Order in the Archaeological Record: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Order in the Archaeological Record:

Description:

... length, width, or weight, that combine to define a specific artifact or feature. EX: spear point ... conform to the intentions of the people who make the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: virtualYo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Order in the Archaeological Record:


1
Order in the Archaeological Record
  • Material, Space, and Time in Archaeology

2
Material The first frontier
  • When we talk about archaeology, we often talk
    about material culture.
  • Material culture is all of the physical things
    left behind by past peoples and includes
    --everything from temples to human excrement.

3
Artifacts
Portable objects made, modified, or used by
humans
Tools
Manuports
Debris
4
  • Artifacts make up the bulk of archaeological
    cultural material.
  • EX a stone spear tip is an artifact, as is a
    piece of deer bone that has been specifically cut
    and modified so that it can be used to scrape
    hides.
  • We can step beneath the level of the artifact and
    talk about their specific attributes.
  • Attributes specific, measurable elements, such
    as length, width, or weight, that combine to
    define a specific artifact or feature.
  • EX spear point

5
  • Over the years, archaeologists have noticed that
    some artifacts have very similar attributes.
  • In fact, some are so common that they can be
    considered as a group that represents a peoples
    common ideas about the attributes of such
    artifacts.
  • Such types can be compared with other clusters,
    and archaeologists can create what we call
    typologies.

6
Typology
  • Typology a formal description of all the
    attributes that characterize most of the
    artifacts that archaeologists recognize as
    clustering together.
  • However, they are problematic
  • In defining a given type, archaeologists are
    deciding what attributes are most meaningful and
    which are less so to them.
  • Our assumptions may not conform to the intentions
    of the people who make the artifacts, so we
    cannot be sure that out types would be recognized
    as meaningful categories of artifacts by past
    peoples.

7
Ecofacts
Unmodified remains of biological materials
  • Cultural Origins
  • Food Bones
  • Corncobs
  • Paleofeces
  • Noncultural Origins
  • Rodent bones
  • Insect remains
  • Palynology

8
  • Not all material things carry information about
    the human past were made or modified by humans.
  • Material such as pollen, seeds, grasses and
    remains of rodents and even insects can help
    archaeologists reconstruct the past.
  • Ecofacts naturally occurring material such as
    pollen and phytoliths that can provide
    information about past human behavior.

9
Features
Non-portable constructions that people made for
some purpose
  • Dams
  • Rock Art
  • Earthworks
  • Hearths
  • Pits
  • Roads

Architecture
10
  • Feature a combination of artifacts and/or
    ecofacts that create a single, definable item,
    such as a fireplace or burial.
  • Features often convey a great deal more
    information to archaeologists that do single
    artifacts.
  • First, a feature contains several different forms
    of materials
  • Second, and more significant, the way the
    features components are assembled to accomplish
    some purpose conveys a tremendous amount of
    information about how past peoples conceived of
    and constructed their world.

11
What is Lost
  • Not everything made by past peoples survive and
    make it into the archaeological record.
  • Softer more perishable subsistence, such as
    cloth, often disintegrates very quickly,
    especially in soils that are particularly acidic.
  • Best conditions for preservation
  • Very wet
  • Very cold

12
Tolland Man c. 2000 y.a.
13
  • Worst conditions those that change
  • Hot ? cold
  • Wet? dry
  • Tropics

14
Space The Second Frontier
  • It seems obvious to most of us that human beings
    have made different sorts of things in different
    places.
  • Archaeology teaches us that things differ across
    time as well.
  • During the age of exploration and colonial
    expansion of the 16th-19th centuries, this fact
    was not always so obvious.

15
Early Assumptions
  • The result of colonial expansion was that
    European scholars organized the material culture
    of the different people they were coming into
    contact with according to their own philosophical
    biases and assumptions of superiority.
  • Cultures that were still alive during European
    colonialization (Maya, Aztec, Inka, and others
    were considered somewhat beautiful by nonetheless
    barbaric.
  • If, however, the material culture came form
    extinct civilizations, especially those that had
    thrived in areas of current colonial dominance,
    then such material culture was generally revered
    as spectacular and very cultured.

