Chapter 23 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 23

Description:

In the early years of ARPAnet unique single names were used for machines. ... merlin. 9. 23.8 Top-Level Domains - continued. top-level domain. second-level domain ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: acbar
Category:
Tags: chapter | merlin

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 23


1
Chapter 23 Domain Name System (DNS) 23.2 Names
for Machines It is usually easier to refer to a
machine as juniper than as 138.26.66.6
23.3 Flat Namespace ? Early ARPAnet unique
names for machines, registered with Network
Information Center
? Continued until 1000 machines
? Beyond that a massive bureaucracy would have
been necessary to ensure uniqueness of names
? The Domain Name System was created
2
Chapter 23 Domain Name System (DNS) -
continued 23.4 Hierarchical Names City Athens
Athens, AL or Athens, GA or Athens, TN
? Specifying state removes ambiguity.
23.5 Delegation of Authority for Names If you
want to start a new city and call it Athens,
you probably need permission from the state you
will probably be allowed to do it if there is not
already and Athens in your state. Once you
have permission for the city name, you probably
have the authority to name the neighborhoods.
In DNS The topmost level of the hierarchy
divides the namespace and delegates authority for
each division it need not be bothered by changes
within a division.
3
23.6 Subset Authority This can be carried down
to more levels local.group.site
There is an analogy to the telephone numbering
system ltarea codegt ltexchangegt
ltextensiongt (although in this case the
highest level is written on the left).
4
In the Internet, hierarchical machine names are
assigned according to the structure of
organizations that obtain authority for parts of
the namespace, not necessarily according to the
structure of the physical network connections.
Example 1 Two small departments, philosophy and
foreign languages, might share a floor in the
Humanities building their domain names,
pl.uab.edu and fl.uab.edu are different but they
may share a single LAN and therefore have the
same IP (sub)network address.
Example 2 The CIS department has a large number
of hosts and several LANs. All hosts have domain
names with the same suffix, cis.uab.edu but their
IP addresses are 138.26.64.x 138.26.65.y
138.26.66.z
5
23.7 Internet Domain Names The Domain Name
System has two, conceptually independent
aspects (abstract) - name syntax and
delegating authority over names
(concrete) - distributed computing
system that efficiently maps names to
addresses
Section 23.7 continues with the first topic.
6
23.7 Internet Domain Names continued Domain
name cs.purdue.edu contains three labels. This
is the lowest-level domain or
third-level domain.
Any suffix of a label in a domain name is also
called a domain purdue.edu is the second-level
domain edu is the top-level domain
(labels can be up to 63 ASCII characters long
the total length of the name can be up to 255
characters long)
7
23.8 Top-Level Domains
Figure 23.1 Top-level domains
8
23.8 Top-Level Domains - continued The domain
name space can be represented by a rooted tree
Different from Comer! More later
top-level domain
second-level domain
third-level domain
merlin
Figure 23.2
9
23.8 Top-Level Domains - continued
top-level domain
second-level domain
third-level domain
The domain name of a subtree is a list of its
labels, separated by periods, along the path to
the root.
All domain names end in . e.g. cs.purdue.edu.
but the . is usually omitted in
speech (not omitted in coding).
10
23.8 Top-Level Domains - continued Conceptually,
the top-level names permit two independent naming
hierarchies geographic organizational
For the geographic scheme each country has a
two-letter code e.g. us for United States
Beneath this top level there are second-level
domains for each state, e.g. al.us
An organization can choose which way it wants to
be known. In the US we mostly see the
organizational structure e.g uab.edu not
uab.al.us Other countries often use the
geographic hierarchy e.g. bham.ac.uk for the
University of Birmingham (England).
11
23.8 Top-Level Domains - continued There is a
registrar for each top-level domain, e.g. edu
An organization applies to the top-level
registrar for approval of a second-level
domain, e.g. uab.edu
A department of an organization applies to the
organization administration for approval of a
third-level domain, e.g. cis.uab.edu
The departmental administrator may assign
fourth-level domains, e.g. juniper.cis.uab.edu
12
23.9 Name Syntax and Type A record in the domain
name system includes not only the name, but also
a type, e.g. IP address of the named
machine mailbox (name of the machine running
the SMTP server)
At first well use the first type for examples
other types later
13
23.9 Name Syntax and Type - continued The syntax
of a domain name does not determine what type of
object is represented. gwen.purdue.edu could
be an individual machine (leaf of tree),
although cs.purdue.edu Is a non-leaf domain,
with numerous machines under it.
14
Comers example machine gwen.purdue.edu.
gwen
One cannot distinguish the names of subdomains
from the names of individual objects or the type
of an object using only the domain name syntax.
15
23.10 Mapping Domain Names to Addresses Recall
that DNS has two, conceptually independent
aspects (abstract) - name syntax delegat
ing authority over names (concrete) - a
distributed computing system that efficiently
maps names to addresses Now we consider the
second aspect.
16
23.10 Mapping Domain Names to Addresses
continued The domain name system includes an
efficient reliable general-purpose
distributed system for mapping names to addresses.
17
23.10 Mapping Domain Names to Addresses
continued What is meant by these characteristics?
