Regional Plan Comparison: Southern Relief Route and Alternate Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Regional Plan Comparison: Southern Relief Route and Alternate Plan

Description:

Regional Plan Comparison: Southern Relief Route and Alternate Plan – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: admi772
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regional Plan Comparison: Southern Relief Route and Alternate Plan


1
Regional Plan ComparisonSouthern Relief Route
and Alternate Plan
  • Presentation to
  • Transportation Policy Board
  • El Paso MPO
  • September 22, 2006

2
Topics for Discussion
  • Description of the Plans
  • Plan Similarities
  • Plan Differences
  • Next Steps
  • Discussion

3
Background
  • SRR is based on TxDOTs Regional Mobility Plan
  • SRR Phase 1 documented and presented to TAC and
    TPB (April-May 2006)
  • Alternate Plan based on official 2030 Gateway MTP
  • Elements included in both plans
  • Northeast Parkway (NEP)
  • Border Highway East (BHE)
  • Border Highway West (BHW)
  • Upgrades to West Paisano
  • Loop 375 widening (Cesar Chavez)
  • Non-tolled improvements to I-10 (Mesa to
    Executive Ctr.)

4
Regional Plan Similarities
5
Summary of Similarities
  • NEP (Super-2) and BHE are the same
  • SRR Phase I and Alternate Plan (1 thru 4 7)
    both offer
  • Non-tolled improvements to I-10
  • BHW downtown missing link
  • Schuster connection and interchange
  • Executive Ctr. interchange
  • Paisano upgrade to limited access (freeway)
  • Provide access to Schuster and Executive Ctr.

6
Similarities SRR Phase 1 and Alternate Plan (1
thru 4 7)
7
TxDOT SRR Phase 1
Mesa Dr. (SH 20)
Ramping Improvements (Non-Tolled)
Resler Dr. Direct Connects
Ramping Improvements (Non-Tolled)
C/D Road (Non-Tolled)
8
TxDOT SRR Phase 1
Racetrack / Doniphan/NM 273 Interchange
C/D Road (Non-Tolled)
I-10
US 85
Ramping Improvements (Non-Tolled)
Sunland Park Dr,
I-10
Auxiliary Lane to Executive Ctr. (Non-Tolled)
Ramping Improvements (Non-Tolled)
9
TxDOT SRR Phase 1
I-10
Auxiliary Lane to Executive Ctr. (Non-Tolled)
Executive Ctr.
Executive Ctr.
Non-Tolled Paisano Under Elevated Toll Lanes
US 85 (Paisano)
10
TxDOT SRR Phase 1
ASARCO
Toll Lanes (Elevated)
Non-Tolled Paisano Under Toll Lanes
Restrictive ROW Area
Restrictive ROW Area
Toll Lanes (Elevated)
I-10
Rio Grande River
Non-Tolled Paisano Under Toll Lanes
11
TxDOT SRR Phase 1
Schuster (Exist)
UTEP
Schuster Connect to I-10 SRR
I-10
Non-Tolled Paisano Under Elevated Toll Lanes
Toll Lanes (Elevated)
Paisano
SRR
Toll Lanes (Elevated)
12
TxDOT SRR Phase 1
Non-Tolled LP 375 Under Elevated Toll Lanes
Toll Lanes (Elevated)
End Exist LP 375 (_at_ Santa Fe)
Paisano
LP 375
Begin Toll Lanes (Elevated)
Non-Tolled Section
Coles Interchange
13
TxDOT SRR Phase 1
Non-Tolled Section
Begin Toll Lanes (Continues to Zaragoza)
US 54
LP 375
Non-Tolled Section
14
Alternative Plan - Project 2
Project 2 Limit Doniphan/NM 273
Exec. Ctr. Interchange
1-Ln Frtg Rd (Both Sides of Fwy) (Length of
Project)
Schuster Connection
Source 2030 Gateway MTP, 2030 Network
Project 2 Limit BHW Connect (S. of Yandell)
15
Right of Way Issues
ASARCO
Rio Grande River
American Canal
BNSF Railroad
EB Paisano
WB Paisano
16
Funding Items
17
Funding Items (contd)
  • SRR Phase 1 proposal
  • Includes 108 million of Texas Mobility Fund
    (TMF)
  • Provides 180 million NEW revenue through tolls
  • Does NOT affect Category 2 projects
  • I-10_at_Horizon interchange
  • Montana at Loop375 (Joe Battle) interchange
  • Loop 375 realignment (Canutillo)
  • Hawkins extension, I-10 to North Loop
  • Buford-Horizon
  • FM 3380 (Manny Aguilera) _at_ SH20
  • Artcraft extension (Paseo del Norte)
  • Alternate Plan
  • Includes 108 million TMF
  • Provides 14.9 million in toll revenue
  • Reprioritization of Category 2 projects?
  • Pass-through financing for BHE
  • CBI funds

18
Next Steps
  • Alternate Plan likely will not fund all proposed
    projects without new funding sources
  • SRR proposal recognizes need to prioritize
    projects
  • Which project goes first?
  • Establish criteria to determine regional
    priorities
  • Transportation Policy Board to decide

19
Proposed Criteria to Establish Priorities
  • Individual projects measured vs. No-Build
  • Criteria
  • Reduce congestion
  • Diversion from I-10 (ADTs)
  • Vehicles
  • Trucks
  • LOS on facility and I-10
  • Reduction in delay (travel time)
  • Texas Congestion Index (regional impact)
  • Total Cost (Life Cycle) (e.g. Construction,
    Maintenance, and Operations)
  • Increased Reliability

20
Analysis Scenarios
  • No- Build scenario
  • Based on MPOs 2030 Gateway MTP 2005 network
  • Future demand (2030 demographic projections)
  • Future scenarios
  • NE Pkwy (tolled, Super-2)
  • BHE (non-tolled)
  • TxDOT SRR - Phase 1 (tolled)
  • Alternate Plan Options (as requested by MPO
    staff)
  • Alt Plan A 1 thru 4 7, non-tolled (as
    discussed before)
  • Alt Plan B Same as A, eliminate frontage roads,
    Schuster connection, Executive Center interchange
  • Alt Plan C Same as B, widen West Paisano to 6
    lanes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com