Constitutional Law September 14, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Constitutional Law September 14, 2004

Description:

Burdens 'clearly excessive' in light of 'Putative' local benefit ... Obstruction of Flow (Bibb; S. Pacific) Extraterritorial Regulation (Edgar v. Mite) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: rle
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constitutional Law September 14, 2004


1
Constitutional LawSeptember 14, 2004
  • DCC
  • Overview
  • Discrimination
  • Neutral Measures
  • Overview of Analysis
  • Nondiscriminatory Laws
  • Burdens-Benefit Balancing
  • Burden Export
  • Exceptions

2
DCC Decision Tree
State Regulation or Tax Affecting Commerce?
Yes
No
Discriminatory?
DCC does not apply
Yes
No
Apply Strict Scrutiny
Burdens/Benefits Balancing
Consider Other Provisions
3
Discrimination Recap
  • Discriminatory
  • On its face (forms)
  • In practical effect
  • Nearly per se invalid (SS)
  • Over Under Inclusive
  • LDA
  • Bad Fit and Purpose (link)

4
II. Neutral MeasuresA. Overview
  • Non-Discriminatory/Incidental Effects
  • Apply Pike test
  • Burdens clearly excessive in light of
  • Putative local benefit
  • Legitimacy of Inquiry
  • Not Protectionist
  • What Justification?

5
B. Non-Discriminatory Laws
  • Exxon
  • Ban on refiner owned stations
  • All refiners out of state
  • Clover Leaf
  • Ban on plastic milk cartons
  • Local paper industry
  • CTS
  • Shareholder approval for takeover
  • Takeovers primarily out of state
  • Burden Export (link)

6
C. Balancing1. Burdens
  • Relevant burdens?
  • Commerce, not market or firms (Exxon)
  • But see Pike
  • Weighty burdens
  • Obstruction of Flow (Bibb S. Pacific)
  • Extraterritorial Regulation (Edgar v. Mite)
  • Burden Export?

7
2. Benefits
  • Types of Benefits
  • Health, Safety, Environment
  • Economic Concerns
  • Deference to Local Judgments?
  • Yes Exxon, Cloverleaf, CTS
  • No Pike, Bibb

8
Fit and Purpose
  • Bad Fit Suggests Pretext
  • Elements of Bad Fit
  • Less Discriminatory Alternatives
  • Over and Under Inclusiveness (link)
  • Implications
  • For Strict Scrutiny
  • For Burdens/Benefits Balancing

Back
9
Over Under Inclusiveness
UNDERINCLUSIVE
OVERINCLUSIVE
State Law
Applies
Applies
Does Not Apply
Group A Engages Purported Purpose
Group B Engages Purported Purpose
Group C Does Not Engage Purpose
Hidden Purpose
Back
10
Burden Export
State Policy Makers
State Policy Makers
Burden
Burden
Complaints
Unheard Complaints
Unheard Complaints
In State
Out of State
In State
Out of State
Back
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com