Title: The Neonatal Resuscitation Program NRP: An Initiative to Improve Care to Newborns at the Outset of L
1The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP)An
Initiative to Improve Care to Newborns at the
Outset of Life
2NEONATAL RESUSCITATION PROGRAM (NRP) AN OVERVIEW
-
- SUDHAKAR G. EZHUTHACHAN, MD, DCH, FAAP
- HEAD, DIVISION OF NEONATOLOGY
- HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
- DETROIT , MI
3 WHY DO WE NEED NRP ?
- At least 10 of all newborns require some
assistance at birth i.e. the initial steps of
resuscitation - And 1 require extensive resuscitation
- There are 1 million deaths per year resulting
from Birth Asphyxia (WHO, 1995) - A significant number will have respiratory
problems and a large will have seizures and
later problems such as CP which means that one
could possibly affect the outcomes of several
million newborn infants every year
4NRP IN THE U.S.A.
- 1960s Mushrooming of neonatal and high risk OB
care - 1970s Regionalization of Perinatal Care
- Community Hospitals played pivotal role in
neonatal resuscitation - NIH funding of 5 educational grants to address
neonatal resuscitation training - American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) forms group
to address training
5NRP IN THE U.S.A.
- AAP and the American Heart Association led NRP
development - NRP faculty approach was tiered-
- National, Regional and Hospital Based
- 1987- A Standardized National Neonatal
Resuscitation Program built on Consensus rolled
out in the USA
6NRP in the U.S.A. Key Factors Sustaining It
- The most critical ingredient for the success
of NRP.the goodwill and altruism of a broad and
diverse groupthis continues to sustain the
program - Need for Continuing Education and Maintenance of
Competency - Linked to Accreditation of Institutions
- Standard of Care and Medico-Legal concerns
7NRP IN THE U.S.A. (contd)
- From 1987 until 2000, changes in NRP were largely
the result of feedback from practitioners not
necessarily based on evidence - What is Evidence Based Medicine ?
- the conscientious, explicit, and judicious
use of current best evidence in making
decisions about the care of individual patients -
8Definition of Evidence
- Websters - something that furnishes proof
- Definition is subjective to interpretation
- Wide latitude as to what constitutes proof
- Can be reflected in guidelines and
recommendations - U.S. Preventive Services Task force developed
Classification Schema for Quality of evidence
9Evidence Based Medicine in NRP
- Ten major questions were reviewed
- Extensive literature search on each topic
- Each article was assigned a level of evidence
based on study design and methodology
10 EBM - Steps in Evaluation Level of Evidence
- Level 1 large randomized clinical trials or
meta analyses of multiple randomized clinical
trials - Level 4 Historic, non-randomized, cohort or
case control studies - Level 8 Rational conjecture (common sense),
common accepted practice before evidence based
guidelines
11EBM - Next Step
- Critically evaluate the quality of each source in
terms of research design and methods. - Scale Excellent to unsatisfactory
- Evaluate direction of the study results and the
statistics - Scale Supportive, neutral, opposing proposal
12Final Step
- Determine the class of recommendation
- Class I - definitely recommended
- Class II - acceptable and useful
- Class II a - Acceptable and useful, very good
evidence provides support - Class II b - Acceptable and useful, fair to good
evidence provides support - Class III - Not acceptable, not useful, may be
harmful
13NRP 2000 IN THE U.S.A.
