BMED4800ECSE4800 Introduction to Subsurface Imaging Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

BMED4800ECSE4800 Introduction to Subsurface Imaging Systems

Description:

Introduction to Subsurface Imaging Systems. Lecture 5: X-ray Imaging (cont. ... Tomosynthesis- 3D X-ray. 3D Breast Imaging - Tomosynthesis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: badrinat
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BMED4800ECSE4800 Introduction to Subsurface Imaging Systems


1
BMED-4800/ECSE-4800Introduction to Subsurface
Imaging Systems
  • Lecture 5 X-ray Imaging (cont.)
  • Kai E. Thomenius1 Badri Roysam2
  • 1Chief Technologist, Imaging Technologies,
  • General Electric Global Research Center
  • 2Professor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Center for Sub-Surface Imaging Sensing
2
Review of Last Lecture
  • Quick historical review of X-rays was given.
  • Block diagrams, key components defined.
  • Brief discussion of x-ray scattering
  • An X-ray beam, traversing through an object, is
    attenuated by the exponential Lambert-Beer Law.
  • The product of the attenuation coefficient and
    the path length of the x-ray beam in such a
    target is critical in establishing
    detectability.
  • Today
  • Digital Detectors, X-ray Metrics

3
Outline of Course Topics
  • THE BIG PICTURE
  • What is subsurface imaging?
  • Why a course on this topic?
  • EXAMPLE Projection Imaging
  • X-Ray Imaging
  • Computer Tomography
  • COMMON FUNDAMENTALS
  • Propagation of waves
  • Interaction of waves with targets of interest 
  • PULSE ECHO METHODS
  • Examples
  • MRI
  • A different sensing modality from the others
  • Basics of MRI
  • MOLECULAR IMAGING
  • What is it?
  • PET Radionuclide Imaging
  • IMAGE PROCESSING CAD

4
www.aapm.org/meetings/amos2/pdf/26-5959-83142-414.
pdf
5
Digital Detector Front End
www.aapm.org/meetings/amos2/pdf/26-5959-83142-414.
pdf
6
Detector Details
www.aapm.org/meetings/amos2/pdf/26-5959-83142-414.
pdf
7
Selenium based Detector
www.aapm.org/meetings/amos2/pdf/26-5959-83142-414.
pdf
8
Performance Metrics
9
Signal-to-noise Ratio (SNR)
  • SNR determines the detectability of an object
  • Signal derived from x-ray quanta
  • Noise comes from a variety of sources
  • X-ray quantum statistics, Poisson distribution
  • Electronic noise
  • Sampling noise
  • Anatomical noise
  • Signal processing steps critical to image quality
  • Correction for detector variability, defects
  • Post-process filtering

10
Quantum noise
  • For a digital x-ray detector system with square
    pixels
  • if the average number of x-rays recorded in each
    pixel is N,
  • then the noise (per pixel) will be
  • Statistical distribution associated with x-rays
    is the Poisson distribution.
  • The above relation falls out directly from this
    fact.

11
Poisson Distribution
  • Poisson Distribution is a probability
    distribution given by

If the expected no. of occurrences in a space is
l, then the probability that there are exactly k
occurrences is given by f(k,l)
12
Signal-to-noise ratio
  • The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is given by
  • When the number of x-rays, N, is increased, the
    radiation dose also increases.
  • To double the SNR, the dose to the patient needs
    to be increased by a factor of 4
  • Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for any two
    intensities (I1 and I2) at a detector is given by
  • Here N is the nominal value of photons reaching
    the detector.

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Other Measures of Image Quality
  • Limiting Spatial Resolution (LSR)
  • The highest frequency that can be visualized
  • Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)
  • Measures how the detector passes signal, as a
    function of spatial frequency

MTF
1.0
0.03 - 0.05
LSR
0
Spatial Frequency (cycles/mm)
Modulation at detector output
MTF
Modulation at detector input
16
MTF1
in
out
Source http//203.64.251.39/info/download/etc/br
eastx/93/93-04.ppt
17
MTF0.5
in
out
  • Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) / Spatial
    resolution
  • An imaging systems ability to render the
    contrast of an object as a function of object
    detail.

