CRIMINAL LAW: The Nature of Crime

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

CRIMINAL LAW: The Nature of Crime

Description:

Title: Unit 6: Author: admin Last modified by: UIS Created Date: 11/21/2006 7:50:03 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company: AVRSB Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CRIMINAL LAW: The Nature of Crime


1
CRIMINAL LAWThe Nature of Crime
2
Criminal Law
  • Criminal law exists to control or penalize acts
    that are considered wrong, or harmful by society.

3
Criminal Law and Criminal Offences
  • The Law exists to protect people
  • Criminal law deals with offences committed
    against society as a whole
  • Focus on prevention and penalty

4
What is the Criminal Code?
  • Contains most criminal laws
  • Suggests sentences to be imposed based on other
    cases dealt with previously
  • Also suggests procedures to be used
  • The Code is amended (changed) by government as
    values and circumstances change in society
  • Example Crimes relating to technology

5
Criminal Actions
  • In order for an action to be considered a crime,
    certain conditions must exist
  • Must be considered wrong
  • Must cause harm to other people, society or those
    in need of protection (minors)
  • The harm must be serious in both nature and
    degree
  • The harm must be best dealt with though the
    mechanism of criminal law

6
Over the years
  • Crimes that were once considered serious are now
    considered less serious.
  • Example Marijuana possession
  • Penalties have also changed as a reflection of
    the beliefs that society has
  • Laws continue to evolve as society changes

7
Did you know?
  • One in five Canadians or 20 of Canadians, fear
    being a victim of crime in his or her own
    community.

8
Pairs Activity
  • Slip or Trip?

9
Slip or Trip?
  • What do YOU think happened?
  • You are a member of the investigative team. You
    must determine whether this was an accident or
    murder. Analyze the evidence in Margarets story
    and the picture and look for clues for how and
    why the incident occurred. Once you have gathered
    the evidence, prepare your argument.
  • Was it an accident or murder?

10
Slip or Trip?
  • After Margaret and her husband Charles got into
    a fight, she stormed out of the house and left
    him at home. Margaret drove to the country club
    where a party was going on. Everyone there
    complimented Margaret on her dress and how well
    it fit her slender figure and this made her feel
    a little better.
  • Margaret left just before one in the morning
    and invited a few friends to follow her home for
    one more drink. She got home 10 minutes before
    they arrived but when her friends rang the
    doorbell, Margaret ran outside saying, Something
    terrible has happened! Charles has slipped and
    fell on the stairs! He was coming down for
    another drink- he still had the glass in his
    hand- and I think hes dead. Oh my God, what
    should I do?
  • The police concluded that Charles died from a
    wound on the head and confirmed the fact that
    hes been drunk. What do YOU think happened?
  • You are a member of the investigative team. You
    must determine whether this was an accident or
    murder. Analyze the evidence in Margarets story
    and the picture and look for clues for how and
    why the incident occurred. Once you have gathered
    the evidence, make your claim. Was it an accident
    or murder?

11
Thinking about our community
  • What are some crime prevention programs and/or
    strategies that are used in our community?
  • Do you think they work? Why or why not?

12
Heres a sample on how Crime Stoppers is working
13
  • Did you know that section 43 of the Criminal
    Code allows school teachers, parents, or
    guardians to use reasonable force in
    disciplining children under their care?
  • What would you consider reasonable force?
  • Do you think this section of the code should be
    amended? Why or why not?

14
Corporal Punishment
  • Corporal punishment is the deliberate infliction
    of pain as retribution for an offence, or for the
    purpose of disciplining or reforming a wrongdoer,
    or to deter attitudes or behaviour deemed
    unacceptable.
  • Legal corporal punishment of school students for
    misbehaviour involves striking the student on the
    buttocks or the palm of the hand in a
    premeditated ceremony with an implement specially
    kept for the purpose such as a paddle, or with
    the open hand.
  • It is not to be confused with cases where a
    teacher lashes out on the spur of the moment,
    which is not "corporal punishment" but violence
    or brutality, and is illegal almost everywhere.

15
  • Corporal punishment in schools is still legal in
    some parts of the world, including 20 of the
    States of the USA, but has been outlawed in other
    places, including Canada, Japan, South Africa,
    New Zealand, and nearly all of Europe except the
    Czech Republic and France. It remains commonplace
    and lawful in many Asian and African countries.

16
Does Gender Matter?
  • Corporal punishment of male students has, in most
    cultures, generally been more prevalent and more
    severe than that of female students, but this
    generally applies to other forms of punishment as
    well, and probably relates partly to
    long-standing perceptions that boys are simply
    less well behaved than girls on average,
    especially during adolescence. In Queensland,
    Australia, school corporal punishment of girls
    was banned in 1934 but for boys in private
    schools it is still legal as of 2009.
  • In Singapore, schoolboys are routinely caned for
    misbehaviour while the caning of girls at school
    is forbidden by law. In the U.S., statistics
    consistently show that about 80 of school
    paddlings are of boys.

