Womens Studies and Ancient History - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Womens Studies and Ancient History

Description:

Women's Studies and ... These writings recognize that matrilineality existed argue ... of the God because of her kingly father's acknowledged divinity. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: kimberl50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Womens Studies and Ancient History


1
Womens Studies and Ancient History
  • Most of us, as products of a patriarchy-created
    educational system, believe that women have
    always had less status than and been dominated by
    men.

2
  • Most anthropological writings indicate that the
    general egalitarianism in these societies did not
    fully apply to women.
  • These writings recognize that matrilineality
    existed argue that it just substituted the
    authority of a womans male relatives for that
    her father and husband.
  • They suggest that women, even in foraging
    societies, were basically equal to men but had
    slightly lower status.
  • They suggest that womens role is always
    private, while mens is public.

3
  • Theories of early humans or their predecessors
    have long believed that men were hunting, while
    women gathered seeds and plants and took care of
    the children.

4
  • Thomas Hobbes, a famous historian and
    philosopher, theorized that aggressiveness and
    competitiveness were what enabled people to
    overcome their environment and create great
    civilizations.

http//www.skuola.net/filosofia/pensiero_politico.
asp
A study of available data, however, suggests that
these statements are not true, that probably some
bias caused assumptions to be made about data
that were not necessarily true.
5
  • We now believe that
  • 1) that a stage of primitive communism,
    preceded the emergence of social stratification
  • and
  • 2) that women in certain ancient societies,
    did hold a relatively equal position to that of
    men, even where stratification existed, but
    gradually lost that status as patriarchal
    societies gained power and used it to
    institutionalize changes

6
  • Eleanor Leacock believes that studying data from
    social and physical anthropology, archeology, and
    primatology in their entirety, rather than
    selectively, suggests that sociality, curiosity,
    and playfulness--not aggressiveness or
    competitiveness as Thomas Hobbes once
    theorized--made it possible for a fairly small
    and defenseless creature to evolve into the human
    being that created many different ways of life
    around the world.

7
  • Sociality is the abounding desire to be close to
    others of the same species and an overriding
    interest in them.
  • Rather than competition among individuals for an
    elevated status, some historians now believe that
    a rich group life led to cooperation, which
    itself led to and depended upon the development
    of tools, utensils, and language.

8
  • Private property,
  • Social stratification,
  • Political subjugation, and
  • Institutionalized warfare with standing armies
  • That these exist do not automatically express
    some innate human nature or some necessary linear
    progression of human history.

9
  • The institutionalized inequalities so familiar
    and natural to us, the dominance hierarchies,
    arose in the fourth millennium B.C.E., during the
    urban revolution.

10
  • Prior to that, data suggests, that at different
    times, various egalitarian gathering and hunting,
    and later, horticultural (or hoe-agricultural)
    societies existed.
  • They elaborated ritually on various forms of
    social and ceremonial rank but still maintained,
    as far as can be determined, the equal right of
    all to basic sources of livelihood.
  • http//www.museums.org.za/sam/resource/arch/linton
    3.htm

11
  • The theory of urban revolution goes like this
  • As a result of human inventiveness and
    ingenuity (agriculture and its tools)
    specialization of work developed, moving
    some out of direct contact with food
    production. Barter became commerce, supplies
    began to be stored for the future for the first
    time, and Priest-chiefs gradually began assuming
    control of the stores, transferring ritual rank
    to elitism. Equal access to land became
    restricted, and class systems were created--not
    always without resistance. (Leacock 18)

12
The Ancients
  • Study of the Ancients is difficult for several
    reasons
  • Source Material
  • Competition
  • Bias

13
Exam StatsMultiple Choice Portion
  • Class Average 17.1
  • Back Row 15.1
  • Third Row 17.6
  • Second Row 18
  • First Row 19.2
  • Women 17.2
  • Men 16.8

14
  • Source Material, itself
  • Material about ancient cultures, produced by
    these ancient cultures is not always readily
    available or easy to come by. Most of it must be
    literally un-earthed and can be damaged or
    destroyed in the reclaiming process. Materials
    usually consist of burial or ceremonial sites, or
    in the case of more advanced or civilized
    societies--like Egypt or Sumer--written
    texts of economic accounts, laws or codes, or
    personal seals. Much data from the past has not
    survived or is currently unavailable.

