Comparison of Bacterial Etiology of Infectious Corneal Ulcers in Contact Lens Wearers and Non-Contact Lens Wearers at the University of Chicago - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison of Bacterial Etiology of Infectious Corneal Ulcers in Contact Lens Wearers and Non-Contact Lens Wearers at the University of Chicago

Description:

We analyzed the laboratory results of corneal ulcers seen at University of ... With or without anesthesia. Streaked on blood, chocolate, and Sabourad dextrose agar ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:228
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ascrs2009A
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison of Bacterial Etiology of Infectious Corneal Ulcers in Contact Lens Wearers and Non-Contact Lens Wearers at the University of Chicago


1
Comparison of Bacterial Etiology of Infectious
Corneal Ulcers in Contact Lens Wearers and
Non-Contact Lens Wearers at the University of
Chicago
  • Shuchi B. Patel MD1, Krishna Patel1, Michael A.
    Saidel MD1
  • 1Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science,
    University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • Authors have no financial interests

2
Purpose
  • We analyzed the laboratory results of corneal
    ulcers seen at University of Chicago between 2002
    and 2007 in order to determine the relative
    frequencies of pathogens causing bacterial ulcers
    in both contact lens related and non-contact lens
    related.
  • The results were then divided into two subgroups
    (contact lens associated, and non-contact lens
    associated). The bacterial spectrum was compared
    as well as the antibiotic susceptibilities.

3
Methods
  • A retrospective chart review was done for all
    patients identified as having a corneal ulcer
    between the years 2002 and 2007. Only patients
    with central corneal ulcers were included in the
    study. Patients with viral, fungal, protozoan or
    neurotrophic ulcers were excluded (eg. bacterial
    ulcers only).

4
Cultures
  • Technique
  • Taken with Kimura spatula
  • With or without anesthesia
  • Streaked on blood, chocolate, and Sabourad
    dextrose agar
  • Lowenstien-Jensen, thioglycolate, nonnutrient
    agar with E. Coli overlay used if appropriate
  • Sent for Gram and Giemsa stain
  • Considered a positive culture
  • If at least one colony was seen on two or more
    media
  • Or if a colony was present on a single medium and
    the organism was also identified on staining

5
Results
  • 251 charts were reviewed.
  • 62 central corneal ulcers were identified.
  • 53 of these ulcers were cultured (85).
  • 34 of the cultured ulcers had positive cultures
    (64).
  • 29 patients were contact lens wearers (47).
  • Many of the ulcers were polymicrobial, with a
    total of 51 organisms isolated from the 34
    cultures.

6
Most common organisms
  • Coagulase negative staphylococcus (14/51)
  • Psuedomonas aeruginosa (9/51)
  • Staphylococcus aureus (9/51)
  • a hemolytic streptococci (6/51)
  • Corynebacterium (5/51)

7
.5 most common organisms in non-contact lens
wearers
  • Staphylococcus aureus (9/32)
  • a hemolytic streptococci (5/32)
  • Coagulase negative staphylococcus (4/32)
  • Psuedomonas aeruginosa (4/32)
  • 5. Corynebacterium (4/32)

8
6 most common organisms in contact lens wearers
  • Coagulase negative staphylococcus (10/19)
  • Psuedomonas aeruginosa (5/19)
  • 3. Moraxella (1/19)
  • 4. Serratia (1/19)
  • 5. a hemolytic streptococci (1/19)
  • 6. Corynebacterium (1/19)

9
Conclusion
  • The antibiotic susceptibilities of the pathogens
    were similar whether the patient had a contact
    lens related ulcer or not.

10
  • There is a different spectrum of bacteria found
    in ulcers that are found in contact lens wearers
    versus those in non contact lens wearers, though
    the antibiotic susceptibilities are similar.
  • The overall bacterial spectrum found was similar
    in percentages to those from previous
    publications.
  • However, in the subgroup analysis, the spectrum
    appears much different, with Staph aureus
    becoming the most common agent found. Also,
    contrary to previously published literature, the
    most common contact lens associated bacteria was
    not Psuedomonas aeruginosa but coagulase negative
    staph.

11
  • Further studies should be done to determine
    whether this finding is a new trend, location
    specific, or due to confounding factors such as
    previous treatment with antibiotics prior to
    performance of a culture.

12
References
  1. Liesegang TJ, Forster RK. Spectrum of microbial
    keratitis in South Florida. Am J Ophthalmol.
    1980903847.
  2. Jones DB. Initial therapy of suspected microbial
    corneal ulcers specific antibiotic therapy based
    on corneal smears. Surv Ophthalmol.
    19792497116.
  3. Gudmundsson OG, Ormerod LD, Kenyon KR, et al.
    Factors influencing predilection and outcome in
    bacterial keratitis. Cornea. 19898115121.
  4. Choy MH, Stapleton F, Willcox MD et al.
    Comparison of virulence factors in Pseudomonas
    aeruginosa strains isolated from contact lens-
    and non-contact lens-related keratitis. J Med
    Microbiol. 2008 Dec57(Pt 12)1539-46.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com