Tailoring Early Interventions to Maximize Child Benefits and Feasible Service Delivery Sharon Landes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Tailoring Early Interventions to Maximize Child Benefits and Feasible Service Delivery Sharon Landes

Description:

Tailoring Early Interventions to Maximize Child Benefits and ... Abecedarian Project: Woodcock-Johnson. Age-referenced Reading Standard Scores at age 8 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:199
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: lorimcc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tailoring Early Interventions to Maximize Child Benefits and Feasible Service Delivery Sharon Landes


1
Tailoring Early Interventions to Maximize Child
Benefits and Feasible Service Delivery Sharon
Landesman Ramey, Ph.D.Craig T. Ramey,
Ph.D.Directors, Georgetown UniversityCenter on
Health and EducationIntervention and treatment
for Alcohol-Affected Individuals The Next
ChallengeAtlanta October 22 -23 2007
2
Scientific Foundations for the new Education
Science
  • Research on neuroplasticity (animal models)
  • Studies of extreme deprivation (orphanages,
  • maternal deprivation, isolation)
  • Demonstration projects
  • Naturalistic and longitudinal studies
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to test
  • the efficacy of a planned intervention to
  • alter the life course

3
Applied Biosocial Contextual Development
(ABCD) A Framework for Understanding Human
Development
4
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)we have
conducted include
  • The Abecedarian Project (ABC)
  • Project CARE
  • Infant Health and Development Program (8 sites)
  • Romanian Orphanage Studies
  • Intensive Pediatric CI Therapy (cerebral palsy)
  • National Transition Demonstration Study (31
    sites)
  • Testing pre-K curricula and coaching models
  • System and statewide scale-up studies

  • Ramey Ramey

5
PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE EARLY INTERVENTION
  • Timing (onset, duration, offset)
  • Intensity (per day/wk/mth/yr(s))
  • Direct learning experiences
  • Breadth of services/supports
  • Individual differences
  • Environmental maintenance

Ramey Ramey (1998), American Psychologist
6
1. Principle of Timing
  • When the intervention begins and ends
    significantly influences magnitude of effects
  • Neurodevelopmental theory and research are
    central to understanding important features of
    CNS that rapidly developing at certain ages
  • Development at earlier stages sets conditions for
    later stages (cumulative toll hypotheses)
  • Principle is highly similar to that in teratology

7
Evidence supporting the principle of timing
  • Derives from cross-study comparisons,
    meta-analyses of gt 25 interventions
  • Usually larger and more lasting effects occur
    when intervention begins earlier and lasts longer
  • Limitation Inherent confounds in research
    related to this principle, since most RCTs that
    produced the largest gains began earlier,
    continued longer, and probably were more fully
    implemented

8
  • Synaptogenesis by brain region graph illustrates
  • plausible biological basis for Principle of Timing

Adapted from Huttenlocher in Ramey Ramey Right
from Birth (1999)
9
2. Principle of Dosage (Intensity)
  • Interventions which are more intensive (as
    indexed by hours per day, days per week, etc.)
    produce larger changes
  • Exact specification of optimal doses has been
    very difficult, largely due to cost and pragmatic
    issues in intervetion reserach
  • Some evidence consistent with threshold
    hypothesis (mostly at lower limits)
  • Highly similar to dose-response curve principle
    in teratology

10
Mothers Speech and Infant VocabularyNaturalisti
c evidence consistent with RCT support for
Principle of Dosage
Huttenlocher et al, Developmental Psychology,
(1991)
11
3. Principle of Direct Learning Experiences
  • Interventions that directly alter the childs
    experiences (i.e., transactions with others and
    environment) have significantly greater effects
    than do those that indirectly change the childs
    life (e.g., parenting programs, coordination of
    service delivery supports)
  • Note majority of early interventions have
    focused on indirect effects based on hope that
    these would lead to sustainable environmental
    supports (to date, this hypothesis has not been
    confirmed)

12
4. Principle of Breadth of Services/Supports
  • Early interventions that are multi-component and
    address child needs in health, cognition,
    social-emotional development generally produce
    larger and longer lasting effects
  • Limitations
  • Research evidence has many confounds, since
    broader programs also tend to be more intensive
    and include direct learning experiences
  • most intervention programs tested in RCTs
    focused on children with multiple needs and risk
    conditions (due to natural co-occurrence)

13
5. Principle of Individual Differences
  • Some children benefit more (or less) than do
    other children
  • This principle has been affirmed primarily by
  • Findings that children with greater needs for
    environmental supports tend to benefit more
  • Findings that children with more substantial CNS
    insult may not benefit as much from generic
    (i.e., not spectrum-specific intervention)
    intervention
  • Similar to teratology principle of differential
    genetic susceptibility or Gene X Environment
    Interaction Effect

