What does meaning mean - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

What does meaning mean

Description:

Mind/body and formalism/functionalism. The problem of meaning. The syntax ... Mental language interfaces with the physical world in ... formalism ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:149
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: CCU7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What does meaning mean


1
What does meaning mean?
  • Linguistics lecture 3
  • November 2, 2006

2
Overview
  • Interfaces with and within language
  • Mind/body and formalism/functionalism
  • The problem of meaning
  • The syntax-semantics interface

3
Language is half in the mind,half in the
physical world
4
Interfaces
  • Mental language interfaces with the physical
    world in semantics (meaning)
  • Mental language interfaces with the physical
    world in phonology (form)
  • Syntax is the interface between semantics and
    phonology

5
Formalist view
  • Modularity hypothesis semantics, syntax, and
    phonology have their own grammatical structure,
    and are not influenced or shaped by their
    interface roles
  • Thus syntax is not shaped by semantics
  • Likewise, phonology is not shaped by the physical
    side of speech

6
Functionalist view
  • Interactionist hypothesis semantics, syntax,
    and phonology are strongly influenced by their
    interface roles
  • Some formalists permit functionalism, but only in
    biological evolution
  • For example, they say that syntax is innate, but
    that it evolved to solve the semantics-phonology
    interface problem

7
Linguists see interfaces everywhere
  • Nonlinguistic cognition (e.g. vision, muscle
    control) interfaces with the physical world
  • This interface uses nonlinguistic mental
    representations (e.g. visual images)
  • These nonlinguistic mental representations
    interface with formal propositions
  • Propositions interface with the actual sentences
    of syntax
  • Syntax interfaces with phonology, which
    interfaces with the physical world again

8
  • Physical world

(images etc)
Mental representations
Propositions
Syntax
Phonology
Physical world
9
Is meaning an interface?
  • What does dog mean? Two things
  • ? It refers to something in the world
  • dog ?
  • ? It can be defined in terms of other forms
  • dog animal with four legs that
  • dog ???

10
Yes, meanings are interfaces
  • Meaning type ? is Reference what a linguistic
    form refers to in the real world
  • Actually, its an interface between linguistic
    form and mental representations of the world
    (shaped partly by vision, etc)
  • Meaning type ? is Sense a formal representation
    of meaning
  • This is the mental thing that the linguistic
    form links to propositions

11
The nature of reference
  • Proper names refer to individuals
  • (1) James Myers is here.
  • Common words refer to classes
  • (2) The American linguist at CCU is here.
  • Note that sentences (1) and (2) seem to have the
    same sense (formal equivalence), but different
    references (e.g. if I am replaced by another
    American linguist)

12
The reference of a sentence
  • The standard theory of sentence meaning is
    truth-conditional semantics
  • A sentence refers to the conditions (maybe
    imaginary) under which it is true.
  • (1) George W. Bush is a Taiwanese.
  • (2) All Taiwanese have three legs.
  • Sentence (1) would be true under different
    conditions than sentence (2), so they have
    different meanings.

13
The essential role of sense
  • Words and sentences dont link to the world
    directly, but instead interface through formal
    propositions sense.
  • Sentence Chomsky eats dogs.
  • Sense A specific person P called Chomsky has
    a relationship R called eating with a class C
    called dogs, such that R(P,C)
  • Reference A mental representation (using images
    etc) of the situation described by the above
    proposition

14
The syntax-semantics interface
  • But how are sentences translated into formal
    propositions?
  • This issue is closely related to formal logic
  • (1) George W. Bush is a Taiwanese.
  • (2) All Taiwanese have three legs.
  • (3) Therefore, George W. Bush has three legs.
  • This is logically valid (3) follows from (1)
    and (2), even though they are false.

15
Syntax and logic
  • The above reasoning is valid because of its
    abstract structure
  • (1) X is a Y.
  • (2) All Y have Z.
  • (3) X has Z.
  • This is syntax

All Y have Z
16
Semantics and formalism
  • The syntax-proposition interface obeys its own
    formal rules that seem to be unrelated to
    experience with the real world
  • (1) Bill told John about him.
  • (2) Bill told John about himself.
  • (3) Bill told John to kill himself.
  • (4) Bill told John he is smart.

him ? Bill, him ? John himself Bill himself
John he Bill or he John
17
Formal semantic universals?
  • Self words in English must be linked to words
    close enough in the sentence
  • Bill told John to say Henry likes himself.
  • himself Henry, and nobody else
  • But Chinese allows long-distance reference
  • ????????????????
  • ?? ??? or ?? (but not ???)

18
Syntax and ambiguity
  • Ambiguous sentences have multiple meanings
  • Why do you believe that James is dumb?
  • Remember? In this case, ambiguity comes from two
    different deep structures
  • (1) Whyx do you believe x that James is
    dumb?
  • What makes you believe this about James?
  • (2) Whyx do you believe that James is dumb x
    ?
  • What causes James to be dumb?

19
Propositions and ambiguity
  • Ambiguity with only one deep structure
  • A student read every book.
  • Proposition 1
  • a studentx every booky x read y
  • There is a student who read every book.
  • Proposition 2
  • every booky a studentx x read y
  • For every book, there is a student who read
    it.

20
Ambiguity and transformations?
  • The ambiguity of the James is dumb sentence
    comes from the transformation from deep structure
    to surface structure.
  • Maybe the ambiguity of the student sentence
    comes from another transformation
  • surface structure to propositions

21
Transforming into propositions
  • If this is right, then creating propositions
    should obey syntactic constraints some
    transformation should be illegal
  • So with more complex syntax, ambiguity in the
    student sentence disappears
  • A student said that he read every book
  • (1) a studentx every booky x said that
    hex read y
  • (2) every booky a studentx x said that
    hex read y

22
Semantics and functionalism
  • This formal stuff works pretty well, but people
    also interpret sentences using real-world
    knowledge
  • (1) Bill told John she is smart.
  • (2) Bill told John. He was surprised.
  • (3) Bill told John. He shouldnt have.
  • (4) Bill told John he should listen.

she ? Bill or John he John he Bill he John?
23
Summary
  • Language interfaces with the world through
    semantics and phonology
  • Formalists believe in modularity, functionalists
    dont
  • Meaning involves both sense and reference
  • Interpreting sentences requires transforming them
    into propositions
  • Real-world knowledge is also necessary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com