Cryptococcal IRIS in Africa: clinical manifestations and pathogenesis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Cryptococcal IRIS in Africa: clinical manifestations and pathogenesis

Description:

Cryptococcal IRIS in Africa: clinical manifestations and pathogenesis ... Erin Huiras, MD (Dermatology) Faculty Collaborators. IDI/Makerere Univ: Univ of Manitoba: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: flo123
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cryptococcal IRIS in Africa: clinical manifestations and pathogenesis


1
Cryptococcal IRIS in Africa clinical
manifestations and pathogenesis
  • Paul R. Bohjanen, M.D., Ph.D.
  • Associate Professor of Microbiology and Medicine
  • University of Minnesota
  • Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • Professor in Residence
  • Infectious Diseases Institute
  • Makerere University
  • Kampala, Uganda

2
  • Outline
  • Role of immune activation in HIV pathogenesis.
  • Use of microarrays to assess immune activation in
    HIV-infected Ugandan patients before and after
    initiation of antiretroviral therapy.
  • Outcomes of cryptococcal meningitis in Uganda in
    the era of antiretroviral therapy (ART).
  • Clinical features of HIV Immune Reconstitution
    Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) in patients with
    recent cryptococcal meningitis after initiation
    of ART.
  • Use of microarrays to assess biomarkers of IRIS
    after initiation of ART in patients with or
    without recent cryptococcal meningitis.

3
Primary HIV Infection
Viral Dissemination
Partial Immune Containment
Chronic Immune Activation
Destruction of Lymphoid Tissue
Decreased Circulating CD4 T Cells
AIDS
4
Immune Reconstitution
  • Potent ARV therapy blocks viral replication and
    prevents the destruction of CD4 T cells.
  • This shifts the balance toward CD4 T cell
    regeneration and improvement in immune function.
  • CD4 T cell counts increase.
  • Antigen-specific immune responses are restored.

5
Immune Reconstitution
  • The bottom line is that patients who respond to
    ART have improved immune function and are at
    lower risk for the development of opportunistic
    infections.

6
Is immune reconstitution always beneficial?
7
Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndromes
(IRIS)
  • Immune Reconstitution Paradox Recovery in the
    function of the immune system with ART can
    promote an inflammatory reaction to antigens that
    were previously not recognized by the immune
    system.
  • This inflammatory reaction can sometimes lead to
    worsening of a current or latent opportunistic
    infection.
  • The onset of IRIS often occurs 2-8 weeks after
    initiation of ARV therapy but can occur earlier
    or later.

8
IRIS Triggering Antigens
  • In IRIS, the flaring of specific immune responses
    to microbial antigens occurs in the setting of
    improving immunity after the initiation of
    effective ART.
  • IRIS may represent either an appropriate
    inflammatory response that was previously masked
    by severe immune deficiency or a pathological
    exaggerated inflammatory reaction.
  • Inciting antigens may be from an active infection
    (replicating microorganisms) or from the remnants
    of a treated infection (microbial debris) or
    latent infection.
  • IRIS is also associated with autoimmune disorders
    or malignancies such as Kaposis sarcoma and
    lymphoma.

9
Pathogens associated with IRIS
Mycobacterium avium Mycobacterium
tuberculosis Mycobacterium leprae Cryptococcus
neoformans Pneumocystis jiroveci Histoplasma
capsulatum
Hepatitis B virus Hepatitis C virus Varicella-zos
ter virus Cytomegalovirus BK Virus Parvovirus
B19 JC virus Papilloma virus HHV-8 (KS)
10
Clinical Presentation
  • IRIS can occur as early as a few days after
    starting ARV therapy. In patients with baseline
    CD4 T-cell counts below 50 cells/mm3, most
    events will happen within the first 8 weeks of
    therapy. Late IRIS with symptom onset after more
    than 1 year of ARVs have been described.
  • Patients typically become ill in the setting of
    improving virologic and immunological measures.
  • IRIS may be mistaken for a new opportunistic
    infection, but it can sometimes be distinguished
    by an atypical manifestation, such as localized
    inflammation where one would expect disseminated
    disease.
  • IRIS may also present as paradoxical worsening of
    a known opportunistic infection.
  • Depending on the site and activity of the
    immunologic response, the severity of clinical
    symptoms can vary widely from mild to
    life-threatening events.

11
IRIS Case Definition
  • Evidence of clinical response to ART with
  • On ART
  • gt1 log10 copies/mL decrease in HIV RNA (if
    available)
  • Infectious or Inflammatory condition within 6
    months of ART initiation
  • Symptoms can not be explained by either
  • Newly acquired infection
  • Expected clinical course of a previously
    recognized and successfully treated infectious
    agent
  • Treatment failure
  • Side effects of ART.
  • Complete ART non-compliance

12
IRIS Associated with Crytococcal Meningitis
  • IRIS may be associated with cryptococcal
    meningitis following initiation of ART.
  • Upon initiation of ART, 25 of CM patients
    experience IRIS with increases in headache,
    intracranial pressure, signs of inflammation, and
    in 25, serious complications include loss of
    vision, cranial nerve palsies, reduced cognition
    and death.

13
IRIS Management
  • Evidence-based treatment recommendations are
    lacking.
  • Identify the inciting pathogen and treat it.
  • Most cases of IRIS are managed without stopping
    ARVs.
  • In severe cases, treatment options include
    stopping ARVs, steroids, NSAIDS, and surgical
    treatment (for example drainage of abscesses).