- International Guidelines 2000 Conference on
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency
Cardiac Care formulated new evidence based
recommendations for NRP - Members included AAP NRP Steering Committee,
AHA and the Pediatric Working Group of the
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
(ILCOR)
14NRP 2000 GUIDELINESEVIDENCE BASED RECOMMENDATIONS
- Handling of infants with amniotic stained fluid
stained - Prevent heat loss and avoid hyperthermia
- Use of 100 oxygen only
- Potential use of laryngeal mask and exhaled CO2
detectors - Change in chest compression method and simplified
rate response
15NRP 2000 GUIDELINESEVIDENCE BASED RECOMMENDATIONS
- Early administration of epinephrine
- Albumin no longer the fluid of choice isotonic
crystalloid solution is - Potential for use of intraosseous route
- When resuscitation may not be initiated or may be
discontinued in the delivery room
16 17Neonatal Resuscitation Program Curriculum
- Dmytro Dobrianskyi, MD, PhD
- Keti Nemsadze, MD, PhD
18Program Components
- Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) developed in
U.S. by the AHA and the AAP was used as a model
in the NIS. - Main features of the Program
- Implementation based on perinatal regions
- Self-study textbook
- Appropriateness for all professional levels
- Adaptability for local practice
- Formats of the NRP course
- Self-study
- Small group
- 1- or 2-day course
19Program Components
- Educational resources of the original Program
- Self-study textbook
- Educational video
- Approximately 300 slides
- Skill stations (course training equipment)
- Instructors Manual
- NRP test package
- Standardized final written evaluation and
practical tests
20Program Components
- Didactic components of the original Program
- Student textbook provided prior to the course
date - Provider Course consisting of 6 separate lessons,
each covering a specific area of a neonatal
resuscitation - Lectures and practical training at the skill
stations - Instructor Course - to prepare those providers
who would become teachers
21Program Content
Assess babys response to birth
Always needed by newborns
Initial steps
- Establish effective ventilation
- Bag and mask
- Endotracheal intubation
Needed less frequently
Provide chest compressions
Rarely needed by newborns
Administer medications
22Program Components - NIS
- All original educational NRP material was
translated from English and distributed in the
NIS (Russian, Ukrainian, Georgian). - NRP Training Centers were established.
- Provider Training Course Standards are absolutely
the same as the requirements in the U.S. - The first courses in the NIS were co-taught with
U.S. partners. - Program components and course formats used in the
NIS were adapted to meet the needs of the Regions.
23Program Participants
- Anyone responsible for any part of a neonatal
resuscitation is an appropriate candidate for a
provider course. - Historically, only physicians were considered
participants in resuscitation - Currently, neonatologists, obstetricians,
midwives, nurses, anesthesiologists and
pediatricians have been included in the provider
courses.
24NRP Instructors
- The key person in the NRP is an instructor, who
is responsible not only for provider training but
for implementation of the Program in every
institution with delivery or newborn services. - To accomplish this the number of instructors need
to be quite high to ensure the program will
succeed in reaching all caregivers
25Organization of NRP Instructors in the USA
26Organization of NRP Instructors in the NIS
27NRP Instructors
- To become an NRP instructor, a person must meet
the following eligibility requirements - Be a physician or nurse from critical care
nursery setting - Have training and experience in the hospital care
of newborns in a delivery room or critical care
nursery setting. - Have educational or clinical responsibilities
within a hospital or other appropriate medical
facility (eg, medical school, nursing school). - Have a provider training or take an NRP
Instructor Course that includes the provider
component.
28NRP Instructors
- It is important to emphasize that in the NIS
settings, not all academicians can be instructors
and conduct the NRP course because of its
significant practical nature. - To achieve the objectives of the Program,
practical clinicians must be widely involved into
instructor activity.
29Instructor Training in the NIS
- Instructors were trained as providers by US
faculty, Provider Course (8 hours). - Instructor Course was used to provide physicians
with knowledge of adult learning theory,
principles of teaching and information on
conducting a course (4 hours) - To enhance the level of expertise of instructors,
a Train the Trainer (TOT) Course was developed. - Content of TOT includes basic physiological
issues related to the care of high risk infants
and is an additional resource to the original
program.
30Importance of the Skill Stations
- The theoretical and practical knowledge of NRP
and - its implementation in maternity houses,
significantly improves the quality of health care
services contributing to desirable outcomes
31Importance of the Skill Stations
- Education on practical skills enables
participants to establish newly acquired
knowledge in everyday practice - Working with small groups makes it possible to
assess individuals, identify areas needing
improvement and focus on these areas. - Participants become familiar with equipment that
is necessary for resuscitation and encounter
simulated situations for practice. - Improved skills, increases ones confidence in
performing resuscitation correctly and
efficiently
32Importance of the Skill Stations
- Participants observe each others mistakes as well
as ways to problem solve - Participants develop skills related to selection
and functioning of appropriate equipment. - Each skills station builds on the previous one,
which gives participants the opportunity to
master skills. This decreases the frequency of
complications during resuscitation and enhance
desirable outcomes. - The performance check list gives the instructor
an objective tool to evaluate participants
knowledge, decision making and comfort with newly
acquired skills
33The weak points of education in Former Soviet
Union
- Education was based only on theoretical issues.
