Program Reviews: The Focus of Outcomes Assessment in the Graduate School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Program Reviews: The Focus of Outcomes Assessment in the Graduate School

Description:

Howard University Has Conducted Graduate Program Reviews Since 1970's ... Categories of Graduate Programs Based Upon Recent Reviews ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: how9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Program Reviews: The Focus of Outcomes Assessment in the Graduate School


1
Program Reviews The Focus of Outcomes Assessment
in the Graduate School
  • Orlando L. Taylor
  • Dean
  • otaylor_at_howard.edu

2
Background on Graduate Program Reviews
  • Periodic Program Reviews Are a Norm in Graduate
    Schools Throughout the U.S.
  • Howard University Has Conducted Graduate Program
    Reviews Since 1970s
  • The Current Model Was Refined in 1997 in
    Accordance with National Trends
  • Emphases on Enhancing Academic Planning and
    External Reputation

3
Key Aspects of Graduate School Program Reviews
  • Coordinated by a Program Review Council
  • Typically Conducted Within Units Every 5-7 Years
  • All Units Assessed Since 1998 as a Part of SFA I
  • Focus on Student Enrollment, Faculty
    Productivity, Graduate Faculty Membership,
    Extramural Support, External Reputation,
    Curriculum Resources
  • Utilize Internal Data, Institutional Data,
    External Reputational Data, Self Studies and Site
    Visits
  • Final Planning Conference Convened with Unit
    Faculty, Chairs, Deans and Provost

4
Categories of Graduate Programs Based Upon Recent
Reviews
  • IStrong Programs and Targets of Opportunity
  • IIPrograms on the Threshold of Achieving
    National Prominence
  • IIIPrograms That Meet Acceptable Levels of
    Quality, But Are Unlikely to Achieve Higher
    Standing in the Foreseeable Future Without
    Greater Research Productivity, Funding and/or
    Student Interest
  • IVWeak Programs Where Warning Signs Are on the
    Horizon with Respect to Low Student Enrollment,
    Faculty Productivity, Reputation and/or
    Accreditation Status (if applicable).
  • VWeak Programs That Are Candidates for
    Termination Because of Low Student Enrollment,
    Faculty Productivity and/or Reputation

5
Strategic Academic Planning Based Upon Program
Reviews
  • Enhanced Support for Strong Programs and Targets
    of Opportunity
  • Review and Re-engineering of Specializations
    Based upon Resources, Trends and Needs
  • Consideration of New Programs, Program Mergers
    and Interdisciplinary Arrangements
  • Creation of Strategies to Enhance Enrollment,
    Productivity, Graduate Faculty in Weaker
    Programs
  • Creation of Strategies to Achieve Accreditation,
    Where Applicable
  • Preparation of Plans for Elimination of
    Non-Productive Programs

6
For Further Information
  • Wayne Patterson
  • Senior Fellow for Program Reviews and
    International Programs
  • Graduate School
  • Howard University
  • 202-806-4686
  • wpatterson_at_howard.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com