15
  • Disciplinary Priority
  • The very people involved in reclaiming and
    studying these artifacts can hinder the study of
    those artifacts.
  • Archeologists tend to concentrate on excavating
    palaces, temples, and royal tombs rather than on
    town sites which could potentially tell us more
    about the lives of ordinary people in antiquity.
  • Philologists, who translate texts, often give
    higher priority to figuring out lexicographical
    and grammatical problems, seldom analyzing the
    content as thoroughly as a social historian.

16
  • Ethnocentric Bias Ethno- meaning Race, from the
    Greek for People
  • Societies with histories outside of the
    traditions of Europe or the Orient are commonly
    all lumped together and labeled Primitive.
  • This has two effects.
  • 1) Statements made about women in primitive
    societies do not usually take into account the
    diversity of all those societies.

17
  • 2) Scholars can misinterpret data based on their
    own assumptions, such as assuming either that
    male-female dyads exist in all societies
    social-economic and child care organization, as
    they do in Western civilization, or that social
    action is always divided into public, formal,
    political (Male) spheres and private, familial,
    informal (Female) spheres.
  • This has historically been a difficult bias
    to overcome. Many of the Greek and Roman
    historians found other societies, either ones
    which dominated and conquered or ones which they
    were dominated and conquered by, strange and less
    civilized--just based on different customs and,
    in some cases, different gender relations.

18
  • Androcentric Bias Andro- meaning Male,
    masculine, from the Greek for Man
  • Anthropologists and scientists, on the whole,
    have been men who interview other men and assume
    that the data collected is sufficient for
    understanding a society.
  • Women scholars have accepted this, because
    they, too, are products of the same culture and
    institutions. They are trained to think like
    men. Only recently have men and women become
    conscious of the distortions created by male or
    patriarchal bias. (Kimmels invisibility)

19
  • A recent re-analysis of the data suggests,
    again, that patriarchal traditions were preceded
    by egalitarian horticultural societies, as can be
    discerned from what little we know about the
    early hunting peoples of Europe.

20
Neanderthal Society
  • The few hints left about the life of the
    Neanderthals, the theorized ancestors of modern
    humans who lived until 40 or 50,000 years ago
    confirm the essentially social nature of human
    evolution.
  • Several families shared single large dwellings,
    and evidence suggests that the infirm were cared
    for. Burial sites give the evidence of this
  • A Skeleton of relatively old arthritic cripple
    in one site
  • One of an older man whose right arm had been
    amputated when young
  • Older skeletons buried with flowers

21
Cro-Magnon Society
  • This social nature is reaffirmed by studies of
    the Cro-Magnons, (35,00-10,000 years ago) the
    theorized successors of the Neanderthals and
    precursors to modern humans.
  • Cave paintings of the Cro-Magnons indicate a
    respect for hunted animals (as opposed to an
    aggressive desire to kill a weaker creature) and
    an appreciation of their beauty.
  • These paintings also suggest a ceremonial life in
    which both men and women participated.
  • Additionally, numerous female figurines, ranging
    from very fat to almost stick-like but always
    very stylized indicate the importance of women to
    ritual.

22
Women in the Stone Age
  • Venus of Willendorf
  • c. 24,000-22,000 BCE
  • Limestone
  • 43/8 inches (11.1 cm) high
  • (Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna)

1966 Movie Poster
23
Theory of Creation of Patriarchy
  • The urban revolution (economic and political
    changes) coincided with territorial challenges
    and disputes, which necessitated the creation of
    standing armies, which, in turn, further divided
    labor between and thought about the sexes. Women
    were likely to be seen as objects or property
    that needed protection.