Practical skills were not taught. - No equipment and manikins were available for
teaching practical skills - Medical staff were unfamiliar with equipment
necessary newborn resuscitation and often could
not use existing equipment despite the
indications. - The first attempt at resuscitation usually was
performed directly on a patient, therefore often
delayed, performed incorrectly, resulting in
frequent complications and resuscitation
failure.
34Station I -Initial steps of resuscitation
Common practice in Former Soviet Union
- Important not only for a depressed infant but
every newborn. - Making decisions about further steps of
resuscitation happens here - This step requires only a few seconds, so
mastering the sequence of the skills is very
important.
Prevention of heat loss mostly was neglected
Suctioning was not different in cases of clear
or meconium stained amniotic fluid. Assessment of
the infant was based on Apgar score assessed at
I minute of life.
35Lesson 1Initial steps of Resuscitation
Heat loss prevention
Opening of airways
Assessment of the infant
- Position the infant
- Suctioning mouth, then nose
- Breathing
- Heart rate
- Color
- Place on warmer
- Dry the newborn
- Remove wet towel
- if needed intubate and
- suctioning trachea
- if necessary provide tactile stimulation and
give free flow oxygen
36 37 Station 2 - Support Breathing
- Importance Common practice in
Former Soviet Union
- Harmful methods and prolonged tactile stimulation
were used - Support breathing was based on medications
- Ventilation with bag and mask was rare, mostly
initiating breathing was conducted mouth-to-mouth
breathing
- Supporting oxygenation,
- establishment of spontaneous
- breathing and timely prevention of hypoxia
- getting acquainted with the equipment and how
it works - learning how to ventilate safely
- identification of indications for chest
compression
38Station 2 - Support Breathing
Selection of appropriate equipment and ensure it
is functioning
Performing ventilation
- Adequate rate
- Adequate pressure
- Assessment of adequate ventilation
-
- Assessment of HR
- Decision of next steps of resuscitation
39Station 3 - Support Circulation
Common Practice in Former Soviet Union
- Provision of artificial heart rate
- Restoring circulation
- Ensuring adequate oxygen supply
- Chest compression was initiated primarily after
cardiac arrest - Chest compressions were never combined with
ventilation - Sometimes harmful methods of compression were
used
40Station 3 - Support Circulation
Technique
- position the infant
- firm support for the back,
- neck slightly extended
- 2 finger technique
- thumb technique
- adequate location, depth and rate
- coordination of chest compression ventilation
- assessment of HR in 15-20 sec.
41Station 4 - Endotracheal Intubation
Importance Common practice in Former
Soviet Union
- Identification of indications
- Intubation often was not limited to 20 sec
- The indications were often ignored
- Ineffective bag and mask ventilation
- prolonged ventilation
- Tracheal suctioning
- diaphragmatic hernia
42Station 4 - Endotracheal Intubation
Technique
Selection and preparation of the equipment
- Position the infant
- Insertion of laryngoscope and
- visualization of glottis
- Insertion of ET tube
- Checking the tube placement
- Securing the tube
- Selection of the endotracheal tube size
- Selection and preparation of laryngoscope
- with appropriate size of blade
- Preparation of suctioning and
- ventilating equipment
43Tell me and Ill forgot Show me and I may not
remember involve me, and I understand
44Quality Assessment of NRP
- Sudhakar G. Ezhuthachan, MD, DCH, FAAP
45Evaluation Strategies
- Evaluation of the course - maintaining course
standards - Evaluation of clinical application of knowledge
- Evaluation of patient outcomes
46Evaluation by Others
- U.S. NRP Steering Committee has just begun to
discuss evaluation of the course - Illinois, USA - Marked reduction in high risk
infants with low apgars scores at 1 min. Of
infants with low 1 min scores, more improved by 5
mins, in the group studied after the
implementation of the NRP course
47Evaluation by Others
- Kerala, India - Use of a standardized curriculum
like NRP reduced perinatal asphyxia after
delivery - Zhuhai, China - Neonatal Mortality (perinatally)
was reduced by 3 times after NRP curriculum was
introduced.
