Substantive Patent Law Harmonization: A View from WIPO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Substantive Patent Law Harmonization: A View from WIPO

Description:

Patentable subject matter and technical character (USA wants a broad approach) ... Establishing a Road Map. The limits of harmonization. confined to higher level law ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: stan222
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Substantive Patent Law Harmonization: A View from WIPO


1
Substantive Patent Law HarmonizationA View from
WIPO
  • Securing IP Rights Abroad
  • American Bar Association (ABA)
  • Section of Intellectual Property Law
  • April 12, 2002
  • Washington DC
  • Francis Gurry
  • Assistant Director General
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

2
The Patent System WorldwideThe Current Context
  • Rapidly increasing demand for patent rights
    worldwide
  • the globalization of IP rights
  • Stress in the system
  • pendency periods
  • Diversity of needs
  • the dominance of the trilateral regions
  • the emergence of growth in certain developing
    countries
  • the place of small offices

3
Worldwide Demand for Patent Rights
Source Trilateral Statistical Reports
4
PCT Filings from Developing Countries
  • 70.6 increase over 2000 in number of PCT
    applications filed in developing
    countries
  • Particularly high increase in
  • China (188.4)
  • India (102.6)
  • Republic of Korea (53.1)
  • Mexico (50.7)
  • 5,378 international applications originated from
    developing countries
  • Republic of Korea (2,318), China (1,670), South
    Africa (418), India (316), Singapore (271)

5
Why Harmonize?
  • Approximating legal to economic conditions
  • Can patent policy be realized in globalizing
    markets when it operate divergently in different
    territories?
  • business method patents
  • The mobility of knowledge as a factor of
    production
  • the law of the export market rules
  • Making choice of law less important
  • Creating the Conditions for the Economically
    Rational Use of Resources
  • The perspective of national IP Offices
  • duplication of work
  • The perspective of the user
  • cost of obtaining and maintaining protection

6
Patent Law Harmonization
  • Negotiations 1985 to 1991
  • 1991 Diplomatic Conference failed to conclude a
    treaty
  • Patent Law Treaty (PLT) 2000
  • formal and procedural matters
  • entry into force accession or ratification by 10
    States (1 so far)
  • Draft Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT) now
    being discussed by Standing Committee on Patents
    (SCP)
  • 2 SCP meetings in 2001 2 in 2002
  • Diplomatic Conference in 2004 (?)

7
Substantive Patent Law Harmonization(SPLT)
  • Issues being addressed
  • definition of prior art novelty, inventive
    step/non-obviousness and industrial
    applicability/utility sufficient disclosure
    drafting and interpretation of claims
  • includes disclosures on the Internet
  • Other issues on the table
  • first-to-file, early publication, post-grant
    opposition
  • Interface between PCT and PLT
  • Provisions at three levels treaty, regulations,
    practice guidelines (harmonizing Office practices)

8
SPLTSome controversial issues
  • Patentable subject matter and technical character
    (USA wants a broad approach)
  • Inclusion of industrial applicability/utility
  • Support requirement (Europe) -v- written
    description requirement (USA)
  • Grace period
  • Grounds for refusal/invalidation of an
    application
  • unlawfully acquired genetic resources as a ground?

9
Establishing a Road Map
  • The limits of harmonization
  • confined to higher level law
  • tension with other areas of public policy and
    accommodating development
  • the slowness of multilateral processes
  • limited impact on cost efficiencies
  • Need for additional, complementary strategies
  • WIPO Patent Agenda

10
Possible Elements of Additional Strategies
  • Development of PCT
  • PCT Reform
  • Harmonization of practices
  • experiments in mutual exploitation of work
    product
  • use of PCT as a vehicle
  • Encouragement of regional systems
  • intermediate solution
  • Thinking the long-term need for, and architecture
    of, a global title

11
Obstacles
  • Managing the increasing number of tensions
    between intellectual property and other areas of
    public policy
  • health, biodiversity, standardization,
    information is free, development
  • are uniform law and practice possible?
  • Managing the tensions of re-structuring in
    administrations and professions
  • the changing role of the national office
  • fear on the part of intellectual property
    professionals

12
URLs
  • http//www.wipo.int (general)
  • http//www.wipo.int/eng/document/scp_ce/index_6.ht
    m
  • (SPLT)
  • http//www.wipo.int/pct/en/index.html (PCT)
  • http//patentagenda.wipo.int (WIPO Patent Agenda)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com