Physician Led Reform Vs Collaborative Reform - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Physician Led Reform Vs Collaborative Reform

Description:

Patients and doctors believe any Plan is trustworthy or truly motivated for QI ... The public will not tolerate excuses. What would that look like? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: wshoe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Physician Led Reform Vs Collaborative Reform


1
Physician Led Reform Vs Collaborative Reform
  • Wells Shoemaker MD
  • Medical Director
  • California Association of Physician Groups, PMG
    Santa Cruz

2
Some Peculiar Plan Beliefs
  • Consumers actually care about brand
    differentiation
  • Practicing doctors care about branding
  • HEDIS Plan scores have local relevance
  • Patients and doctors believe any Plan is
    trustworthy or truly motivated for QI

3
Realities from Local Perspective
  • Plans are all considered difficult partners by
    groups, distrusted by individual Drs.
  • Groups regard our patients not by Plan label, but
    by PCP. Not a Blue Cross patient, but a Dr.
    Weber patient.
  • Patients are members of our population, using our
    own resources. This is Good.
  • Constant migration and discontinuity

4
Silos of CareLocal and State
  • Integrated group vs. IPA
  • HMO vs. PPO vs. Medicare vs. Medi-Cal etc.
  • Solo, small group, large group
  • Affiliated vs. Unaffiliated
  • Safety Net, FQHC /-, politics and mission
  • Public Health
  • Cognitive vs. Procedural
  • Hospital based vs. office based

5
Common Ground
  • No single agency, even a huge Blue One, has
    enough money, influence, or expertise to change
    health care delivery and quality over a
    population.
  • There is more than enough money, expertise, and
    zeal in the system to do so.

6
Local Example
  • Santa Cruz CountyHealth Improvement
    PartnershipALL players, executive level, every
    month
  • Choose common ground issues for community wide
    effort. Compete elsewhere
  • Dramatic progress with spin offs

7
State Example
  • Breakthroughs in Chronic Care Program
  • Health Plans
  • Purchasers
  • Lead Medical Groups CAPG
  • Lumetra and State Agencies
  • Pharma
  • Composite Clout is Considerable

8
Tools
  • Incentives work if aligned. Thanks, Blues.
  • Delegated model is logical bridge
  • Combination of peer awareness then pressure PLUS
    realistic redesign teaching AND economic
    facilitation requiredwe have the first two.
  • Need the best creative minds of Plans, Purchaser,
    Groupstrust, networks

9
More Collaboration Coming
  • ICSI is a model that worksculturally
  • CA has the pieces on the table
  • Charismatic leaders at the table
  • CAPG focus changingdelegated model matches Plan
    needs for local footprint
  • Need executive commitment to go from pilot
    curiosity posture to mission

10
The Answer is Yes
  • We have abundant experience with pilots, small
    populations, and regions to know that quality of
    care can be changed in rather short order.
  • Is it possible? That is no longer in question.
    The question is the scale and the rateand the
    commitment.
  • Since the answer is Yes, we have an ethical
    mandate to do it . The public will not tolerate
    excuses.

11
What would that look like?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com