48IMPACT OF NRP EDUCATION at 10 centers in INDIA
- Pre training (3 m) Post training
p value - Total live births 5110 7198
- Resuscitation
- Bag/ Mask Ventilation 107 (2.1)
294 (4.1) lt0.001 - Intubations 113 (2.2) 153 (2.1)
NS - Apgar score lt4
- 1 min 230 (4.5) 219 (3.0) lt0.001
- 5 min 102 (2.0) 74 (1.0) lt0.001
- Outcome
- MAS 97 (1.9) 157 (2.1) NS
- Respiratory distress 362 (7.1) 412
(5.7) lt0.01 - Seizures 107 (2.1) 49
(0.7) lt0.001 - Asphyxial Brain injury 102 (2.0)
49 (0.6) lt0.001 - Total deaths 159 (3.1)
176 (2.4) lt0.05
49Early Attempts in Ukraine
- Data collected on every birth in maternity houses
in western Ukraine - Implementation sets were used as incentive
- Data sent monthly to the NRP Training Center
- Collection was tedious and not everyone
participated
50Rater (per 1000) of CNS Abnormalities in 7
day-old newborns in 3 hospitals
51Evaluation of Courses
- First courses were co-taught with US faculty in
most Centers - Peer review process currently being developed and
is to be discussed at next Steering Committee
Meeting - Key elements - instructor student ratio,
ensuring students have opportunity to be
prepared, monitoring of exams, performance at
skills stations -
52Evaluation of Clinical Application
- Site visits conducted in Ukraine in May
1999, March 2001 - Institutions evaluated - 3 in 1999, 6 in 2001
- District as well as City sites
- Components evaluated - preparation of staff,
equipment, performance of staff, knowledge
base, clinical outcomes
53Preparation of Staff
- Staff Trained
- Neonatologists - 100
- Obstetricians - 56 (in 2 places, 100)
- Anesthesiologists - not active in training
- Nurses - 69 (2 places 100, many who are not
trained have been educated by MDs) - Midwives - 50 (most deal only with mother while
others resuscitate infant)
54Preparation of Staff
- Most had been trained in regional center, and
one was an outreach course - Student to instructor ratios appropriate
- All hospitals have a process to notify the
resuscitation team of a delivery - All hospitals transferred high risk mothers
appropriately as soon as possible to the City
55Equipment
- The most crucial issue - one can educate a whole
country, but without appropriate tools,
clinical application is difficult - Implementation sets distributed in 1997 were
depleted - Equipment is well taken care - guarded
- 8 of 9 had excellent Delivery Room set up
- Feedback from staff on equipment was obtained
56Performance
- Observation of deliveries and preparation for
deliveries yielded positive application of
principles - Documentation in the medical record substantiated
this finding - Mock Codes may be helpful to aid in assessing and
reinforcing knowledge
57Knowledge of Staff
- Pretests were used in Georgia -data pending
- 90 of institutions yielded good understanding of
most principles - Management of infants with meconium stained
amniotic fluid needed reinforcement - Thermal management issues uncovered in 2
institutions -water baths
58Clinical Outcomes
- Mortality is multifactorial and takes time to
impact - Morbidities related to temperature and low apgar
scores show improvement
59Low Temperature and the Newborn
- A wet newborn loses heat very rapidly
- Hypothermia reduces the ability of the infant to
respond to resuscitation efforts - Hypothermia uses up energy (glucose) and oxygen,
both needed by the brain. - Effective temperature maintenance is critical for
both survival and reducing morbidity
60THE EFFECTS OF LOW TEMPERATURE ON AN INFANT
Cold Stress
Acidosis
Convulsions
Death
HYPOTHERMIA
Pulmonary Vessel Spasm
Low Glucose
More Hypothermia
Lack of Oxygen
More Acid Production
61Numbers of Neonates Transferred with Hypothermia
i.e. Temperature Lower than 35 C
62Reduction in of Infants admitted to LOCH with
Severe Perinatal Asphyxia
63Incidence of Severe Asphyxia in Infants admitted
to LOCH
64Implementation Phases and Effectiveness of the
Neonatal Resuscitation Program in RussiaO. N.
Belova
65The NRP Program has been operating as part of the
Russian-American Partnership in Russia since 1989
- 11 years
66Order of Ministry of Health of the Russian
Federation No. 372 Improvement of Primary
and Resuscitation Care for Neonates in the
Delivery Room became effective on 12/28/95. More
than 5 years have passed
67The results of the implementation of the NRP
protocol were summarized at the conference on
Primary and Resuscitation Care for Neonates in
the Delivery Room.Results of the Implementation
of the Order of the Russian Ministry of Health
No. 372.Problems. Outlook for Growth.