efficient most names can be mapped
locally, without needing Internet traffic
(probably not true of home network)
reliable no single machine failure will
prevent the system from operating
correctly
general-purpose not restricted to
mapping machine domain names to IP addresses
(but we will often use this as our example)
distributed a set of servers at multiple
sites cooperatively solve the mapping
problem
18
23.10 Mapping Domain Names to Addresses
continued
Name Server This is a server that supplies
name-to-address translation, mapping from domain
names to IP addresses (the example were
concentrating on). There is a cooperating
system of such servers.
The corresponding client software is called a
name resolver, which accesses one or more name
servers when needing to translate a name.
19
23.10 Mapping Domain Names to Addresses
continued
First, assume ? name server for each level in
the tree
? Search starts at root (top-down)
? Root server knows how to contact all top-level
servers
Line means able to contact not usually directly
Figure 23.3
Similarly, the top-level domain server knows how
to contact the server for each second-level
domain and so on. The servers can be physically
located anywhere.
20
23.10 Mapping Domain Names to Addresses
continued ? Arrangement on previous slide would
produce a large number of small servers.
? In practice the tree of servers will be
flattened.
I dont think this is right! See later.
Figure 23.4
21
23.10 Mapping Domain Names to Addresses
continued
DNS is an amazing system, which made the Internet
usable by ordinary people! (Contrast having to
use IP addresses.)
second-level domains (2008) ? 80,000,000
.com ? 10,000,000 .net ? 6,000,000
.org ? 174,000,000 total
The company VeriSign runs the top-level server
for .com, .net, and .org, and responds to 6
18 billion requests per day
(about 1 3 for each person on earth).
22
23.11 Domain Name Resolution We continue to
assume that name resolution proceeds
top-down. There are two ways to use the
system iterative the client contacts the
chain of servers, one at a time recursive
the client contact the first server and asks it
to take over the task or resolution.
In either case the client forms a domain name
query that has four components
the domain name to be resolved
the class of the domain name (will always be
IP for us)
the type of answer desired (e.g. machine IP
address)
iterative or recursive resolution
23
23.11 Domain Name Resolution - continued
The entire DNS namespace is divided into
non-overlapping zones of authority.
Here is a very small portion of the divided
namespace
There is a name server for each zone
authoritative server
24
23.11 Domain Name Resolution - continued When a
domain server receives a query it checks to see
if the name lies in the subdomain for which this
server is an authority. If yes the
server translates the domain name to an IP
address, appends the answer to the query, and
returns it to the client
If not the server checks to see if the
client requested iterative or recursive If
iterative the server replies to the client with a
suggestion about the next server the
client should contact
If recursive, the server turns round and
recursively becomes a client, acting on behalf
of the previous client eventually an
authoritative server is reached, the
translation found, and the recursion unwinds,
returning the answer to the original client.
25
23.11 Domain Name Resolution - continued
Q How does a client find a name server at which
to begin the search? A A client must know the
IP address of at least one name server. (In UNIX
systems these addresses are in the file
/etc/resolv.conf)
Q How does a name server find another name
server to contact if the first server cannot
answer the query? A A name server must know
the IP address at least one root server (there
are 13 root servers, spread around the world,
referred to as A .. M the A root server is
198.41.0.4).
The domain name service uses well-known port 53,
usually UDP.
26
23.12 Efficient Translation We have pretended
that resolution proceeds top-down, but this would
be inefficient, because name resolution
often refers to local names (questionable not
true in home environment may be true in
organizational environment)
if every client always went first to the
top-level server, it might become
overloaded
failure of the top-level server, or of
communication with it, would prevent
resolution, even if a local server could resolve
the name.
27
23.12 Efficient Translation - continued So we
adopt a two-step name resolution mechanism that
preserves the administrative hierarchy but
permits efficient translation resolution
begins with a local name server if this
server cannot resolve the name, the query is sent
to a higher server in the domain name
system.
28
23.12 Efficient Translation - continued Example
User on machine flits.cs.vu.nl pings machine
linda.cs.yale.edu
209.86.66.94
130.37.16.112
29
23.13 Caching The Key to Efficiency Scenario A
name server receives a recursive request for a
name not in the servers zone of authority. The
server recursively becomes a client and
eventually receives back the requested mapping,
which it provides to the original client.
The server also retains the mapping in its DNS
cache. If the server receives another request for
this same mapping, it supplies the information
from its DNS cache. However, it does not mark
its reply as authoritative.
Since mappings may change, soft state is used.
When an authoritative server provides a mapping,
the server includes a Time to Live (TTL) that
indicates how long the mapping may be assumed to
remain valid. The receiving server deletes the
mapping after the TTL has elapsed.
TTL is usually set to 1 day
30
23.13 Caching The Key to Efficiency - continued
Example User on machine flits.cs.vu.nl pings
machine linda.cs.yale.edu

