Democracy and the Workplace: Connecting Dispute Resolution with Organizational Values and Mission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Democracy and the Workplace: Connecting Dispute Resolution with Organizational Values and Mission

Description:

Applies democratic principles in the corporate democracy ... Will make them democracy enhancing, rather than democracy diminishing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:205
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: richard64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Democracy and the Workplace: Connecting Dispute Resolution with Organizational Values and Mission


1
Democracy and the Workplace Connecting Dispute
Resolution with Organizational Values and Mission
  • Professor Richard C. Reuben
  • University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law
  • January 4, 2005

2
My central thesis
  • Democratic values lie at the heart of todays
    workplaces. While we often think of participation
    as the primary democratic value, there are others
    that are just as significant.
  • Dispute resolution mechanisms in todays
    workplaces should be implemented in a manner
    that promotes democratic values rather than
    diminishes them
  • Doing so will allow dispute resolution to
    contribute to the overall mission of the
    organization, including better worker
    performance, greater compliance with
    organizational mission, and the creation of a
    workplace where people want to be and stay.

3
The Transformation of the Workplace
  • Old Workplace Values Master-Servant
  • Workers viewed as resources to be exploited
  • Loyalty Psychological contract
  • Commitment to internal labor market
  • New Workplace Values Partnership
  • Workers recognized as individuals to be
    cultivated
  • Mobility, flexibility and adaptability
  • Importance of social capital
  • The sum of an organizations informal
    institutions, norms, conventions and social
    preferences.

4
Transformation as Democratization
  • Classic Democracy participatory self-governance
    in the governmental context
  • Corporate democracy
  • Applies democratic principles in the corporate
    democracy
  • Generally limited to employee involvement in
    governance
  • Organizational democracy
  • Extends concept of corporate democracy in
    several ways
  • Not just governance, but also operation of
    functions, such as workplace
  • Not just governments and corporations, but also
    other forms of organization, such as the public
    sector and not-for-profits
  • Not just participation, but other core democratic
    values

5
Core Values of Democracy
  • Personal autonomy
  • Political values
  • Participation
  • Accountability
  • Transparency
  • Rationality
  • Note Values are relative, not absolute
  • Legal values
  • Equality
  • Due process
  • Social Capital Values
  • Trust
  • Social connection
  • Cooperation and reciprocity
  • Civic virtue

6
Assessing democratic characterPublic
adjudication vs. mediation












7
Assessing democratic characterPublic
adjudication vs. mediation
High
High
High
High
Low
High
Depends
High
High

Low
High
High
Medium
8
Implications for dispute systems designers and
program managers
  • Programs should be structured and operated in
    ways that foster rather than undermine these
    values
  • Will make them democracy enhancing, rather than
    democracy diminishing
  • In so doing, will enhance their legitimacy within
    the organization
  • Doing so can be challenging, and raises
    fundamental questions
  • Autonomy mandatory mediation?
  • Transparency
  • Caucus vs. non-caucus models
  • Tension with confidentiality
  • Due process
  • Who chooses mediator style?
  • Tip When values collide or are in tension, look
    to autonomy value

9
Social Capital in the Organizational Context
  • Definition The sum of an organizations
    informal institutions, norms, conventions and
    social preferences.
  • All of the other factors contribute to social
    capital
  • Barometers
  • Trust flowing between employees and management,
    vertically and horizontally
  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)
  • Altruism (helping behaviors)
  • Compliance (rules, policies, etc.)
  • Courtesy (gestures taken to prevent problems)
  • Sportsmanship (willingness to accept bumps in the
    road without protest)
  • Civic virtue (organizational spiritedness)
  • Norm of reciprocity leads to cycles of social
    capital within organization
  • Virtuous cycle when animated by constructive
    behaviors
  • Vicious cycle when animated by destructive
    behaviors

10
Social Capital Barometer 1 Trust
  • Trust is a function of expectations
  • Expectations with respect to trust are set by
    democratic values
  • Basic expectation regarding dispute resolution
  • Right to day in court
  • Anything I want to do other than that
  • Trust with respect to disputes
  • When disputes handled consistently with
    democratic values, trust in the organization is
    promoted
  • When disputes handled inconsistently with
    democratic values, trust in the organization is
    diminished
  • Managing trust with respect to disputes is
    especially important
  • Disputes may be a small part of overall
    functioning of the workplace, but they have a
    pervasive importance that touches all other
    aspects

11
Social Capital Barometer 2 OCB Compliance with
Rules, Policies, Mission
  • What is compliance?
  • Willingness to accept and support rules and
    policies
  • Compliance is a function of trust (Tyler). Two
    key observations
  • As a general matter, belief in integrity of
    process more important than the substance of the
    rules, policies, etc.
  • Process values square with democratic values
  • Whether people given voice, allowed to influence
    outcome (participation)
  • Whether decisions were explained (rationality)
  • Whether decision maker behaved neutrally
    (equality)
  • Whether people treated with respect (due
    process)
  • As a particular matter, we begin with an
    illusion of benevolence
  • Tested against personal experiences
  • To the extent consistent, trust affirming
  • Stokes social capital by eliciting positive
    reciprocal behaviors
  • To the extent inconsistent, trust disconfirming
  • Starves social capital by eliciting negative
    reciprocal behaviors

12
So, what does this all mean in the real world?
  • Performance
  • When dispute resolution reinforces democratic
    values, it fosters OCB, which in turn enhances
    task performance
  • Study of mill workers found that helping,
    sportsmanship, and civic virtue enhanced task
    performance, measured in terms of quality,
    quantity of paper produced
  • Study of insurance agents found sportsmanship and
    civic virtue enhanced performance of insurance
    agents
  • When dispute resolution frustrates democratic
    values, it diminishes OCB, which in turn
    diminishes task performance

13
Real world implications
  • Compliance
  • Workplace institutions, like dispute resolution,
    that are consistent with worker expectations
    regarding democratic values will foster
    acceptance and support of organizational
    objectives, strategies, and mission
  • Workplace institutions, like dispute resolution,
    that are inconsistent with worker expectations
    with respect to democratic values will encourage
    non-compliance with organizational objectives,
    strategies, and mission
  • Reactance theory when our free behaviors are
    limited, we tend to react destructively

14
Some concluding questions . . .
  • More empirical research needed to test and refine
    theories
  • E.g., surveying organizations with democratic and
    undemocratic dispute resolution programs, and
    inquiring about how that affects worker
    perceptions of the organization, task
    performance, willingness to support mission
  • Beyond the basic guidance I have provided, how
    should ADR program managers integrate these
    principles into their daily work?
  • Which daily issues and practices are implicated
    by the theory?
  • What unique challenges are raised by the
    governmental context?
  • What barriers are there to applying the theory?
  • How can those barrier be overcome?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com