Exploring the structure of the oceanic environment: A classification approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Exploring the structure of the oceanic environment: A classification approach

Description:

(zooplankton vs. fish vs. sea lions) A quantitative approach. e.g. classifying landscapes ... 1Yi Chao, Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: karinb8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exploring the structure of the oceanic environment: A classification approach


1
Exploring the structure of the oceanic
environment A classification approach
Edward GregrKarin BodtkerAndrew Trites
Marine Mammal Research Unit Fisheries
Centre University of British Columbia October
2004
2
Why classify oceanic structure?
  • related to biological spatial distributions
  • temporal changes (e.g. regime shifts)
  • Steller sea lion in an ecosystem context

3
Oceanic structure classified Dodimead et al. 1963
4
Extending the classification approach
  • biological perspective
  • quantitative and repeatable
  • adaptable
  • consider temporal variability (seasons, years,
    regimes)
  • different spatial scales (zooplankton vs. fish
    vs. sea lions)

5
A quantitative approache.g. classifying
landscapes
6
Data for oceanic classification
  • 1 degree ROMS output1, interpolated to equal area
    grid.
  • Seasonal averages,1966-1975 and 1980-1989.

1Yi Chao, Jet Propulsion Lab, California
Institute of Technology
7
Classification methodH - means clustering
algorithm1
Identify initial clusters
Assign pixels to nearest cluster based on
maximum likelihood
Iterate until stable
1Hartigan, J. A. 1975. Clustering Algorithms.
John Wiley Sons, New York.
8
Results summer, 1966-1975
9
Results correspond to domains
Summer, 1966-1975
10
Results seasonal variability
11
Results regime variability
  • Alaska gyre evidence of stronger flow post - 1976
  • Transitional domain boundary shift

12
Results map comparisons
  • Seasons more similar between regimes than
    consecutive seasons within each regime

13
Results biological relevance
Chl-a, mg/L1 Summer, 1997-2003
1Andrew Thomas, School of Marine Sciences,
University of Maine
14
Summary
  • quantitative and adaptable approach
  • regions correspond to classic domains
  • temporal differences mapped and quantified
  • regions have biological relevance

15
Thanks very much ...
IntellectualIan Perry, Mike Foreman, Stephen
Ban, the MMRU lab, and the attendees of numerous
earlier presentations of this work.
DataYi Chao, Jet Propulsion Lab, California
Mike Foreman, Institute of Ocean Sciences,
British Columbia Al Hermann, PMEL, Washington
Wieslaw Maslowski, Naval Postgraduate School,
California Andy Thomas, University of Maine,
Maine.
FundingNOAA, the North Pacific Marine Science
Foundation, and the North Pacific Universities
Marine Mammal Research Consortium.
16
(No Transcript)
17
Map comparisons
  • Higher score, more similar
  • Seasons more similar between regimes than
    consecutive seasons within each regime.

18
Classification algorithm
  • Selecting the number of clusters to keep

Keep 6 or 8 clusters
19
Oceanic structure classified
  • Biomes and provinces of Longhurst 1998
  • variability within not evident
  • boundaries may shift
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com