After step 7 the server cs.vu.nl would enter the
mapping in its DNS cache and start a soft-state
timer (and in step 8 provide the mapping to the
name resolver on machine flits).
31
23.13 Caching The Key to Efficiency
continued We can now refine the algorithm for a
DNS server receiving a query IF query domain is
in servers Zone Of Authority reply with answer
marked AUTHORITATIVE
ELSE IF query domain is in servers cache
reply with answer not marked AUTHORITATIVE
and provide source of information
ELSE IF recursion requested available
server becomes client and searches
ELSE IF iteration requested or recursion
not available return no answer, but
provide suggestions
of other servers that may be helpful
32
23.14 Domain Name System Message Format This
format is used for all messages (requests and
replies)
Figure 23.5
33
23.14 Domain Name System Message Format -
continued
4-bit op-code
9 reserved 10 authenticated 11
disabled
Response code
Figure 23.6
34
23.14 Domain Name System Message Format
continued Format of the QUESTION section of the
general format
juniper.cis.uab.edu.
A
IP
Figure 23.7
35
The domain name system database consists of a
collection of resource records
juniper.cis.uab.edu.
A
IP
1 day
4
138.26.66.6
Figure 23.8
All DNS replies (ANSWER section, AUTHORITY
section, and ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section are
in the form of resource records
36
23.15 Compressed Name Format The first paragraph
is not actually about compression!
Q Because DNS labels and names are variable in
length, how can we represent them internally?
A Domain names are stored as a sequence of
labels each label begins with an octet that
specifies its length.
Q How do we know when the name is complete?
A All names end at the root, which has a
zero-length name, so the length prefix at the
end of the name will be zero (explains why not
un-named root).
So juniper.cis.uab.edu is stored as 07 6a
75 6e 69 70 65 72 03 63 69 73 03 75 61 62 03 65
64 75 00 j u n i p e
r c i s u a b e
d u
End of name
Count byte
37
23.15 Compressed Name Format continued To
conserve space in the reply, name servers
compress by sending only the first copy of each
domain name. Subsequent mentions of the name, or
parts of it, are represented by pointer bytes to
the first occurrence. Pointers always occur at
the beginning of a label and replace the count
byte.
Q How do we distinguish count bytes from
pointers?
A Labels cannot be more than 63 characters long,
so the leftmost two bits of a count byte must be
00
Pointers are distinguished by having the leftmost
two bits 11 The next 14 bits of a two-byte field
are the pointer.
38
Part of a Wireshark trace of DNS reply to query
for juniper.cis.uab.edu
The complete name is in the RR but it is
compressed in the answer section.
AUTHORITY and ADDITIONAL INFORMATION sections
39
23.16 Abbreviation of Domain Names Telephone
analogy If destination and source are in same
area, its (usually) not necessary to dial the
area code
Similarly, within CIS department juniper may
be used for juniper.cis.uab.edu.
40
23.16 Abbreviation of Domain Names - continued
The DNS system allows for lookup of
fully-qualified domain names only.
Although the human user may key in juniper the
client software must add the suffix before
accessing the domain name system.
(in a UNIX system file /etc/resolv.conf contains
possible values of the suffix)
41
23.17 Inverse Mappings and 23.18 Pointer
Queries We have been concentrating on mapping
from a machines domain name to its IP
address. Sometimes we need the inverse mapping
(given address, find name)
There is a special domain in-addr.arpa for
this For an IP address 138.26.66.6 the form of
the query to the DNS system is 6.66.26.138.in-
addr.arpa which should give the
reply juniper.cis.uab.edu
42
23.19 Object Types and Resource Record
Contents Recall that in reply to a query the DNS
sends a copy of the relevant resource
records. DNS contains several types of resource
record.
Here are some
Figure 23.9
43
23.19 Object Types and Resource Record Contents -
continued A server always returns helpful
information in the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECTION
of the response.
For example, the ANSWER SECTION responding to a
mail-server question contains the domain name of
a server for the requested domain.
The ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECTION will provide
the corresponding IP address ( a type A resource
record)
44
Wireshark trace of DNS reply to query for
juniper.cis.uab.edu
45
23.19 Object Types and Resource Record Contents -
continued
A small portion of a possible DNS database for
domain cs.vu.nl
46
23.20 Obtaining Authority for a Subdomain Before
an organization is granted authority for a
second-level domain it must agree to operate a
DNS server that meets stringent standards. The
Internet authority requires that the information
in every second-level domain server be
replicated. The information must appear in at
least two independent name servers.
Q What is the definition of independent?
Independent means that the servers have no
single common point of failure. The servers
cannot be on the same physical network cannot
obtain electrical power from the same source.
In practice, an organization must find at least
one other site that agrees to run a backup
server. For UAB the backup is at deltacom.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com