17
  • Every province except Alberta, Ontario, and
    Saskatchewan had banned corporal punishment in
    public schools before the 2004 ban, though
    British Columbia and Manitoba were the only
    provinces to ban it in both public and private
    schools. They are, in chronological order by year
    of provincial ban
  • British Columbia - 1973
  • Nova Scotia - 1989
  • New Brunswick - 1990
  • Yukon - 1990
  • Prince Edward Island- 1993
  • Northwest Territories - 1995
  • Nunavut - 1995
  • Newfoundland and Labrador - 1997
  • Quebec- 1997

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
1971 Moyers supplies catalogue advertising straps
for sale to schools.
21
Thoughts!
22
Bookwork
  • Read pages 139-143
  • Answer questions 1-7

23
Quasi-criminal laws
  • Technically, laws created by provinces or
    municipalities are not considered criminal laws,
    but quasi-criminal laws. These laws generally
    cover less serious offences and the usual
    punishment for breaking them is a fine, but you
    could potentially be sentenced to jail.
  • Example Speeding tickets, underage drinking

24
The Elements of a Crime
  • To convict a person of a criminal offense, 2
    elements must exist at the same time the offence
    was committed.
  • Actus Reus The Guilty Act- the voluntary
    physical act involved in committing the
    offence
  • Mens Rea The Guilty Mind- the intent to commit
    an offence or knowledge that what he or she did
    was against the law.
  • CRIME

25
Which are examples of Actus Reus?
  • Robert puts a knife to Trevors back and forces
    him to rob a corner store.
  • 2. Jean sleepwalks and does something illegal.
  • 3. Thomas made Gina angry and she strikes him.

26
Mens Rea
  • Intent A persons state of mind and willingness
    to break the law despite the consequences. There
    are 2 types of intent
  • General Intent Person commits wrongful act for
    its own sake
  • e.g. Joe got really mad and hit Fred. Proving
    Joe hit Fred establishes Mens Rea.
  • b) Specific Intent Person commits one wrongful
    act for the purpose of accomplishing another.
  • e.g. Joe hit Fred so he could rob him. Proving
    Joe hit Fred with the specific intent to rob him
    establishes Mens Rea.

27
Mens Rea
  • Motive The reason that a person commits a
    crime. It is not the same as intent.
  • Example
  • Intent Joe hit Fred with the specific intent to
    rob him.
  • Motive Joe had outstanding gambling debts.

28
Mens Rea
  • Knowledge
  • Sometimes knowledge of certain facts is enough to
    indicate mens rea.
  • Criminal Negligence
  • Recklessness
  • Wilful blindness
  • All involve not taking the necessary care to
  • ensure that your actions or omissions do not
  • cause harm.

29
knowledge contd
  • Criminal Negligence
  • Doing anything or omitting to do anything (that
    is your duty to do so) that shows reckless
    disregard for the lives and safety of others.
    (E.g. Company dumps toxic chemicals and it gets
    into someones well.)
  • Recklessness
  • Consciously taking a risk that a reasonable
    person would not take (e.g. throwing a glass
    bottle into crowd of people)
  • Wilful Blindness
  • Deliberately closing your mind to the possible
    consequences of your actions by choosing not to
    ask questions or investigate the situation. (e.g.
    buying a cheap TV from someone with the letters
    Horton written on the side of it)

30
R. v. MacGillivray, (1995)Page 144
  • What did he do to cause the accident?
  • Drove at a dangerous speed
  • Did not ensure that he had vision
  • 2. The maximum sentence in the Criminal Code for
    dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing
    death is a jail term not exceeding 14 years. Do
    you think that this offence should have a longer
    prison sentence? Explain.

31
Check Your Understanding!
  • In the following excerpt from the Criminal Code,
    indicate which word or words establish the mens
    rea for the offence in question
  • 342 (1) Every person who
  • (d) uses a credit card, knowing that it has been
    revoked or cancelled, is guilty of

32
  • 1. Read the article on page 146 of your text
  • Father Jailed in Death of Son Left
    Unsupervised
  • 2. What did Robert do which was wrong?
  • - Robert had not provided adequate supervision
    for his young children.
  • What evidence did the Crown use to prove actus
    reus or that Robert was guilty of a crime?
  • - The Crown proved that lack of supervision had
    been a problem recently and that Robert had
    acknowledged this by promising the social worker
    that he would provide more care. This
    demonstrated a pattern of problematic behaviour
    around issues of supervision.