68Rating of the Results of the PNR Programby
Respondents
Excellent
17
30
Good
Satisfactory
53
69Changes in Statistical Indicators as a Result of
the Implementation of the NRP Protocol
- Find it difficult to respond - 25
- See positive changes in statistical indicators -
62 - Do not associate the positive changeswith the
effect of the order - 2 - Do not see an association between indicators and
negative changes - 2 - Did not respond - 9
70Positive Changes in Statistical Indicators
- Perinatal mortality - 22
- Early neonatal mortality - 43
- Infant mortality - 18
- Death due to asphyxia, RDS, including low birth
weight infants - 10 - Neonatal mortality - 6
71Changes in Indicators of Early Neonatal Mortality
in the Russian Federation
72Change in the type of primary resuscitation and
state of neonates during 1990-2000 in Maternity
Hospital No. 27 in the city of Moscow ()
73(No Transcript)
74Causes of Problems in Implementing the PNR
Protocol
- Health care organizers regard level of knowledge
of Order No. 372 as adequate - 6 - Lack of understanding by local organization - 5
- Disagreement with requirements of protocol -
2.5 - Other - 2.5
75The results of a questionnaire showed that only
63 of neonatologists have mastered neonatal
resuscitation procedures
- The order of the Ministry of Health of the
Russian Federation No. 372
Improvement of Primary and
Resuscitation Care for Neonates in the Delivery
Room became effective almost five years ago.
76Knowledge of neonatologists on the type of
primary resuscitation care to be given to
neonatesbased on pretest results
1996
1997
- Passed
- Failed
2000
77In the opinion of 44 of the respondents, the
primary reason for this is the absence of NRP
training
- NRP resource training centers operate only in 5
regions within Russia
78Excerpt from the decree of the Board of the
Ministry of Health of Russia of January 9, 2001
Infant Mortality and Ways to Reduce It
- 9.6. To organize ongoing seminars for
neonatologists on topics in primary neonatal
resuscitation care
79Measures to Improve Neonatal Care
- Development/improvement of perinatal networks
- Creation of departments specializing in care of
children who had problems at birth - Increasing the role of mid-level medical
personnel in providing NR
80Measures to Improve Neonatal Care
- Analysis of legal and ethical aspects of this
issue - Research (asphyxia, meconium aspiration, NR in
children with ELBW, infection control during NR,
oxygen therapy)
81A tree has grown from the seed planted by AIHA,
USAID, and the Russian and American partners.
And then...
82Neonatal Resuscitation Program in Ukraine
Results of Implementation
- Goyda N. M.D., Ph.D.
- Head, Medical Services Department
- Ministry of Health of Ukraine
83Key Indicators of Health of Children (1992-1995)
84Ratio of Stillbirth and Early Neonatal
Mortality Causes
85Primary Disability Causes Ratio in Children 0-16
86Key Demographic Indicators
87List of Legal and Regulatory Documents,
National, State and Target Programs in the
Scope of Maternal and Child Health Care in Ukraine
- Long-term Program to improve status of women,
family, Maternal and Child Care - Complex Program to resolve disability problem
- National Program Children of Ukraine
- Additional activities to support implementation
of the National Program Children of Ukraine up
until CY 2005 - National Program on Reproductive Health
88Key Objectives of the National Program Children
of Ukraine
- Improvement of medical care to pregnant women and
newborns - Morbidity prevention and delivery of up-to-date
medical care to children
89Decree of Ministry of HealthJanuary 5, 1996
- Organization of medical service for newborns in
Ukraine
90Three-Level System of Care of Newborns in Ukraine
- Level I - Resuscitation of newborns in a delivery
room right after the delivery, which is primary
resuscitation aimed at developing an adequate
postnatal adaptation of a baby from the very
first second of his life. - Level II - Resuscitating in Newborn Departments
at Maternity Hospitals and delivering intensive
care. - Level III - Delivering medical care to newborns
in ICUs at Pediatric Regional and Multi-Specialty
Pediatric City Hospitals.
91Implementing The Neonatal Resuscitation Program
has made it possible for Ukraine to
- Study the experience of U.S. leading
neonatologists - Teach Ukrainian Instructors
- Develop and equip Training Centers
- Start mass dissemination of neonatal
resuscitation principles among medical staff - Apply new medical techniques in neonatology
- Create a distinctively new system of health care
delivery to newborns
92Standardized Approach to Training
- First Training Center was created through an AIHA
partnership - Replication of this model was used to open 5
additional centers - Instructor training program was developed to help
standardize the course format and prepare
instructors - Instructor training model has been used to train
instructors from many countries.