16
  • EX ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia.
  • The notion of Diffusionismspread of material or
    ideas from a point of origin into other places.
  • Postulated that all civilization developed first
    in ancient Egypt and then moved, or diffused,
    outward.
  • Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl sailed across
    the Atlantic to prove it could happen on the Ra
    II.

17
Modern Approaches
  • In the late 1920s and early 30s people such as
    Alfred Krober and his contemporaries noted that
    people living in similar environments often made
    similar material (and sometime behavioral)
    adaptations to survive in that climate.
  • In all, large blocks of space could be defined in
    which similarities and differences in human
    lifeways could be identified and studied.
  • While this is problematic and is still open to
    debate, the operation of defining culture areas
    was a key step in refining archaeological
    studies.
  • By the mid 1960s the culture area concept was
    being replaced by a smaller unit of study, the
    region.

18
  • This so-called regional approach, archaeologist
    identify an area that is essentially a discrete
    environment or series of environments.
  • They might be river valleys, highlands
    overlooking specific lakes.
  • The advantage of this approach is that
    archaeologists could focus their research on a
    relatively small area and therefore better
    identify the resources and challenges that people
    of the past confronted in the region.

19
  • Other spatial concepts
  • Sitesspatially discreet places in which evidence
    for past human activity is found.
  • Componentsa single zone within an archaeological
    site that represents the actions of past peoples,
    often presumably with a relatively short span of
    time.
  • Site localitya large geographic area, such as a
    valley or gorge, in which may separate sites are
    clustered.

20
Time The Third Frontier
  • Archaeologists can look at what they find in 2
    ways.
  • They can examine materials that are of
    approximately the same age and they can compare
    materials through time.
  • The first approach is called synchronic, or
    within time.
  • Synchronic- within time or within a limited span
    of time.
  • By comparing artifacts are other finds that are
    approximately the same age, archaeologists can
    begin to see the range of technological and
    behavioral variation that existed at that time.
  • Different types of artifacts that existed
    thousands of years ago. EX of Chumash beads.

21
  • Alternatively, we can look at changes across
    time. This is called diachronic- across or
    through time.
  • Here, we can study the changes that take place in
    the material culture and behaviors of people over
    extended periods of time.
  • Because time is one of the key variables that
    archaeologists look at, they have developed these
    sets of concepts which help them interpret
    temporal sequences within components and across
    sites.
  • Archaeologists take advantage of being able to
    see the layering within the earth as they
    excavate therefore, this layering can be used to
    determine that one artifacts is older than
    another artifact in a different level or vice
    versa.
  • Law of Superposition

22
Time, Space, and Material Culture Intertwined
  • As we have just discussed, archaeologists need to
    integrate the three major variables discussed
    thus far material culture, time, and space.
  • The Three-Age Approach
  • This method was pioneered by C.J. Thomsen which
    linked stone, bronze, and iron material culture
    together in three successive periods. The basic
    concept of the method was adopted throughout much
    of the world.
  • Note stages in text page 47

23
  • The process of naming archaeological materials
    and time-space groupings differs greatly around
    the world.
  • One of the few consistent elements in the
    nomenclature systems is a tendency to seek to
    impose a meaningful order on the archaeological
    record.
  • This means that naming systems often reflect
    divisions of the archaeological record according
    to the three primary variables, time, space, and
    material culture.
  • Moreover, these divisions help archaeologists
    study the past in two different but complementary
    ways, diachronically (or across time) and
    synchronically (within time).

24
  • All of this brings us back to the earliest naming
    sequences first described last week
  • Pecos Classification System- an archaeological
    sequence for the American Southwest proposed by
    A.V. Kidder based on his work at the Pecos Pueblo
    using the direct historical approach.
  • Direct historical approach- the tracing of
    cultural material backwards in time from known
    historical points using changes in typologies as
    guides.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com