33
Partner Activity
  • Choose a partner. There are no groups of three.
    You may work alone, but if you wish to have a
    partner and do not have one, please see me.
    Credit will not be given to groups of 3.
  • 2. Grab an assignment sheet from the top of the
    back bookshelf.
  • 3. Complete the activity. Follow the instructions
    carefully and be sure to hand in your paper
    before the end of the period. This is a marked
    assignment, so give me your best work. ? Be
    prepared to defend your decisions next day.

34
A Lawyer Riddle
  • A lawyer at Allen-Makins has a brother who is a
    paralegal at Morrison Forester.  However, the
    paralegal at Morrison Forester doesnt have a
    brother who is a lawyer at Allen Makins.  Why
    not?
  • Answer
  • The lawyer is the paralegals sister.

35
Consider This
  • Under current Canadian law, children under 12
    are not considered capable of forming mens rea
    therefore, they are not held responsible for the
    crimes they commit.
  • Should they be held criminally responsible?

36
R. v. Adey (2001)Page 149
  1. What questions do you have about this case?
  2. What connections can you make regarding this
    case?
  3. Do you agree with the final judgment? Why or why
    not?

37
R. v. Kerster (2001)Page 151
  • 1. What physical steps did Kerster take on
    the meeting day to indicate that he was going to
    complete the crime had he not been stopped? (This
    is the actus reus of his attempt)
  • Met with Daryl Heatherington
  • Brought money ()
  • Went to the hotel to meet the girl
  • 2. Describe how the accused showed his intent
    (mens rea) for attempting to obtain the sexual
    services of a person under 18.
  • Using a false name
  • Discussing money to be paid for the act
  • Discussing the kind of sexual favours he wanted
    performed by the girl
  • Do you think it is right for police to organize
    this kind of sting operation?

38
What should be done?
  • http//www.cbc.ca/player/News/ID/2394131981/?page
    16sortMostRecent4 (Global 2 minutes)
  • http//www.cbc.ca/player/News/TV20Shows/Power20
    20Politics20with20Evan20Solomon/ID/2403570671/
    (CBC Harper to change laws 2 minutes)
  • http//www.cbc.ca/player/Embedded-Only/News/Canada
    /Manitoba/Video20Games/ID/2369061146/ (CBC
    Luring online 2.5 min)
  • http//globalnews.ca/video/867298/toronto-cop-uses
    -social-media-to-catch-child-predator (policing
    on-line - 3 min)

39
Vocabulary
  • Liability legal responsibility for a wrongful
    action
  • Question what should happen when someone is
    wrongfully accused, found guilty and later
    acquitted?

40
Strict and Absolute Liability(Page 152)
  • See handout
  • Nature of Crime definitions
  • Rv. Ford (154) and Judge Fired for Lying (156)

41
Incomplete CrimesCan a charge still be laid?
  • When we discussed actus reus and mens rea, we
    noted that a criminal act must be completed for a
    crime to exist. In other words, there can be no
    theft where property is not actually taken.
    However, there are some exceptions to this rule,
    covered by the laws governing incomplete crimes.
    There are two types of incomplete crimes.

42
Incomplete Crimes 1Attempt
  • Even when a person is unsuccessful in the
    commission of a crime, that person can be charged
    with attempt. This means that he or she had the
    intent to commit the crime but for some reason
    failed to carry it through. An attempt does not
    constitute actus reus, but technically the guilty
    act begins the moment mere preparation turns into
    an action required to commit the offence.
  • To prove someone guilty of a criminal attempt,
    all the Crown has to show is that the accused had
    the necessary intent and took some obvious steps
    towards committing the crime.

43
Incomplete Crimes 1Attempt
  • Example
  • In the case of a terrorist bombing, such a step
    might be the construction of the bomb itself or
    getting in a car to transport the bomb to the
    target site. Either of these actions could
    indicate a realistic threat and either would make
    the participants liable to charges of criminal
    attempt.

44
Incomplete Crimes 2Conspiracy
  • This is an agreement between two or more people
    to perform an illegal act. It does not matter
    whether the act is actually carried out. Even if
    the conspirators change their minds or do not get
    a chance to commit the offence, they are still
    guilty of conspiracy because they once agreed to
    complete the crime.

45
Incomplete Crimes 2Conspiracy
  • Example
  • Justin and Jane agree to rob the Victory Credit
    Union. They both believe they need the money and
    that it is worth the risk. They work out the
    robbery together and plan for it to happen in two
    weeks. Unfortunately for them, they are busted by
    police just as they pull up to the Credit Union-
    a neighbour heard their conversations and called
    police. They were charged with conspiracy to
    commit robbery.

46
  • What is a STING operation?
  • Who is involved?
  • Are they legal?
  • What are the limitations?

