Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness

Description:

To assess Tribal emergency preparedness and response capabilities, with special ... Tribal lands are often in rural settings and/or cover large areas. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: ETP
Learn more at: https://sites.pitt.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness


1
Preliminary AssessmentTribal Emergency Response
Preparedness
  • Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP
  • Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

2
Project Objectives
  • To assess Tribal emergency preparedness and
    response capabilities, with special focus on
    radiological hazards.
  • To identify support and training needs of Tribes
    related to emergency preparedness.

3
Project Objectives(continued)
  • To engage Tribal communities in emergency
    preparedness response activities.
  • To help establish criteria and mechanisms for
    improving, enhancing, or possibly developing
    integrated Tribal programs related to emergency
    response.

4
Project Triggers
  • Tribal lands are often in rural settings and/or
    cover large areas.
  • If chemical, biological, or radiological release
    occurs, Tribes may be the primary government
    entity to respond.
  • Outside agencies need to understand how well
    prepared Tribes are and what support needs exist.

5
Accomplishments to Date
  • Set up pilot assessment to obtain data from a
    cross-section of Tribes.
  • Identified and selected nine Tribes to
    participate in the pilot assessment.
  • Conducted in-person interviews with the nine
    Tribes during the summer-fall 2003.

6
Accomplishments to Date (continued)
  • Conducted follow-up with Tribes as needed to
    ensure completeness and accuracy of
    Tribe-specific data.
  • Compiled findings, prepared Tribe-specific
    reports.
  • Developed a summary report of overall findings.

7
MethodsCriteria for Selecting Tribes
  • Proximity to major transportation routes.
  • Proximity to nuclear/chemical facilities or
    Department of Defense or Energy sites.
  • Potential presence of unregulated landfills
    (radioactive waste).
  • Proximity to U.S. borders.

8
Methods Data Collection
  • Interviewed Tribal representatives one-on-one or
    in small group settings.
  • Topics discussed
  • - Overall knowledge and understanding
  • - Infrastructure and equipment
  • - Emergency preparedness planning
  • - Communications
  • - Training
  • - Support needs

9
MethodsData Compilation
  • Extracted and compiled the information recorded
    during interviews and follow-up communications.
  • Prepared Tribe-specific reports and compiled
    aggregate data in single summary report,
    identifying overall observations and trends.

10
Participating Tribes
11
Size of Participating Tribes
  • lt 5,000 (3 Tribes)
  • 5,001-15,000 (2 Tribes)
  • 15,001-30,000 (1Tribe)
  • gt30,000 (3 Tribes)

12
Overall Findings
  • Tribes are generally aware of the types of
    hazards and response scenarios that may arise on
    Tribal lands, but lack specific knowledge.
  • A wide range of response preparedness was
    observed. Some Tribes are better equipped and
    have more comprehensive emergency response
    programs than others.

13
Overall Findings(continued)
  • Some Tribes are aware that other state, county,
    or local emergency response plans exist, but
    desire more information about where the Tribes
    fit in.
  • Tribal readiness for radiological hazards is
    limited. Virtually none of the Tribes have the
    capabilities to identify orphan sources, and most
    do not have equipment or training for
    radiological emergencies.

14
Overview Support Needs
  • Tribes report that they need
  • Training/technical support.
  • Funding for dedicated staff and equipment.
  • Improved communications within Tribal Nations and
    with local, county, and state agencies serving
    their Tribal areas.

15
Breakdown of Findings
16
Infrastructure
  • Few Tribes are completely self-sufficient in
    terms of personnel, equipment, and resources to
    respond to various emergency situations.
  • Most Tribes have law enforcement groups 4 of the
    9 Tribes interviewed have fire departments
    others rely on outside first responder services
    or a combination of Tribal and outside services.

17
Infrastructure (continued)
  • Most Tribes rely on outside or contract medical
    services. Most facilities serving Tribes are
    equipped to handle at least 6-20 patients in an
    emergency some can treat 50 or more patients.

18
Infrastructure (continued)
19
Equipment
  • Less than half the Tribes report having emergency
    response equipment.
  • Tribes with equipment are more prepared for
    chemical and biological emergencies.
  • No relationship was observed between equipment
    inventory and the Tribal size or land mass.

20
Emergency Response Planning
  • Most Tribes interviewed have some form of an
    emergency response plan completed or under
    development. All but one of these incorporates
    measures to respond to radiological hazards.
  • Tribes report cooperation among their first
    responders and with outside agencies in
    developing response plans. Still, Tribes
    expressed interest in fostering more coordination
    with outside agencies.

21
Communications
  • Most Tribes have a system to communicate with
    other agencies in an emergency.
  • More than half the Tribes have a communications
    system used by first responders.
  • Fewer Tribes have a system to notify the public
    of an emergency. Those that do often rely on
    radios and television, among other means.

22
Support NeedsOverall
  • At least a third of the Tribes interviewed
    requested that EPA/ATSDR share information about
    funding sources, technical support providers, and
    training tools available to Tribes (for emergency
    planning and increasing general knowledge about
    hazards faced).

23
Training
  • Training in emergency response readiness varies
    among the Tribes. Some Tribes receive extensive
    training in emergency response readiness,
    participate in mock drills, and even train others
    responders.
  • Most training has focused on chemical and
    biological hazards. Fewer responders are trained
    in radiological hazards or to recognize orphan
    sources.

24
Needed Training/ Technical Assistance
  • How to safely respond to emergencies, such as the
    proper use of equipment, particularly for
    radiological and biological hazards.
  • How to develop or improve emergency response
    plans.
  • Assistance with mock drills.

25
Needed Training/ Technical Assistance
  • Templates for emergency response plans.
  • Useful Web sites.
  • Names of training resources and providers.

26
Other Needs
  • Additional funding and staff dedicated to
    emergency response planning and training.
  • Mechanisms for enhanced information sharing with
    IHS, the Tribes, and other agencies (How to
    achieve greater coordination).
  • Improved equipment and supplies.

27
Other Requests
  • Inclusion of Tribes in other governmental
    agencies notification procedures.
  • Demonstrated commitment from federal agencies to
    support Tribes.

28
Next Steps
  • Use pilot assessment results as a basis for
    assessing all the tribes ER capabilities in the
    U.S.
  • Expand the assessment of training/ educational
    needs.
  • - Supplement findings with other similar
    studies, if available.
  • - Refine pilot questionnaire, based on Tribal
    input and consider more widespread
    distribution.

29
Future Considerations
  • Establish training implementation strategies.
  • Raise awareness of identified issues across
    states and Tribes.
  • Form partnerships foster collaboration among
    government agencies and Tribes.
  • Define role of Federal agencies in the process.
  • Identify funding mechanisms for staff, equipment,
    etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com