KOSTRA MunicipalityState Reporting Experiences from Norway - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

KOSTRA MunicipalityState Reporting Experiences from Norway

Description:

Local governments in Norway. KOSTRA: Background, purpose, history and ... Benefits for Statistics Norway: Improved data, electronic reporting, new systems ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: annebritt6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: KOSTRA MunicipalityState Reporting Experiences from Norway


1
KOSTRA - Municipality/State ReportingExperiences
from Norway
  • Anne-Britt Svinnset
  • Statistics Norway

2
Main topics
  • Local governments in Norway
  • KOSTRA Background, purpose, history and
    organisation
  • Data and key figures
  • Electronic chain of reporting
  • Publishing
  • Use of the statistics

3
Local Governments in Norway
  • The regional level 18 Counties
  • The local level 433 Municipalities - from 250 to
    500 000 inhabitants
  • Responsible for important services
  • schools, health care, care for the elderly,
    water, wastewater treatment, garbage removal,
    fire protection ....
  • Use about 17 per cent of GDP

4
The chain of reporting before KOSTRA
Municipal agency
Municipality
Govern-ment agency
Ministry
Statistics Norway
5
Project history
  • 1995-1996 Pilot project
  • Four municipalities
  • 1998-2001 Project continues
  • Increasing number of municipalities - all in
    2001
  • Further development of the system
  • 2002 - - - KOSTRA established

6
KOSTRAs purposes
  • Better information about the local authorities
  • Coherent system
  • Comparability - benchmarking
  • Timeliness
  • More efficient reporting
  • No data redundancy
  • Electronic data reporting

7
KOSTRAs chain of reporting
Municipal agency
Municipality
Ministries
Govern-mental agencies
Statistics Norway
8
Better information - organisation
  • Task forces (for kindergartens, primary schools,
    etc.) make annual reports
  • Changes in the reporting
  • Coordination to avoid double reporting
  • Reduce the burden of reporting
  • The Council for KOSTRA discusses the reports
  • The ministries responsible for the reporting and
    SN makes the formal decision

9
Coherent information system
Recource allocation
Productivity
Services and users
Priority
Coverage
Requirements (population characteristics)
10
Accounting regulations
  • Classification by Function, example
  • 201 Kindergarten
  • 211 Extra care for children in kindergartens
  • 221 Localities and transport for children in
    kindergartens
  • Classification by Types of Expenditure, ex
  • Services produced by the municipalities
  • Services bought from others (private companies,
    other municipalities or the state)
  • Transfers

11
Electronic Data Reporting (EDR)
  • Both the national authorities and the
    municipalities need statistical information -
    FAST!
  • KOSTRA collects information 15 February, year
    n1
  • KOSTRA publishes the first figures 15 march, year
    n1
  • This timetable is only possible with electronic
    data reporting

12
External data
Municipality
Electronic form
Statistics Norway
Metadatabase
WWW publishing
KPD
STT
SMT
Client systems
Accounts
Statistical auditing systems
13
Electronic control of data
  • Before reporting
  • Controls in the electronic forms
  • Control program for file extracts
  • When SN receive data
  • Control program for file extracts (the same as
    before reporting)
  • Auditing systems in SN
  • The municipalities have the ultimate
    responsibility for correct reporting and data
    quality

14
KOSTRA calendar
  • 15.1. Reporting of file extracts for client data
    from municipalities (year n-1)
  • 15.2. Reporting of other data from the
    municipalities (year n-1)
  • 15.3. Publishing of data (not revised figures)
    (year n-1)
  • 15.4. Reporting of corrected data from
    municipalities (year n-1)
  • 15.6. Publishing of revised data (year n-1)
  • 30.6. Annual reports from the task forces
  • 1.10. Final decision about reporting (year n)
  • 1.10. Final decision about changing of file
    extracts (year n1)
  • 1.11. Letter to the municipalities with
    information about reporting (year n)

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Users of the statistics
  • The central authorities
  • Municipalities
  • The Association of Local Authorities A project
    to help municipalities start benchmarking within
    networks.
  • SN have arranged courses for local politicians in
    how to find and use the data.
  • The figures are used in research
  • The press uses the figures
  • And the national accounts get much better
    specifications

19
Conclusions
  • The Ministry of Local Government and Regional
    Developments involvement helped a lot By giving
    status, opening doors and funding much of the
    costs
  • Organization was important Close contact with
    both the local and the central governments
  • Benefits for Statistics Norway Improved data,
    electronic reporting, new systems for auditing,
    processing and publishing statistics
  • KOSTRA has been an expensive, long-lasting
    project, but is still considered a success due to
    the benefits for the many users of the statistics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com