Title: The growing importance of ethics in the ERA: From moral philosophy to integrated ethics
1The growing importance of ethics in the ERA
From moral philosophy to integrated ethics
- Prof. Margit Sutrop
- Director of the Centre for Ethics, University of
Tartu, Estonia - HEALTH-NCP-NET 1st Training, Brussels, 21.10.2008
2Outline
- Morality and ethics
- Reasons of the boom in ethics
- Ethics as an integral part of research
- Plurality of morals and unity of ethics In
search of universal principles - Changes in ethical frameworks new challenges to
ethics
3The use of terms
- Morality is the embodiment of norms and values
which have been collectively acknowledged as
binding. Morality refers to historically emerged
practices of people and cultures. - Ethics refers to the whole domain of morality and
to the theoretical reflection on moral values,
norms and principles.
4Ethics
- Theoretical ethics
- Normative ethics (justification of norms)
- Metaethics (language of morals, nature of value
judgements)
- Practical ethics
- Applied ethics
- ( moral issues of different fields of life)
- Professional ethics
- (values, obligations codified in professional
practices)
5Practical ethics
- Medical ethics
- Bioethics
- Environmental ethics
- Public ethics
- Media ethics
- Business ethics
- Ethics of sports
- Research ethics
6Ethics boom in practical and professional ethics
- A search for shared values
- Institutionalization of ethics (first centre in
1969 Hastings Centre on Hudson) - More courses of ethics in university curricula
- Creation of special journals for ethics
- Ethical review system established
- Codes of ethics for different professions
7What makes this ethics boom so special? (M.
Davis,1999)
- Institutionalization of ethics neither of the
previous booms produced centres for ethics - Ethics is treated as a subject where
controversies are normal (courses of ethics are
problem-oriented) - Philosophers not ministries leading the
discussions - Training in ethics for all professions required
8Possible reasons of ethics boom
- Fundamental changes in society (values under
change, growing individual choices) - Urbanization, huge cities
- Globalization
- Secularization of Western societies
- Diversity of religions
- Growth of individual autonomy
- People are more aware of their rights and less
about their duties and responsibilities
9Ethics in science
- Research ethics a kind of professional ethics
which sets and justifies the ethical standards of
conduct in research - Bioethics a kind of applied ethics which deals
with ethical issues in biomedical research
10Research ethics
- Standards of ethical conduct in science honesty,
carefulness, openness, freedom, credit, social
responsibility, mutual respect,respect for
subjects. - Ethical standards of conduct in research play a
key role in advancing the goals of science in
promoting cooperation, collaboration, and trust
among researchers and in attaining the publics
trust and support. - European Science Foundations Good scientific
practice in research and scholarship, 2000
11Why has ethics become important in relation to
science?
- Advances in science and technology create new
ethical issues of research. From the question
what we can do? to the question what we
should/may do? - Max Weber the natural sciences can give us
answers to questions about what we should do if
we want to rule the world technologi-cally. But
to answer the question whether we must or should
rule the world technologically, we must step
outside science.
12Continously pivoted, disputed concepts issues
- concept of human dignity
- the concept of personhood when does human life
begin? - the moral status of the human embryo (abortion,
stem cell research) - the right of the individual versus the right of
the community - respect for the human life versus beneficence
(duty to alleviate the suffering)
13Attempts to formulate universal principles
- The Belmont Report (1979)
- Beauchamp and Childress Principles of Biomedical
Ethics (1979) - The Oviedo Convention on Human Rights
Biomedicine (1997) - UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and
Human Rights (2005)
14Two different challenges
- The globalisation of medical resarch the need
to capture universal values and formulate
universal principles (global bioethics) - The emerging reality of the diversity of moral
cultures the need to respect plurality and
ethical diversity (Asian, American, European
bioethics)
15 American versus European principles of bioethics
- Tom Beauchamp and James Childress (1979)
- autonomy
- beneficence,
- non-maleficence
- justice
- Peter Kemp, a.o Barcelona Declaration (2000)
- autonomy
- dignity
- integrity
- vulnerability
16Reasons of moral disagreement
- The disagreement is often not the result of the
uptake of different values but of different
interpretation or prioritization of values. - Moral values depend on our self-understanding,
conception of good life, which depend on
historical and economic situation, cultural
tradition, and religious convictions.
17New challenges to ethics
- Is there a need for changing ethical frameworks?
- From individual liberal ethics towards
communitarian approach - individual rights versus the common good?
- Individual interests versus public interest?
18Individualist framework in medical ethics
- Medical ethics, and more recently bioethics, have
been guided by values of liberal individualism. - Values of autonomy and privacy introduced later
than beneficence and non-maleficence - Principle of informed consent codified after
World War II to denounce the practices of Nazi
medicine (Nuremberg code etc)
19The Academy of Medical Sciences report, January
2006
- Report Personal data for public good using
health information in medical research - Overemphasis on privacy and autonomy, including
an insistence on the need for explicit consent
even though this may be impractical or
undesirable for other reasons. - The Academy invoked the public interest
argument, suggesting that inhibiting the use of
medical records for research is unethical because
lives which could otherwise have been saved by
epidemiological research were being lost.
20Reasons for re-thinking ethical frameworks
- Instrumental reasons
- epidemiological research is more difficult since
without a subjects informed consent it is
impossible to gather statistical data - restrictions requiring new informed consent on
the re-use of biological samples and data
severely limit research - Substantial reasons genetic information is by
nature shared among others thus raising doubts
about the traditional applicability of concepts
like ownership and privacy .
21How to proceed? Arguing for a pluralist approach
to values.
- No need to see individual-interest based and
collective-interest based ethical frameworks in
opposition. This is not an either/or issue. An
appropriate balance between the individual and
public interests should be maintained. - Values we care about are plural and contextual.
- There is no one overriding value, yet values are
objective and not relative. - Ranking of values only reasonable in particular
settings.
22Thank you for your attention!