93Standardized Approach to Training
- First courses were co-taught with U.S. faculty
- Now, Ukrainian faculty assist with co-teaching in
other new centers - InstructorStudent ratio maintained, 14-5
- Certificates only issued if written exam and
skill stations were independently completed
94Number of Specialists Trained in Training Centers
95Perinatal and Newborn Mortality in Ukraine
(1997-2000)
96Neonatal Mortality in Regions where there are
Training Centers
97The following issues remain unresolved
- Legalizing the work of the centers
- Certification - national issues
- Standardization of program throughout Ukraine
98Suggestions with respect to further cooperation
- Support the creation of 8-10 additional Training
Centers due to the vast area of Ukraine - Regular scientific forums on issues of primary
newborn resuscitation - Involvement of international experts in the
development of national neonatology standards
99Neonatal Resuscitation in Slovakia 1992..2001
- Peter Krcho MD,PhD
- NICU Perinatal Center Kosice Slovakia
100Situation before
- The newborns were not resuscitated by neonatal
team - Airway management ? not adequate and late
- The majority of cases did not receive adequate
care... High neonatal mortality
101Our Priorities in 1992
- Early detection of the problems after delivery in
newborns - Early resuscitation with bag and mask
- Better selection of the kind of follow up
intervention that is necessary - START with better CPR especially in perinatal
centers - CPR managed by neonatal physicians and nurses not
by anesthesiologists - IT WAS THE BEGINNING OF THE REGIONALIZATION
PROCESS
102Present ...
- Better collaboration between the units
- EBM interventions are now clear
- In most severe cases still intrauterine transport
is the best ...
103What are our priorities now
- Better intervention in all cases
- Intrauterine transport to the perinatal center
- Decrease of NM in the whole region especially in
newborns under 1499g - Delivery of high risk pregnancies in regional
center,... under 999g
104Continue with ...
- After 9 years of CPR projects we need to continue
retraining - Updating the training modality
- Use better education techniques-
- Real time video , www based education, better
selection of the NICU team ... - ...skills, skills, skills...
105How did we make it ...
- AAP/AHA training guidelines from 1992
- Direct personal teaching
- Every neonatal physicians and nurses in contact
with newborns - resuscitation dolls, photodocumentation and
direct participation in transport, or
resuscitation in delivery room - It has impacted networking, better confidence for
the center
106(No Transcript)
107Intrauterine transport to the Perinatal Center
108Statistical Proof
109Still some severe problems...
- Can we provide the best skills over 24 hours?
- Can we build the best team in region?
- Can we maintain the same level with the same
equipment? - Can we follow the progress of the world...
110Case ? ULBWN 540g
111Sustainability / Dissemination / Teaching
112In Closing Issues for the Future of NRP
113Sustainability Issues
- Ministry level support to legalizecenter
activities and training - Affiliation of centers with academic institutions
- Incorporation of NRP into CME to ensure
standardization - Development of a recertification process to
ensure skills are maintained
114Sustainability Issues
- Quality monitoring of courses to ensure the
certification process is legitimate - Development of an outreach plan to ensure
widespread dissemination - Development of additional centers in large
countries - Obtaining basic resuscitation equipment for all
institutions
115Sustainability Issues
- Technical support for centers to encourage
continued networking and communication between
hospitals, health departments and the Ministry - Development of Perinatal Networks
(regionalization) to support those infants who
need continued care
116NRP TC - Start Up Costs
- Medical equipment for skills
- stations plus shipping 7,000.00
- Office Equipment, furniture 9.200.00
- Educational materials 2,000.00
- Training by US Trainers
- One 2 person trip 10,000.00
- TOTAL 28,200.00
117NRP TC Maintenance Costs
- Telephone and email connections 1,680.00
- Equipment resupply, manuals, office supplies,
printing 5,100.00 - Outreach courses and quality assessment
visits 5,260.00 - Yearly total per center 12,040.00
118The Future of NRP in the Former Soviet Union
- NRP Steering Committee formed in 2000
- Encourage collaboration between centers
- Establish standards for NRP Courses in these
countries - Learn from each other
119The Future of NRP in the Former Soviet Union
- Collectively address problems of sustainability
- Quality assessment plan implemented
- Implementation of new evidence based medicine
guidelines, beginning with faculty training, Fall
2001
120(No Transcript)