TC Ontario Region TSES Phase 11 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

TC Ontario Region TSES Phase 11

Description:

Two (2) technology options means, two (2) distinct data sources. ... 2-way communications, via digital text-messaging ... way digital communications. web-based ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: tran103
Category:
Tags: tses | ontario | phase | region

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TC Ontario Region TSES Phase 11


1
TC Ontario RegionTSES Phase 11
  • Study Results,
  • Recommendations for Implementation
  • May 20, 2003

2
Phase 11 Purpose Objectives
  • Pilot Study (Phase 1) Proof of Concept
  • Demonstrated truck tractor logs as a fruitful and
    increasingly abundant source of empirical data on
    border wait-times, other related delays
    capacity constraints in the highway system
  • Phase 11 Objectives Move beyond proof of
    concept to
  • Clarify effective ways means to initiate
    maintain the electronic interchange of
    proprietary data on wait-times at major Ontario
    border crossings.
  • Identify/estimate the total costs of implementing
    a scalable program of electronic data gathering 7
    in-house data management.
  • Elicit a broad base of participation support
    for such a program from the carrier community.

3
...Where have we been !
  • We have looked at both (Satellite GPS)
    technology options from top-bottom. We know
  • the strengths limitations of each
  • the technical options, and practical applications
    that exist, and
  • the cost of building a data set in successive
    increments
  • Interest remains strong at both the association
    and individual carrier level.
  • progress made, carrier by carrier, abetted by the
    fact we can demonstrate alternative ways, means
    and costs of generating the required data elements

4
...What do we know !
  • What to remember, as we move forward (i.e rules
    of thumb, or lessons learned)
  • Two (2) technology options means, two (2)
    distinct data sources. Both can be used, to
    increase sample size, but each differs in certain
    fundamental respects
  • proposed solutions are based on ready-use
    applications, that require little or no custom
    programming, or concerted RD efforts
  • all start-up costs are clearly visible, and are
    comparable to those incurred by carriers
    subscribing to any particular service
  • ongoing operating costs are linear i.e. unit
    charge/data reading escalates directly relation
    to volume of traffic coverage..

5
..What do we know (contd)
  • the project is fully scalable, we can start small
    expand in increments as additional carriers
    service vendors agree to participate
  • the singular focus of attention on border
    wait-times is more straight forward
    technically, more cost-effective, and all but
    eliminates any perception of regulatory
    oversight, that would arise if compiling a broad
    cross-section of data on the entire O/D trip.
  • there is no compelling operational reason to
    limit attention to any one particular crossing,
    once carrier access is granted and interface with
    the host network(s) is established, data can be
    generated from any/all Ontario crossings.

6
Tracking Technology Options
  • Technology service options
  • CanCom Satellite tracking
  • GPS-based tracking
  • Similarities
  • Real-time (position) tracking, 2-way
    communications
  • Precision/accuracy, extent of geographic coverage
  • System reliability, data logging storage
    capacity
  • Differences
  • Network structure
  • Scale of operations, existing market shares, and
    most notably,
  • How the actual location, or position signal is
    generated

7
CanCom Satellite System Service
  • Technology Components
  • CanCom lease-in-perpetuity on former Anik family
    of telecommunication satellites
  • Exclusive Canadian.distributor of QualComms
    proprietary OmniTRACS technology
  • Network Service Elements
  • Automatic vehicle tracking I.e. position polling
  • 2-way communications, via digital text-messaging
  • Data storage, data mgmt.services, including
    (optional)integration withback-office
    functions I.e. route planning, dispatch,
    accounting, payroll
  • Scale of Operations
  • Only satellite service provider in Canada
  • Operations Centre processes more than 3M
    transaction per month
  • 400 Canadian fleets I.e.,23 of 25 largest
    truckload carriers
  • 27,000 mobile units in service, _at_ 20 of
    registered t-trailer units

