Improving Chronic Illness Care a quick look at the CCM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Improving Chronic Illness Care a quick look at the CCM

Description:

Summarize the current literature about practices that have implemented the Chronic Care Model. ... External evaluations of early efforts by Chin et al., RAND ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: katiecol
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving Chronic Illness Care a quick look at the CCM


1
Improving Chronic Illness Carea quick look at
the CCM
  • WA State Collaborative to Improve Health
  • April 17, 2008

2
Objectives
  • Identify the six components that comprise the
    Chronic Care Model what they are and how they
    fit together.
  • Summarize the current literature about practices
    that have implemented the Chronic Care Model.
  • Describe what key changes a practice can make to
    improve care for their chronically ill patients.

3
Chronic Illness in America
  • More than 125 million Americans suffer from one
    or more chronic illnesses and 40 million limited
    by them.
  • Despite annual costs of more than 1 trillion and
    significant advances in care, one-half or more of
    patients still dont receive appropriate care.
  • Gaps in quality care lead to thousands of
    avoidable deaths each year.
  • Patients and families increasingly recognize the
    defects in their care.

4
Johns Hopkins U.S. Survey about Chronic Care
Agreeing
5
The IOM Quality Chasm Report Conclusions
The current care systems cannot do the job.
Trying harder will not work.
Changing care systems will.
6
To Change Outcomes Requires Fundamental Practice
Change
  • Reviews of interventions in several conditions
    show effective practice changes are similar
    across conditions.
  • Integrated changes with components directed at
  • influencing physician behavior
  • better use of non-physician team members
  • enhancements to information systems
  • planned encounters
  • modern self-management support, and
  • care management for high risk patients

7
Chronic Care Model
Health System
Community
Health Care Organization
Resources and Policies
ClinicalInformationSystems
DeliverySystem Design
Self-Management Support
Decision Support
Prepared, Proactive Practice Team
Informed, Activated Patient
Productive Interactions
Improved Outcomes
8
How would I recognize a productive interaction?
Prepared Practice Team
Informed, Activated Patient
Productive Interactions
  • Assessment of self-management skills and
    confidence as well as clinical status
  • Tailoring of clinical management by stepped
    protocol
  • Collaborative goal-setting and problem-solving
    resulting in a shared care plan
  • Active, sustained follow-up

9
Vignettes
10
Experience with Collaboratives
  • More than 1,000 different health care
    organizations and various diseases involved to
    date
  • Began with national BTS, now regional,
    state-based facility specific
  • HRSAs Health Disparities Collaboratives-600
    community and migrant health centers, now
    academic medical centers small practices
  • External evaluations of early efforts by Chin et
    al., RAND

11
RAND Evaluation of Chronic Care Collaboratives
  • Studied 51 organizations in four different
    collaboratives, 2132 BTS patients, 1837 controls
    with diabetes, CHF, asthma
  • Controls generally from other practices in
    organization
  • Data included patient and staff surveys, medical
    record reviews

12
RAND Findings
  • Organizations made average of 48 changes in 5.8/6
    CCM areas
  • IT received most attention, community linkages
    the least
  • CHF pilot patients more knowledgeable and more
    often on recommended therapy, had 35 fewer
    hospital days
  • Asthma and diabetes pilot patients more likely to
    receive appropriate therapy.
  • Asthma pilot patients had better QOL
  • Diabetes had significantly better glycemic control

13
RCTs of CCM-based interventions
  • All but one shows implementation of the CCM
    significantly improves process and outcome
    measures compared to controls and when included
    in the trial less intensive interventions (e.g.
    physician training alone).
  • Team motivation to change may be an important
    factor in predicting success.
  • Preliminary evidence that collaboratives improve
    process measures at the end of 1 year and
    outcomes after 3 to 4 years.

14
Challenges Remaining
Try less time- intensive learning
Reaching beyond early adopters
Create supportive systems
Target small practices
15
Contact us at
www.improvingchroniccare.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com