Residential Lighting Session 1 A Vision for Efficient Lighting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Residential Lighting Session 1 A Vision for Efficient Lighting

Description:

BC Hydro, BPA, Cape Light Compact, CEC, ComEd, DOE, Efficiency Maine, Efficiency ... Maxlite, Osram Sylvania, Phillips, Satco, Sea Gull Lighting, Sunpark, TCP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: rfos8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Residential Lighting Session 1 A Vision for Efficient Lighting


1
Residential Lighting - Session 1 A Vision for
Efficient Lighting
2
Sessions at a Glance
  • Session 1
  • Presentation Where are we today? How did we get
    here?
  • Discussion What activities are you planning for
    2008? Do we need to make the Vision more
    actionable?
  • Session 2
  • Presentation Where are we going?
  • Discussion How do we move ahead?

3
Whats going on here?
Rejuvenation Lighting
4
Participants
  • CEE Members
  • BC Hydro, BPA, Cape Light Compact, CEC, ComEd,
    DOE, Efficiency Maine, Efficiency Vermont, Energy
    Trust of Oregon, EPA, FEMP, Hydro Quebec, Idaho
    Power, LIPA, MidAmerican, National Grid, NEEP,
    NRCan, NW Alliance, NYSERDA, OPA, PNNL, Puget
    Sound Energy, Salt River Project, SCE, SDGE,
    SMUD, Tacoma, Wisconsin
  • Manufacturers
  • American Fluorescent, ALA, Buffalolite, Finelite,
    GE, Greenlite, Heath Zenith, Hubbardton Forge,
    Hunter, Kichler, Litex, Lithonia, Maxlite, Osram
    Sylvania, Phillips, Satco, Sea Gull Lighting,
    Sunpark, TCP
  • Retailers
  • Home Depot, Lighting Design by Wettsteins,
    Lowes, Wal-Mart

5
Todays Opportunities
  • Lighting key to addressing climate change
  • Many stakeholders are pursuing efficiency
  • Progress on many barriers
  • Multiple pin configurations
  • Problems with color consistency
  • Few manufacturers
  • Limited availability of fixtures/lamps
  • Few designs emphasizing CFL advantages
  • Little marketing at retail
  • Higher incremental cost
  • Lack of inexpensive dimming technologies

?
?
?
?
?
?
?
  • Negative consumer perceptions of CFLs

?
6
Todays Challenges
  • Still more work to do on barriers
  • Inconsistency in assumptions
  • Different program approaches and foci
  • Less effective due to lack of coordinated efforts

7
Purpose of the Visioning Effort
  • Bring together stakeholders in a shared goal
  • Uncover varying assumptions
  • Seek more consistency and use of best practices
  • Improve energy savings impacts

8
Draft Vision
  • Achieve a 50 reduction in the amount of
    electricity used to light a square foot of space
    in the average US residence by 2020.

9
Night of the Living Document
  • Possible implications of minimum standards
  • Progress on Barriers (CFL dimming, Hg, perception
    of fluorescent)
  • Applications with the greatest savings potential
  • Likely technical developments
  • SSL trajectory for general illumination
  • Improved incandescent, halogen

10
Discussion Topics
  • What activities are you planning for 2008?
  • How specific are these plans?
  • Would additional content in the Vision make it
    easier for you to take action?
  • What could others do to complement your actions?

11
Residential Lighting - Session 2 A Vision for
Efficient Lighting
12
Our Key Questions
  • What are our priorities for future work?
  • Enhancing the Vision
  • Tracking activities
  • Measuring progress
  • Developing talking points
  • Other?
  • How will we put our plans into motion?

13
1. Enhancing the Vision
  • A list of explicit, agreed-upon assumptions
  • Energy intensity
  • New construction rates
  • New construction and retrofit lighting trends
  • Energy rate projections
  • Efficiency options in each major application (now
    and projected into the future)

14
2. Tracking our Activities
  • More detailed Program Summaries
  • Quarterly calls to discuss new programs
  • Other ideas?

15
3. Measuring Progress
  • Need to understand and track changes in sales,
    installation, and use of efficient options
  • No one source is available for this purpose
  • One possible solution
  • Track available information and use stated
    assumptions to estimate impacts
  • Sources Dept. of Commerce, ENERGY STAR, CA DEER
    Database, Census Bureau

16
(No Transcript)
17
Californias DEER Database
18
4. Addressing Barriers
  • Talking Points
  • Mercury and proper disposal
  • Color of fluorescent
  • Application guide for use with consumers
  • Other ideas?

Courtesy of Monte Helm, Ph.D. Fort Lewis College
19
Discussion Topics
  • What are the priorities for next year?
  • Enhancing the Vision
  • Tracking activities
  • Measuring progress
  • Addressing barriers
  • Other?
  • How will we achieve that work?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com