ReTooling the Factory: Scaffolding for Library Labs in Large First Year Courses - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

ReTooling the Factory: Scaffolding for Library Labs in Large First Year Courses

Description:

Literature review. Methods. Scaffolding ... Reference Services Review, 32, 185-189. ... Comprehensive theoretical review of large class IL challenges; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: joannas
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ReTooling the Factory: Scaffolding for Library Labs in Large First Year Courses


1
Re-Tooling the Factory Scaffolding for Library
Labs in Large First Year Courses
  • Joanna Szurmak
  • Science Liaison Librarian
  • University of Toronto Mississauga Library

2
Session Outline
  • About UTM and PSY100
  • the large class IL instruction problem
  • Literature review
  • Methods
  • Scaffolding
  • Instruction Pedagogies
  • Experimental and statistical shortcomings
  • Results
  • Future work

3
Session Learning Objectives
  • Identify and reflect on the challenges of
    providing IL instruction in large classes.
  • Reflect on ways of assessing and packaging IL
    instruction pedagogies in large classes using the
    PSY100 case study.
  • Identify and analyze IL scaffolding tools.
  • Develop insights into the laborious process of
    refinement and re-negotiation(Thaxton Mosby,
    2004, p.189).

4
PSY100 at UTM
  • University of Toronto at Mississauga
  • primarily undergraduate campus
  • 10,000 plus students
  • Introduction to Psychology (PSY100)
  • key pre-requisite for 12 programs of study
  • largest 1st year course on campus
  • textbook/lecture/lab model
  • text-based multiple-choice tests 56 of course
    mark.

industrial remains by extranoise at
http//www.everystockphoto.com/photo.php?imageId6
98787
5
Psychology InstructionStudies Found in
Literature
  • Larkin, J. E., Pines, H. A. (2005). Developing
    information literacy and research skills in
    introductory psychology A case study Electronic
    version. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31,
    40-45.
  • IL skills are part of a stand-alone assignment
  • Librarian works to develop assignment but stays
    out of the classroom
  • IL skills are reflected in summative course
    evaluation.

6
Psychology InstructionStudies Found in
Literature
  • Thaxton, L., Faccioli, M. B., Mosby, A. P.
    (2004). Leveraging collaboration for information
    literacy in psychology Electronic version.
    Reference Services Review, 32, 185-189.
  • Librarians do extensive pre- and post-assessments
    of student IL competencies
  • Librarians and faculty collaborate to focus
    instruction on course learning objectives
  • IL embedding is a laborious process of
    refinement and renegotiation (p. 189).

7
Large Class InstructionStudies Found in
Literature
  • Vander Meer, P., Ring, D. M., Perez-Stable,
    M.A. (2007). Engaging the masses library
    instruction with large undergraduate classes
    Electronic version. College Undergraduate
    Libraries, 14, 39-55.
  • Comprehensive theoretical review
  • Authors offer diverse strategies
  • Key component is active learning (p. 41) which
    involves higher-order thinking (analysis,
    synthesis, evaluation).

8
Large Class InstructionStudies Found in
Literature
  • Chalmers, M.,(2008). Lessons from the academy
    actuating effective mass-class information
    literacy instruction Electronic version.
    Reference Services Review, 36, 23-38.
  • Comprehensive theoretical review of large class
    IL challenges
  • Suggestions on active learning from the sciences
    where such classes are routine
  • Are we trying to teach too much? (p. 34)

9
The Situation, Well Articulated
  • To date there has been scant discussion in the
    library literature about using mass-class active
    learning pedagogies in information literacy (IL)
    instruction. (Chalmers, 2008, p.23)

10
Putting it all together in PSY100
  • stand-alone assignments fostering engagement
  • IL content mapping
  • assessment
  • active scaffolding pedagogy.

11
Situating IL in PSY100
PSY Lab Scaffolding
Instruction and Reference Framework
Information Needs of Students
Embed IL content into a natural niche in the
course structure so that it can be fully
supported by the existing framework.
12
Cognitive Scaffolding
  • Cognitive supports that allow students to
    internalize new tasks
  • Structure they can build upon.
  • Has to fit within the PSY100 framework of
  • Textbook/lecture/multiple choice
  • lab activities.
  • Has to fit within the support structure of
  • course activities
  • library reference.

13
PSY100 Cognitive Mapping
text-based multiple choice (54 of the mark)
lecture-based multiple choice (21)
Labs (25)
Richard C. Overbaugh and Lynn Schultz, Old
Dominion University http//www.odu.edu/educ/roverb
au/Bloom/blooms_taxonomy.htm
14
Where are the HOTS?