14
Why is so much IRIS seen in Africa?
  • IRIS occurs most often in patients with advanced
    HIV disease and severe immunosuppression.
    Because of limited availability of ART in Africa,
    treatment is often reserved only for patients
    with advanced disease.
  • Opportunistic infections associated with IRIS,
    such as tuberculosis and cryptococcal meningitis,
    occur frequently in Africa.
  • Limited diagnostic capabilities in resource poor
    regions may impair the diagnosis of alternative
    etiologies, such as a second opportunistic
    infection. The diagnosis of IRIS is often
    invoked when no other definitive diagnosis is
    found.

15
Research Questions
  • What is the incidence of IRIS?
  • How often is IRIS associated with significant
    morbidity and mortality?
  • Who is at greatest risk?
  • How should IRIS be treated?
  • Can the immune system be modulated to prevent
    IRIS?
  • In patients with IRIS-associated infections, such
    as TB or CM, is it better to treat the OI first
    and then start ART?

16
IRIS Study Design
17
Development of two pilot cohorts 24 patients
in each
18
Incidence Rate 35
19
Response to ART in Cohort 1 (24 patients)
Baseline CD4 58 60 cells/uL viral load
5.5 5.4 log At 3 months CD4 192 133
cells (P lt .001) with 23 of 24 individuals having
a gt50 CD4 cell/uL increase. viral load
undetectable among 19 of 24 patients (Range of
five detectable subjects 431-1,657 HIV RNA
copies/mL). 20 of 24 patients have been
followed for gt 6 months with 8 study visits, and
100 follow up has occurred.
20
IRIS Events (Cohort 1)
21
  • A patient without prior cryptococcal disease
    and negative serum CRAG at enrollment, developed
    progressive tongue swelling. Biopsy revealed
    encapsulated yeast consistent with a
    cryptococcoma which regressed with two weeks of
    fluconazole therapy.

22
Cryptococcal Meningitis Outcomes
Suspected Meningitis N71
Non-CM meningitis N22
Cryptococcal Meningitis N49
On ART, IRIS Event N5
Survived Hospitalization N36
Died during hospitalization N8
Died prior to ART N7
Started ART N24
Lost prior to ART N5
Alive at 6 months N18
Died after ART start N6
37
23
Response to ART in Cohort 2 (24 patients)
Baseline CD4 29 27 cells/uL viral load
350,000 258,000 copies/mL At 3 months CD4
80 63 cells viral load 846 1340 copies/mL
24
IRIS Events in Cohort 2
Six patients have died since enrollment.
25
  • Immune activation in peripheral blood of
    HIV-infected patients in Uganda before and after
    initiation of ART

26
(No Transcript)
27
Most of the transcripts that were down-regulated
after ART are T cell activation genes.
28
Multiple components of TNF and Interferon
response pathways were down-regulated following
initiation of ART
29
  • Immune activation in peripheral blood of
    HIV-infected patients in Uganda who do or do not
    develop IRIS after initiation of ART

30
Expression patterns of hundreds of genes are
altered in patients with CM
31
Baseline Gene Expression that Predicts IRIS
P0.005
32
Gene Expression Predictors of IRIS (Aim 1)
  • Cell Signaling Pathways
  • Chemokine Signaling
  • PI3Kinase/AKT Signaling
  • Cell Death Pathways
  • Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis Pathways
  • Drug Metabolism Pathways
  • PGK1 metabolism of lamivudine

33
Gene Expression Predictors of CM IRIS (Aim 2)
  • Cell Signaling Pathways
  • NF-?B Signaling
  • Toll-like Receptor Signaling
  • Death Receptor Signaling
  • Cell Death Pathways
  • Cell Cycle Pathways
  • Transcription Factors

34
Biomarkers (signatures) of IRIS and CM IRIS
35
Biomarkers (signatures) of IRIS
36
Biomarkers (signatures) of CM and CM IRIS
IRIS, non-CM events TB at 6½ months



No OI Controls CM IRIS CM
Controls
37
Gene Expression Associated with CM IRIS
38
Conclusions
  • HIV IRIS occurs frequently in sub-Saharan Africa,
    appearing in more than 1/3 of the patients in our
    study.
  • IRIS has a diverse spectrum of clinical
    presentations and a wide range of severity.
  • Mortality is high among patients with CM both
    prior to initiation of ART and after ART is
    initiated.
  • IRIS occurs frequently in patients with CM with
    manifestations related to CM as well as other OIs
    that may be present.
  • The normal response to ART is characterized by a
    decrease in immune activation that can be
    measured in peripheral blood using microarrays.
  • Immune activation in IRIS can be measured in
    peripheral blood using microarrays and specific
    biomarkers or patterns of biomarkers (signatures)
    may be useful to diagnose IRIS.
  • Even prior to initiation of ART, the expression
    of biomarkers in peripheral blood may be useful
    for predicting patients risk for subsequent
    development of IRIS.

39
Research Trainees
Fellows David Meya MBChB (ID-IDI) David
Boulware, MD (ID-U of MN) Irina Vlasova MD,PhD
(Postdoc- U of MN) Students Joshua Rhein (4th
year Med) Sam Goblirsch (4th year Med) Jack
Staddon (Combined MD/PhD) Darlisha Williams (MPH
student) Sarah Lee (Combined MD/MPH) Residents B
rett Handel-Paterson, MD (Med-Peds) Erin Huiras,
MD (Dermatology)
40
Faculty Collaborators
IDI/Makerere Univ Univ of Manitoba Andrew
Kambugu (co-PI) Allan Ronald Keith
McAdam Harriet Mayanja-Kizza Duke Univ Moses
Kamya John Perfect Univ of CO Univ of
WA Edward Janoff (co-PI) Merle Sande Univ of
MN Institute of Tropical Paul Bohjanen
(co-PI) Medicine, Antwerp Tim Behrens
Bob Colebunders Phil Peterson Luc
Kestens James Neaton Tracy Bergemann
41
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com