14
6. Principle of Environmental Maintenance
  • Benefits of early intervention are sustained
    longer when children continue to receive strong,
    appropriate environmental supports after
    intervention ends
  • Limitation Almost impossible to separate effects
    of subsequent depriving or harmful environments
    (which could reverse benefits of early
    intervention) from the need for true
    maintenance
  • Influenced by the fact that special needs
    children display different issues that result
    in problems that depend on their age and
    setting (e.g., problems of teens differ from
    those of preschoolers)

15
Examples affirming these principles from some of
our longitudinal RCTs
  • Interventions for children from highly
    impoverished, often chaotic environments
    (Abecedarian Project and Project CARE Romanian
    Orphanage studies)
  • Targeted interventions for
  • Low birthweight, premature infants (IHDP)
  • Children with moderate to severe neuromotor
    impairments (Project ACQUIRE)

16
ABC Project (Craig Ramey, PI) 1972 2007
(ongoing)
  • The Abecedarian (ABC) Project was a randomized
    controlled trial (RCT) that tested the efficacy
    of intensive, theory-informed early childhood
    education for extremely low resource (high-risk)
    children
  • 99 of living original participants still in
    longitudinal follow-up study at age 30 yrs
  • Inter-generational data being collected as well

17
Key Research Questions for Abecedarian (ABC)
Project
  • Can the cumulative developmental toll
    experienced by high-risk children
  • be prevented or reduced significantly
  • by providing systematic, high-quality, early
    childhood education
  • from birth through kindergarten entry and/or
  • from k through 2nd grade?

18
The Abecedarian Design Early Intervention
Program
  • Control Group_
  • Adequate nutrition
  • Supportive social services
  • Low-cost or free primary
  • health care
  • Treatment Group _
  • Adequate nutrition
  • Supportive social services
  • Free primary health care
  • Preschool treatment
  • Intensive (full day, 5 days/week,
  • 50 weeks/year, 5 years)
  • Learningames Curriculum
  • Cognitive / Fine Motor
  • Social / Self
  • Motor
  • Language
  • Individualized pace

Campbell Ramey, 1995 American Educational
Research Journal
19
Z Scores and Mean Standardized Scores for
High-Risk Preschool Treatment and
ControlChildren in the Abecedarian Project at
Nine Preschool Measurement Occasions
Ramey et al, 2000 Applied Developmental Science
20
Percent of Abecedarian Sample in Normal IQ Range
(gt84) by Age (longitudinal analysis)
Martin, Ramey, Ramey, 1990 American Journal of
Public Health
21
ABC Project Influences on IQ by Child Age
Adapted from Martin, Ramey, Ramey, American
Journal of Public Health, 1996
22
Brief Summary of Abecedarian K-2 Transition
Program
  • Individualized focus on academic and learning
    activities in school and at home
  • Emphasis on reading, mathematics, and writing
  • Master Home/School Resource Teachers (12 children
    and families per teacher)
  • Development of an individualized and documented
    supplemental curriculum for each child
  • Explicit attention and action relevant to family
    circumstances, as needed
  • Summer camps with academically relevant
    experiences
  • Ramey Ramey, 1999

23
Abecedarian Project Woodcock-Johnson Age-referenc
ed Reading Standard Scores at age 8
24
The Abecedarian (ABC) Project Longitudinal Effect
Sizes for Reading by Treatment Group
Campbell, Ramey, Pugello, Sparling,
Miller-Johnson (2001) Applied Developmental
Science
25
Abecedarian Project
Ramey Ramey, 1999 MR/DD Research Review
26
Key Findings from Abecedarian Project(Abecedaria
n one who learnsthe basics such as the
alphabet)
  • 18 Months to 21 Years Old
  • Intelligence (IQ)
  • Reading and math skills
  • Academic locus-of-control
  • Social Competence
  • Years in school,
  • including college
  • Full-time employment
  • Grade Repetition
  • Special Education
  • placement
  • Teen Pregnancies
  • Smoking and drug
  • use

Plus benefits to mothers of these children
(education, employment)
Ramey et al, 2000
27
Project CARE
  • RCT designed to replicate Abecedarian Project
    (ABC)
  • Added a new treatment group to test the
    efficacy of
  • an intensive 5-year home visiting program using
    the
  • ABC intervention (to test indirect vs direct
    effects)
  • Affirmed same findings in early childhood
    through
  • to young adulthood from educational
    intervention, but
  • no benefits of home visiting on child outcomes