47
Sting Operations
  • It is legal for police to pose as criminals in
    order to catch a criminal
  • Police can legally organize a sting operation
    but police cannot initiate doing something wrong-
    they can only follow the lead of another person.

48
Involvement in a CrimePartner Activity Create
this chart
Station Involvement/Role Crime
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
49
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 1
  • A pharmacy clerk named Lisa supplies the store
    key to her boyfriend, Bib. He uses the key to
    break into the pharmacy and steals prescription
    drugs. Even though Lisa is not present at the
    break-in, Lisa is still guilty of
  • Aiding

50
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 2
  • Norma is injured in a fight with store security
    officers after being caught shoplifting. She
    manages to escape and make it to her friend
    Simones apartment. After hearing what happened,
    Simone offers to let Norma stay with her and
    provides her with food, clothing and medical
    assistance. When the police finally track Norma
    down, they arrest Simone, too, and charge her
    with
  • Accessory after the fact

51
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 3
  • When Natasha persuades Melinda to steal goods
    from the store where Natasha works and advises
    her of the best way to accomplish this act,
    Natasha commits the criminal offence of
  • Counselling

52
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 4
  • Ted and Tracy plan to murder Mario. They hire a
    hit man who turns out to be an undercover police
    officer, and Ted and Tracey are arrested.
    Although they cannot be charged with murder, they
    are charged with
  • Conspiracy

53
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 5
  • If two people walk into a bank, one holding the
    gun and the other collecting the cash, they are
    known as
  • Co-perpetrators

54
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 6
  • Josh had planned to carry out a murder. The
    problem was that when he went to pull the
    trigger, the man escaped Joshs hold and ran off.
    Josh fired and hit him in the leg, but the man
    didnt die. Josh was later arrested on charges
    of
  • Attempted (murder)

55
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 7
  • When Bill assaults Rick in the school parking
    lot, Carlos eggs Bill on, urging him to hit
    Rick repeatedly. Carlos has not touched Rick
    himself and is quite surprised when the police
    arrest him that evening. He demands to know what
    he is being charged with, and the police say,
    You are being charged with
  • Abetting (assault)

56
Involvement in a Crime
  • Station 8
  • A lone robber walks into a bank points a gun at
    the teller and collects the cash, and then
    escapes. That person is called the
  • Perpetrator

57
AssignmentFairy Tale Elements of a Crime
  • Find 2 or 3 people of your choice to work with
    for this activity. This is not an individual
    activity to work on- so if you do not have
    someone with whom to work- see me!
  • Find a quiet spot in the room to work
  • Choose a Fairy Tale of your choice or borrow one
    of mine and complete the activity. Be prepared to
    present your idea(s) to the class.
  • Grimm tales
  • http//www.grimmstories.com/en/grimm_fairy-tales/t
    he_wolf_and_the_seven_little_goats

58
Fairy tale Trial Opening statements
  • You are to summarize the crime using the
    appropriate vocabulary including persons involved
    and all crimes committed.
  • What is the crime / crimes
  • Expected Vocabulary Accessory after the fact
  • Perpetrator (co) Actus Reas
  • Aiding Mens Rea
  • Abetting Attempt
  • Conspiracy
  • Counselling

59
A Problem Solving Quiz for the Legal Alert
  • Last week, five members of the Bordwell
    Associates' Temp Team were assigned to five
    different law firms located on different floors
    in the same high-rise building.  The temps, all
    in different positions, started their assignments
    on different days.  From the information below,
    determine the name of the temporary, the
    position, the day the assignment started, the
    name of the law firm, and on which floor the law
    firm is located.
  • Chris wasnt the file clerk but enjoyed the
    assignment at Rutan.  Bordwells temp paralegal
    worked on a litigation case at Gibson.
  • The temp assigned to Pillsbury started on Friday.
    Pat was busy but was not the receptionist. Chris
    typed 30 wpm.
  • The five Bordwell temps were, in no particular
    order the temp who worked on the 1st floor, the
    temp who started work on Thursday, the temp who
    worked at Stradling, Chris, and the temp who was
    a paralegal.
  • Taylor started working the day before the legal
    secretary, but two days after the temp who worked
    on the 5th floor. The legal secretary worked two
    floors above Laurens floor.
  • The temp who started work on Tuesday was on the
    2nd floor. Kelly didnt start work on Monday.
    Taylor worked on a floor higher than the
    receptionist but lower than the temp who worked
    at Stradling.
  • The temp who started on Wednesday didnt work on
    the 3rd floor. The word processor typed over 100
    wpm and was assigned to Stradling. Kelly enjoyed
    a spectacular view while on assignment at
    OMelveny.  
  • TemporaryPositionDay StartedLaw FirmFloor 
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)