24
Two different strands of social development occur
  • That of the Mediterranean world, where the
    classical patriarchy of the ancient Middle East
    finally succeeded in submerging what had been the
    formal public participation of women in social,
    political, and religious matters and
  • That of the northern European periphery where
    women, though far from equal to men, nonetheless
    retained a relatively higher status than in
    Mediterranean cultures--a status that persisted
    long enough to effect early medieval society.

25
A Comparison between Ancient Egypt and Assyria
  • By analyzing the data we can see that women had a
    higher relative status in ancient Egypt than in
    Assyria.

Queen Hatsheput
26
Egypt
  • Egypt survived for 3,000 years until the
    Greco-Roman civilization, led by the Roman war
    machine under Caesar, finally conquered it in the
    era of Cleopatra.
  • In ancient Egypt men and women were treated
    relatively equally to each other, although they
    experienced differences in treatment based on
    class.
  • For instance, a wealthy Egyptian man and a
    wealthy Egyptian woman were seen as equals under
    their laws, as were a poor man or a poor woman
    however, the wealthy citizens had more rights and
    more advantages under their law than did the poor.

27
Egypt
  • Although it was not always practiced
    consistently, the right to succeed to the throne
    passed through the women of the royal family.
    Thus the king, who was considered to be an
    incarnation of the sky-god Horus, had to marry a
    princess of the royal blood known as the Daughter
    of the God because of her kingly fathers
    acknowledged divinity.

28
  • Often in the royal family, brother married sister
    to keep the throne within the family. This
    corresponds to their mythological accounts of
    Isis and Osiris, sibling deities who marry to
    maintain power.

29
Royal Women
  • Lists of kings often record their mothers names
    as well because of their role in the succession.
  • Splendid tombs provide evidence of this high
    respect of kings mothers, as well. One queen
    (Hetepheres) was buried with golden furniture.
  • Royal women did not dwell secluded in harems but
    took an active role in court life, assuming the
    duties of regents if their husbands died before
    the heir apparent came of age.

30
Common Women
  • Murals show unveiled women selling products in
    marketplace and working in harvest scenes
    alongside men. Women winnowed wheat, handpicked
    flax, spun it into thread, wove it into linen
    cloth, ground wheat, and brewed beer.
  • Household accounts of an Egyptian farm in 2000 B.
    C. Shows that all members of one family received
    wages for the work they performed adult men and
    women receiving equal amounts, youths less.

31
Assyria
  • In ancient Assyria, where Amorite peoples
    displace Sumerians, misogyny borne out of a
    patriarchy in the extreme seems to be the rule
    of gender relations. Assyrians, unlike
    Egyptians, expressed little or no faith in an
    afterlife.
  • Their law code then is extremely harsh as all
    penalties for improper behavior cannot be left
    for the next life.

32
Assyrian Law
  • Private property was extremely important, and
    women had no right to property. Their fathers or
    their husbands controlled everything.
  • A husband could give property his wife brought
    into their marriage to anyone at anytime.
  • However, a woman could still be held responsible
    for her husbands debts, and daughters could
    actually be enslaved for their fathers debts.

33
Assyrian Justice
  • Women who were victims of crime usually suffered
    at the hands of justice.
  • A virgin who was raped by a man would be made to
    marry him, perhaps because he had claimed her
    only asset or perhaps because the rape was seen
    as being her fault.
  • A rapist was punished by having his own wife
    raped by the victims father the rapist of a
    married woman was put to death.
  • Many offenses under the law code could result in
    a womans death, such as abortion, adultery, or
    suspicious activities outside the home.

34
Assyrian Sexuality
  • Female sexuality was intensely regulated. As the
    descent was patrilineal, legitimacy was
    guaranteed by restricting women. Virginity was
    prized for brides.
  • Women needed to be veiled when in public.
  • Even queens were highly restricted, guarded by
    eunuchs along with their husbands concubines in
    the kings harems.

35
Patriarchal Patterns Cross-Culturally
  • As we will see with our study of the earliest
    creation myths across several societies, a
    pattern seems to emerge in ancient history that
    of a creative mother goddess or a creative
    male/female deity pair that, over time and
    corresponding to the development and entrenchment
    of patriarchy, gets replaced with a male creative
    deity/deities.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com