18
MTF
19
Modulation Transfer Function
  • LSR
  • Screen-film has LSR 20 lp/mm
  • corresponds to 25 mm pixel
  • Digital (GE) 100 mm pixel
  • Sources of MTF degradation
  • Lateral spread of light in scintillator
  • limited by CsI needles
  • increases with scintillator thickness
  • Lateral spread of secondary x-rays
  • not significant away from k-edges of Cs and I
  • Sampling aperture of pixel sinc(fxa)sinc(fya)

Digital Imager
M T F
Film-Screen
Spatial Frequency (cycles/mm)
If films LSR is better than digital why do we
see improved performance in digital?
20
MTF For Direct, Indirect, and Screen Film
21
Measures of Image Quality-DQE
  • Detective Quantum Efficiency, DQE
  • SNR gives the transfer function of both signal
    and noise

SNR2 at detector output
SNR2 at detector output
µ
DQE
SNR2 at detector input
Patient Dose
22
DQE
1.0
The higher the DQE, the higher the SNR, and the
greater the probability of detection.
Digital Imager
DQE
Film-Screen
Spatial Frequency (cycles/mm)
High DQE in low-to-mid frequencies aids
detection. High DQE in high frequencies aids
characterization.
23
DQE Definition
where f is the spatial frequency (lp/mm), X is
the exposure (mR) and S Median Signal Level
(cts), i.e. amplitude of information MTF
Modulation Transfer Function NPS Noise Power
Spectrum (cts2 mm2) C Incident Xray
Fluence (xrays / (mm2 mR) DQE describes the
measured SNR in relation to an ideal
detector. SNR2 is deduced from the ratio of MTF2
(signal2) to the NPS (noise2)
24
www.aapm.org/meetings/amos2/pdf/26-5959-83142-414.
pdf
25
Calibration of Digital Detector
  • Dark Image? Offset
  • Diode leakage
  • FET charge retention
  • Electronic noise

26
Calibration of Digital Detector
  • Offset Corrected Dark Image
  • Electronic Noise

27
Calibration of Digital Detector
  • Offset Calibrated
  • Amplifier gainvariation
  • Pixel-to-pixel gain variation

28
Calibration of Digital Detector
  • Offset and Gain calibratedFlood exposed image
  • Poisson statistical x-ray noise
  • Electronic noise

29
Apply Corrections
  • Low dose before and After Offset Correction

30
Apply Corrections
  • High dose

31
Tomosynthesis
32
Advanced Applications
  • Tomosynthesis- 3D X-ray

33
3D Breast Imaging - Tomosynthesis
  • 3D imaging addresses the major problem with
    mammography today superimposed tissue
  • 3D imaging may enable compression reduction
  • Tissue immobilization vs. compression
  • Compliance with screening protocols
  • Single tomo exam in MLO position may replace
    conventional mammography, potentially enabling
    dose reduction

34
Tomosynthesis Concept
35
Prototype System Parameters
  • Prototype based on GEMS Senographe DMR,
    Revolution flat panel detector, motorized tube
    motion assembly
  • 11 projections over /- 25 degrees
  • 7.5 sec patient exam time
  • Total dose
  • 1.5x a single mammographic view
  • 0.75x a standard mammographic screening exam
  • 100 micron pixels
  • 1 mm (3d) slice separation

36
Tomosynthesis
  • Goal
  • Limited 3-D reconstruction to remove
    overlying/underlying structure
  • All image planes visualized using a single
    acquisition
  • Acquisition
  • Vertical tube motion
  • Total tube angle 5 -15
  • Number of Projected Images 15 25
  • Exam length 5 -10 sec (single breath-hold)
  • Slice thickness 1 cm
  • Enabled by GE Revolution detector