8
Satellite Positioning v.Wait-time Measurement
  • Despite its inherent functionality, there is a
    glitch when using the CanCom system to measure
    wait-time at border crossings
  • CanCom position polling is done via traditional
    satellite triangulation
  • Polling typically done at 1 hr, intervals,
  • With each poll time-stamped and long/lat
    coordinates recorded
  • Frequency of polling interval can be increased
    at considerable cost to provide a continuous
    stream of readings, but
  • Unlike a truck-mounted GPS unit, the satellite
    system cant be programmed to initiate a position
    poll at a pre-defined location, or specific set
    of long/lat coordinates, such as the entry exit
    points of a Can/U.S. border crossing

9
What are the viable CanCom options?
  • Given its ubiquitous market presence, the sheer
    volume of trip data routinely processed/stored in
    the CanCom system, we can hardly afford to
    ignore, or omit CanCom from further consideration
  • Basically, we are left with two options
  • Macro Messaging.
  • Interpretation of existing Trip Data Streams
  • Both are practical, albeit 2nd best
    alternatives
  • points in favor against each
  • both lack reliability precision of GPS
    readings
  • More on these options after reviewing accessible
    GPS options in greater detail

10
GPS System Service Options
  • GPS based service providers operate in a
    multiple-vendor market, where barriers to
    entry/exit are less prohibitive, and various
    firms , with comparable technology sets, compete
    to provide a differential array of tracking
    services
  • GPS System Configurations
  • GPS application service providers are typically
    smaller,
  • with a shorter, but by no means insignificant,
    list of client carriers, and most notably,
  • The actual service provided may differ, based on
    each vendors particular system configuration
  • This vital, latter distinction can best be
    illustrated by specific examples

11
Air IQ Ltd.
  • GPS combined with Cellular to provide a mobile
    communications service network
  • AirIQ operates on a different scale, and at a
    lower price-point than CanCom, to offer a similar
    array of tracking, data logging network
    management services
  • Features
  • Real-time tracking position polling
  • 2-way digital communications
  • web-based subscriber access
  • on-board (downloadable) data storage bus (70
    days, FI/FO)
  • on demand Vehicle History Replay with
    hi-resolution mapping interface
  • Polling on demand, at predefined, or specified
    locations
  • actively markets a Boundary Crossing feature

12
Turnpike Global Technologies Ltd.
  • GPS mobile technology integrated with vehicle,
    on-board Electronic Control Unit (ECU)
  • TGT foregoes real-time tracking mobile
    communications in favor of data logging and
    reporting on vehicle operating performance,
    engine diagnostics, vehicle routing and mileage.
  • In effect, TGT offers the equivalent of an
    Electronic Tachograph Card
  • Features
  • polling at pre-defined, or specified locations
  • data logging
  • Vehicle performance activity reporting
  • IFTA fuel tax allocation IRP reporting

13
3rd Party Derivative (IFTA)Applications
  • TGT has successfully expanded its primary
    (vehicle diagnostics) service offering to include
    IFTA/IRP fuel tax allocation and reporting for
    both its own and CanCom subscribers.
  • This reflects an element of convergence,within
    this industry sector, which has productive
    implications for TCs analytical efforts
  • precise identification of jurisdictional
    boundaries is a primary element of IFTA/IRP
    reporting
  • TGTs experience in data analysis/interpretation
    for IFTA purposes is an asset/opportunity that
    will enhance our ability to work within the
    limitations of the CanCom data base
  • The quality and legitimacy of IFTA reporting
    standards is well established and largely beyond
    refute.

14
Border Crossing Times Study
15
Call for Volunteers
  • TC Ontario region staff drafted a call for
    volunteers for the Border Time Crossing Study to
    be posted on the Ontario Trucking Association
    (OTA) web-based newsletter
  • Three interested trucking companies came forward
    initially
  • Challenger Motor Freight
  • Bison Transport
  • Empire Transportation
  • and have offered unqualified support and
    participation
  • This voluntary solicitation not only laid the
    foundation for bilateral discussions with these 3
    carriers, it has also abetted our efforts to
    engage the interest of additional carriers (I.e.
    carrier by carrier)

16
Turnpike Global Technologies (TGT)
  • Turnpike provides a GPS tracking system called
    Route Tracker as well as fuel tax reporting
    services for Route Tracker and CanCom customers
  • Like an electronic tachograph the Route Tracker
    system combines information from the engine
    control module (J1708) with data generated by GPS
    to provide a detailed fingerprint of each trip
  • Data is recorded at frequent intervals i.e, every
    mile or every two miles depending on speed
  • This information is stored for up to 7 years for
    IFTA purposes

