  • incapable of appreciating the nature and quality
    of an act or omission or of knowing that an act
    or omission is wrong.

16
Canada (1992) - NCRMDNot Criminally Responsible
on Account of Mental Disorder
  • No person is criminally responsible for an act
    committed or an omission made while suffering
    from a mental disorder that rendered that person
    incapable of appreciating the nature and quality
    of an act or omission or of knowing that an act
    or omission is wrong.
  • Criminal Code s. 16

17
Considerations on a NCRMD Order
  • Public Protection
  • Reintegration of Accused into Society
  • Accused Mental Condition

23
18
The Disposition may be...
  • Absolute discharge
  • Conditional discharge
  • Detention in hospital
  • Treat against will?

24
19
Who is Found NCRMD?
  • White single male
  • Late 20s early 30s
  • A history of psychiatric hospitalizations
  • Unemployed, w/o grade 12
  • Psychotic
  • Tends to have committed a non-violent crime

25
20
Detention and Release
  • Detention time is highly variable
  • Recidivism rates for those found NGRI and those
    not is comparable

26
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com