Title: A novel flFFF method estimating interfacial interactions related to UF and NF membrane fouling
1A novel fl-FFF method estimating interfacial
interactions related to UF and NF membrane
fouling
- Suhan Kim1,2, Sungyun Lee1, and Jaeweon Cho1,2
- 1 Department of Environmental Science and
Engineering, GIST, Gwangju, Korea - 2 Center for Seawater Desalination Plant,
Gwangju, Korea
2Backgrounds (I)
- Traditional criteria for the membrane selection
pore size and water permeability - Fouling is an inevitable problem in membrane
filtration processes for water reuse and
desalination. - Fouling occurs from interfacial interaction
adhesion and cohesion. The parameter related to
the interaction will be a useful index to
estimate fouling potential.
3Backgrounds (II)
- Efforts to predict the fouling potential
membrane and foulant characterizations - - Membrane characterization zeta potential
(surface charge), pore size distribution, contact
angle (surface energy, hydrophobicity) - - Foulant characterization size and molecular
weight distribution, zeta potential, contact
angle - - Interfacial interaction model using both
membrane and foulant characteristics
Fundamental, but laboratory-dependant (not
field-applicable) methods
(Ref) Lee et al., Desalination 202 (2006) 377.
Kim and Hoek, Desalination 202 (2006) 333.
4Backgrounds (III)
- Typical two purposes of flow field flow
fractionation (fl-FFF) - (1) Separation
- (2) Characterization
(Ref) Cho et el., Colloids and Surfaces A
Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 274 (2006) 43.
Tatavarty et el., Journal of Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology 6 (2006) 2461.
5Objective Hypothesis
Objective
- To develop more direct, intuitive, and
field-friendly technique estimating fouling
potential using fl-FFF.
Hypothesis
- If foulants are detectable, the fouling potential
can be quantified using fl-FFF technique. - The fouling potential by fl-FFF can be verified
from lab-scale fouling tests.
6Theory
- Basic procedure to get the fouling potential
(A)
Larger interaction High fouling potential
(B)
Smaller interaction Low fouling potential
lt FFF results gt
(B)
(A)
7Theory
- Membrane Performance Index (MPI) Fouling
potential Removal efficiency
(A)
Lower PI from Higher fouling potential
(B)
Lower PI from Lower removal efficiency
(C)
Higher PI from Lower fouling potential Higher
removal efficiency
8Experimental Methods fl-FFF
- Membrane
- PW (GE Osmonics, UF)
- NE70 (Saehan, NF)
- NF90 (Dow Filmtec, NF)
- fl-FFF
- w 250 mm
- field flow rate 0.3 ml/min
- UV detector at 254 nm
- Procedure
- Injecting ? Focusing ? Operating w/ no field
No field
9Experimental Methods Fouling Test
- Foulants
- Organic matter
- HA (Humic Acid, Aldrich),
- Nanoparticle
- S120 (Silica nano particle, d120nm)
- Solutes
- NaCl 10 mM
- pH 6 (unadjusted)
- Membrane
- PW (GE Osmonics, UF)
- NE70 (Saehan, NF)
- NF90 (Dow Filmtec, NF)
- Operation conditions
- Hydrodynamic condition
- Cross-flow Re
- Cross-flow velocity m/s
- Initial flux 10 mm/s
-
- Temperature
- T 25?C
10Membrane Characteristics
NE70
NF90
PW
11Membrane Performance Index - S120
12S120 Fouling Test
- Salt rejection
- PW lt 1
- NE70 35
- NF90 96
- Foulant removal
- Conc. 500 mg/L
- PW 100
- NE70 100
- NF90 100
13Membrane Performance Index - HA
14HA Fouling Test
- Salt rejection
- PW lt 1
- NE70 35
- NF90 96
- Foulant removal
- Conc. 170 mg/L
- PW 96
- NE70 99.5
- NF90 99.8
15Key Findings Future works
Key findings
- A novel fl-FFF method estimating Membrane
Performance Index (MPI) for a specific foulant
was developed. - MPI accounts for both fouling potential and
removal efficiency. - Lab-scale fouling test partially verifies MPI.
Future works
- Normalization of MPI (i.e., MPImax 1)
- More applications of MPI
16Acknowledgements
- Financial support
- This work was supported by a grant (No.
R01-2006-000-10993-0) from the Basic Research
Program of the Korea Science and Engineering
Foundation (KOSEF)
- Prof. Chos research group at GIST, Korea.
- Center for Seawater Desalination Plant, Gwangju,
Korea