Authorized Generics: Good For Everyone (Even Generics) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Authorized Generics: Good For Everyone (Even Generics)

Description:

Innovator firms have been supplying generic products for years ... Merck/Zocor, BMS/Plavix. Generics and ill-informed legislators now complaining about low prices ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:157
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: jyes
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Authorized Generics: Good For Everyone (Even Generics)


1
Authorized Generics Good For Everyone (Even
Generics)
  • Jerome A. Swindell
  • Senior Counsel

2
Not A New Issue
  • Innovator firms have been supplying generic
    products for years
  • FDA estimates that innovator firms manufacturer
    over 50 of generic products (http//www.fda.gov/c
    der/consumerinfo/generic_info/generics_question_br
    ochure.htm)
  • GPhA estimates that 56 of Rx filled by generic
    products
  • Thus, only about 28 of Rx filled by product
    manufactured by generic companies

3
Why Do Innovator Firms Supply Generic Marketers?
  • It is profitable
  • Do not want to shut down production capacity
  • Preferable to work with a company that has
    customer contacts and appropriate sales
    organization

4
What Are Generics Complaining About?
  • No complaint about presence of AG in post-expiry
    context.
  • AG is only one of many possible competitors
  • Complaint is about so-called exclusivity period.
  • Generics want to be insulated from competition.
  • Assert that 5-10 million litigation investment
    entitles them to windfall of hundreds of millions
    of dollars.

5
The Role of Antitrust? - None
  • This is a health care policy debate, not an
    antitrust concern.
  • No supportable Section 2 theory
  • Cases have been easily dismissed
  • A few irresponsible commentators have suggested
    predation
  • No evidence of below cost pricing
  • Antitrust should not adopt new rules without
    sufficient evidence of consumer harm, especially
    where the new rule clearly raises prices

6
Authorized Generics are Good for Patients and
Payers
  • No dispute that generic drugs, including
    authorized generics, reduce prices.
    http//www.fda.gov/CDER/ogd/generic_competition.ht
    m Brendt, et al, Authorized Generic Drugs, Price
    Competition and Consumers Welfare
  • According to FDA, the greatest price reduction is
    associated with the second generic. See
    http//www.fda.gov/CDER/ogd/generic_competition.ht
    m (analysis of retail data shows that first
    generic priced at 94 of brand price, but second
    generic reduces prices to 52 of brand price).

7
Authorized Generics are Good for Patients and
Payers
  • Federal and state governments are large payers.
  • Taxpayers benefit from low prices six months
    earlier than otherwise
  • Reduces amount of the tax burden needed to pay
    for health care costs
  • Commercial payers also save money
  • Keep premiums lower.
  • Increase coverage.

8
Authorized Generics are Good for Generic
Companies
  • Example 1 A generic company may be first on a 5
    10 mg product, but not on the 15 mg. An AG
    deal on the 15 mg will allow the company to offer
    a full complement to its customers.
  • Example 2 A generic company may have
    manufacturing difficulties that prevent it from
    launching. The exclusivity period may run out
    even though the generic company has made no sales.

9
Authorized Generics Do Not Inhibit Paragraph IV
Challenges
  • Generics already make filing decisions based on
    expectation of price competition, even during
    exclusivity period.
  • Multiple first applicants. 21 USC
    355(j)(5)(B)(iv)(II)(bb).
  • Unlimited number of firms can share so-called
    exclusivity.
  • Each first applicant will bear litigation costs
    with no promise of monopoly profits.
  • Different first applicants on different dosage
    strengths.
  • Example one firm can be first on the 5mg dosage
    and a different firm can be first on the 10mg
    dosage.
  • Firm with 5mg dosage can compete to fill 10mg Rx.
    Thus, 10mg firm will not make monopoly profits,
    absent collusion.
  • By competing for 10mg Rx, owner of 5mg will not
    earn monopoly profit unless it can effectively
    segment sales intended for 5mg Rx.

10
Authorized Generics Do Not Inhibit Paragraph IV
Challenges
  • Mere existence of subsequent filers suggests that
    patent challenges will not diminish.
  • Some drugs experience more than a dozen paragraph
    IV filings.
  • Subsequent applicants face same 5-10million
    litigation entry barrier faced by first
    applicant.
  • But no prospect of monopoly profits.
  • Entry date for subsequent applicants even more
    uncertain.
  • Existence of subsequent applicants suggests that
    market is sufficiently profitable to bear
    litigation costs even with prospect of price
    competition.

11
Authorized Generics Do Not Inhibit Paragraph IV
Challenges
  • No evidence of inhibition
  • Generic firms control the evidence, but have not
    produced anything.
  • Some concern that low volume drugs may be
    adversely affected.

12
Health Care Policy Question
  • Do we deny consumers price benefit for vast
    amount of drug expenditures in order to preserve
    an incentive to litigate (with no guarantee of
    success) patents relating to very small drugs?

13
The Next Phase Price Cuts Are Per Se Illegal
  • Generic market is profitable innovator companies
    want to compete
  • If Congress outlaws authorized generics,
    innovator companies will lower prices on branded
    products.
  • Recent Best Price legislation makes this decision
    easy
  • Already happening
  • Merck/Zocor, BMS/Plavix
  • Generics and ill-informed legislators now
    complaining about low prices
  • Will they seek legislation that prevents
    innovator firms from lowering prices in response
    to competition?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com