Rotational Axis
Tube vertical motion
Courtesy of Duke University and Wake Forest
Medical Center
Small Changes to Rad System allows for 3D Imaging!
37
Image Reconstruction in Tomo
  • Data incompleteness
  • From a CT perspective, data is very sparse
  • Limited angular range (z-resolution)
  • Insufficient angular sampling (streaks)
  • Truncated projections (inconsistency)

38
Reconstruction Concept Shift and Add
Vertical slice through object
Reconstruction of single plane
Reconstruction of vertical slice through object
Projections at different angles
Add
Shift
Artifacts Out-of-plane structures appear as N
low-contrast copies (N of projections).
Contrast / blurring of artifacts depends on N,
projection angles / tube trajectory, etc.
39
An ExampleStandard 2D x-ray
Images courtesy of Dr. Dan Kopans- MGH
40
Tomosynthesis Missed Cancer
Standard Mammogram MLO
Tomo Slice MLO
Spiculated Lesion
41
Tomosynthesis
Images courtesy of Dr. Dan Kopans- MGH
42
An Example3D Tomosynthesis
Images courtesy of Dr. Dan Kopans- MGH
43
Rad Tomo Example
Low Dose 3D Imaging!
44
Receiver Operating Characteristics
45
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves
  • Most basic task of the diagnostician is to
    separate abnormal subjects from normal subjects
  • In many cases there is significant overlap in
    terms of the appearance of the image
  • Some abnormal patients have normal-looking films
  • Some normal patients have abnormal-looking films
  • ROC curves are a tool for assessing the
    performance of a hypothesis testing algorithms.

46
2 x 2 Decision Matrix
47
ROC curves (cont.)
  • For a single threshold value and the population
    being studied, a single value for TP, TN, FP, and
    FN can be computed
  • The sum TP TN FP FN will be equal to the
    total number of normals and abnormals in the
    study population
  • True diagnosis must be determined
    independently, based on biopsy confirmation,
    long-term patient follow-up, etc.

48
(No Transcript)
49
Summary
  • Design of digital x-ray detectors was described.
  • Performance metrics (MTF, DQE) for x-ray
    performance were given.
  • Justification for digital detectors was based on
    these.
  • Tomosynthesis concept introduced.
  • Brief review of ROC methods for hypothesis
    testing was given.
  • Next time Introduction to CT Scanners

50
Homework
  • Using web resources (or sources given below),
    describe the key steps of the direct conversion
    process with amorphous Selenium. How are x-rays
    converted to electrons?
  • What is the relative performance (MTF or DQE)
    with respect to the CsI-Photodiode approach?
  • Which would you buy and why?
  • http//www.dondickson.co.uk/download/Challenges_of
    _Direct_Digital_Radiology.pdf
  • Hoheisel et al., Modulation transfer function of
    a selenium-based digital mammography system,
    IEEE Proc. Nuclear Science Symposium, 2004,
    3589-3593

51
Instructor Contact Information
  • Badri Roysam
  • Professor of Electrical, Computer, Systems
    Engineering
  • Office JEC 7010
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • 110, 8th Street, Troy, New York 12180
  • Phone (518) 276-8067
  • Fax (518) 276-6261/2433
  • Email roysam_at_ecse.rpi.edu
  • Website http//www.ecse.rpi.edu/roysabm
  • Secretary Laraine Michaelides, JEC 7012, (518)
    276 8525, michal_at_rpi.edu

52
Instructor Contact Information
  • Kai E Thomenius
  • Chief Technologist, Ultrasound Biomedical
  • Office KW-C300A
  • GE Global Research
  • Imaging Technologies
  • Niskayuna, New York 12309
  • Phone (518) 387-7233
  • Fax (518) 387-6170
  • Email thomeniu_at_crd.ge.com, thomenius_at_ecse.rpi.edu
  • Secretary TBD
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com