28
The Infant Health and Development Program (IHDP)
  • Intervention replicated Abecedarian Project
  • New target group premature, low birthweight
    children
  • gestation and lt 2500 gm at birth
  • Conducted at 8 sites (N985 children families)
  • Intervention modified for specific biological
    risk factors
  • Educational intervention lasted only until 3 yrs
    old (CA)
  • Follow-up reported through age 18 yrs
  • IHDP, JAMA,
    1990

29
Infant Health Development Program Outcomes
(plt.01) at 12, 24, 36 months
Ramey 1999, adapted from Gross, Spiker, Haynes,
1997, Helping Low Birth Weight, Premature Babies
30
Examples of findings affirmingPrinciple of
Individual Differences
  • In ABC, children with lowest IQ mothers (lt70)
    showed markedly larger benefits than those whose
    mothers had IQs gt90
  • In IHDP, intervention more efficacious in
    preventing mental retardation (IQlt70) for
    premature, low birthweight children with less
    educated mothers or lower IQ mothers
  • In IHDP, very low birthweight infants did not
    benefit as much

31
Stanford-Binet IQ Scores at 36 Months Heavier LBW
Group (2001-2500gm)
Infant Health and Development, JAMA, 1990
Ramey, AAAS, 1996
32
Stanford-Binet IQ Scores at 36 Months Lighter LBW
Group (lt2000gm)
Infant Health and Development, JAMA, 1990
Ramey, AAAS, 1996
33
Mother-child IQ discrepancy scoresat 48 months
(ABC Project)
Low IQ mothers
Control
X31
Intervention
IQ Points
Normal IQ mothers
Low IQ mothers
X9
Normal IQ mothers
X7.1
X- 4
Control
Intervention
Ramey Ramey, 1999
34
Childrens IQ at 36 months Maternal Education
X Treatment Group
Infant Health and Development Program
Ramey Ramey (1998), Preventive Medicine
(n232)
(n162)
(n166)
(n104)
(n134)
(n63)
(n76)
(n48)
35
The case for targeted interventions for
particular types of children, families, schools,
regions
  • Knowledge about specific child or community
    conditions are higher relevant to
    treatment/intervention content and implementation
  • Targeted interventions can be combined with
    general best practices for children and schools
  • Opportunity to study brain-behavior interactions
    over time as well as need for understanding
    systems change
  • Strong advocacy and clinical support

36
An example of a highly intensive, targeted
intervention that challenges conventional
practices
37
Intensive Pediatric Therapy for Children with
Cerebral Palsy
  • Based on fundamental principles of learning
    theory, clinical rehab reports of adults with
    stroke, and animal experiments
  • First-ever RCT to test a highly intensive form of
    therapy targeted for children with hemiparesis
  • Results demonstrated large and sustained
    benefits, plus spillover effects (unanticipated)
    to other domains of development
  • DeLuca, Echols, Ramey,
    Child Neurology, 2006

38
Key features of Pediatric CI Therapy
  • Highly intensive (6 hours per day, 21 consecutive
    days)
  • Direct and active engagement of child as learner
  • Responsive to childs interests, initial
    competence
  • Based on learning theory principles
  • Designed to promote generalization
  • Constraint leads child to focus on impaired
    limb,
  • overcome developmental disregard, eliminate
  • competing responses, create new CNS pathways

  • DeLuca, Echols, Ramey (2007)

39
PMAL Frequency Rating of Upper Extremity Use
40
PMAL Quality Rating of Upper Extremity Movement
41
(No Transcript)
42
Spillover Effects from Intensive Pediatric CI
Therapy
  • Increased positive social-emotional
    responsiveness
  • Reduced behavioral problems
  • Improved communication skills
  • Decreased sensory aversion to touch
  • Improved gross motor and mobility skills
  • Increased self-confidence and independence
  • DeLuca,
    Echols, Ramey, 2007

43
Individual Differences Principle in Pediatric CI
Trial
44
Challenges for the Science of Implementation
  • Need to understand how to promote changes in
    practice consistent with sound evidence
  • Tremendous skepticism and backlash about whether
    this is another passing fad
  • Lack of public accountability and information
    systems to judge progress and identify urgent
    problems

45
Innovation in Real Time Science
  • Need for timely and ongoing feedback to all
    participants, funders, and the public
  • Should we treat provision of high quality
    education with the same urgency as a public
    health problem that children are being harmed
    if a solid education is not given?
  • Longitudinal tracking, surveillance, and
    practical guidance to families and educational
    systems

46
For copies of this PowerPoint presentation,please
download from our website http//che.georgetown.
eduor contactDr. Sharon Landesman Ramey
(202) 687-2874email sr222_at_georgetown.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com