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Top 3
levels of the Taxonomy
15
Where are the HOTS in PSY100?
BONUS! ACRL IL Performance Indicators and
Outcomes 1.2f, 2.5b and others

LAB ACTIVITIES
16
Cognitive Scaffolding
  • Has to fit within the PSY100 framework of
  • Textbook/lecture/multiple choice
  • pre-labs and lab assignments.
  • Has to reconcile the Modus Operandi of
  • PSY lab coordinator
  • library instruction and reference

No HOTS
Needs ease of marking
Wants good research questions
17
Existing PSY100 Library Lab
  • Not formally part of the lab curriculum
  • 0.5 part of the lab mark, but
  • Presented in the lecture to 500 students in 15
    minutes.

No scaffolding No thematic cohesion with
lecture Not supporting learning objectives
18
The Interim Solution
  • In the short term
  • analyzed the course IL content
  • redesigned the library assignment to be more
    engaging (with Dr. Jeffrey Graham, PSY100 lab
    coordinator).
  • moved the library tutorial introduction into the
    lab where it fits better thematically.
  • But thats a problem, too, because

19
PSY100 is a mass-class
  • up to 1500 students in the Fall/Winter session
  • 3 lecture streams of 500 students each
  • up to 25 lab sessions.
  • One cannot effectively teach in 20 sections.
  • One has to innovate in the Summer session (200
  • students) and adapt new insights for the
  • Fall/Winter session.

20
PSY Summer Session Retool and
  • investigate what kinds of scaffolding and
    instruction pedagogies work to support IL skills
    in the assignment

21
Collaborate
  • encapsulate the best practices so that they can
    be reproduced either by lab TAs or in an online
    tutorial

22
PSY100 Plan of Action
  • Give students the new lab assignment.
  • Conduct a 10-question IL pre-test and post-test.
  • Carry out a 30 min. instruction session in 2
    summer lab sessions.
  • Investigate the effects of active or
    concept-based instruction vs. task-based teaching.

23
Focus on Instruction Pedagogies
Task-based instruction gives them less room for
error
Yes, but with concept-based active learning they
will re-use what they learned!
  • Lab coordinator sees different issues than
    instruction librarian.

24
IL Pre- and Post-Tests
  • SAILS instrument
  • standardized assessment of information literacy
  • skills (Kent State University).
  • 10 questions chosen from
  • search strategies (ACRL IL Standard 2)
  • search tool selection (ACRL IL Standard 2)
  • search tool identification (ACRL IL Standards 1,
    2)
  • Post-tests carried out 10 days after pre-tests.

25
Data Analysis Challenges
  • No control group since everyone has to do the
    assignment and get instruction
  • Pre-test and post-test questions not identical
  • Only ¾ of the data collected thorough the
    learning management system.
  • Student IDs stripped out for privacy reasons.

26
Quantitative vs. Qualitative
  • Aggregate quantitative analysis
  • Averages and STD/SEM values for both data sets
  • No pre- and post- mapping for individual test
    subjects
  • No paired t-tests to measure statistical
    significance of the effect of instruction.

27
PSY100 Pre-Test Results
SEM17.0
SEM17.0
Scores are out of 100
28
PSY100 Pre-Test Results
Pre-Test Averages and STDs
Concept Task
29
PSY100 Post-Test Results
SEM18.7
SEM21.7
Scores are out of 100
30
PSY100 Post-Test Results
Post-Test Averages and STDs
Concept Task
31
Results Side by Side
Pre-Test Averages and STDs
Post-Test Averages and STDs
Concept Task
Concept Task
32
Erratum
  • Results are interesting but not statistically
    significant.
  • My paper says they are
  • I made a mistake of using response number SEMs
    vs. average score SEMs.

33
Upcoming
  • More PSY100 pre- and post-test data
  • Will present more data, along with ideas on how
    to assess actively in IL tutorials using
    iClickers.
  • When?
  • WILU 2009 in Montreal, QC, on May 26, 2009.

34
Future Work
  • What was the role of the assignment?
  • There were IL benefits to doing it, but they were
    not measured independently.
  • How to translate the tentative results to serve
    the Fall/Winter course?
  • See Chalmers(2008) for ideas.

35
Images in this Presentation
  • All images are either public domain or used under
    a Creative Commons Licence from
    everystockphoto.com (Attribution Licence).
  • All public domain images are from the Library of
    Congress flickr collection of photos from the
    1930s-1940s taken by Alfred T. Palmer.
  • CCL images are by extranoise at
    http//www.everystockphoto.com/photo.php?imageId6
    98787.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com