17
TCs Crossing Times Wish List
  • To estimate border crossing times at least two
    GPS polls (and associated variables) are required
    on each side of the border, with additional polls
    programmed at pre-defined intervals to create a
    set border zone
  • At a minimum, TC wants to profile the border
    crossing times by date, time of day, and day of
    week.
  • Ideally TC would then consolidate the data by
    origin destination, carrier type and SCTC
    classification number where possible.
  • Desired outputs include crossing time averages
    and variability for Canada and US-bound trips.

18
TurnPikes Existing Data Set
  • TGTs data base is comprised of historical border
    crossing data for the Bluewater, Ambassador and
    Queenston-Lewiston and Peace Bridges.
  • The existing database includes almost 11,000
    truck trips
  • The historical time-series includes observations
    from December 2001 to March 2003
  • Summary data can be generated on demand in a
    variety of reporting formats.
  • New border crossing data is compiled and the
    aggregate data set is updated on a weekly basis.
  • This ongoing data can be accessed by TC, at an
    additional cost, as it is compiled processed on
    a weekly/monthly basis.

19
TGT Cost Estimates
20
Ongoing Efforts . Next Steps
  • TC Ontario Region has engaged Turnpike Global
    Technologies (TGT) to customize their program
    software and complete the analysis of their
    (12/01-07/03) data records in accordance with TC
    specifications
  • analysis of the existing historic records will
    provide useful baseline data and the foundation
    for a collaborative partnership with a GPS data
    management specialist
  • the custom program software will include
    sufficient functionality, one, to generate
    wait-times within a pre-defined border zone as
    well as the actual crossing, and two, to import
    additional data from other external sources.
  • Total Cost 21,680.00 Completion date 08/03
  • Upon successful completion of the initial
    contract, TC anticipates procuring additional
    border wait time data from TGT on an ongoing
    (weekly/monthly)basis.
  • Total Cost _at_ 25-30K/annum

21
Ongoing efforts Next Steps (contd)
  • The potential exists to negotiate a similar
    contractual agreement with AirIQ to procure
    border crossing data on an ongoing
    (weekly/monthly) basis.
  • Discussions with AirIQ have been ongoing and data
    access/procurement options have been discussed at
    length
  • Detailed negotiations awaiting only carrier
    consent to access data records before proceeding
  • Estimated Cost25K/annum for 100 crossings/day,
    based on 0.20/data entry (negotiable depending
    on volume), plus Start-Up costs (nominal)
  • Depending on the results of TGTs development
    efforts raw data procured form AirIQ, and other
    potential sources, could be imported into the TGT
    software model

22
Other Related Intiatives Next Steps
  • In light of the limitations cited respecting the
    CanCom data base, Macro-Messaging is the only
    immediately apparent option to generate wait-time
    data via the CanCom network
  • Macros are preformatted sub-routines to
    facilitate ease of text messaging
  • 2 simple Marcos, delineating entry/exit at border
    crossings, would be activated by drivers with
    little more than 2 keystrokes
  • Discussions with CanCom have determined the costs
    of initiating this option to be _at_ 10K/annum per
    100crossings/day, plus 15K start-up costs, plus
    _at_7K /annum for Q Mass subscriber renewal fees.

23
Other Related Initiatives Next Steps
  • Considering the extent of CanComs market reach,
    we believe Macro-Messaging to be a viable option
    however, two mitigating factors warrant further
    consideration before proceeding
  • Initial carrier reaction to the Macro messaging
    option is skeptical, or lukewarm at best. They
    question the reliability of driver intervention,
    otherwise noting any intervention is not part of
    current business process
  • The emergence of TGT ltd, with it existing Q Mass
    access to CanCom data and corresponding expertise
    in data interpretation for IFTA/IRP reporting,
    presents an opportunity for us to work in
    collaboration with both to further assess
    derivative way/mean to fine-tune and/or interpret
    existing trip data streams.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com